Cognitive and Emotional Mapping With SEEG

Mapping of cortical functions is critical for the best clinical care of patients undergoing epilepsy and tumor surgery, but also to better understand human brain function and connectivity. The purpose of this review is to explore existing and potential means of mapping higher cortical functions, including stimulation mapping, passive mapping, and connectivity analyses. We examine the history of mapping, differences between subdural and stereoelectroencephalographic approaches, and some risks and safety aspects, before examining different types of functional mapping. Much of this review explores the prospects for new mapping approaches to better understand other components of language, memory, spatial skills, executive, and socio-emotional functions. We also touch on brain-machine interfaces, philosophical aspects of aligning tasks to brain circuits, and the study of consciousness. We end by discussing multi-modal testing and virtual reality approaches to mapping higher cortical functions

Decoding Brain Activity Associated with Literal and Metaphoric Sentence Comprehension Using Distributional Semantic Models

Recent years have seen a growing interest within the natural language processing (NLP)community in evaluating the ability of semantic models to capture human meaning representation in the brain. Existing research has mainly focused on applying semantic models to de-code brain activity patterns associated with the meaning of individual words, and, more recently, this approach has been extended to sentences and larger text fragments. Our work is the first to investigate metaphor process-ing in the brain in this context. We evaluate a range of semantic models (word embeddings, compositional, and visual models) in their ability to decode brain activity associated with reading of both literal and metaphoric sentences. Our results suggest that compositional models and word embeddings are able to capture differences in the processing of literal and metaphoric sentences, providing sup-port for the idea that the literal meaning is not fully accessible during familiar metaphor comprehension

Imageability ratings across languages

Imageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network-the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho = .68) and the variance explained (R (2) = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made

Is preserved consciousness during seizures associated with quality of life among patients with drug-resistant epilepsy?

Drug-resistant epilepsy is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL) due to a myriad of disease-related and psychosocial factors. Although consciousness during seizures is a core feature of seizure classification, its impact on QoL in people with epilepsy (PWE) is not well understood. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing QoL between PWE with focal aware (FA) versus impaired awareness (FIA) seizures. Sixty-nine adults with epilepsy completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QoLIE-31) inventory as part of their pre-surgical neuropsychological evaluation (FA: n = 26, FIA: n = 43). There was no group difference in seizure burden as defined by the proportion of comorbid focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FA:65.4 %; FIA: 79.1 %). People with FA seizures reported lower overall QoL than people with FIA seizures; sub-scale analyses revealed that seizure worry drives this effect. There was no difference in QoL between people with motor and non-motor FA seizures. Results suggest that FA seizures are burdensome on the QoL of PWE. FA seizures may contribute to seizure worry due to preserved awareness of aversive peri-ictal phenomenon. Findings suggest that clinical efforts should continue to be made to optimize seizure control in people with breakthrough FA seizures. Prospective longitudinal monitoring of QoL in trials of consciousness-targeting neurostimulation therapy is needed to determine if QoL changes as a function of improved peri-ictal consciousness following treatment