29 research outputs found
Overcoming Clinician and Parent Ambivalence: General Practitioners' Support of Children of Parents With Physical or Mental Illness and/or Substance Abuse
Children who are next of kin to parents with physical or mental illness and/or substance abuse need access to mental health support and several cost-effective interventions are available. Because most parents in the target group often consult general practitioners (GPs), GPs may have a crucial role in identifying burdened children and ensuring their follow-up. However, this important topic has received little attention in clinical discussions and research. In response to the knowledge gap, we conducted the research project Burdened Children as Next of Kin and the General Practitioner. Four sub-studies have been completed and published: a sub-study with qualitative analysis of focus group interviews with GPs (paper 1), a qualitative analysis of focus group interviews with adolescents as next of kin (paper 2), and a qualitative analysis of individual interviews with parents with illness and/or substance abuse (paper 3). The results from these sub-studies were incorporated in a survey sent to members of a nationwide GP organization (paper 4). The aim of the present sub-study was to gain further knowledge about conditions for the encounters between GPs and parents with impairments to be supportive for the children as next of kin. The material of the present sub-study derived from the project's four previous sub-studies and comprised a secondary analysis of the four prior sub-studies. We conducted an overarching thematic analysis of these sub-studies' results sections. We searched for statements from the GPs, the adolescents, and the parents on their experiences and evaluations of the needs of the children and their families, and the possible ways of accommodating these needs in general practice. The analysis shows that both GPs and parents were ambivalent about addressing the topic of the patients' children during consultations. This was the case although the GPs were in a good position to identify these vulnerable children, and the parents were worried about their children's situations. Possible strategies for GPs to overcome this ambivalence can be to (1) strengthen their competence in the topic, (2) gradually build trusting relationships with parents, and (3) gradually gain contextual knowledge about the families' situations. GPs can do this by performing ordinary GP tasks and acknowledging the parents' efforts to give their children good daily lives
Implementing new routines in adult mental health care to identify and support children of mentally ill parents
BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are often transmitted from one generation to the next. This knowledge has led to changes in Norwegian legislation, making it mandatory to assess whether or not patients have children, and to provide necessary support for the children of mentally ill patients. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the process of implementing new routines in adult mental health services to identify and support children of mentally ill parents. METHODS: The design was a pre-test post-test study. The sample (N = 219 at pre-test and N = 185 at post-test) included mental health professionals in the largest hospital in the region, who responded to a web-based survey on the routines of the services, attitudes within the workforce capacity, worker’s knowledge on the impact of parental mental illness on children, knowledge on legislation concerning children of patients, and demographic variables. RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that some changes are taking place in clinical practice in terms of increased identification of children. Adult mental health services providing support for the children was however not fully implemented as a new practice. CONCLUSION: The main finding in this study is that the identification frequency had increased significantly according to self-reported data since the Family Assessment Form was implemented. The increase in self-reported identification behavior is however taking place very slowly. Three years after the legislation was changed to making it mandatory to assess whether or not patients have children, it was still not fully incorporated in the routines of the entire workforce. In terms of support for the families affected by parental mental illness, the changes are not yet significant
ChildTalks+: a study protocol of a pre-post controlled, paired design study on the use of preventive intervention for children of parents with a mental illness with focus on eating disorders
Background:
Children of parents with a mental illness are at high risk of developing a mental disorder as a result of
transgenerational transmission. Without effective intervention, they could form the next generation of psychiatric
patients. ChildTalks+ is a preventive intervention involving four structured psychoeducational sessions designed for
parents affected by a mental disorder and their children. Its aim is to reduce the risk of mental disorders in children
of parents with mental illness. This study draws on our clinical practice and involves a group of patients with eating
disorders. The aim of the project, which will run in the Czech Republic, is to evaluate the effectiveness of ChildTalks+
methodology.
Methods:
ChildTalks+ therapists (professionals from health, social, and educational facilities) will recruit 66 families
where a parent is treated for a mental disorder and the family includes children aged 6–18. Paired allocation into an
intervention group (N = 33) and a control group (N = 33) will be based on the number of risk factors identified in the
family. Both groups will complete questionnaires at the baseline, post-test, and follow-up assessments after six and 12
months. The intervention group will receive the ChildTalks+ intervention within 2 months of the baseline assessment;
the control group after the last assessment. Questionnaires will be completed by parents and children aged 12+ and,
in two cases, 15+ years. Quantitative data will be supplemented with qualitative data from ChildTalks+ therapists
working with patients with eating disorders.
Discussion:
The ChildTalks+ intervention is expected to strengthen parenting competencies and family protective
factors, improve family communication, increase awareness of parental mental health issues, and improve the wellbe-
ing of children of parents with mental illness with long-term sustainable outcomes. The study should contribute to
the evidence base for the ChildTalks+ program and help identify key themes in the implementation of similar preven-
tive intervention
Sustaining efforts to improve family well-being with parents with mental ill health and substance (mis)use
Research conducted over the past 30 years has developed an extensive body of knowledge on families where parents experience mental ill health and/or substance (mis)use, and interventions that are effective in improving their outcomes. A more recent focus has also explored the importance and nuance of implementation. This perspective article reflects on the concept and practice of sustainability within this body of work and considers underlying assumptions in the field about the goal and direction of interventions that make clarity about sustainability difficult. We identify challenges for understanding sustainability, relating to how and who defines it, what is measured and the impact of context. We conclude by considering how we might be better able to plan and design for sustainability within this field
Introduction of the generic sense of ability to adapt scale and validation in a sample of outpatient adults with mental health problems
IntroductionThe ability to adapt is a core aspect of daily human life. Recent models and theories emphasize its essential role for health and well-being. It concerns the perceived ability to readjust and actively deal with the psychosocial consequences of challenging events. While many questionnaires measure competences related to adaptability to specific conditions, a scale that measures a generic sense of the ability to adapt is lacking. The aim of the present study is to introduce the Generic Sense of Ability to Adapt Scale (GSAAS) and to examine its psychometric properties.MethodsThe article describes two sub-studies. In the first study the items of the GSAAS were generated and field-tested in a cross-sectional non-clinical sample using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis.ResultsThis resulted in a 10-item questionnaire measuring a single dimension with good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.87). In the second study the 10-item scale was validated using a cross-sectional sample of 496 outpatient adults with mental health problems. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure of the GSAAS and the absence of measurement variance across gender, age and education. Reliability was high (α = 0.89) and moderate to strong correlations between the GSAAS and concurrent validation measures confirmed its convergent validity. Regarding incremental validity, the GSAAS accounted for 7.4% additional explained variance in symptomatic distress above and beyond sense of coherence.DiscussionIn conclusion, the GSAAS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess people’s generic sense of the ability to adapt. It is a practical and quick tool that can be used to measure a vital aspect of health in research and clinical treatment settings
Factors that may Facilitate or Hinder a Family-Focus in the Treatment of Parents with a Mental Illness
Reply to Nielsen et al. social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
From local social mindfulness to global sustainability efforts?
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe
Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one’s location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries’ better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits