Eastside Cemetery, Vol. 2

This project is a partial supplement to the Eastside Cemetery survey made in 1975 and issued as Volume I. Only three SECTIONs of the cemetery commonly referred to as the Old SECTIONs were surveyed at that time, and many burials have occurred in those SECTIONs since that date. OLD SECTIONs of A, Blocks 1 to 6, SECTION B, Blocks 1 through 8, and SECTION C, Blocks 5 through 12, are not updated herein. The cemetery is comprised of five SECTIONs separated by paved roads. g north and south. The SECTIONs are her divided into Blocks which are bounded by paved lanes, for the most part, running east to west.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1008/thumbnail.jp

Eastside Cemetery, Vol. 1

Graves in the “Old Section” of Eastside Cemetery, Statesboro, Bulloch County, Georgia are recorded here. This survey of tombstones is a project of the Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, and done in the Spring of 1975. Burials after that date are usually not shown.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1007/thumbnail.jp

Bulloch County, Georgia Cemeteries, Vol. 2

This volume continues the survey of Bulloch County cemeteries by the Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, DAR. The cemeteries in this volume were surveyed and compiled by Mrs. Lawrence B. Kelly, Chairman, Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, and Mrs. Alvaretta K. Register, Registrar, with the assistance of the following: Mrs. Fred D. Beasley, Lawrence B. Kelly, Col. USA, ret’d, Frank Mikell, Mrs. Willie Lee Moseley, Mrs. Aldine A. Rosser, Miss Victoria Steele. Find this book in the University Libraries\u27 cataloghttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1001/thumbnail.jp

Bulloch County, Georgia Cemeteries, Vol. 5

This volume if the fifth in a series of Bulloch County, Georgia, cemetery surveys begun in 1979 by the Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution. One Jenkins County cemetery is included because it was once in Bulloch County. A number of the cemeteries are Black cemeteries. Members of the Black community expressed a desire for surveys to be made of their church cemeteries. The cemeteries in this volume were surveyed, compiled, and typed by Mrs. Lawrence B. Kelly, Chairman, Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, with the assistance of the following persons: Mrs. William Starling, Mrs. David Starling, Mrs. James B. Hairehttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1004/thumbnail.jp

Bulloch County, Georgia Cemeteries, Vol. 3

This volume continues the survey of Bulloch County cemeteries by the Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, DAR. Two cemeteries in Jenkins County and one in Candler County are included because these counties were once part of Bulloch County and descendants of persons buried in these cemeteries are living in Bulloch County. The cemeteries in this volume were surveyed and compiled by Mrs. Lawrence B. Kelly, Chairman, Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, with the assistance of the following: Mrs. Annette Bacon, Mrs. Campbell, Lawrence B. Kelly, Col. USA, ret’d, Frank Mikell, Mrs. Aldine A. Rosser, Mrs, David Starling, Mrs. William Starling, Miss Victoria Steele, Mrs. Jennie Toole Find this book in the University Libraries\u27 cataloghttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1002/thumbnail.jp

Bulloch County, Georgia Cemeteries, Vol. 7

This is volume 7 of a series of tombstone inscriptions from Bulloch County cemeteries and from cemeteries in surrounding counties that once were a part of Bulloch. A special effort was made to locate all Black cemeteries in the county for this volume. The cemeteries in this volume were surveyed, compiled, indexed and typed by Mrs. Lawrence B. Kelly, Chairman, Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, with the assistance of the following persons: Mrs. William Starling, Mrs. David Starling, Miss Sue Fortynhttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1006/thumbnail.jp

Bulloch County, Georgia Cemeteries, Vol. 4

This volume is a continuation of the survey of Bulloch County Cemeteries by the Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution. As before, Cemeteries in surrounding counties which once were in Bulloch County are included. The cemeteries in this volume were surveyed and compiled by Mrs. Lawrence B. Kelly, Chairman, Genealogical Records Committee, Archibald Bulloch Chapter, Daughters of the American Revolution, with the assistance of the following: Smith Banks, Robert Bath, Mrs. Aldine A. Rosser, David Starling, Mrs. David Starling, Mrs. William Starling. This volume contains 20 cemeteries with a total of 1781 tombstone inscriptions. Find this book in the University Libraries\u27 cataloghttps://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/dar-cemetery-books/1003/thumbnail.jp

Plans for a Neutron EDM Experiment at SNS

The electric dipole moment of the neutron, leptons, and atoms provide a unique window to Physics Beyond the Standard Model. We are currently developing a new neutron EDM experiment (the nEDM Experiment). This experiment, which will be run at the 8.9 A Neutron Line at the Fundamental Neutron Physics Beamline (FNPB) at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, will search for the neutron EDM with a sensitivity two orders of magnitude better than the present limit. In this paper, the motivation for the experiment, the experimental method, and the present status of the experiment are discussed.Comment: 9 Pages, 4 Figures, submitted to the proceedings of the Second Meeting of the APS Topical Group on Hadronic Physics, Nashville, TN, October 22-24, 200

The relationships between golf and health:A scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between golf and health. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Published and unpublished reports of any age or language, identified by searching electronic databases, platforms, reference lists, websites and from consulting experts. REVIEW METHODS: A 3-step search strategy identified relevant published primary and secondary studies as well as grey literature. Identified studies were screened for final inclusion. Data were extracted using a standardised tool, to form (1) a descriptive analysis and (2) a thematic summary. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 4944 records were identified with an initial search. 301 studies met criteria for the scoping review. Golf can provide moderate intensity physical activity and is associated with physical health benefits that include improved cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic profiles, and improved wellness. There is limited evidence related to golf and mental health. The incidence of golfing injury is moderate, with back injuries the most frequent. Accidental head injuries are rare, but can have serious consequences. CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners and policymakers can be encouraged to support more people to play golf, due to associated improved physical health and mental well-being, and a potential contribution to increased life expectancy. Injuries and illnesses associated with golf have been identified, and risk reduction strategies are warranted. Further research priorities include systematic reviews to further explore the cause and effect nature of the relationships described. Research characterising golf's contribution to muscular strengthening, balance and falls prevention as well as further assessing the associations and effects between golf and mental health are also indicated

Pain assessment for people with dementia: a systematic review of systematic reviews of pain assessment tools.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence of under-detection and poor management of pain in patients with dementia, in both long-term and acute care. Accurate assessment of pain in people with dementia is challenging and pain assessment tools have received considerable attention over the years, with an increasing number of tools made available. Systematic reviews on the evidence of their validity and utility mostly compare different sets of tools. This review of systematic reviews analyses and summarises evidence concerning the psychometric properties and clinical utility of pain assessment tools in adults with dementia or cognitive impairment. METHODS: We searched for systematic reviews of pain assessment tools providing evidence of reliability, validity and clinical utility. Two reviewers independently assessed each review and extracted data from them, with a third reviewer mediating when consensus was not reached. Analysis of the data was carried out collaboratively. The reviews were synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: We retrieved 441 potentially eligible reviews, 23 met the criteria for inclusion and 8 provided data for extraction. Each review evaluated between 8 and 13 tools, in aggregate providing evidence on a total of 28 tools. The quality of the reviews varied and the reporting often lacked sufficient methodological detail for quality assessment. The 28 tools appear to have been studied in a variety of settings and with varied types of patients. The reviews identified several methodological limitations across the original studies. The lack of a 'gold standard' significantly hinders the evaluation of tools' validity. Most importantly, the samples were small providing limited evidence for use of any of the tools across settings or populations. CONCLUSIONS: There are a considerable number of pain assessment tools available for use with the elderly cognitive impaired population. However there is limited evidence about their reliability, validity and clinical utility. On the basis of this review no one tool can be recommended given the existing evidence