19 research outputs found
Marker-Assisted Selection for Biotic Stress Resistance in Peanut
Peanut is the second-most important legume grown worldwide. Cultivated peanut is a disomic
tetraploid, 2n—4x—40, with limited genetic diversity due to a genetic bottleneck in formation of
the polyploid from ancestors A. duranensis and A. ipaensis. Consequently, resistance_to biotic stresses
is limited in the cultigen; however, wild species possess strong resistances. Transfer o f these resistances
is hindered by differences o f ploidy, but production o f synthetic amphidiploids, coupled
with use o f molecular markers, enables efficient gene transfer. Marker maps have been made from
interspecific crosses, and SSR-based maps from cultivated parents have been developed recently. At
least 410 resistance gene analogues have been identified. The first markers for biotic stress tolerance
were for root-knot nematode resistance and introgressed from one A. cardenasii chromosome. These
and improved markers have been used for marker-assisted backcrossing, contributing to release of
three cultivars. Additional QTLs have been identified since. Early and late leafspots cause significant
yield losses worldwide, and resistance depends on multiple genes. Using interspecific populations,
five resistance QTLs for early leafspot were identified using greenhouse inoculations, and five QTLs
for late leafspot were identified using detached leaf assays. Using cultivated species populations, 28
QTLs were identified for LLS resistance; all but one were minor QTLs; the major QTL was donated
by an interspecific introgression line parent. Rust often occurs alongside leafspots, and rust resistance
was characterized as one major QTL, plus several smaller QTLs. Marker-assisted backcrossing o f this
major QTL has been performed into different populations. QTLs for resistance to other biotic stresses
have been identified, namely to groundnut rosette virus, Sclerotinia blight, afiatoxin contamination,
aphids, and tomato spotted wilt virus. Marker-assisted breeding is still in early stages, and development
o f more rapid and inexpensive markers from transcriptome and genome sequencing is expected
to accelerate progress
Physiological basis for tolerance to and recovery from pre-flowering drought in peanut
Drought during the pre-flowering stage can increase yield of peanut. There is limited information on genotypic variation for tolerance to and recovery from pre-flowering drought (PFD) and more importantly the physiological traits underlying genotypic variation. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of moisture stress during the pre-flowering phase on pod yield and to understand some of the physiological responses underlying genotypic variation in response to and recovery from PFD. A glasshouse and field experiments were conducted at Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The glasshouse experiment was a randomized complete block design consisting of two watering regimes, i.e. fully-irrigated control and 1/3 available soil water from emergence to 40 days after emergence followed by adequate water supply, and 12 peanut genotypes. The field experiment was a split-plot design with two watering regimes as main-plots, and 12 peanut genotypes as sub-plots. Measurements of N fixation, leaf area (LA) were made in both experiments. In addition, root growth was measured in the glasshouse experiment. Imposition of PFD followed by recovery resulted in an average increase in yield of 24 % (range from 10 % to 57 %) and 12 % (range from 2 % to 51 %) in the field and glasshouse experiments, respectively. Significant genotypic variation for N fixation, LA and root growth was also observed after recovery. The study revealed that recovery growth following release of PFD had a stronger influence on final yield than tolerance to water deficits during the PFD. A combination of N fixation, LA and root growth accounted for a major portion of the genotypic variation in yield (r = 0.68-0.93) suggesting that these traits could be used as selection criteria for identifying genotypes with rapid recovery from PFD. A combined analysis of glasshouse and field experiments showed that LA and N fixation during the recovery had low genotype × environment interaction indicating potential for using these traits for selecting genotypes in peanut improvement programs