Sperm Cryopreservation in Brown Bear (Ursus arctos): Preliminary Aspects

P. 9-17The development of sperm cryopreservation procedures in brown bear is the basis for establishing a specific genetic resource bank aimed at the preservation of a Cantabric brown bear population, which is seriously threatened. Several issues complicate the development of these cryopreservation procedures: lack of previous specific studies, a high incidence of urospermia and spermagglutination observed in bear ejaculates. Moreover, the availability of individuals for research from these threatened populations is problematic. In the case of the Cantabric brown bear, we have used males from other populations, but of the same species, as surrogates, to carry out a direct extrapolation of the results. Urospermia – Moreover, 70% of the ejaculates are urine contaminated and spermagglutination have a detrimental effect on post‐thawing cell quality recovery in this species. Considering the high value of these samples (autochthonous population with few individuals), a pre‐selection of the ejaculates is not a viable alternative. Preventive methods reducing the mentioned detrimental effects need to be developed. On the basis of previous data, we can suppose that bear spermatozoa resist freezing injuries well. Nevertheless, because of the scarcity of this information, it is necessary to conduct further research on bear semen freezing under field conditions. Epidydimal spermatozoa can be important for genetic resource banking of threatened populations and thus specific cryobiological protocols need to be assayed. To date, 168 brown bear ejaculates have been frozen by the ITRA‐ULE group at the University of León (Spain) in the development of methodologies for the preservation of brown bear sperm.S

Genome edited sheep and cattle

Genome editing tools enable efficient and accurate genome manipulation. An enhanced ability to modify the genomes of livestock species could be utilized to improve disease resistance, productivity or breeding capability as well as the generation of new biomedical models. To date, with respect to the direct injection of genome editor mRNA into livestock zygotes, this technology has been limited to the generation of pigs with edited genomes. To capture the far-reaching applications of gene-editing, from disease modelling to agricultural improvement, the technology must be easily applied to a number of species using a variety of approaches. In this study, we demonstrate zygote injection of TALEN mRNA can also produce gene-edited cattle and sheep. In both species we have targeted the myostatin (MSTN) gene. In addition, we report a critical innovation for application of gene-editing to the cattle industry whereby gene-edited calves can be produced with specified genetics by ovum pickup, in vitro fertilization and zygote microinjection (OPU-IVF-ZM). This provides a practical alternative to somatic cell nuclear transfer for gene knockout or introgression of desirable alleles into a target breed/genetic line

Epigenetics and developmental programming of welfare and production traits in farm animals

The concept that postnatal health and development can be influenced by events that occur in utero originated from epidemiological studies in humans supported by numerous mechanistic (including epigenetic) studies in a variety of model species. Referred to as the ‘developmental origins of health and disease’ or ‘DOHaD’ hypothesis, the primary focus of large-animal studies until quite recently had been biomedical. Attention has since turned towards traits of commercial importance in farm animals. Herein we review the evidence that prenatal risk factors, including suboptimal parental nutrition, gestational stress, exposure to environmental chemicals and advanced breeding technologies, can determine traits such as postnatal growth, feed efficiency, milk yield, carcass composition, animal welfare and reproductive potential. We consider the role of epigenetic and cytoplasmic mechanisms of inheritance, and discuss implications for livestock production and future research endeavours. We conclude that although the concept is proven for several traits, issues relating to effect size, and hence commercial importance, remain. Studies have also invariably been conducted under controlled experimental conditions, frequently assessing single risk factors, thereby limiting their translational value for livestock production. We propose concerted international research efforts that consider multiple, concurrent stressors to better represent effects of contemporary animal production systems

Comparison of the efficacy of conventional slow freezing and rapid cryopreservation methods for bovine embryos

Day 7 bovine morulae and early blastocysts were randomly assigned to one of four cryopreservation methods: (i) a modified conventional controlled slow freezing and stepwise dilution after thawing; and three methods which enable direct transfer of the embryo into the recipient upon thawing: (ii) conventional controlled slow freezing and a modification of a one-step procedure, (iii) vitrification with 6.5 M glycerol plus 6% BSA (w/v), and (iv) vitrification with 25% glycerol (v/v) and 25% propanediol (v/v). In a comparative in vitro study, the percentage of grade 1 and 2 embryos developing into expanded blastocysts in culture for cryopreservation methods 1-4 were, respectively, 53% (29/55), 33% (20/61), 44% (26/59), and 51% (17/33). Method 2 yielded a significantly lower survival rate than methods 1 (P 0.1) when compared to method 1. Method 3 has considerable promise in providing a successful method for the cryopreservation of bovine embryos that (i) reduces the time required for equilibration and cooling, (ii) provides for simple and rapid one-step dilution of cryoprotectant after thawing, and (iii) enables more embryos to be thawed and transferred per unit time

Comparison of the efficacy of conventional slow freezing and rapid cryopreservation methods for bovine embryos

Day 7 bovine morulae and early blastocysts were randomly assigned to one of four cryopreservation methods: (i) a modified conventional controlled slow freezing and stepwise dilution after thawing; and three methods which enable direct transfer of the embryo into the recipient upon thawing: (ii) conventional controlled slow freezing and a modification of a one-step procedure, (iii) vitrification with 6.5 M glycerol plus 6% BSA (w/v), and (iv) vitrification with 25% glycerol (v/v) and 25% propanediol (v/v). In a comparative in vitro study, the percentage of grade 1 and 2 embryos developing into expanded blastocysts in culture for cryopreservation methods 1-4 were, respectively, 53% (29/55), 33% (20/61), 44% (26/59), and 51% (17/33). Method 2 yielded a significantly lower survival rate than methods 1 (P 0.1) when compared to method 1. Method 3 has considerable promise in providing a successful method for the cryopreservation of bovine embryos that (i) reduces the time required for equilibration and cooling, (ii) provides for simple and rapid one-step dilution of cryoprotectant after thawing, and (iii) enables more embryos to be thawed and transferred per unit time