Orientation discrimination across the visual field: matching perceived contrast near threshold

AbstractPerformance can often be made equal across the visual field by scaling peripherally presented stimuli according to F=1+E/E2 where E2 is the eccentricity at which stimulus size must double to maintain foveal performance levels. Previous studies suggest that E2 for orientation discrimination is in the range of 1.5°–2° when stimuli are presented at contrasts well above detection threshold. Recent psychophysical and physiological evidence suggests spatial reorganization of receptive fields at near-threshold contrasts. Such contrast-dependent changes in receptive field structure might alter the amount of size scaling necessary to equate task performance across the visual field. To examine this question we measured orientation discrimination thresholds for a range of stimulus sizes and eccentricities (0°–15°). We used the same procedure previously employed except that stimuli were presented at near-threshold contrasts. We controlled for the effects of perceptual contrast on thresholds through a matching procedure. A standard line of 3° in length presented at fixation was set to 2 just noticeable differences above detection threshold. The perceived contrast of all other stimuli was adjusted by the subject to match this one. Orientation discrimination thresholds were then obtained at these matching contrasts for all stimulus sizes and eccentricities. E2 values of 3.42° and 3.50° were recovered for two subjects; these values were about a factor of two larger than E2 values previously found for this task when stimuli were presented at higher physical contrasts

Backward masking and the central performance drop

AbstractKehrer [Spatial Vision 2 (1987) 247] found that texture discrimination performance sometimes peaks in the parafovea rather than at the fovea, and he referred to this phenomenon as the central performance drop (CPD). Kehrer used a backward mask to limit performance and Morikawa [Vision Res. 40 (2000) 3517] argued that in some cases the temporal aspects of the backward mask may be critical to the emergence of the CPD. In one experiment Morikawa showed that the CPD does not emerge when a simultaneous noise-mask (different from the mask used by Kehrer) is used to limit performance. In another experiment Morikawa showed that unmasked texture displays comprising short lines do not elicit the CPD. In both cases, changes in the temporal aspects of the texture displays were accompanied by changes in the spatial structure of the mask or stimulus. For the spatio-temporal theory of the CPD to be sustained one would have to show that noise masks elicit a CPD when used as backward masks and that the short-line textures elicit a CPD when followed by backward masks. Our evidence provides little if any support for either of these predictions. Furthermore, an analysis of a simple filter-rectify-filter model of texture segmentation shows that a greatly attenuated CPD is to be expected when a noise mask is used as a source of spatial noise

Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry

AbstractTo assess the role of second-order channels in symmetry perception we measured the effects of check size, spatial frequency content, eccentricity and grey scale range on the detection of symmetrical and anti-symmetrical patterns. Thresholds for symmetrical stimuli were only moderately affected by these manipulations. Anti-symmetrical stimuli composed of large black and white checks elicited low thresholds. However, anti-symmetry became essentially undetectable at small check sizes. Removing low frequencies from large-check-size, anti-symmetrical stimuli had little effect on thresholds whereas removing high frequencies had a pronounced effect. Moving the stimuli from fixation to 8° eccentricity caused a dramatic increase in thresholds for anti-symmetrical stimuli but not symmetrical stimuli. When the grey scale range was increased anti-symmetry was undetectable at any check size whereas symmetry was easily seen at all. We argue that these results and others in the literature suggest that anti-symmetry is only detected under conditions favourable to selective attention

1862-08-20 Captain F.A. Gurnsey requests Adjutant General Hodsdon\u27s signature on recruiting paperwork

https://digitalmaine.com/cw_me_2nd_regiment_corr/1457/thumbnail.jp

NA

http://www.archive.org/details/analysisofapplic00frosU.S. Navy (U.S.N.) authors

Object integration requires attention: visual search for Kanizsa figures in parietal extinction

The contribution of selective attention to object integration is a topic of debate: integration of parts into coherent wholes, such as in Kanizsa figures, is thought to arise either from pre-attentive, automatic coding processes or from higher-order processes involving selective attention. Previous studies have attempted to examine the role of selective attention in object integration either by employing visual search paradigms or by studying patients with unilateral deficits in selective attention. Here, we combined these two approaches to investigate object integration in visual search in a group of five patients with left-sided parietal extinction. Our search paradigm was designed to assess the effect of left- and right-grouped nontargets on detecting a Kanizsa target square. The results revealed comparable reaction time (RT) performance in patients and controls when they were presented with displays consisting of a single to-be-grouped item that had to be classified as target vs. nontarget. However, when display size increased to two items, patients showed an extinction-specific pattern of enhanced RT costs for nontargets that induced a partial shape grouping on the right, i.e., in the attended hemifield (relative to the ungrouped baseline). Together, these findings demonstrate a competitive advantage for right-grouped objects, which in turn indicates that in parietal extinction, attentional competition between objects particularly limits integration processes in the contralesional, i.e., left hemifield. These findings imply a crucial contribution of selective attentional resources to visual object integration

Increased Sensitivity to Mirror Symmetry in Autism

Can autistic people see the forest for the trees? Ongoing uncertainty about the integrity and role of global processing in autism gives special importance to the question of how autistic individuals group local stimulus attributes into meaningful spatial patterns. We investigated visual grouping in autism by measuring sensitivity to mirror symmetry, a highly-salient perceptual image attribute preceding object recognition. Autistic and non-autistic individuals were asked to detect mirror symmetry oriented along vertical, oblique, and horizontal axes. Both groups performed best when the axis was vertical, but across all randomly-presented axis orientations, autistics were significantly more sensitive to symmetry than non-autistics. We suggest that under some circumstances, autistic individuals can take advantage of parallel access to local and global information. In other words, autistics may sometimes see the forest and the trees, and may therefore extract from noisy environments genuine regularities which elude non-autistic observers

Texture Segregation By Visual Cortex: Perceptual Grouping, Attention, and Learning

A neural model is proposed of how laminar interactions in the visual cortex may learn and recognize object texture and form boundaries. The model brings together five interacting processes: region-based texture classification, contour-based boundary grouping, surface filling-in, spatial attention, and object attention. The model shows how form boundaries can determine regions in which surface filling-in occurs; how surface filling-in interacts with spatial attention to generate a form-fitting distribution of spatial attention, or attentional shroud; how the strongest shroud can inhibit weaker shrouds; and how the winning shroud regulates learning of texture categories, and thus the allocation of object attention. The model can discriminate abutted textures with blurred boundaries and is sensitive to texture boundary attributes like discontinuities in orientation and texture flow curvature as well as to relative orientations of texture elements. The model quantitatively fits a large set of human psychophysical data on orientation-based textures. Object boundar output of the model is compared to computer vision algorithms using a set of human segmented photographic images. The model classifies textures and suppresses noise using a multiple scale oriented filterbank and a distributed Adaptive Resonance Theory (dART) classifier. The matched signal between the bottom-up texture inputs and top-down learned texture categories is utilized by oriented competitive and cooperative grouping processes to generate texture boundaries that control surface filling-in and spatial attention. Topdown modulatory attentional feedback from boundary and surface representations to early filtering stages results in enhanced texture boundaries and more efficient learning of texture within attended surface regions. Surface-based attention also provides a self-supervising training signal for learning new textures. Importance of the surface-based attentional feedback in texture learning and classification is tested using a set of textured images from the Brodatz micro-texture album. Benchmark studies vary from 95.1% to 98.6% with attention, and from 90.6% to 93.2% without attention.Air Force Office of Scientific Research (F49620-01-1-0397, F49620-01-1-0423); National Science Foundation (SBE-0354378); Office of Naval Research (N00014-01-1-0624

Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight

We report results from two experiments assessing distribution of attention and cue use in adults with dyslexia (AwD) and in a group of typically reading controls. Experiment 1 showed normal effects of cueing in AwD, with faster responses when probes were presented within a cued area and normal effects of eccentricity and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). In addition, AwD showed stronger benefits of a longer SOA when they had to move attention farther, and stronger effects of inclusion on the left, suggesting that cueing is particularly important in more difficult conditions. Experiment 2 tested the use of cues in a texture detection task involving a wider range of eccentricities and a shorter SOA. In this paradigm, focused attention at the central location is actually detrimental and cueing further reduces performance. Thus, if AwD have a more distributed attention, they should show a reduced performance drop at central locations and, if they do not use cues, they should show less negative effects of cueing. In contrast, AwD showed a larger drop and a positive effect of cueing. These results are better accounted for by a smaller and weaker spotlight of attention. Performance does not decrease at central locations because the attentional spotlight is already deployed with maximum intensity, which cannot be further enhanced at central locations. Instead, use of cueing helps to focus limited resources. Cues orient attention to the right area without enhancing it to the point where this is detrimental for texture detection. Implications for reading are discussed