101 research outputs found
Inferring Strategies for Sentence Ordering in Multidocument News Summarization
The problem of organizing information for multidocument summarization so that
the generated summary is coherent has received relatively little attention.
While sentence ordering for single document summarization can be determined
from the ordering of sentences in the input article, this is not the case for
multidocument summarization where summary sentences may be drawn from different
input articles. In this paper, we propose a methodology for studying the
properties of ordering information in the news genre and describe experiments
done on a corpus of multiple acceptable orderings we developed for the task.
Based on these experiments, we implemented a strategy for ordering information
that combines constraints from chronological order of events and topical
relatedness. Evaluation of our augmented algorithm shows a significant
improvement of the ordering over two baseline strategies
Generating EDU Extracts for Plan-Guided Summary Re-Ranking
Two-step approaches, in which summary candidates are generated-then-reranked
to return a single summary, can improve ROUGE scores over the standard
single-step approach. Yet, standard decoding methods (i.e., beam search,
nucleus sampling, and diverse beam search) produce candidates with redundant,
and often low quality, content. In this paper, we design a novel method to
generate candidates for re-ranking that addresses these issues. We ground each
candidate abstract on its own unique content plan and generate distinct
plan-guided abstracts using a model's top beam. More concretely, a standard
language model (a BART LM) auto-regressively generates elemental discourse unit
(EDU) content plans with an extractive copy mechanism. The top K beams from the
content plan generator are then used to guide a separate LM, which produces a
single abstractive candidate for each distinct plan. We apply an existing
re-ranker (BRIO) to abstractive candidates generated from our method, as well
as baseline decoding methods. We show large relevance improvements over
previously published methods on widely used single document news article
corpora, with ROUGE-2 F1 gains of 0.88, 2.01, and 0.38 on CNN / Dailymail, NYT,
and Xsum, respectively. A human evaluation on CNN / DM validates these results.
Similarly, on 1k samples from CNN / DM, we show that prompting GPT-3 to follow
EDU plans outperforms sampling-based methods by 1.05 ROUGE-2 F1 points. Code to
generate and realize plans is available at
https://github.com/griff4692/edu-sum.Comment: ACL 202
A Bayesian Causal Inference Approach for Assessing Fairness in Clinical Decision-Making
Fairness in clinical decision-making is a critical element of health equity,
but assessing fairness of clinical decisions from observational data is
challenging. Recently, many fairness notions have been proposed to quantify
fairness in decision-making, among which causality-based fairness notions have
gained increasing attention due to its potential in adjusting for confounding
and reasoning about bias. However, causal fairness notions remain
under-explored in the context of clinical decision-making with large-scale
healthcare data. In this work, we propose a Bayesian causal inference approach
for assessing a causal fairness notion called principal fairness in clinical
settings. We demonstrate our approach using both simulated data and electronic
health records (EHR) data
Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Preschool Children Using Multiple Methods
Background: The ability to determine the relationship between diet and health outcomes in children requires reproducible and validated long-term dietary assessment tools such as food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).Objective: To test the reproducibility and relative validity of a FFQ for young children using 24-hour food recalls (24HRs), anthropometric measurements, and a comprehensive feeding practices questionnaire (CFPQ).Methods: Children (aged 5-6) and their mothers were recruited during one school-year (2008) from preschools. Children's anthropometric measurements were obtained. Mothers provided during a personal interview on three occasions a 110-item semiquantitative FFQ, 24HRs and CFPQ. Pearson-correlation coefficients were calculated between the results of the FFQ and 3*24HR. Validity coefficients between the FFQ and the different measurements were calculated. Scores of the 12 factors of the CFPQ were calculated and related to dietary intake.Results: Sixty-six healthy children (47% boys) were recruited. Pearson's correlations between the average of the FFQs and 3*24HRs ranged from 0.3-0.6 (P<0.05). The highest correlation coefficients were 0.59 for total fat intake and 0.56 for energy. Dietary intake of energy and carbohydrates differed significantly (P=0.05, 0.001 respectively) across the three BMI z-score levels (normal-weight, overweight, obese) and the three waist circumference tertiles (0.019, 0.006 respectively). Obesogenic factors from the CFPQ correlated with consumption of empty calories like sweets, snacks, junk foods and sweet drinks.Conclusions: The modified FFQ is a relatively valid instrument to estimate mean energy intake in preschool children. The questionnaire performs reasonably well to rank children with respect to macronutrients intake as well as obesogenic food groups
Task 2: ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation lab 2014
This paper reports on Task 2 of the 2014 ShARe/CLEF
eHealth evaluation lab which extended Task 1 of the 2013 ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation lab by focusing on template lling of disorder attributes. The task was comprised of two subtasks: attribute normalization (task 2a) and cue identication (task 2b).We instructed participants
to develop a system which either kept or updated a default attribute value for each task. Participant systems were evaluated against a blind reference standard of 133 discharge summaries using Accuracy (task 2a)
and F-score (task 2b). In total, ten teams participated in task 2a, and three teams in task 2b. For task 2a and 2b, the HITACHI team systems (run 2) had the highest performances, with an overall average average accuracy of 0.868 and F1-score (strict) of 0.676, respectively
Overview of the ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation lab 2013
Discharge summaries and other free-text reports in healthcare transfer information between working shifts and geographic locations. Patients are likely to have difficulties in understanding their content, because of their medical jargon, non-standard abbreviations, and ward-specific idioms. This paper reports on an evaluation lab with an aim to support the continuum of care by developing methods and resources that make clinical reports in English easier to understand for patients, and which helps them in finding information related to their
condition. This ShARe/CLEFeHealth2013 lab offered student mentoring and shared tasks: identification and normalisation of disorders (1a and 1b) and normalisation of abbreviations and acronyms (2) in clinical reports with respect to terminology standards in healthcare as well as information retrieval (3) to address questions patients may have when reading clinical reports. The focus on patients' information needs as opposed to the specialised information needs of physicians and other healthcare workers was the main feature of the lab distinguishing it from previous shared tasks. De-identied clinical reports for the three tasks were from US intensive care and originated from the MIMIC II database. Other text documents for Task 3 were from the Internet and originated from the Khresmoi project. Task 1 annotations originated from the ShARe annotations. For Tasks 2 and 3, new annotations, queries, and relevance
assessments were created. 64, 56, and 55 people registered their interest in Tasks 1, 2, and 3, respectively. 34 unique teams (3 members per team on average) participated with 22, 17, 5, and 9 teams in Tasks 1a, 1b, 2 and 3, respectively. The teams were from Australia, China, France, India, Ireland, Republic of Korea, Spain, UK, and USA. Some teams developed
and used additional annotations, but this strategy contributed to the system performance only in Task 2. The best systems had the F1 score of 0.75 in Task 1a; Accuracies of 0.59 and 0.72 in Tasks 1b and 2; and
Precision at 10 of 0.52 in Task 3. The results demonstrate the substantial community interest and capabilities of these systems in making clinical
reports easier to understand for patients. The organisers have made data and tools available for future research and development
Making effective use of healthcare data using data-to-text technology
Healthcare organizations are in a continuous effort to improve health
outcomes, reduce costs and enhance patient experience of care. Data is
essential to measure and help achieving these improvements in healthcare
delivery. Consequently, a data influx from various clinical, financial and
operational sources is now overtaking healthcare organizations and their
patients. The effective use of this data, however, is a major challenge.
Clearly, text is an important medium to make data accessible. Financial reports
are produced to assess healthcare organizations on some key performance
indicators to steer their healthcare delivery. Similarly, at a clinical level,
data on patient status is conveyed by means of textual descriptions to
facilitate patient review, shift handover and care transitions. Likewise,
patients are informed about data on their health status and treatments via
text, in the form of reports or via ehealth platforms by their doctors.
Unfortunately, such text is the outcome of a highly labour-intensive process if
it is done by healthcare professionals. It is also prone to incompleteness,
subjectivity and hard to scale up to different domains, wider audiences and
varying communication purposes. Data-to-text is a recent breakthrough
technology in artificial intelligence which automatically generates natural
language in the form of text or speech from data. This chapter provides a
survey of data-to-text technology, with a focus on how it can be deployed in a
healthcare setting. It will (1) give an up-to-date synthesis of data-to-text
approaches, (2) give a categorized overview of use cases in healthcare, (3)
seek to make a strong case for evaluating and implementing data-to-text in a
healthcare setting, and (4) highlight recent research challenges.Comment: 27 pages, 2 figures, book chapte
The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>An increase in work on the full text of journal articles and the growth of PubMedCentral have the opportunity to create a major paradigm shift in how biomedical text mining is done. However, until now there has been no comprehensive characterization of how the bodies of full text journal articles differ from the abstracts that until now have been the subject of most biomedical text mining research.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We examined the structural and linguistic aspects of abstracts and bodies of full text articles, the performance of text mining tools on both, and the distribution of a variety of semantic classes of named entities between them. We found marked structural differences, with longer sentences in the article bodies and much heavier use of parenthesized material in the bodies than in the abstracts. We found content differences with respect to linguistic features. Three out of four of the linguistic features that we examined were statistically significantly differently distributed between the two genres. We also found content differences with respect to the distribution of semantic features. There were significantly different densities per thousand words for three out of four semantic classes, and clear differences in the extent to which they appeared in the two genres. With respect to the performance of text mining tools, we found that a mutation finder performed equally well in both genres, but that a wide variety of gene mention systems performed much worse on article bodies than they did on abstracts. POS tagging was also more accurate in abstracts than in article bodies.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Aspects of structure and content differ markedly between article abstracts and article bodies. A number of these differences may pose problems as the text mining field moves more into the area of processing full-text articles. However, these differences also present a number of opportunities for the extraction of data types, particularly that found in parenthesized text, that is present in article bodies but not in article abstracts.</p
Enveloping Sophisticated Tools into Process-Centered Environments
We present a tool integration strategy based on enveloping pre-existing tools without source code modifications or recompilation, and without assuming an extension language, application programming interface, or any other special capabilities on the part of the tool. This Black Box enveloping (or wrapping) idea has existed for a long time, but was previously restricted to relatively simple tools. We describe the design and implementation of, and experimentation with, a new Black Box enveloping facility intended for sophisticated tools --- with particular concern for the emerging class of groupware applications
Antimicrobial resistance among migrants in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are rising globally and there is concern that increased migration is contributing to the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. However, the effect of migration on the burden of AMR in Europe has not yet been comprehensively examined. Therefore, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data for AMR carriage or infection in migrants to Europe to examine differences in patterns of AMR across migrant groups and in different settings. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus with no language restrictions from Jan 1, 2000, to Jan 18, 2017, for primary data from observational studies reporting antibacterial resistance in common bacterial pathogens among migrants to 21 European Union-15 and European Economic Area countries. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to report data on carriage or infection with laboratory-confirmed antibiotic-resistant organisms in migrant populations. We extracted data from eligible studies and assessed quality using piloted, standardised forms. We did not examine drug resistance in tuberculosis and excluded articles solely reporting on this parameter. We also excluded articles in which migrant status was determined by ethnicity, country of birth of participants' parents, or was not defined, and articles in which data were not disaggregated by migrant status. Outcomes were carriage of or infection with antibiotic-resistant organisms. We used random-effects models to calculate the pooled prevalence of each outcome. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016043681. FINDINGS: We identified 2274 articles, of which 23 observational studies reporting on antibiotic resistance in 2319 migrants were included. The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or AMR infection in migrants was 25·4% (95% CI 19·1-31·8; I2 =98%), including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (7·8%, 4·8-10·7; I2 =92%) and antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (27·2%, 17·6-36·8; I2 =94%). The pooled prevalence of any AMR carriage or infection was higher in refugees and asylum seekers (33·0%, 18·3-47·6; I2 =98%) than in other migrant groups (6·6%, 1·8-11·3; I2 =92%). The pooled prevalence of antibiotic-resistant organisms was slightly higher in high-migrant community settings (33·1%, 11·1-55·1; I2 =96%) than in migrants in hospitals (24·3%, 16·1-32·6; I2 =98%). We did not find evidence of high rates of transmission of AMR from migrant to host populations. INTERPRETATION: Migrants are exposed to conditions favouring the emergence of drug resistance during transit and in host countries in Europe. Increased antibiotic resistance among refugees and asylum seekers and in high-migrant community settings (such as refugee camps and detention facilities) highlights the need for improved living conditions, access to health care, and initiatives to facilitate detection of and appropriate high-quality treatment for antibiotic-resistant infections during transit and in host countries. Protocols for the prevention and control of infection and for antibiotic surveillance need to be integrated in all aspects of health care, which should be accessible for all migrant groups, and should target determinants of AMR before, during, and after migration. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare Charity, the Wellcome Trust, and UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infections and Antimictobial Resistance at Imperial College London
- …