Profiles of physical, emotional and psychosocial wellbeing in the Lothian birth cohort 1936

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Physical, emotional, and psychosocial wellbeing are important domains of function. The aims of this study were to explore the existence of separable groups among 70-year olds with scores representing physical function, perceived quality of life, and emotional wellbeing, and to characterise any resulting groups using demographic, personality, cognition, health and lifestyle variables.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify possible groups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results suggested there were 5 groups. These included High (n = 515, 47.2% of the sample), Average (n = 417, 38.3%), and Poor Wellbeing (n = 37, 3.4%) groups. The two other groups had contrasting patterns of wellbeing: one group scored relatively well on physical function, but low on emotional wellbeing (Good Fitness/ Low Spirits,n = 60, 5.5%), whereas the other group showed low physical function but relatively well emotional wellbeing (Low Fitness/Good Spirits, n = 62, 5.7%). Salient characteristics that distinguished all the groups included smoking and drinking behaviours, personality, and illness.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Despite there being some evidence of these groups, the results also support a largely one-dimensional construct of wellbeing in old age—for the domains assessed here—though with some evidence that some individuals have uneven profiles.</p

Changes in care provision to older parents during COVID-19 and the well-being of adult children: The moderating roles of the child-parent relationship and pandemic-related measures

Objective: The study addresses the associations between changes in care provision to older parents since the pandemic and worsened depression and anxiety in adult children. It also explores whether pandemic-related control measures and child-parent relationships moderated these associations. Background: Changes in informal care during the pandemic, such as increased or decreased caregiving frequency, may have affected caregivers’ psychological well-being. Limited research exists on how stressors and resources shape the well-being of adult children caregivers. Method: Data from 740 respondents in the first SHARE Corona Survey (SCS) who provided care for their parents during the pandemic were analyzed. Changes in depression and anxiety were assessed using data from SCS and pre-pandemic Wave. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, with added interactions between the moderators - pandemic measures and child-parent relationship characteristics - and changes in care frequency. Results: Increased caregiving frequency during the pandemic was associated with worsened depression. Stricter pandemic measures intensified this effect but also reduced the likelihood of anxiety for those who provided care less often. A higher quality of relationship with the mother in childhood was marginally associated with lower depression among those increasing caregiving but worsened depression for those decreasing it. Conclusion: To address post-pandemic caregiving challenges, efforts should focus on reducing caregiver stress and considering the enduring influence of early child-parent relationships.Fragestellung: Die Studie untersucht die Zusammenhänge zwischen Veränderungen in der Pflege älterer Eltern seit der Pandemie und einer Verschlechterung von Depressionen und Angstzuständen bei erwachsenen Kindern. Außerdem wird untersucht, ob pandemiebezogene Kontrollmaßnahmen und die Beziehungen zwischen Kindern und Eltern diese Zusammenhänge moderieren. Hintergrund: Veränderungen in der informellen Pflege während der Pandemie, wie eine erhöhte oder verringerte Pflegefrequenz, könnten das psychische Wohlbefinden der Pflegepersonen beeinflusst haben. Es gibt nur wenige Untersuchungen darüber, wie Stressfaktoren und Ressourcen das Wohlbefinden von erwachsenen Kindern, die ihre Eltern pflegen, beeinflussen. Methode: Es wurden die Daten von 740 Befragten der ersten SHARE-Corona-Umfrage (SCS) analysiert, die ihre Eltern während der Pandemie pflegten. Veränderungen bei Depressionen und Ängsten wurden anhand von Daten aus der SCS und der Welle vor der Pandemie untersucht. Es wurden logistische Regressionsanalysen durchgeführt, die Interaktionen zwischen den Moderatoren - Pandemiemaßnahmen und Merkmale der Eltern-Kind-Beziehung - und Veränderungen in der Betreuungshäufigkeit einschlossen. Ergebnisse: Eine erhöhte Pflegehäufigkeit während der Pandemie war mit einer höheren Depressivität assoziiert. Strengere pandemiebedingte Maßnahmen verstärkten diesen Effekt, reduzierten jedoch auch die Wahrscheinlichkeit von Angstzuständen bei denen, die weniger häufig Pflege leisteten. Eine höhere Qualität der Beziehung zur Mutter in der Kindheit war geringfügig mit einer verminderten Depressivität bei denjenigen assoziiert, die ihre Betreuungsintensität erhöhten, aber mit einer Zunahme der Depressivität bei denjenigen, die sie verringerten. Schlussfolgerung: Um die Herausforderungen der Pflege nach der Pandemie zu adressieren, sollten sich die Bemühungen darauf konzentrieren, den Stress der Pflegepersonen zu reduzieren und den dauerhaften Einfluss der frühen Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen zu berücksichtigen

Pathways from ageism to loneliness

Many older adults in our society suffer from loneliness – a painful, distressing feeling arising from the perception that one’s social connections are inadequate. When loneliness is experienced over prolonged periods of time, it can become devastating to older adults’ physical and mental health. Loneliness has been associated with depression, cognitive decline, and mortality. As the ageing population around the world grows in size and proportion, tackling late life loneliness is becoming a top priority in both ethical and economic terms. Previous studies have attempted to attribute late life loneliness to individual (micro) and social network (meso)-level characteristics. We argue that ageism at the societal (macro)-level – encompassing stereotypes, prejudices, and de facto discrimination against older adults – predisposes the older population to neglect, social isolation, and ultimately, loneliness. We propose three mechanisms whereby ageism may contribute to loneliness. First, chronic social rejection may incline older adults to avoid and withdraw from social participation. Second, individuals may self-embody the stereotypes of old age such as old age being a time of loneliness. The last path is an objective one, which emphasizes age-based discriminatory practices that increase social exclusion of older adults thereby increasing their risk of becoming lonely

Improving community health networks for people with severe mental illness : a case study investigation

Introduction Policy drivers in mental health to address personal recovery, stigma and poor physical health indicate that new service solutions are required. This study aimed to understand how connections to people, places and activities were utilised by individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) to benefit health and wellbeing. Methods A five-module mixed-methods design was undertaken in two study sites. Data were collected from 150 network-mapping interviews and 41 in-depth follow-up interviews with people with SMI; in-depth interviews with 30 organisation stakeholders and 12 organisation leaders; and 44 telephone interviews with practitioners. We undertook a three-stage synthesis process including independent lived experience feedback, and a patient and public involvement team participated in tool design, data collection, analysis and write-up. Results Three personal network types were found in our study using the community health network approach: diverse and active; family and stable; formal and sparse. Controlled for other factors we found only four variables significantly associated with which network type a participant had: living alone or not; housing status; formal education; long-term sickness or disability. Diagnosis was not a factor. These variables are challenging to address but they do point to potential for network change. The qualitative interviews with people with SMI provided further understanding of connection-building and resource utilisation. We explored individual agency across each network type, and identified recognition of the importance and value of social support and active connection management alongside the risks of isolation, even for those most affected by mental illness. We identified tensions in personal networks, be that relationships with practitioners or families, dealing with the impact of stigma, or frustrations of not being in employment, which all impact on network resources and well-being. The value of connectedness within personal networks of people, place and activity for supporting recovery was evident in shaping identity, providing meaning to life and sense of belonging, gaining access to new resources, structuring routines and helping individuals ‘move on’ in their recovery journey. Health-care practitioners recognised that social factors were important in recovery but reported system-level barriers (workload, administrative bureaucracy, limited contact time with clients) in addressing these issues fully. Even practitioners working in third-sector services whose remit involved increasing clients’ social connection faced restrictions due to being evaluated by outcome criteria that limited holistic recovery-focused practices. Service providers were keen to promote recovery-focused approaches. We found contrasts between recovery ideology within mental health policy and recovery practice on the ground. In particular, the social aspects of supporting people with SMI are often underprioritised in the health-care system. In a demanding and changing context, strategic multiagency working was seen as crucial but we found few examples of embedded multisector organisation partnerships. Conclusion While our exploratory study has limitations, findings suggest potential for people with SMI to be supported to become more active managers of their personal networks to support well-being regardless of current network type. The health and social care system does not currently deliver multiagency integrated solutions to support SMI and social recovery

High frequency of pathogenic non-founder germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in families with breast and ovarian cancer in a founder population

Funding Information: This work was supported by State Research Program “Biomedicine for the public health (BIOMEDICINE)” project 5 “Personalised cancer diagnostics and treatment effectiveness evaluation”. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s).Background: Pathogenic BRCA1 founder mutations (c.4035delA, c.5266dupC) contribute to 3.77% of all consecutive primary breast cancers and 9.9% of all consecutive primary ovarian cancers. Identifying germline pathogenic gene variants in patients with primary breast and ovarian cancer could significantly impact the medical management of patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the rate of pathogenic mutations in the 26 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in patients who meet the criteria for BRCA1/2 testing and to compare the accuracy of different selection criteria for second-line testing in a founder population. Methods: Fifteen female probands and 1 male proband that met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for BRCA1/2 testing were included in the study and underwent 26-gene panel testing. Fourteen probands had breast cancer, one proband had ovarian cancer, and one proband had both breast and ovarian cancer. In a 26-gene panel, the following breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes were included: ATM, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, EPCAM, FAM175A, MEN1, MLH1, MRE11A, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53, and XRCC2. All patients previously tested negative for BRCA1 founder mutations. Results: In 44% (7 out of 16) of tested probands, pathogenic mutations were identified. Six probands carried pathogenic mutations in BRCA1, and one proband carried pathogenic mutations in BRCA2. In patients, a variant of uncertain significance was found in BRCA2, RAD50, MRE11A and CDH1. The Manchester scoring system showed a high accuracy (87.5%), high sensitivity (85.7%) and high specificity (88.9%) for the prediction of pathogenic non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations. Conclusion: A relatively high incidence of pathogenic non-founder BRCA1/2 mutations was observed in a founder population. The Manchester scoring system predicted the probability of non-founder pathogenic mutations with high accuracy.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Characterisation of Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X, Lynch syndrome and non-familial colorectal cancer

Background:Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCTX) is defined as individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) who families meet Amsterdam Criteria-1 (AC1), but whose tumours are DNA-mismatch-repair-proficient, unlike Lynch syndrome (LS). FCCTX does not have an increased risk of extra-colonic cancers. This analysis compares epidemiologic and clinicopathologic features among FCCTX, LS, and ‘non-familial' (non-AC1) CRC cases.Methods:From the Colon Cancer Family Registry, FCCTX (n=173), LS (n=303), and non-AC1 (n=9603) CRC cases were identified. Questionnaire-based epidemiologic information and CRC pathologic features were compared across case groups using polytomous logistic regression.Results:Compared with LS, FCCTX cases were less likely to be current (vs never) smokers; have a proximal subsite (vs rectal) tumour; or have mucinous histology, poor differentiation, or tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. There were no observed differences in co-morbidities or medication usage.Conclusions:FCCTX were less likely to be current tobacco users; other exposures were similar between these groups. Histopathologic differences highly suggestive of LS CRCs do not appear to be shared by FCCTX