Maximizing the ecological contribution of conservation banks

In 1995, California established the first conservation banking program in the United States to provide a new financial mechanism to conserve wildlife and natural communities in rapidly developing regions. Conservation banks are lands protected and managed for conservation of species of concern. Developers may purchase species credits from a conservation bank to offset adverse impacts of development at another site. Conservation banks facilitate pooling of mitigation resources from multiple development projects to protect planned habitat reserves of greater ecological value than can be achieved with project-byproject mitigation. In this study, we conducted the first ever assessment of the ecological performance of the California Conservation Banking Program. Specifically, we investigated to what extent conservation banks contribute to achieving regional conservation objectives.We hypothesized that conservation banks within a region should have similarly high ecological values if they are appropriately evaluated and prioritized based on principles of conservation planning. We created a new ecological value metric to evaluate and rank conservation banks and used it to compare potential conservation banks or reserves within a region. We found the ecological value of banks within regions varied and concluded that maximizing the ecological contribution of conservation banks requires prioritization of lands for potential bank sites and reserves. Our analysis identified circumstances where conservation banking is not an appropriate mitigation mechanism to protect rare species and natural communities. We concluded that limited funding for conservation planning should be directed toward regions where species of concern are wide-ranging, biodiversity is highly variable, threats to species of concern are highly varied, and there are many potential conservation bank sites. © 2013 The Wildlife Society

Population Size of Hatchery-Reared and Wild Pallid Sturgeon in the Lower Missouri River

The population size of pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus is currently unknown throughout much of the Missouri River. Listed as federally endangered in 1990, the pallid sturgeon remains one of the rarest fishes in the Missouri and Mississippi River basins, and little to no natural recruitment occurs. Artificial population supplementation via a hatchery propagation program was initiated, necessitating the collection of sexually mature pallid sturgeon. Therefore, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission maintained an intensive broodstock collection and mark– recapture effort from 2008 to 2010 to capture reproductively ready adults for the propagation program. Coordinated crews fished baited trotlines from the confluence of the Platte and Missouri rivers at river kilometer (rkm) 957.6 to a point about 80.5 rkm downstream. A total of 438 pallid sturgeon were captured, which amounts to a 7.8% recapture rate. The objectives of the study were to (1) use these data to estimate the annual population sizes of wild-origin and hatchery-reared pallid sturgeon within the above-mentioned 80.5-rkm reach of the lower Missouri River and (2) compare current population levels with the Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Team’s population objective. We used the mark–recapture data in a robust-design analysis to derive population estimates and annual survival, capture, and temporary emigration rates. The annual population estimate for wild pallid sturgeon varied from 5.4 to 8.9 fish/rkm, whereas the estimate for known hatchery-reared fish varied from 28.6 to 32.3 fish/rkm. The robust-design approach to our analysis resulted in useful estimates of population size and other variables important to quantifying species recovery and management targets; the approach may be suitable for other fisheries management data sets