Parentification, distress, and relationship with parents as factors shaping the relationship between adult siblings and their brother/sister with disabilities

According to parentification theory, when the siblings of a brother/sister with disabilities assume parent-like duties, this role reversal is known as sibling-focused parentification. It has a significant impact on these siblings’ distress and the quality of their family relationships; 605 Italian adult siblings (19–26 years) of people with disabilities completed the online survey. Measures of siblings’ parentification, distress, quality of family relationships, social support, and perceived benefits of parentification were used. The hypothesized model aims to test, on the target sample, the distress and the quality of the relationship with parents as mediators on the interplay between the siblings’ parentification and their sibling relationship. Additionally, social support and perceived benefits of parentification as protective factors were considered. Results showed that the distress and the low quality of the relationship with parents negatively affected the interplay between the siblings’ parentification and the relationship with their own brother/sister with disabilities. Social support and the perceived benefits of parentification decreased the siblings’ distress levels; the perceived benefits of parentification served as a protective factor for the quality of the relationship with parents. Current findings extend the knowledge regarding the risk and protective factors of the siblings’ mental health when disability occurs in the family. Additionally, they inform family-based intervention programs, which should involve the whole family system for reducing distress and improving the wellbeing of siblings without disabilities

Parentification, distress, and relationship with parents as factors shaping the relationship between adult siblings and their brother/sister with disabilities

According to parentification theory, when the siblings of a brother/sister with disabilities assume parent-like duties, this role reversal is known as sibling-focused parentification. It has a significant impact on these siblings’ distress and the quality of their family relationships; 605 Italian adult siblings (19–26 years) of people with disabilities completed the online survey. Measures of siblings’ parentification, distress, quality of family relationships, social support, and perceived benefits of parentification were used. The hypothesized model aims to test, on the target sample, the distress and the quality of the relationship with parents as mediators on the interplay between the siblings’ parentification and their sibling relationship. Additionally, social support and perceived benefits of parentification as protective factors were considered. Results showed that the distress and the low quality of the relationship with parents negatively affected the interplay between the siblings’ parentification and the relationship with their own brother/sister with disabilities. Social support and the perceived benefits of parentification decreased the siblings’ distress levels; the perceived benefits of parentification served as a protective factor for the quality of the relationship with parents. Current findings extend the knowledge regarding the risk and protective factors of the siblings’ mental health when disability occurs in the family. Additionally, they inform family-based intervention programs, which should involve the whole family system for reducing distress and improving the wellbeing of siblings without disabilities

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Sustainable, Flexible, and Biocompatible Enhanced Piezoelectric Chitosan Thin Film for Compliant Piezosensors for Human Health

none13noneGaia Marzo; Vincenzo M. Mastronardi; Luciana Algieri; Federica Vergari; Filippo Pisano; Luca Fachechi; Sergio Marras; Lara Natta; Barbara Spagnolo; Virgilio Brunetti; Francesco Rizzi; Ferruccio Pisanello; Massimo De VittorioDE MARZO, Gaia; Mastronardi, Vincenzo M.; Algieri, Luciana; Vergari, Federica; Pisano, Filippo; Fachechi, Luca; Marras, Sergio; Natta, Lara; Spagnolo, Barbara; Brunetti, Virgilio; Rizzi, Francesco; Pisanello, Ferruccio; DE VITTORIO, Massim

Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in severe ASA III elderly population: a pilot trial

BACKGROUND: Patients affected by hip fracture (HF) have high risk of perioperative complications. Despite regional anesthesia is widely used, hypotension is common and increases the risk of myocardial ischemia. The aim of this work was to study hemodynamic changes following spinal (SA) and general (GA) anesthesia in this selected population of patients. METHODS: Twenty patients over 70 years, ASA III, scheduled for HF repair were randomized to receive SA or general anesthesia GA. Hemodynamic responses to SA and GA were analyzed trough LiDCO\u2122plus monitor (LiDCO Ltd., Cambridge, UK). RESULTS: SA provided a more stable hemodynamic profile. SA group received less interventions to keep mean arterial pressure (MAP) within limits. GA group had intraoperative cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI) and MAP significantly lower than baseline. Despite both groups experienced hypotension after the induction, MAP reduction in SA group was primarily due to systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) decline, whereas hypotension in GA group was primarily due to a reduction in SVI and CI. The coefficient of variation (CV) was significantly higher in GA group for CI, SVI, MAP and heart rate (HR) within one hour analysis comparing to SA group. SA group had an higher CV for SVRI. CONCLUSION: SA in the elderly population with hip fracture provides a more stable hemodynamic profile requiring less intervention to keep MAP close to baseline value. Hypotension was common in SA and GA after induction and within intraoperative period. A larger randomized clinical study should be performed to confirm these preliminary data