32 research outputs found
Knee stability assessment on anterior cruciate ligament injury: Clinical and biomechanical approaches
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is common in knee joint accounting for 40% of sports injury. ACL injury leads to knee instability, therefore, understanding knee stability assessments would be useful for diagnosis of ACL injury, comparison between operation treatments and establishing return-to-sport standard. This article firstly introduces a management model for ACL injury and the contribution of knee stability assessment to the corresponding stages of the model. Secondly, standard clinical examination, intra-operative stability measurement and motion analysis for functional assessment are reviewed. Orthopaedic surgeons and scientists with related background are encouraged to understand knee biomechanics and stability assessment for ACL injury patients
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.
BACKGROUND: Assistive products are items which allow older people and people with disabilities to be able to live a healthy, productive and dignified life. It has been estimated that approximately 1.5% of the world's population need a prosthesis or orthosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically identify and review the evidence from randomized controlled trials assessing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions. METHODS: Literature searches, completed in September 2015, were carried out in fourteen databases between years 1995 and 2015. The search results were independently screened by two reviewers. For the purpose of this manuscript, only randomized controlled trials which examined interventions using orthotic or prosthetic devices were selected for data extraction and synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 342 randomised controlled trials were identified (319 English language and 23 non-English language). Only 4 of these randomised controlled trials examined prosthetic interventions and the rest examined orthotic interventions. These orthotic interventions were categorised based on the medical conditions/injuries of the participants. From these studies, this review focused on the medical condition/injuries with the highest number of randomised controlled trials (osteoarthritis, fracture, stroke, carpal tunnel syndrome, plantar fasciitis, anterior cruciate ligament, diabetic foot, rheumatoid and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankle sprain, cerebral palsy, lateral epicondylitis and low back pain). The included articles were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Details of the clinical population examined, the type of orthotic/prosthetic intervention, the comparator/s and the outcome measures were extracted. Effect sizes and odds ratios were calculated for all outcome measures, where possible. CONCLUSIONS: At present, for prosthetic and orthotic interventions, the scientific literature does not provide sufficient high quality research to allow strong conclusions on their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
Anterior cruciate ligament injury : factors affecting selection of treatment and intermediate outcome
Aim: The aim of this comprehensive study was to evaluate whether anterior
cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patients choosing non-operative treatment
differ from those choosing ACL reconstruction regarding age, gender,
personality, activity level prior to injury, anterior-posterior knee
joint laxity and outcome as evaluated using the Knee Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS) five weeks following the ACL injury. Furthermore the
reasons for choosing reconstruction were studied to determine whether
patients who choose reconstructive surgery early do so for the same
reasons as patients who choose reconstruction later. The aim was also to
identify factors, such as gender, personality and subsequent knee trauma,
affecting the outcome six years after the injury as well as to study the
effects of a functional knee brace on ACL-deficient patients early in the
rehabilitation process.
Material and methods: The subjects participating in this comprehensive
study were between 18 and 50 years and had sustained a unilateral ACL
tear within the past five weeks. At the time of inclusion the subjects
completed the Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP). The
subjects were continuously evaluated with the KOOS, the Cincinnati knee
score, the Tegner score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-10, the KT-1
000 arthrometer and the Biodex System 3. Subjects who chose to undergo
ACL reconstruction were asked to report the reasons relevant for their
decision. At the six years follow-up the subjects completed the KOOS, the
Tegner score and a questionnaire to determine ACL reconstruction and
subsequent knee trauma. Medical records were reviewed.
Results: The subjects who chose non-operative treatment had a lower
pre-injury activity level and were older than those who chose to undergo
ACL reconstruction. Further, they displayed less irritability and less
aggression at the time of entry into the study than the subjects who
later chose reconstructive surgery. Neither outcome, as evaluated using
the KOOS within five weeks after the ACL injury, sagital knee joint
laxity nor gender did correlate with treatment selection.
The decision to undergo early reconstruction was in 15/20 (75 %) subjects
based on concerns about future knee problems and not on their experience
of knee dysfunction. Fourteen of the sixteen (88 %) subjects who chose
delayed reconstructive surgery, based their decision on their experience
of knee dysfunction.
At the six years follow-up the subjects who had sustained additional knee
trauma after their ACL injury had a significantly worse outcome according
to the KOOS than the other subjects. There were no significant
differences in the KOOS between the subjects who had undergone ACL
reconstruction and those who were treated non-operatively. Furthermore
neither age, gender, pre-injury activity level, personality nor history
of meniscus and/or articular cartilage injury seemed to have an effect on
the outcome at follow-up.
When using the brace the subjects in the brace group reported
significantly less knee instability as measured with the VAS than the
control group. There was no difference between the groups with respect to
pain, discomfort, ability to walk on even ground, stair climbing or
ability to perform preinjury physical activities as measured with the
VAS. Furthermore, bracing had no effect on any of the variables in the
KOOS or the Cincinnati knee score and no effect on quadriceps or
hamstring muscle peak torque. However, a vast majority of the subjects in
the brace group noted that they experienced improved stability and a
positive effect on rehabilitation when using the brace
Introducing Linux and open source
Ericsson is adapting its products and work processes to take advantage of opportunities afforded by open-source software. In particular, the Linux operating system (OS) has become an important component for Ericsson. The authors describe the use of Linux and open-source software in Ericsson products and how they benefit Ericsson’s customers. They also touch on the characteristics of open-source software and present a new Linux-based building block for Ericsson’s Integrated Site applications. Background The communications industry is moving toward systems that are based on modular and common, off-the-shelf hardware and software components. The underpinnings of this transition are open standards and architectures (Box A, Item I). Open architectures and the standardizatio