Testing devices for the prevention and treatment of stroke and its complications

We are entering a challenging but exciting period when many new interventions may appear for stroke based on the use of devices. Hopefully these will lead to improved outcomes at a cost that can be afforded in most parts of the world. Nevertheless, it is vital that lessons are learnt from failures in the development of pharmacological interventions (and from some early device studies), including inadequate preclinical testing, suboptimal trial design and analysis, and underpowered studies. The device industry is far more disparate than that seen for pharmaceuticals; companies are very variable in size and experience in stroke, and are developing interventions across a wide range of stroke treatment and prevention. It is vital that companies work together where sales and marketing are not involved, including in understanding basic stroke mechanisms, prospective systematic reviews, and education of physicians. Where possible, industry and academics should also work closely together to ensure trials are designed to be relevant to patient care and outcomes. Additionally, regulation of the device industry lags behind that for pharmaceuticals, and it is critical that new interventions are shown to be safe and effective rather than just feasible. Phase IV postmarketing surveillance studies will also be needed to ensure that devices are safe when used in the ‘real-world’ and to pick up uncommon adverse events

An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance, including diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke : a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic evaluation

Erratum issued September 2015 Erratum DOI: 10.3310/hta18270-c201509Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The timing, extent, progression and regression of deep vein thrombosis in immobile stroke patients: observational data from the CLOTS multicenter randomized trials

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important complication of stroke, but the evidence to support commonly used prophylactic strategies is conflicting. OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence, extent, associated clinical features and evolution of DVT after stroke. PATIENTS/METHODS: The CLOTS trials 1 and 2 together randomized 5632 immobile stroke patients in 135 hospitals in nine countries. We screened patients for asymptomatic DVT with compression duplex ultrasound (CDU) at about 7-10 days and again at about 25-30 days after enrollment. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-one (11.4%) of 5632 patients had DVT detected on the first CDU scan at a median of 8 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-10 days) after enrollment, and an additional 176 (3.1%) had a DVT on the second CDU scan at a median of 28 days (IQR 26-30 days). Of the 817 with DVTs, 289 (35%) were symptomatic and 39 (5%) had pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed by imaging. Six hundred and seventy-six (83%) were unilateral, 141 (17%) were bilateral, 322 (39%) were limited to calf veins, 172 (21%) were popliteal, and 323 (40%) were femoral. Among the 542 patients with DVT and a weak leg, the DVT affected the weaker leg in 396 (73%), the stronger leg in 59 (11%), and was bilateral in 87 (16%). Among the 318 patients with a DVT detected on the first CDU scan who had a second scan, the DVT regressed in 148 (47%), stayed the same in 140 (44%), and progressed in only 30 (9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although most DVTs develop within the first week, some develop later, and some early DVTs progress. Any prophylaxis needs to be started early but ideally continued for at least 4 weeks