Contamination of green bay water with lead and cadmium by a 37-m long, 2-m draft research vessel

During late April 1989, Green Bay, Lake Michigan water was sampled for dissolved concentrations of lead and cadmium. Samples used to document horizontal contamination of the water by a research vessel were collected using a rubber boat rowed 2, 50, 100, and 200 m upwind of the anchored mother ship. Samples used to document vertical contamination of the water column by the research vessel were collected from the vessel at water depths of 0.2, 2, 5, 10, and 20 m. Both lead and cadmium blanks were < 0.5 ng/l and below their limits of detection at the 95% level of confidence of 3.5 and 0.98 ng/l, respectively. Concentrations of lead in the horizontal direction varied between 3.5 ng/l at 200 m from the ship and 7.7 ng/l at 2 m from the ship. Cadmium concentrations varied from 2.8 ng/l at 2 m from the ship to 1.5 ng/l at 200 m from the ship. Lead concentrations in the vertical direction varied between 8.4 ng/k at a depth of 0.2 m and 3.3 ng/l at 5 m. Cadmium concentrations ranged between 4.5 ng/l at 2 m and 2.2 ng/l at 20 m. The vertical studies were inconclusive and appeared to be influenced by resuspension of bottom sediments. Uncontaminated samples can be collected as close as 100 m to the research vessel.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29851/1/0000198.pd

In vivo biodistribution and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of inhaled fresh and aged cerium oxide nanoparticles in rats

Abstract Background Cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles used as a diesel fuel additive can be emitted into the ambient air leading to human inhalation. Although biological studies have shown CeO2 nanoparticles can cause adverse health effects, the extent of the biodistribution of CeO2 nanoparticles through inhalation has not been well characterized. Furthermore, freshly emitted CeO2 nanoparticles can undergo an aging process by interaction with other ambient airborne pollutants that may influence the biodistribution after inhalation. Therefore, understanding the pharmacokinetic of newly-generated and atmospherically-aged CeO2 nanoparticles is needed to assess the risks to human health. Methods A novel experimental system was designed to integrate the generation, aging, and inhalation exposure of Sprague Dawley rats to combustion-generated CeO2 nanoparticles (25 and 90 nm bimodal distribution). Aging was done in a chamber representing typical ambient urban air conditions with UV lights. Following a single 4-hour nose-only exposure to freshly emitted or aged CeO2 for 15 min, 24 h, and 7 days, ICP-MS detection of Ce in the blood, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, brain, olfactory bulb, urine, and feces were analyzed with a mass balance approach to gain an overarching understanding of the distribution. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that includes mucociliary clearance, phagocytosis, and entry into the systemic circulation by alveolar wall penetration was developed to predict the biodistribution kinetic of the inhaled CeO2 nanoparticles. Results Cerium was predominantly recovered in the lungs and feces, with extrapulmonary organs contributing less than 4 % to the recovery rate at 24 h post exposure. No significant differences in biodistribution patterns were found between fresh and aged CeO2 nanoparticles. The PBPK model predicted the biodistribution well and identified phagocytizing cells in the pulmonary region accountable for most of the nanoparticles not eliminated by feces. Conclusions The biodistribution of fresh and aged CeO2 nanoparticles followed the same patterns, with the highest amounts recovered in the feces and lungs. The slow decrease of nanoparticle concentrations in the lungs can be explained by clearance to the gastrointestinal tract and then to the feces. The PBPK model successfully predicted the kinetic of CeO2 nanoparticles in various organs measured in this study and suggested most of the nanoparticles were captured by phagocytizing cells.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134633/1/12989_2016_Article_156.pd

LOL2 and LOL5 loci control latex production by laticifer cells in Euphorbia lathyris

[EN] Laticifers are specialized plant cells capable of indefinite elongation that ramify extensively and are responsible for latex biosynthesis and accumulation. However, the mechanisms underlying laticifer cell differentiation, growth and production of latex remain largely unknown. In a search for mutants showing enhanced accumulation of latex we identified two LOT OF LATEX (LOL) loci in Euphorbia lathyris. lol2 and lol5 mutants show enhanced production of latex contained within laticifer cells. The recessive lol2 mutant carries increased biosynthesis of the plant hormone jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile) and therefore establishes a genetic link between jasmonic acid (JA) signaling and latex production in laticifers. Instead, heightened production of latex in lol5 plants obeys to enhanced proliferation of laticifer cells. Phylogenetic analysis of laticifer-expressed genes in E. lathyris and in two other latex-bearing species, Euphorbia corallioides and Euphorbia palustris, allowed the identification of canonical JA responsive elements present in the gene promoter regions of laticifer marker genes. Moreover, we identified that the hormone JA functions not as a morphogen for laticifer differentiation but as a trigger for the fill out of laticifers with latex and the associated triterpenoids. The identification of LOL loci represents a further step towards the understanding of mechanisms controlling latex production in laticifer cells.This work was supported by Spanish MINECO (BFU2015 -68199 -R to P.V.) and Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo 2014/024 to P.V.).Castelblanque, L.; Balaguer Zamora, B.; Marti, C.; Orozco, M.; Vera Vera, P. (2018). LOL2 and LOL5 loci control latex production by laticifer cells in Euphorbia lathyris. New Phytologist. 219(4):1467-1479. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15253S146714792194Agrawal, A. A., & Konno, K. (2009). Latex: A Model for Understanding Mechanisms, Ecology, and Evolution of Plant Defense Against Herbivory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40(1), 311-331. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120307Barres, L., Vilatersana, R., Molero, J., Susanna, A., & Galbany-Casals, M. (2011). Molecular phylogeny of Euphorbia subg. Esula sect. Aphyllis (Euphorbiaceae) inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA markers with biogeographic insights. TAXON, 60(3), 705-720. doi:10.1002/tax.603007Becerra, J. X., & Venable, D. L. (1990). Rapid-Terpene-Bath and «Squirt-Gun» Defense in Bursera schlechtendalii and the Counterploy of Chrysomelid Beetles. Biotropica, 22(3), 320. doi:10.2307/2388545Boffelli, D. (2003). Phylogenetic Shadowing of Primate Sequences to Find Functional Regions of the Human Genome. Science, 299(5611), 1391-1394. doi:10.1126/science.1081331Bonaventure, G., Gfeller, A., Rodríguez, V. M., Armand, F., & Farmer, E. E. (2007). The fou2 Gain-of-Function Allele and the Wild-Type Allele of Two Pore Channel 1 Contribute to Different Extents or by Different Mechanisms to Defense Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology, 48(12), 1775-1789. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcm151Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernández, G., Adie, B., Chico, J. M., Lorenzo, O., … Solano, R. (2007). The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature, 448(7154), 666-671. doi:10.1038/nature06006Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xBary, A. de, Bower, F. O., & Scott, D. H. (1884). Comparative anatomy of the vegetative organs of the phanerogams and ferns; doi:10.5962/bhl.title.56013De Geyter, N., Gholami, A., Goormachtig, S., & Goossens, A. (2012). Transcriptional machineries in jasmonate-elicited plant secondary metabolism. Trends in Plant Science, 17(6), 349-359. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.001Dombrecht, B., Xue, G. P., Sprague, S. J., Kirkegaard, J. A., Ross, J. J., Reid, J. B., … Kazan, K. (2007). MYC2 Differentially Modulates Diverse Jasmonate-Dependent Functions in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 19(7), 2225-2245. doi:10.1105/tpc.106.048017Dussourd, D., & Eisner, T. (1987). Vein-cutting behavior: insect counterploy to the latex defense of plants. Science, 237(4817), 898-901. doi:10.1126/science.3616620Ellis, C., Karafyllidis, I., Wasternack, C., & Turner, J. G. (2002). The Arabidopsis Mutant cev1 Links Cell Wall Signaling to Jasmonate and Ethylene Responses. The Plant Cell, 14(7), 1557-1566. doi:10.1105/tpc.002022Frame, B. R., Shou, H., Chikwamba, R. K., Zhang, Z., Xiang, C., Fonger, T. M., … Wang, K. (2002). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation of Maize Embryos Using a Standard Binary Vector System. Plant Physiology, 129(1), 13-22. doi:10.1104/pp.000653Godoy, M., Franco-Zorrilla, J. M., Pérez-Pérez, J., Oliveros, J. C., Lorenzo, Ó., & Solano, R. (2011). Improved protein-binding microarrays for the identification of DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors. The Plant Journal, 66(4), 700-711. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04519.xHAGEL, J., YEUNG, E., & FACCHINI, P. (2008). Got milk? The secret life of laticifers. Trends in Plant Science, 13(12), 631-639. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.09.005HAO, B. (2000). Laticifer Differentiation in Hevea brasiliensis: Induction by Exogenous Jasmonic Acid and Linolenic Acid. Annals of Botany, 85(1), 37-43. doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.0995Huber, M., Epping, J., Schulze Gronover, C., Fricke, J., Aziz, Z., Brillatz, T., … Erb, M. (2016). A Latex Metabolite Benefits Plant Fitness under Root Herbivore Attack. PLOS Biology, 14(1), e1002332. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002332James, J., Tugizimana, F., Steenkamp, P., & Dubery, I. (2013). Metabolomic Analysis of Methyl Jasmonate-Induced Triterpenoid Production in the Medicinal Herb Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. Molecules, 18(4), 4267-4281. doi:10.3390/molecules18044267Jefferson, R. A., Kavanagh, T. A., & Bevan, M. W. (1987). GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. The EMBO Journal, 6(13), 3901-3907. doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.xKonno, K. (2011). Plant latex and other exudates as plant defense systems: Roles of various defense chemicals and proteins contained therein. Phytochemistry, 72(13), 1510-1530. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.02.016Laosombut, T., Arreewichit, P., Nirapathpongporn, K., Traiperm, P., Kongsawadworakul, P., Viboonjun, U., & Narangajavana, J. (2016). Differential Expression of Methyl Jasmonate-Responsive Genes Correlates with Laticifer Vessel Proliferation in Phloem Tissue of Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 35(4), 1049-1063. doi:10.1007/s00344-016-9603-4Lescot, M. (2002). PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 30(1), 325-327. doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.325Lewinsohn, T. M. (1991). The geographical distribution of plant latex. Chemoecology, 2(1), 64-68. doi:10.1007/bf01240668Lorenzo, O., Chico, J. M., Sánchez-Serrano, J. J., & Solano, R. (2004). JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 Encodes a MYC Transcription Factor Essential to Discriminate between Different Jasmonate-Regulated Defense Responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 16(7), 1938-1950. doi:10.1105/tpc.022319Mahlberg, P. G. (1961). EMBRYOGENY AND HISTOGENESIS IN NERIUM OLEANDER II. ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE NON-ARTICULATED LATICIFER. American Journal of Botany, 48(1), 90-99. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1961.tb11608.xMahlberg, P. G. (1963). Development of Non-Articulated Laticifer in Seedling Axis of Nerium oleander. Botanical Gazette, 124(3), 224-231. doi:10.1086/336195Mahlberg, P. G. (1993). Laticifers: An historical perspective. The Botanical Review, 59(1), 1-23. doi:10.1007/bf02856611Mahlberg, P. G., & Sabharwal, P. S. (1968). ORIGIN AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF NONARTICULATED LATICIFERS IN EMBRYOS OF EUPHORBIA MARGINATA. American Journal of Botany, 55(3), 375-381. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1968.tb07389.xMangas, S., Bonfill, M., Osuna, L., Moyano, E., Tortoriello, J., Cusido, R. M., … Palazón, J. (2006). The effect of methyl jasmonate on triterpene and sterol metabolisms of Centella asiatica, Ruscus aculeatus and Galphimia glauca cultured plants. Phytochemistry, 67(18), 2041-2049. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.06.025Memelink, J., Verpoorte, R., & Kijne, J. W. (2001). ORCAnization of jasmonate-responsive gene expression in alkaloid metabolism. Trends in Plant Science, 6(5), 212-219. doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(01)01924-0Mertens, J., Pollier, J., Vanden Bossche, R., Lopez-Vidriero, I., Franco-Zorrilla, J. M., & Goossens, A. (2015). The bHLH Transcription Factors TSAR1 and TSAR2 Regulate Triterpene Saponin Biosynthesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiology, 170(1), 194-210. doi:10.1104/pp.15.01645Mertens, J., Van Moerkercke, A., Vanden Bossche, R., Pollier, J., & Goossens, A. (2016). Clade IVa Basic Helix–Loop–Helix Transcription Factors Form Part of a Conserved Jasmonate Signaling Circuit for the Regulation of Bioactive Plant Terpenoid Biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology, 57(12), 2564-2575. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcw168Metcalfe, C. R. (1967). Distribution of latex in the plant kingdom. Economic Botany, 21(2), 115-127. doi:10.1007/bf02897859Nessler, C. L., & Mahlberg, P. G. (1981). CYTOCHEMICAL LOCALIZATION OF CELLULASE ACTIVITY IN ARTICULATED, ANASTOMOSING LATICIFERS OF PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L. (PAPAVERACEAE). American Journal of Botany, 68(5), 730-732. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1981.tb12405.xPauwels, L., Inzé, D., & Goossens, A. (2009). Jasmonate-inducible gene: what does it mean? Trends in Plant Science, 14(2), 87-91. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.005Pickard, W. F. (2008). Laticifers and secretory ducts: two other tube systems in plants. New Phytologist, 177(4), 877-888. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02323.xPirrello, J., Leclercq, J., Dessailly, F., Rio, M., Piyatrakul, P., Kuswanhadi, K., … Montoro, P. (2014). Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of the jasmonate signalling pathway in response to abiotic and harvesting stress in Hevea brasiliensis. BMC Plant Biology, 14(1). doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0341-0Ramírez, V., Van der Ent, S., García-Andrade, J., Coego, A., Pieterse, C. M., & Vera, P. (2010). OCP3 is an important modulator of NPR1-mediated jasmonic acid-dependent induced defenses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology, 10(1), 199. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-199Rouster, J., Leah, R., Mundy, J., & Cameron-Mills, V. (1997). Identification of a methyl jasmonate-responsive region in the promoter of a lipoxygenase 1 gene expressed in barley grain. The Plant Journal, 11(3), 513-523. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11030513.xSánchez-Bel, P., Sanmartín, N., Pastor, V., Mateu, D., Cerezo, M., Vidal-Albalat, A., … Flors, V. (2017). Mycorrhizal tomato plants fine tunes the growth-defence balance upon N depleted root environments. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41(2), 406-420. doi:10.1111/pce.13105Staswick, P. E., Su, W., & Howell, S. H. (1992). Methyl jasmonate inhibition of root growth and induction of a leaf protein are decreased in an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(15), 6837-6840. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.15.6837Suzuki, H., Reddy, M. S. S., Naoumkina, M., Aziz, N., May, G. D., Huhman, D. V., … Dixon, R. A. (2004). Methyl jasmonate and yeast elicitor induce differential transcriptional and metabolic re-programming in cell suspension cultures of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Planta, 220(5), 696-707. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1387-2Tamari, G., Borochov, A., Atzorn, R., & Weiss, D. (1995). Methyl jasmonate induces pigmentation and flavonoid gene expression in petunia corollas: A possible role in wound response. Physiologia Plantarum, 94(1), 45-50. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00782.

BTN3A2 Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Is Associated with Higher Tumor Infiltrating T Cells and a Better Prognosis

BTN3A2/BT3.2 butyrophilin mRNA expression by tumoral cells was previously identified as a prognostic factor in a small cohort of high grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HG-EOC). Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of BT3.2 at the protein level in specimen from 199 HG-EOC patients. As the only known role of butyrophilin proteins is in immune regulation, we evaluated the association between BT3.2 expression and intratumoral infiltration of immune cells by immunohistochemistry with specific antibodies against BT3.2, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68 and CD206. Epithelial BT3.2 expression was significantly associated with longer overall survival and lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.651, p = 0.006 and HR = 0.642, p = 0.002, respectively) and significantly associated with a higher density of infiltrating T cells, particularly CD4+ cells (0.272, p<0.001). We also observed a strong association between the relative density of CD206+ cells, as evaluated by the ratio of intratumoral CD206+/CD68+ expression, and risk of disease progression (HR = 1.355 p = 0.044, respectively). In conclusion, BT3.2 protein is a potential prognostic biomarker for the identification of HG-EOC patients with better outcome. In contrast, high CD206+/CD68+ expression is associated with high risk of disease progression. While the role of BT3.2 is still unknown, our result suggest that BT3.2 expression by epithelial cells may modulates the intratumoral infiltration of immune cells

TSP-1 Secreted by Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Contributes to Retinal Ganglion Cell Neurite Outgrowth and Survival

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are pluripotent and thereby a potential candidate for cell replacement therapy for central nervous system degenerative disorders and traumatic injury. However, the mechanism of their differentiation and effect on neural tissues has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluates the effect of BMSCs on neural cell growth and survival in a retinal ganglion cell (RGCs) model by assessing the effect of changes in the expression of a BMSC-secreted protein, thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), as a putative mechanistic agent acting on RGCs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The effect of co-culturing BMSCs and RGCs in vitro was evaluated by measuring the following parameters: neurite outgrowth, RGC survival, BMSC neural-like differentiation, and the effect of TSP-1 on both cell lines under basal secretion conditions and when TSP-1 expression was inhibited. Our data show that BMSCs improved RGC survival and neurite outgrowth. Synaptophysin, MAP-2, and TGF-beta expression are up-regulated in RGCs co-cultured with BMSCs. Interestingly, the BMSCs progressively displayed neural-like morphology over the seven-day study period. Restriction display polymerase chain reaction (RD-PCR) was performed to screen for differentially expressed genes in BMSCs cultured alone or co-cultured with RGCs. TSP-1, a multifactorial extracellular matrix protein, is critically important in the formation of neural connections during development, so its function in our co-culture model was investigated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection. When TSP-1 expression was decreased with siRNA silencing, BMSCs had no impact on RGC survival, but reduced neurite outgrowth and decreased expression of synaptophysin, MAP-2 and TGF-beta in RGCs. Furthermore, the number of BMSCs with neural-like characteristics was significantly decreased by more than two-fold using siRNA silencing. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the TSP-1 signaling pathway might have an important role in neural-like differentiation in BMSCs and neurite outgrowth in RGCs. This study provides new insights into the potential reparative mechanisms of neural cell repair

All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory: Exploring the Extreme Multimessenger Universe

The All-sky Medium Energy Gamma-ray Observatory (AMEGO) is a probe class mission concept that will provide essential contributions to multimessenger astrophysics in the late 2020s and beyond. AMEGO combines high sensitivity in the 200 keV to 10 GeV energy range with a wide field of view, good spectral resolution, and polarization sensitivity. Therefore, AMEGO is key in the study of multimessenger astrophysical objects that have unique signatures in the gamma-ray regime, such as neutron star mergers, supernovae, and flaring active galactic nuclei. The order-of-magnitude improvement compared to previous MeV missions also enables discoveries of a wide range of phenomena whose energy output peaks in the relatively unexplored medium-energy gamma-ray band

Broadband Multi-wavelength Properties of M87 during the 2017 Event Horizon Telescope Campaign

Abstract: In 2017, the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration succeeded in capturing the first direct image of the center of the M87 galaxy. The asymmetric ring morphology and size are consistent with theoretical expectations for a weakly accreting supermassive black hole of mass ∼6.5 × 109 M ⊙. The EHTC also partnered with several international facilities in space and on the ground, to arrange an extensive, quasi-simultaneous multi-wavelength campaign. This Letter presents the results and analysis of this campaign, as well as the multi-wavelength data as a legacy data repository. We captured M87 in a historically low state, and the core flux dominates over HST-1 at high energies, making it possible to combine core flux constraints with the more spatially precise very long baseline interferometry data. We present the most complete simultaneous multi-wavelength spectrum of the active nucleus to date, and discuss the complexity and caveats of combining data from different spatial scales into one broadband spectrum. We apply two heuristic, isotropic leptonic single-zone models to provide insight into the basic source properties, but conclude that a structured jet is necessary to explain M87’s spectrum. We can exclude that the simultaneous γ-ray emission is produced via inverse Compton emission in the same region producing the EHT mm-band emission, and further conclude that the γ-rays can only be produced in the inner jets (inward of HST-1) if there are strongly particle-dominated regions. Direct synchrotron emission from accelerated protons and secondaries cannot yet be excluded

Chlorovirus-Mediated Membrane Depolarization of \u3ci\u3eChlorella \u3c/i\u3eAlters Secondary Active Transport of Solutes

Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) is the prototype of a family of large, double-stranded DNA, plaque-forming viruses that infect certain eukaryotic chlorella-like green algae from the genus Chlorovirus. PBCV-1 infection results in rapid host membrane depolarization and potassium ion release. One interesting feature of certain chloroviruses is that they code for functional potassium ion-selective channel proteins (Kcv) that are considered responsible for the host membrane depolarization and, as a consequence, the efflux of potassium ions. This report examines the relationship between cellular depolarization and solute uptake. Annotation of the virus host Chlorella strain NC64A genome revealed 482 putative transporter-encoding genes; 224 are secondary active transporters. Solute uptake experiments using seven radioactive compounds revealed that virus infection alters the transport of all the solutes. However, the degree of inhibition varied depending on the solute. Experiments with nystatin, a drug known to depolarize cell membranes, produced changes in solute uptake that are similar but not identical to those that occurred during virus infection. Therefore, these studies indicate that chlorovirus infection causes a rapid and sustained depolarization of the host plasma membrane and that this depolarization leads to the inhibition of secondary active transporters that changes solute uptake