54 research outputs found

    A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

    Get PDF
    Meeting abstrac

    Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-Free Surgical Pathways During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Comparative Cohort Study.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19-free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19-free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS: Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19-free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19-free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score-matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19-free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19-free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

    Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: An international, multicenter, comparative cohort study

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation). RESULTS Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76). CONCLUSION Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks

    Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

    Get PDF
    This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

    AnĂĄlisis de los aspectos logĂ­sticos y organizativos de un crucero para pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria crĂłnica. La ExpediciĂłn RESpIRA y el Crucero de la EPOC

    No full text
    Los pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria crĂłnica incluidos en programas de oxigenoterapia y ventilaciĂłn mecĂĄnica domiciliaria refieren tener habitualmente grandes dificultades para realizar viajes complejos que impliquen diferentes destinos y permanencias prolongadas fuera de su domicilio habitual. Todos ellos tienen en comĂșn la necesidad de disponer de un equipamiento tecnolĂłgico mĂĄs o menos sofisticado en casa que limita su libertad de movimientos. Hablamos de los sistemas de oxigenoterapia y respiradores mecĂĄnicos. Dadas las dificultades para viajar en aviĂłn que tienen este tipo de pacientes, nos planteamos que un crucero serĂ­a una alternativa ideal al ser el hotel el que se desplaza. Ello facilitarĂ­a la logĂ­stica del viaje, pues sĂłlo tendrĂ­amos que realizar la instalaciĂłn de los equipos en un Ășnico emplazamiento. Con estas premisas hemos organizado hasta la fecha 2 cruceros para enfermos respiratorios crĂłnicos, la ExpediciĂłn RESpIRA y el Crucero de la EPOC. En nuestra experiencia, los problemas a los que debemos enfrentarnos a la hora de organizar un crucero para pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria crĂłnica se relacionan con el reclutamiento de pacientes, la financiaciĂłn del viaje y la elecciĂłn del itinerario que vamos a realizar. Una vez aclarados estos aspectos, hay que conseguir la autorizaciĂłn de la compañía naviera correspondiente, con el visto bueno de los servicios mĂ©dicos y de seguridad de a bordo. Tras obtener el permiso para poder realizar el crucero y una vez que sepamos cuĂĄntos pacientes van a viajar, es necesario conocer quĂ© material vamos a necesitar en tĂ©rminos de nĂșmero de equipos de oxigenoterapia, respiradores y material fungible y, finalmente, dĂłnde lo vamos a conseguir. DespuĂ©s sĂłlo quedarĂĄ disfrutar de la excursiĂłn. La participaciĂłn de los mĂ©dicos responsables de los programas de oxigenoterapia y ventilaciĂłn mecĂĄnica domiciliaria es fundamental para transmitir seguridad a los pacientes y garantizar la soluciĂłn de los problemas tĂ©cnicos y mĂ©dicos que pueden presentarse durante el viaje
    • 

    corecore