The Chromosome Number of Schaffnerella Gracilis (Gramineae, Chloridoideae)

The first ever chromosome report for the monotypic genus Schaffnerella (Grarnineae, Chloridoideae) is 2n = 20 (10 II) from pollen parent cells at diakinesis, which indicates diploidy and a base number of 10. The close relative Lycurus likewise has x = 10, but is tetraploid (2n = 4x = 40)

Phylogenetics of Chloridoideae (Gramineae): a Preliminary Study Based on Nuclear Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer and Chloroplast trnL–F Sequences

The phylogeny of Chloridoideae (Gramineae) was inferred from parsimony analyses of DNA sequences from two genomes—the chloroplast trnL intron, trnL 3\u27 exon, and trnL–F intergenic spacer, and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1 + 5.8S + ITS2). Eighty species representing 66 chloridoid genera were sampled, including all but four of the native New World genera. Analyses of the individual and combined data sets were performed. The phylogenies were found to be highly congruent. Of the four tribes and seven subtribes of Chloridoideae sensu Clayton and Renvoize (1986) whose phylogenetic status could be tested with our taxon sample, only Orcuttieae and Uniolinae were monophyletic. The phylogenies suggested significant homoplasy in morphological traits, including inflorescence type, number of florets per spikelet, and number of lemma nerves. We propose a new classification based on the three main clades in the phylogenies—tribes Cynodonteae, Eragrostideae, and Zoysieae. The Eragrostideae clade is well resolved and supported and is further divided into three subtribes, Cotteinae, Eragrostidinae, and Uniolinae. Cynodonteae include most of the genera in our study, but the clade is poorly resolved. However, a clade formed of Muhlenbergia and nine other genera is present in both phylogenies and is well resolved and supported. A number of interesting, well-supported relationships are evident in the phylogenies, including Pappophorum–Tridens flavus, Tragus–Willkommia, and Gouinia–Tridens muticus–Triplasis–Vaseyochloa. Except for Bouteloua, no genus represented by multiple species proved to be monophyletic in the phylogenies

Revision of Muhlenbergia (Poaceae, Chloridoideae, Cynodonteae, Muhlenbergiinae) in Peru: classification, phylogeny, and a new species, M. romaschenkoi

A taxonomic treatment, phylogeny based on analysis of six DNA sequence markers (ITS, ndhA intron, rpl32-trnL, rps3, rps16 intron and rps16-trnK) and classification of Muhlenbergia for Peru is given. Seventeen species and one presumed hybrid are recognised. Muhlenbergia romaschenkoi sp. nov. is newly described from the Río Huallaga Valley, northeast of Huánuco. The type of Podosemum angustatum [≡ Muhlenbergia angustata] clearly aligns with what we had been referring to as the hybrid between this species and M. rigida. Therefore, we adopt the next available heterotypic name, Muhlenbergia coerulea, for what we had been calling M. angustata and change the hybrid designation to M. coerulea × M. rigida. Lectotypes are designated for Epicampes coerulea Griseb., Muhlenbergia affinis Trin., Muhlenbergia berlandieri Trin., Muhlenbergia beyrichiana Kunth, Muhlenbergia elegans var. atroviolacea Kuntze, Muhlenbergia elegans var. subviridis Kuntze and Muhlenbergia phragmitoides Griseb

Angiosperm Phylogeny: 17 Genes, 640 Taxa

• Premise of the study : Recent analyses employing up to fi ve genes have provided numerous insights into angiosperm phylogeny, but many relationships have remained unresolved or poorly supported. In the hope of improving our understanding of angiosperm phylogeny, we expanded sampling of taxa and genes beyond previous analyses. • Methods : We conducted two primary analyses based on 640 species representing 330 families. The fi rst included 25 260 aligned base pairs (bp) from 17 genes (representing all three plant genomes, i.e., nucleus, plastid, and mitochondrion). The second included 19 846 aligned bp from 13 genes (representing only the nucleus and plastid). • Key results : Many important questions of deep-level relationships in the nonmonocot angiosperms have now been resolved with strong support. Amborellaceae, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales are successive sisters to the remaining angiosperms ( Mesangiospermae ), which are resolved into Chloranthales + Magnoliidae as sister to Monocotyledoneae + [Ceratophyllaceae + Eudicotyledoneae ]. Eudicotyledoneae contains a basal grade subtending Gunneridae . Within Gunneridae , Gunnerales are sister to the remainder ( Pentapetalae ), which comprises (1) Superrosidae , consisting of Rosidae (including Vitaceae) and Saxifragales; and (2) Superasteridae , comprising Berberidopsidales, Santalales, Caryophyllales , Asteridae , and, based on this study, Dilleniaceae (although other recent analyses disagree with this placement). Within the major subclades of Pentapetalae , most deep-level relationships are resolved with strong support. • Conclusions : Our analyses confi rm that with large amounts of sequence data, most deep-level relationships within the angiosperms can be resolved. We anticipate that this well-resolved angiosperm tree will be of broad utility for many areas of biology, including physiology, ecology, paleobiology, and genomics

Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/1/ajb20704-sup-0010.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/2/ajb20704.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/3/ajb20704-sup-0001.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/4/ajb20704-sup-0016.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/5/ajb20704-sup-0017.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/6/ajb20704-sup-0021.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/7/ajb20704-sup-0003.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/8/ajb20704-sup-0002.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/9/ajb20704-sup-0011.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/10/ajb20704-sup-0019.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/11/ajb20704-sup-0015.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/12/ajb20704-sup-0006.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/13/ajb20704-sup-0020.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/14/ajb20704-sup-0013.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/15/ajb20704-sup-0004.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/16/ajb20704-sup-0012.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/17/ajb20704-sup-0005.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/18/ajb20704-sup-0018.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/19/ajb20704-sup-0009.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/20/ajb20704-sup-0014.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/21/ajb20704-sup-0007.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142064/22/ajb20704-sup-0008.pd

Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/1/ajb21016-sup-0009-AppendixS9.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/2/ajb21016.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/3/ajb21016-sup-0004-AppendixS4.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/4/ajb21016-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/5/ajb21016-sup-0002-AppendixS2.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/6/ajb21016_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/7/ajb21016-sup-0005-AppendixS5.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/8/ajb21016-sup-0006-AppendixS6.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/9/ajb21016-sup-0008-AppendixS8.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/10/ajb21016-sup-0003-AppendixS3.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/143738/11/ajb21016-sup-0007-AppendixS7.pd

ERAGROSTIS ANCASHENSIS (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM ANCASH, PERU

Volume: 19Start Page: 65End Page: 7

A supermatrix approach provides a comprehensive genus-level phylogeny for Gentianales

Gentianales consist of Apocynaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae, and Rubiaceae, of which the majority are woody plants in tropical and subtropical areas. Despite extensive efforts in reconstructing the phylogeny of Gentianales based on molecular data, some interfamily and intrafamily relationships remain uncertain. We reconstructed the genus-level phylogeny of Gentianales based on the supermatrix of eight plastid markers (rbcL, matK, atpB, ndhF, rpl16, rps16, the trnL-trnF region, and atpB-rbcL spacer) and one mitochondrial gene (matR) using maximum likelihood. The major clades and their relationships retrieved in the present study concur with those of previous studies. All of the five families of Gentianales are monophyletic with strong support. We resolved Rubiaceae as sister to the remaining families in Gentianales and showed support for the sister relationship between Loganiaceae and Apocynaceae. Our results provide new insights into relationships among intrafamilial clades. For example, within Rubiaceae we found that Craterispermeae were sister to Morindeae + (Palicoureeae + Psychotrieae) and that Theligoneae were sister to Putorieae. Within Gentianaceae, our phylogeny revealed that Gentianeae were sister to Helieae and Potalieae, and subtribe Lisianthiinae were sister to Potaliinae and Faroinae. Within Loganiaceae, we found Neuburgia as sister to Spigelieae. Within Apocynaceae, our results supported Amsonieae as sister to Melodineae, and Hunterieae as sister to a clade comprising Plumerieae + (Carisseae + APSA). We also confirmed the monophyly of Perplocoideae and the relationships among Baisseeae + (Secamonoideae + Asclepiadoideae)