8 research outputs found
State of the Art of Identification for Cyprinid Fish Larvae from Eastern North America
Morphological characteristics are known for 62 species of cyprinid larvae in 22 genera occupying waters of North America east of the Continental Divide. Currently known diagnostic characters are presented for most of these species. Species are arranged into groups according to their relative preanal length, eye shape, preanal myomere number, and ventral pigmentation. Descriptive literature is noted, as are errors in the literature. Practical considerations for making identifications, species in need of description, and characters to be investigated are discussed.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142047/1/tafs0319.pd
DIETS OF YOUNG COLORADO SQUAWFISH AND OTHER SMALL FISH IN BACKWATERS OF THE GREEN RIVER, COLORADO AND UTAH
Volume: 55Start Page: 95End Page: 10
Differential daytime and night-time stomatal behavior in plants from North American deserts
Night-time stomatal conductance (g night) occurs in many ecosystems, but the g night response to environmental drivers is relatively unknown, especially in deserts. Here, we conducted a Bayesian analysis of stomatal conductance (g) (N=5013) from 16 species in the Sonoran, Chihuahuan, Mojave and Great Basin Deserts (North America). We partitioned daytime g (g day) and g night responses by describing g as a mixture of two extreme (dark vs high light) behaviors. Significant g night was observed across 15 species, and the g night and g day behavior differed according to species, functional type and desert. The transition between extreme behaviors was determined by light environment, with the transition behavior differing between functional types and deserts. Sonoran and Chihuahuan C4 grasses were more sensitive to vapor pressure difference (D) at night and soil water potential (ψ soil) during the day, Great Basin C3 shrubs were highly sensitive to D and ψ soil during the day, and Mojave C3 shrubs were equally sensitive to D and ψ soil during the day and night. Species were split between the exhibition of isohydric or anisohydric behavior during the day. Three species switched from anisohydric to isohydric behavior at night. Such behavior, combined with differential D, ψ soil and light responses, suggests that different mechanisms underlie g day and g night regulation