Salud, optimismo y afrontamiento en trabajadores, profesionales y no profesionales, que trabajan con personas en riesgo social

145 p.La presente investigación tiene por objetivo, Identificar la relación entre Salud, Optimismo Disposicional y Estilos de Afrontamiento en Trabajadores, Profesionales y No Profesionales, que trabajan con personas en Riesgo Social, en la ciudad de Talca. Se evaluó a 119 trabajadores de diversas instituciones, dedicadas a la atención de personas vulnerables socialmente, con los siguientes instrumentos: el General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), el Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), y la Escala de Evaluación de Técnicas de Afrontamiento (COPE). Los resultados indican que: 1) un 18% de la muestra presenta una alteración en su funcionamiento emocional normal, 2) no se presenta una relación entre salud y optimismo disposicional, 3) la salud presenta correlaciones negativas con algunos estilos que conforman el afrontamiento centrado en el problema y correlaciones positivas con algunos estilos que conforman el afrontamiento de evitación, 4) el optimismo disposicional presenta una correlación positiva con el factor de afrontamiento centrado en el problema y con algunos estilos que conforman este factor, y una correlación negativa con la desconexión conductual, 5) y los trabajadores no profesionales presentan peor salud y utilizan con mayor frecuencia los estilos de afrontamiento de negación y desconexión conductual, en comparación a los trabajadores profesionales. Estos resultados podrían ser considerados en planes de intervención para estos trabajadores, basados en los estilos de afrontamiento asociados a una mejor salud y considerando el optimismo disposicional como una variable que promueve el desarrollo de estos estilos. Palabras clave: Salud, Optimismo, Afrontamiento

Plan de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Empresa Como En Casa.

Plan de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Empresa Como En Casa.La Responsabilidad Social Empresarial es la contribución al desarrollo humano sostenible, a través del compromiso y la confianza, además aborda una gran variedad de aspectos como hacer negocios basados en principios éticos y apegados a la ley, contribuyendo con el bienestar de los trabajadores, los derechos humanos, la privacidad, la discriminación en el lugar de trabajo, los derechos ambientales, las relaciones con la comunidad, etc. El presente trabajo corresponde a un plan de responsabilidad social de la empresa Como En Casa, donde se tiene en cuenta conceptos como código de ética, marketing social, marketing social corporativo y Stakeholders, los cuales representan un papel importante en el ámbito empresarial. La responsabilidad social empresarial se basa en una contribución activa y voluntaria equivalente a optimizar tres objetivos: equidad social, crecimiento económico y valor ecológico por parte de la empresa con el fin de mejorar el entorno social, económico y ambiental. Se tuvieron en cuenta diferentes metodologías como evaluaciones de desempeño, selección del Modelo de competitividad de Igor Ansoff , guías mundiales, código de conducta, mapa genérico de los Stakeholders y matriz de influencia vs impacto, por ultimo construimos el plan de responsabilidad social , donde planteamos los objetivos, estrategias, plazos estimados, recursos, indicadores y tipo de seguimiento teniendo en cuenta que dimensión se desempeñaba el Stakeholders, diseño del plan de comunicaciones y por último se realiza un modelo de informe de gestión, en resultado de esto se cumpliría con todas las pautas necesarias para desarrollar el plan de responsabilidad social empresarial .Corporate Social Responsibility is the contribution to sustainable human development, through commitment and trust, also addresses a wide variety of aspects such as doing specific business in ethical principles and in accordance with the law, contributing to the welfare of workers, human rights, privacy, discrimination in the workplace, environmental rights, community relations, etc. The present work corresponds to a social responsibility plan of the company As at home, where concepts such as code of ethics, social marketing, corporate social marketing and stakeholders are taken into account, which represent an important role in the business field. Corporate social responsibility is based on an active and voluntary contribution equivalent to the optimization of three objectives: social equity, economic growth and ecological value by the company in order to improve the social, economic and environmental environment. Different methodologies were taken into account, such as performance evaluations, selection of the Igor Ansoff Competitiveness Model, global guides, code of conduct, generic map of the Stakeholders and influence vs. impact matrix, finally we built the social responsibility plan, where we set the objectives, strategies, estimated deadlines, resources, indicators and type of monitoring, taking into account the size of the stakeholders, design of the communications plan and finally a management report model is made, as a result would comply with all the necessary guidelines to develop the corporate social responsibility plan

Global disparities in surgeons’ workloads, academic engagement and rest periods: the on-calL shIft fOr geNEral SurgeonS (LIONESS) study

: The workload of general surgeons is multifaceted, encompassing not only surgical procedures but also a myriad of other responsibilities. From April to May 2023, we conducted a CHERRIES-compliant internet-based survey analyzing clinical practice, academic engagement, and post-on-call rest. The questionnaire featured six sections with 35 questions. Statistical analysis used Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression (SPSS® v. 28). The survey received a total of 1.046 responses (65.4%). Over 78.0% of responders came from Europe, 65.1% came from a general surgery unit; 92.8% of European and 87.5% of North American respondents were involved in research, compared to 71.7% in Africa. Europe led in publishing research studies (6.6 ± 8.6 yearly). Teaching involvement was high in North America (100%) and Africa (91.7%). Surgeons reported an average of 6.7 ± 4.9 on-call shifts per month, with European and North American surgeons experiencing 6.5 ± 4.9 and 7.8 ± 4.1 on-calls monthly, respectively. African surgeons had the highest on-call frequency (8.7 ± 6.1). Post-on-call, only 35.1% of respondents received a day off. Europeans were most likely (40%) to have a day off, while African surgeons were least likely (6.7%). On the adjusted multivariable analysis HDI (Human Development Index) (aOR 1.993) hospital capacity > 400 beds (aOR 2.423), working in a specialty surgery unit (aOR 2.087), and making the on-call in-house (aOR 5.446), significantly predicted the likelihood of having a day off after an on-call shift. Our study revealed critical insights into the disparities in workload, access to research, and professional opportunities for surgeons across different continents, underscored by the HDI

Correction to: Cluster identification, selection, and description in Cluster randomized crossover trials: the PREP-IT trials

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article

Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. LANCET. 2016;388(10053):1659-1724.Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2015 provides an up-to-date synthesis of the evidence for risk factor exposure and the attributable burden of disease. By providing national and subnational assessments spanning the past 25 years, this study can inform debates on the importance of addressing risks in context. Methods We used the comparative risk assessment framework developed for previous iterations of the Global Burden of Disease Study to estimate attributable deaths, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and trends in exposure by age group, sex, year, and geography for 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks from 1990 to 2015. This study included 388 risk-outcome pairs that met World Cancer Research Fund-defined criteria for convincing or probable evidence. We extracted relative risk and exposure estimates from randomised controlled trials, cohorts, pooled cohorts, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources. We used statistical models to pool data, adjust for bias, and incorporate covariates. We developed a metric that allows comparisons of exposure across risk factors-the summary exposure value. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk level, we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. We decomposed trends in attributable burden into contributions from population growth, population age structure, risk exposure, and risk-deleted cause-specific DALY rates. We characterised risk exposure in relation to a Socio-demographic Index (SDI). Findings Between 1990 and 2015, global exposure to unsafe sanitation, household air pollution, childhood underweight, childhood stunting, and smoking each decreased by more than 25%. Global exposure for several occupational risks, high body-mass index (BMI), and drug use increased by more than 25% over the same period. All risks jointly evaluated in 2015 accounted for 57.8% (95% CI 56.6-58.8) of global deaths and 41.2% (39.8-42.8) of DALYs. In 2015, the ten largest contributors to global DALYs among Level 3 risks were high systolic blood pressure (211.8 million [192.7 million to 231.1 million] global DALYs), smoking (148.6 million [134.2 million to 163.1 million]), high fasting plasma glucose (143.1 million [125.1 million to 163.5 million]), high BMI (120.1 million [83.8 million to 158.4 million]), childhood undernutrition (113.3 million [103.9 million to 123.4 million]), ambient particulate matter (103.1 million [90.8 million to 115.1 million]), high total cholesterol (88.7 million [74.6 million to 105.7 million]), household air pollution (85.6 million [66.7 million to 106.1 million]), alcohol use (85.0 million [77.2 million to 93.0 million]), and diets high in sodium (83.0 million [49.3 million to 127.5 million]). From 1990 to 2015, attributable DALYs declined for micronutrient deficiencies, childhood undernutrition, unsafe sanitation and water, and household air pollution; reductions in risk-deleted DALY rates rather than reductions in exposure drove these declines. Rising exposure contributed to notable increases in attributable DALYs from high BMI, high fasting plasma glucose, occupational carcinogens, and drug use. Environmental risks and childhood undernutrition declined steadily with SDI; low physical activity, high BMI, and high fasting plasma glucose increased with SDI. In 119 countries, metabolic risks, such as high BMI and fasting plasma glucose, contributed the most attributable DALYs in 2015. Regionally, smoking still ranked among the leading five risk factors for attributable DALYs in 109 countries; childhood underweight and unsafe sex remained primary drivers of early death and disability in much of sub-Saharan Africa. Interpretation Declines in some key environmental risks have contributed to declines in critical infectious diseases. Some risks appear to be invariant to SDI. Increasing risks, including high BMI, high fasting plasma glucose, drug use, and some occupational exposures, contribute to rising burden from some conditions, but also provide opportunities for intervention. Some highly preventable risks, such as smoking, remain major causes of attributable DALYs, even as exposure is declining. Public policy makers need to pay attention to the risks that are increasingly major contributors to global burden. Copyright (C) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat