Tectono-sedimentary evolution of the Plio-Pleistocene Corinth rift, Greece

The onshore central Corinth rift contains a syn-rift succession >3 km thick deposited in 5–15 km-wide tilt blocks, all now inactive, uplifted and deeply incised. This part of the rift records upward deepening from fluviatile to lake-margin conditions and finally to sub-lacustrine turbidite channel and lobe complexes, and deep-water lacustrine conditions (Lake Corinth) were established over most of the rift by 3.6 Ma. This succession represents the first of two phases of rift development – Rift 1 from 5.0–3.6 to 2.2–1.8 Ma and Rift 2 from 2.2–1.8 Ma to present. Rift 1 developed as a 30 km-wide zone of distributed normal faulting. The lake was fed by four major N- to NE-flowing antecedent drainages along the southern rift flank. These sourced an axial fluvial system, Gilbert fan deltas and deep lacustrine turbidite channel and lobe complexes. The onset of Rift 2 and abandonment of Rift 1 involved a 30 km northward shift in the locus of rifting. In the west, giant Gilbert deltas built into a deepening lake depocentre in the hanging wall of the newly developing southern border fault system. Footwall and regional uplift progressively destroyed Lake Corinth in the central and eastern parts of the rift, producing a staircase of deltaic and, following drainage reversal, shallow marine terraces descending from >1000 m to present-day sea level. The growth, linkage and death of normal faults during the two phases of rifting is interpreted to reflect self-organisation and strain localisation along co-linear border faults. In the west, interaction with the Patras rift occurred along the major Patras dextral strike-slip fault. This led to enhanced migration of fault activity, uplift and incision of some early Rift 2 fan deltas, and opening of the Rion Straits at c. 400–600 ka. The landscape and stratigraphic evolution of the rift was strongly influenced by regional palaeotopographic variations and local antecedent drainage, both inherited from the Hellenide fold and thrust belt

A comparative study of confined vs.semi-confined turbidite lobes from the Lower Messinian Laga Basin (Central Apennines, Italy). Implications for assessment of reservoir architecture

This study investigates the depositional architecture of turbidite lobes from the Southern Laga Basin (Lower Messinian, Central Apennines) and the external controls on its development. Physical stratigraphy and facies analysis on a 1700 m thick interval enabled us unraveling the hierarchical partitioning and internal arrangement of lobes from four units with different degree of topographic confinement. A four-fold hierarchy of depositional bodies was recognized including: i) event beds deposited by single turbidity currents: ii) single lobes, consisting of bed sets with variable degree of sand amalgamation; iii) lobe sets, i.e. depocentre-wide stacks of single lobes and iv) lobe complexes, representing high rank units of greater internal complexity. Field mapping of the studied lobes highlighted a significant change in size and morphology of the receiving depocentre resulting from sediment filling and onlapping of basinal slopes. The lobe depocentre evolved from a funnel-shaped trough with an initial size of ~150 km2 to a wider basin reaching a maximum extent of over 500 km2, which implies decreasing degree of confinement from older to younger lobes. Comparison of depositional architectures across the studied units points out two end-members: i) confined sheet-like lobes, consisting of topography contained sandbodies with flat geometry and little facies variability in their axial part and ii) semi-confined lobes with a ‘jigsaw’ architecture, comprised of shingled to compensated depositional bodies with lobate to sigmoidal planform and highly variable facies partitioning. The former architecture is interpreted as the product of flow containment of incoming flows by lateral basinal slopes with consequent deposition under confined accommodation space, whereas the latter would record sedimentation within a wider depocentre allowing for free flow expansion and lateral migration of lobes. The different architecture of confined vs. semi-confined lobes has important implications for the hydrocarbon industry as it results in significantly dissimilar structures of permeability and connectivity