COVID-19 e doença hipertensiva no Brasil: possibilidade de uma tempestade perfeita

N/AN/

Biosimilars approvals by thirteen regulatory authorities: A cross-national comparison

Biosimilars are biological medicines highly similar to a previously licensed reference product and their licensing is expected to improve access to biological therapies. This study aims to present an overview of biosimilars approval by thirteen regulatory authorities (RA). The study is a cross-national comparison of regulatory decisions involving biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Canada, Colombia, Europe, Hungary, Guatemala, Italy, Mexico, Peru and United States. We examined publicly available documents containing information regarding the approval of biosimilars and investigated the publication of public assessment reports for registration applications, guidelines for biosimilars licensing, and products approved. Data extraction was conducted by a network of researchers and regulatory experts. All the RA had issued guidance documents establishing the requirements for the licensing of biosimilars. However, only three RA had published public assessment reports for registration applications. In total, the investigated jurisdictions had from 19 to 78 biosimilars approved, most of them licensed from 2018 to 2020. In spite of the advance in the number of products in recent years, some challenges still persist. Limited access to information regarding the assessment of biosimilars by RA can affect confidence, which may ultimately impact adoption of these products in practice.Fil: Machado, Fernanda Lacerda da Silva. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Cañás, Martín. Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche; ArgentinaFil: Doubova, Svetlana V.. Mexican Institute Of Social Security; MéxicoFil: Urtasun, Martín Alejandro. Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche; ArgentinaFil: Marin, Gustavo Horacio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Osorio de Castro, Claudia Garcia Serpa. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz; BrasilFil: Albuquerque, Flavia Caixeta. Sorocaba University; BrasilFil: Ribeiro, Tatiane Bonfim. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Pont, Lisa. University of Technology Sydney; AustraliaFil: Crisóstomo Landeros, José. Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile; ChileFil: Roldán Saelzer, Juan. Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile; ChileFil: Sepúlveda Viveros, Dino. Universidad del Desarrollo; Chile. Universidad Autónoma de Chile; ChileFil: Acosta, Angela. Universidad Icesi; ColombiaFil: Machado Beltrán, Manuel A.. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; ColombiaFil: Gordillo Alas, Lily Iracema. Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance; GuatemalaFil: Orellana Tablas, Lourdes Abigail. Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance; GuatemalaFil: Benko, Ria. University of Szeged; HungríaFil: Convertino, Irma. University of Pisa; ItaliaFil: Bonaso, Marco. University of Pisa; ItaliaFil: Tuccori, Marco. University of Pisa; ItaliaFil: Kirchmayer, Ursula. Lazio Regional Health Service; ItaliaFil: Contreras Sánchez, Saúl E.. Mexican Institute of Social Security; MéxicoFil: Rodríguez Tanta, L. Yesenia. Universidad Cientifica del Sur;Fil: Gutierrez Aures, Ysabel. Ministry of Health of Peru; PerúFil: Lin, Boya. University of Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Alipour Haris, Golnoosh. University of Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Eworuke, Efe. Real World Solutions; Estados UnidosFil: Lopes, Luciane Cruz. Sorocaba University; Brasi

An overview of biosimilars approvals by thirteen regulatory authorities: A cross national comparison

Biosimilars are biological medicines highly similar to a previously licensed reference product and their licensing is expected to improve access to biological therapies. This study aims to present an overview of biosimilars approval by thirteen regulatory authorities (RA). The study is a cross-national comparison of regulatory decisions involving biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Canada, Colombia, Europe, Hungary, Guatemala, Italy, Mexico, Peru and United States. We examined publicly available documents containing information regarding the approval of biosimilars and investigated the publication of public assessment reports for registration applications, guidelines for biosimilars licensing, and products approved. Data extraction was conducted by a network of researchers and regulatory experts. All the RA had issued guidance documents establishing the requirements for the licensing of biosimilars. However, only three RA had published public assessment reports for registration applications. In total, the investigated jurisdictions had from 19 to 78 biosimilars approved, most of them licensed from 2018 to 2020. In spite of the advance in the number of products in recent years, some challenges still persist. Limited access to information regarding the assessment of biosimilars by RA can affect confidence, which may ultimately impact adoption of these products in practice.Facultad de Ciencias Médica

Núcleos de Ensino da Unesp: artigos 2010: volume 6: políticas públicas e organização escolar

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES

Resumos concluídos - Saúde Coletiva

Resumos concluídos - Saúde Coletiv

NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES: a data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics

Mammalian carnivores are considered a key group in maintaining ecological health and can indicate potential ecological integrity in landscapes where they occur. Carnivores also hold high conservation value and their habitat requirements can guide management and conservation plans. The order Carnivora has 84 species from 8 families in the Neotropical region: Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Otariidae; Phocidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae. Herein, we include published and unpublished data on native terrestrial Neotropical carnivores (Canidae; Felidae; Mephitidae; Mustelidae; Procyonidae; and Ursidae). NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES is a publicly available data set that includes 99,605 data entries from 35,511 unique georeferenced coordinates. Detection/non-detection and quantitative data were obtained from 1818 to 2018 by researchers, governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and private consultants. Data were collected using several methods including camera trapping, museum collections, roadkill, line transect, and opportunistic records. Literature (peer-reviewed and grey literature) from Portuguese, Spanish and English were incorporated in this compilation. Most of the data set consists of detection data entries (n = 79,343; 79.7%) but also includes non-detection data (n = 20,262; 20.3%). Of those, 43.3% also include count data (n = 43,151). The information available in NEOTROPICAL CARNIVORES will contribute to macroecological, ecological, and conservation questions in multiple spatio-temporal perspectives. As carnivores play key roles in trophic interactions, a better understanding of their distribution and habitat requirements are essential to establish conservation management plans and safeguard the future ecological health of Neotropical ecosystems. Our data paper, combined with other large-scale data sets, has great potential to clarify species distribution and related ecological processes within the Neotropics. There are no copyright restrictions and no restriction for using data from this data paper, as long as the data paper is cited as the source of the information used. We also request that users inform us of how they intend to use the data

Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone

As part of an EU funded project to investigate the factors influencing bone preservation in the archaeological record, more than 250 bones from 41 archaeological sites in five countries spanning four climatic regions were studied for diagenetic alteration. Sites were selected to cover a range of environmental conditions and archaeological contexts. Microscopic and physical (mercury intrusion porosimetry) analyses of these bones revealed that the majority (68%) had suffered microbial attack. Furthermore, significant differences were found between animal and human bone in both the state of preservation and the type of microbial attack present. These differences in preservation might result from differences in early taphonomy of the bones. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

Núcleos de Ensino da Unesp: artigos 2008

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq