3,951 research outputs found
ApĂČleg de les amebes
En el seu seminari sobre la violĂšncia el segon volum del qual ha sortit fa alguns mesos, Françoise HĂ©ritier pren com a punt de partida de la seva reflexiĂł "la qĂŒestiĂł [...] plantejada sovint de saber si l'home Ă©s naturalment, Ă©s a dir, biolĂČgicament, violent i intolerant"
La otra cara de la luna. Escritos sobre el JapĂłn
Compila nueve conferencias, comunicaciones breves y entrevistas en las cuales Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss despliega su particular visiĂłn del JapĂłn. Los textos cubren temas tan disĂmiles como el arte, la tĂ©cnica culinaria, la mitologĂa, los relatos de diversos viajeros o la dialĂ©ctica eterna entre tradiciĂłn y cambio. No faltan los habituales recursos del maestro del estructuralismo: las citas de Montaigne, Rousseau o Chateaubriand, las analogĂas con mitos griegos y norteamericanos, la expresiĂłn barroca, la comparaciĂłn sorprendente, la frase memorable
Mythical Thinking, Scientific Discourses and Research Dissemination
This article focuses on some principles for understanding. By taking Anna Mikulakâs article âMismatches between âscientificâ and ânon-scientificâ ways of knowing and their contributions to public understanding of scienceâ (IPBS 2011) as a point of departure, the idea of demarcation criteria for scientific and non-scientific discourses is addressed. Yet this is juxtaposed with mythical thinking, which is supposed to be the most salient trait of non-scientific discourses. The author demonstrates how the most widespread demarcation criterion, the criterion of verification, is self-contradictory, not only when it comes to logic, but also in the achievement of isolating natural sciences from other forms of knowledge. According to Aristotle induction is a rhetorical device and as far as scientific statements are based on inductive inferences, they are relying on humanities, which rhetoric is a part of. Yet induction also has an empirical component by being based on sense-impressions, which is not a part of the rhetoric, but the psychology. Also the myths are understood in a rhetorical (LĂ©vi-Strauss) and a psychological (Cassirer) perspective. Thus it is argued that both scientific and non-scientific discourses can be mythical
Productivité et condition humaine
Bien quâil la lise et lâentende rĂ©pĂ©ter tous les jours, lâaffirmation que le chĂŽmage continuera de sâaggraver si le produit national nâaugmente pas rĂ©guliĂšrement dâun certain pourcentage dĂ©concerte lâethnologue et suscite en lui un sentiment dâirrĂ©alitĂ©. Il existe donc des sociĂ©tĂ©s â la sienne â qui vivent dans un Ă©tat permanent de dĂ©sĂ©quilibre, constamment en lutte contre le temps, pour qui le simple fait de ne pas avancer se traduit par un recul, qui doivent produire, et produire sans trĂȘve..
What is Life Worth? A Rough Guide to Valuation
In this speculative article, the aim is to elaborate a definition of life that is not biological, and a valuation of it that is not commodified. This is undertaken by the
development of an understanding of death as a process which is embedded in the life of a community. The idea is that we can best understand what life is worth by first
understanding what death means
- âŠ