34 research outputs found
Intra- and inter-observer analysis in the morphological assessment of early-stage embryos
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability in the evaluation of embryo quality. Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using different morphological parameters.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Multilevel images of embryos on day 1, day 2 and day 3, were analysed using a standard scoring system. The kappa coefficient was calculated to measure intra- and inter-observer variability before and after training sessions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Good to excellent intra-observer agreement was present for most parameters exceptions being scoring the position of pronuclei and the presence of a cytoplasmic halo on day 1, multinucleation on day 2 and the size of fragments on day 3. Inter-observer agreement was only good to excellent for the number of blastomeres on day 2 and day 3 and the orientation of the cleavage axes on day 2. Training sessions had a positive impact on inter-observer agreement.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In conclusion, assessment of morphological characteristics of early stage embryos using multilevel images was marked by a high intra-observer and a moderate inter-observer agreement. Training sessions were useful to increase inter-observer agreement.</p
Effect of a Proposed Trastuzumab Biosimilar Compared With Trastuzumab on Overall Response Rate in Patients With ERBB2 (HER2)–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. A Randomized Clinical Trial
IMPORTANCE Treatment with the anti-ERBB2 humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab
and chemotherapy significantly improves outcome in patients with ERBB2 (HER2)–positive
metastatic breast cancer; a clinically effective biosimilar may help increase access to this therapy.
OBJECTIVE To compare the overall response rate and assess the safety of a proposed
trastuzumab biosimilar plus a taxane or trastuzumab plus a taxane in patients without prior
treatment for ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group,
phase 3 equivalence study in patients with metastatic breast cancer. From December 2012 to
August 2015, 500 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a proposed biosimilar or
trastuzumab plus a taxane. Chemotherapy was administered for at least 24 weeks followed
by antibody alone until unacceptable toxic effects or disease progression occurred.
INTERVENTIONS Proposed biosimilar (n = 230) or trastuzumab (n = 228) with a taxane.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was week 24 overall response rate
(ORR) defined as complete or partial response. Equivalence boundaries were 0.81 to 1.24
with a 90% CI for ORR ratio (proposed biosimilar/trastuzumab) and −15% to 15% with a 95%
CI for ORR difference. Secondary outcome measures included time to tumor progression,
progression-free and overall survival at week 48, and adverse events.
RESULTS Among 500 women randomized, the intention-to-treat population included 458
women (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [11.11] years) and the safety population included 493 women.
The ORR was 69.6% (95% CI, 63.62%-75.51%) for the proposed biosimilar vs 64.0% (95% CI,
57.81%-70.26%) for trastuzumab. The ORR ratio (1.09; 90% CI, 0.974-1.211) and ORR difference
(5.53; 95% CI, −3.08 to 14.04) were within the equivalence boundaries. At week 48, there was no
statistically significant difference with the proposed biosimilar vs trastuzumab for time to tumor
progression (41.3% vs 43.0%; −1.7%; 95% CI, −11.1% to 6.9%), progression-free survival (44.3%
vs 44.7%; −0.4%; 95% CI, −9.4% to 8.7%), or overall survival (89.1% vs 85.1%; 4.0%; 95% CI,
−2.1% to 10.3%). In the proposed biosimilar and trastuzumab groups, 239 (98.6%) and 233
(94.7%) had at least 1 adverse event, the most common including neutropenia (57.5% vs 53.3%),
peripheral neuropathy (23.1% vs 24.8%), and diarrhea (20.6% vs 20.7%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women with ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer
receiving taxanes, the use of a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar compared with trastuzumab
resulted in an equivalent overall response rate at 24 weeks. Further study is needed to assess
safety and long-term clinical outcome.
TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02472964; EudraCT Identifier:
2011-001965-4
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. To assess the impact of this flexibility on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) results, the same dataset was independently analyzed by 70 teams, testing nine ex-ante hypotheses. The flexibility of analytic approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyze the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in hypothesis test results, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of their analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Importantly, meta-analytic approaches that aggregated information across teams yielded significant consensus in activated regions across teams. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset. Our findings show that analytic flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and demonstrate factors related to variability in fMRI. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. To assess the impact of this flexibility on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) results, the same dataset was independently analyzed by 70 teams, testing nine ex-ante hypotheses. The flexibility of analytic approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyze the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in hypothesis test results, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of their analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Importantly, meta-analytic approaches that aggregated information across teams yielded significant consensus in activated regions across teams. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset. Our findings show that analytic flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and demonstrate factors related to variability in fMRI. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed
Is time since vasectomy more important as prognostic factor for pregnancy and live birth than female and laboratory variables when treating vasectomised man using ICSI?
Randomized controlled trial of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist microdose flare‐up versus flare‐up among poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Can sliding-window analysis map time-varying connectivity? Validation using fear conditioning data
Recommended from our members
Decision-Making with Naturalistic Options
How do humans generalise to make better decisions? Previous work has investigated this question using reward-guided decision-making tasks with low-dimensional and artificial stimuli. In this paper, we extend this work by presenting participants with a naturalistic decision-making task, in which options were images of real-world objects and the underlying reward function was based on one of their latent dimensions. Even though participants received no explicit instruction about object features, they quickly learned to do the task and generalised to unseen objects. To understand how they accomplished this, we tested a range of computational models and found that human behaviour is overall best explained by a linear model but that participants’ strategies changed during the experiment. Lastly, we showed that combining pixel-based representations extracted from convolutional neural networks with the original latent dimensions further improved our models. Taken together, our study offers new insights into human decision making under naturalistic settings