21 research outputs found
A Novel Application of Conditional Normalizing Flows: Stellar Age Inference with Gyrochronology
Stellar ages are critical building blocks of evolutionary models, but
challenging to measure for low mass main sequence stars. An unexplored solution
in this regime is the application of probabilistic machine learning methods to
gyrochronology, a stellar dating technique that is uniquely well suited for
these stars. While accurate analytical gyrochronological models have proven
challenging to develop, here we apply conditional normalizing flows to
photometric data from open star clusters, and demonstrate that a data-driven
approach can constrain gyrochronological ages with a precision comparable to
other standard techniques. We evaluate the flow results in the context of a
Bayesian framework, and show that our inferred ages recover literature values
well. This work demonstrates the potential of a probabilistic data-driven
solution to widen the applicability of gyrochronological stellar dating.Comment: Accepted at the ICML 2023 Workshop on Machine Learning for
Astrophysics. 10 pages, 3 figures (+1 in appendices
Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of morphology and colour on environment
We analyse the relationships between galaxy morphology, colour, environment
and stellar mass using data for over 100,000 objects from Galaxy Zoo, the
largest sample of visually classified morphologies yet compiled. We
conclusively show that colour and morphology fractions are very different
functions of environment. Both are sensitive to stellar mass; however, at fixed
stellar mass, while colour is also highly sensitive to environment, morphology
displays much weaker environmental trends. Only a small part of both relations
can be attributed to variation in the stellar mass function with environment.
Galaxies with high stellar masses are mostly red, in all environments and
irrespective of their morphology. Low stellar-mass galaxies are mostly blue in
low-density environments, but mostly red in high-density environments, again
irrespective of their morphology. The colour-density relation is primarily
driven by variations in colour fractions at fixed morphology, in particular the
fraction of spiral galaxies that have red colours, and especially at low
stellar masses. We demonstrate that our red spirals primarily include galaxies
with true spiral morphology. We clearly show there is an environmental
dependence for colour beyond that for morphology. Before using the Galaxy Zoo
morphologies to produce the above results, we first quantify a luminosity-,
size- and redshift-dependent classification bias that affects this dataset, and
probably most other studies of galaxy population morphology. A correction for
this bias is derived and applied to produce a sample of galaxies with reliable
morphological type likelihoods, on which we base our analysis.Comment: 25 pages, 20 figures (+ 6 pages, 11 figures in appendices);
moderately revised following referee's comments; accepted by MNRA
Rockport Comprehensive Plan
This document was developed and prepared by Texas Target Communities (TxTC) at Texas A&M University
in partnership with the City of Rockport, Texas Sea Grant, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi,
Texas A&M University - School of Law and Texas Tech University.Founded in 1871, the City of Rockport aims to continue growing economically and sustainably. Rockport is a resilient community dedicated to sustainable growth and attracting businesses to the area. Rockport is a charming town that offers a close-knit community feel and is a popular tourist destination for marine recreation, fairs, and exhibitions throughout the year. The Comprehensive Plan 2020-2040 is designed to guide the city of Rockport for its future growth. The guiding principles for this planning process were Rockport's vision statement and its corresponding goals, which were crafted by the task force. The goals focus on factors of growth and development including public participation, development considerations, transportation, community facilities, economic development, parks, and housing and social vulnerability
The SPARC Toroidal Field Model Coil Program
The SPARC Toroidal Field Model Coil (TFMC) Program was a three-year effort
between 2018 and 2021 that developed novel Rare Earth Yttrium Barium Copper
Oxide (REBCO) superconductor technologies and then successfully utilized these
technologies to design, build, and test a first-in-class, high-field (~20 T),
representative-scale (~3 m) superconducting toroidal field coil. With the
principal objective of demonstrating mature, large-scale, REBCO magnets, the
project was executed jointly by the MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center (PSFC)
and Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS). The TFMC achieved its programmatic goal
of experimentally demonstrating a large-scale high-field REBCO magnet,
achieving 20.1 T peak field-on-conductor with 40.5 kA of terminal current, 815
kN/m of Lorentz loading on the REBCO stacks, and almost 1 GPa of mechanical
stress accommodated by the structural case. Fifteen internal demountable
pancake-to-pancake joints operated in the 0.5 to 2.0 nOhm range at 20 K and in
magnetic fields up to 12 T. The DC and AC electromagnetic performance of the
magnet, predicted by new advances in high-fidelity computational models, was
confirmed in two test campaigns while the massively parallel, single-pass,
pressure-vessel style coolant scheme capable of large heat removal was
validated. The REBCO current lead and feeder system was experimentally
qualified up to 50 kA, and the crycooler based cryogenic system provided 600 W
of cooling power at 20 K with mass flow rates up to 70 g/s at a maximum design
pressure of 20 bar-a for the test campaigns. Finally, the feasibility of using
passive, self-protection against a quench in a fusion-scale NI TF coil was
experimentally assessed with an intentional open-circuit quench at 31.5 kA
terminal current.Comment: 17 pages 9 figures, overview paper and the first of a six-part series
of papers covering the TFMC Progra
The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex
The cerebral cortex underlies our complex cognitive capabilities, yet little is known about the specific genetic loci that influence human cortical structure. To identify genetic variants that affect cortical structure, we conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 51,665 individuals. We analyzed the surface area and average thickness of the whole cortex and 34 regions with known functional specializations. We identified 199 significant loci and found significant enrichment for loci influencing total surface area within regulatory elements that are active during prenatal cortical development, supporting the radial unit hypothesis. Loci that affect regional surface area cluster near genes in Wnt signaling pathways, which influence progenitor expansion and areal identity. Variation in cortical structure is genetically correlated with cognitive function, Parkinson's disease, insomnia, depression, neuroticism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Recommended from our members
Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin. Between March 9 and June 17, 2020, 614 adult patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized within at least 1 domain following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory or cardiovascular organ support at 121 sites in 8 countries. Of these, 403 were randomized to open-label interventions within the corticosteroid domain. The domain was halted after results from another trial were released. Follow-up ended August 12, 2020. Interventions: The corticosteroid domain randomized participants to a fixed 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours) (nâ=â143), a shock-dependent course (50 mg every 6 hours when shock was clinically evident) (nâ=â152), or no hydrocortisone (nâ=â108). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of ICU-based respiratory or cardiovascular support) within 21 days, where patients who died were assigned -1 day. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model that included all patients enrolled with severe COVID-19, adjusting for age, sex, site, region, time, assignment to interventions within other domains, and domain and intervention eligibility. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Results: After excluding 19 participants who withdrew consent, there were 384 patients (mean age, 60 years; 29% female) randomized to the fixed-dose (nâ=â137), shock-dependent (nâ=â146), and no (nâ=â101) hydrocortisone groups; 379 (99%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean age for the 3 groups ranged between 59.5 and 60.4 years; most patients were male (range, 70.6%-71.5%); mean body mass index ranged between 29.7 and 30.9; and patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged between 50.0% and 63.5%. For the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively, the median organ support-free days were 0 (IQR, -1 to 15), 0 (IQR, -1 to 13), and 0 (-1 to 11) days (composed of 30%, 26%, and 33% mortality rates and 11.5, 9.5, and 6 median organ support-free days among survivors). The median adjusted odds ratio and bayesian probability of superiority were 1.43 (95% credible interval, 0.91-2.27) and 93% for fixed-dose hydrocortisone, respectively, and were 1.22 (95% credible interval, 0.76-1.94) and 80% for shock-dependent hydrocortisone compared with no hydrocortisone. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 (3%), 5 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days. However, the trial was stopped early and no treatment strategy met prespecified criteria for statistical superiority, precluding definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707
Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science
It is well documented that the majority of adults, children and families in need of evidence-based behavioral health interventionsi do not receive them [1, 2] and that few robust empirically supported methods for implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) exist. The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) represents a burgeoning effort to advance the innovation and rigor of implementation research and is uniquely focused on bringing together researchers and stakeholders committed to evaluating the implementation of complex evidence-based behavioral health interventions. Through its diverse activities and membership, SIRC aims to foster the promise of implementation research to better serve the behavioral health needs of the population by identifying rigorous, relevant, and efficient strategies that successfully transfer scientific evidence to clinical knowledge for use in real world settings [3]. SIRC began as a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-funded conference series in 2010 (previously titled the âSeattle Implementation Research Conferenceâ; $150,000 USD for 3 conferences in 2011, 2013, and 2015) with the recognition that there were multiple researchers and stakeholdersi working in parallel on innovative implementation science projects in behavioral health, but that formal channels for communicating and collaborating with one another were relatively unavailable. There was a significant need for a forum within which implementation researchers and stakeholders could learn from one another, refine approaches to science and practice, and develop an implementation research agenda using common measures, methods, and research principles to improve both the frequency and quality with which behavioral health treatment implementation is evaluated. SIRCâs membership growth is a testament to this identified need with more than 1000 members from 2011 to the present.ii SIRCâs primary objectives are to: (1) foster communication and collaboration across diverse groups, including implementation researchers, intermediariesi, as well as community stakeholders (SIRC uses the term âEBP championsâ for these groups) â and to do so across multiple career levels (e.g., students, early career faculty, established investigators); and (2) enhance and disseminate rigorous measures and methodologies for implementing EBPs and evaluating EBP implementation efforts. These objectives are well aligned with Glasgow and colleaguesâ [4] five core tenets deemed critical for advancing implementation science: collaboration, efficiency and speed, rigor and relevance, improved capacity, and cumulative knowledge. SIRC advances these objectives and tenets through in-person conferences, which bring together multidisciplinary implementation researchers and those implementing evidence-based behavioral health interventions in the community to share their work and create professional connections and collaborations
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 nonâcritically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022).
INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (nâ=â257), ARB (nâ=â248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; nâ=â10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; nâ=â264) for up to 10 days.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ supportâfree days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes.
RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ supportâfree days among critically ill patients was 10 (â1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (nâ=â231), 8 (â1 to 17) in the ARB group (nâ=â217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (nâ=â231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ supportâfree days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570
Addressing the needs for improving classical biological control programs in the USA
For years, the development of classical biological has proven to be the most cost-effective and environmentally safe management tool for invasive species. Despite this, in the United States there are a number of political, regulatory and institutional challenges associated with the discovery stage, pre-release phase, and post-release monitoring that have restricted the full potential and the long-term success of many classical biological control programs. Among these needs, we provide recommendations for improved prioritization of specific projects, funding concerns, source countries issues, benefits sharing of biological control agents, shipping live agents, regulatory requirements and procedures, and engagement with the environmental community. We believe these recommendations and potential solutions will significantly improve the future effectiveness of classical biological control programs for the management of invasive species within the United States