319 research outputs found

    Physiological and biochemical responses of invasive species cenchrus pauciflorus benth to drought stress

    Get PDF
    The invasive plant Cenchrus pauciflorus Benth exhibits strong adaptability to stress, especially drought. When newly introduced certain plant species can become invasive and quickly spread in an area due to lack of competition, potentially disturbing the ecological balance and species diversity. C. pauciflorus has been known to cause huge economic losses to agriculture and animal husbandry. Thus, understanding the physiological responses of C. pauciflorus to drought stress could help explore the role of C. pauciflorus in population expansion in sandy land environments. In this study, we evaluated the response of C. pauciflorus to induced low, moderate, and severe drought stress conditions. Results showed a linear reduction in the fresh weight (FW), dry weight (DW), and relative water content (RWC) of the aboveground parts of C. pauciflorus following drought stress as compared to the control plants (no drought stress). Chemical analyses showed that the drought treatments significantly induced the production of proline, soluble proteins, soluble sugars, MDA, and free amino acids as compared to the control treatment (no drought stress). On the other hand, the starch content was significantly reduced in drought-treated plants. This was also accompanied by a significant linear increase in the antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, and CAT) in plants subjected to drought stress. On the basis of physiological and biochemical analyses, we propose that C. pauciflorus has evolved to survive harsh drought stress conditions of the desert via sophisticated biochemical adjustment and antioxidant reprograming that allows protection against damage caused by drought stress

    Multi-Level Characterization of Eggplant Accessions from Greek Islands and the Mainland Contributes to the Enhancement and Conservation of this Germplasm and Reveals a Large Diversity and Signatures of Differentiation between both Origins

    Full text link
    [EN] Crop landraces are found in many inhabited islands of Greece. Due to the particularity of environment and isolation from the mainland, Greek islands represent a natural laboratory for comparing the diversity of landraces from the islands with those of the Greek mainland. A collection of 36 Greek eggplant landraces and traditional cultivars from the mainland and the islands has been phenotypically and genetically characterized using 22 morphological descriptors and 5 SSR markers. The mineral composition (K, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) of fruits was also determined. The objectives of this study include the multi-level characterization of eggplant local landraces and the comparison of diversity among accessions from the Greek mainland and the islands. Characterization of eggplant landraces will contribute to the enhancement and prevention of genetic erosion in this local group and will provide a resource for future investigation and breeding. PCA analysis of morphological traits explained 45.4% of the total variance revealing the formation of two clusters, one with most of the island accessions, and another with most of the mainland ones. The SSR markers used exhibited high average values for the number of alleles/locus (4.6), expected heterozygosity (0.60) and PIC (0.55), while the observed heterozygosity was low (0.13). Both STRUCTURE and PCoA analyses based on SSR data revealed two genetic clusters, one made up mainly by the mainland accessions, while the other one was mainly made up by the island accessions. Although there was considerable variation among the landraces for the concentration of minerals studied, only average Mg concentration was significantly different between mainland and island accessions. Based on our data, the Greek eggplant landraces present considerable morphological and genetic diversity with some differentiation signatures between the island and the mainland accessions. Our results have implications for conservation of Greek landraces and suggest that Greece might be considered as part of a secondary center of diversity for eggplant in the Mediterranean basin."PlantUP" (MIS 5002803) which is implemented under the Action "Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure", funded by the Operational Programme "Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation" (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). Funding was also received from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No 677379 (G2P-SOL project: Linking genetic resources, genomes and phenotypes of Solanaceous crops), and from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigacion and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (grant RTI-2018-094592-B-100 from MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE). Pietro Gramazio is grateful to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and to Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for their respective postdoctoral grants (PAID-10-18 and FY2019 JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan [Standard]).Gramazio, P.; Chatziefstratiou, E.; Petropoulos, C.; Chioti, V.; Mylona, P.; Kapotis, G.; Vilanova Navarro, S.... (2019). Multi-Level Characterization of Eggplant Accessions from Greek Islands and the Mainland Contributes to the Enhancement and Conservation of this Germplasm and Reveals a Large Diversity and Signatures of Differentiation between both Origins. Agronomy. 9(12):1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120887S120912Kougioumoutzis, K., Valli, A. T., Georgopoulou, E., Simaiakis, S. M., Triantis, K. A., & Trigas, P. (2016). Network biogeography of a complex island system: the Aegean Archipelago revisited. Journal of Biogeography, 44(3), 651-660. doi:10.1111/jbi.12920GRAHAM, N. R., GRUNER, D. S., LIM, J. Y., & GILLESPIE, R. G. (2017). Island ecology and evolution: challenges in the Anthropocene. Environmental Conservation, 44(4), 323-335. doi:10.1017/s0376892917000315Price, J. P., Otto, R., Menezes de Sequeira, M., Kueffer, C., Schaefer, H., CaujapĂ©-Castells, J., & FernĂĄndez-Palacios, J. M. (2018). Colonization and diversification shape species-area relationships in three Macaronesian archipelagos. Journal of Biogeography, 45(9), 2027-2039. doi:10.1111/jbi.13396Warren, B. H., Simberloff, D., Ricklefs, R. E., AguilĂ©e, R., Condamine, F. L., Gravel, D., 
 ThĂ©baud, C. (2015). Islands as model systems in ecology and evolution: prospects fifty years after MacArthur-Wilson. Ecology Letters, 18(2), 200-217. doi:10.1111/ele.12398Douma, C., Koutis, K., Thanopoulos, R., Tsigou, R., Galanidis, A., & Bebeli, P. J. (2016). Diversity of agricultural plants on Lesvos Island (Northeast Aegean, Greece) with emphasis on fruit trees. Scientia Horticulturae, 210, 65-84. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.009Hagenblad, J., Leino, M. W., HernĂĄndez Afonso, G., & Afonso Morales, D. (2018). Morphological and genetic characterization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in the Canary Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 66(2), 465-480. doi:10.1007/s10722-018-0726-2MĂ©dail, F. (2017). The specific vulnerability of plant biodiversity and vegetation on Mediterranean islands in the face of global change. Regional Environmental Change, 17(6), 1775-1790. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1123-7Hellenic Statistical Authorityhttp://www.statistics.gr/en/home/Sfenthourakis, S., & Triantis, K. A. (2017). The Aegean archipelago: a natural laboratory of evolution, ecology and civilisations. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki, 24(1). doi:10.1186/s40709-017-0061-3Dimopoulos, P., Raus, T., Bergmeier, E., Constantinidis, T., Iatrou, G., Kokkini, S., 
 Tzanoudakis, D. (2016). Vascular plants of Greece: An annotated checklist. Supplement. Willdenowia, 46(3), 301-347. doi:10.3372/wi.46.46303Tsanakas, G. F., Mylona, P. V., Koura, K., Gleridou, A., & Polidoros, A. N. (2018). Genetic diversity analysis of the Greek lentil (Lens culinaris) landrace ‘Eglouvis’ using morphological and molecular markers. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 16(5), 469-477. doi:10.1017/s1479262118000096Dwivedi, Goldman, & Ortiz. (2019). Pursuing the Potential of Heirloom Cultivars to Improve Adaptation, Nutritional, and Culinary Features of Food Crops. Agronomy, 9(8), 441. doi:10.3390/agronomy9080441Bota, J., Conesa, M. À., Ochogavia, J. M., Medrano, H., Francis, D. M., & Cifre, J. (2014). Characterization of a landrace collection for TomĂ tiga de Ramellet (Solanum lycopersicum L.) from the Balearic Islands. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61(6), 1131-1146. doi:10.1007/s10722-014-0096-3Carillo, P., Kyriacou, M. C., El-Nakhel, C., Pannico, A., dell’ Aversana, E., D’Amelia, L., 
 Rouphael, Y. (2019). Sensory and functional quality characterization of protected designation of origin ‘Piennolo del Vesuvio’ cherry tomato landraces from Campania-Italy. Food Chemistry, 292, 166-175. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.056Schmidt, S. B., George, T. S., Brown, L. K., Booth, A., Wishart, J., Hedley, P. E., 
 Husted, S. (2018). Ancient barley landraces adapted to marginal soils demonstrate exceptional tolerance to manganese limitation. Annals of Botany, 123(5), 831-843. doi:10.1093/aob/mcy215Missio, J. C., Rivera, A., FigĂ s, M. R., Casanova, C., CamĂ­, B., Soler, S., & SimĂł, J. (2018). A Comparison of Landraces vs. Modern Varieties of Lettuce in Organic Farming During the Winter in the Mediterranean Area: An Approach Considering the Viewpoints of Breeders, Consumers, and Farmers. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01491Petropoulos, S. A., Barros, L., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2019). Editorial: Rediscovering Local Landraces: Shaping Horticulture for the Future. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00126Karanikolas, P., Bebeli, P. J., & Thanopoulos, R. (2017). Farm economic sustainability and agrobiodiversity: identifying viable farming alternatives during the economic crisis in Greece. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 69-84. doi:10.1080/21606544.2017.1360212FAO STATISTICAL DATABASEShttp://www.fao.org/faostat/Augustinos, A. A., Petropoulos, C., Karasoulou, V., Bletsos, F., & Papasotiropoulos, V. (2016). Assessing diversity among traditional Greek and foreign eggplant cultivars using molecular markers and morphometrical descriptors. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(4), e0710. doi:10.5424/sjar/2016144-9020Thomas, K., Thanopoulos, R., KnĂŒpffer, H., & Bebeli, P. J. (2011). Plant genetic resources of Lemnos (Greece), an isolated island in the Northern Aegean Sea, with emphasis on landraces. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 59(7), 1417-1440. doi:10.1007/s10722-011-9770-xGarcĂ­a-Verdugo, C., Sajeva, M., La Mantia, T., Harrouni, C., Msanda, F., & CaujapĂ©-Castells, J. (2015). Do island plant populations really have lower genetic variation than mainland populations? Effects of selection and distribution range on genetic diversity estimates. Molecular Ecology, 24(4), 726-741. doi:10.1111/mec.13060Hiraoka, Y., Tamaki, I., & Watanabe, A. (2017). The origin of wild populations of Toxicodendron succedaneum on mainland Japan revealed by genetic variation in chloroplast and nuclear DNA. Journal of Plant Research, 131(2), 225-238. doi:10.1007/s10265-017-0992-7JimĂ©nez, A., Weigelt, B., Santos-Guerra, A., CaujapĂ©-Castells, J., FernĂĄndez-Palacios, J. M., & Conti, E. (2017). Surviving in isolation: genetic variation, bottlenecks and reproductive strategies in the Canarian endemic Limonium macrophyllum (Plumbaginaceae). Genetica, 145(1), 91-104. doi:10.1007/s10709-017-9948-zWheelwright, N. T., Begin, E., Ellwanger, C., Taylor, S. H., & Stone, J. L. (2016). Minimal loss of genetic diversity and no inbreeding depression in blueflag iris (Iris versicolor) on islands in the Bay of Fundy. Botany, 94(7), 543-554. doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0004Hufford, K. M., Mazer, S. J., & Hodges, S. A. (2014). Genetic variation among mainland and island populations of a native perennial grass used in restoration. AoB PLANTS, 6. doi:10.1093/aobpla/plt055McGlaughlin, M. E., Wallace, L. E., Wheeler, G. L., Bresowar, G., Riley, L., Britten, N. R., & Helenurm, K. (2013). Do the island biogeography predictions of MacArthur and Wilson hold when examining genetic diversity on the near mainland California Channel Islands? Examples from endemicAcmispon(Fabaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 174(3), 289-304. doi:10.1111/boj.12122Idrissi, O., Piergiovanni, A. R., Toklu, F., Houasli, C., Udupa, S. M., De Keyser, E., 
 De Riek, J. (2017). Molecular variance and population structure of lentil (Lens culinarisMedik.) landraces from Mediterranean countries as revealed by simple sequence repeat DNA markers: implications for conservation and use. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 16(3), 249-259. doi:10.1017/s1479262117000260Acquadro, A., Barchi, L., Gramazio, P., Portis, E., Vilanova, S., Comino, C., 
 Lanteri, S. (2017). Coding SNPs analysis highlights genetic relationships and evolution pattern in eggplant complexes. PLOS ONE, 12(7), e0180774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180774Cericola, F., Portis, E., Toppino, L., Barchi, L., Acciarri, N., Ciriaci, T., 
 Lanteri, S. (2013). The Population Structure and Diversity of Eggplant from Asia and the Mediterranean Basin. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073702Hurtado, M., Vilanova, S., Plazas, M., Gramazio, P., Fonseka, H. H., Fonseka, R., & Prohens, J. (2012). Diversity and Relationships of Eggplants from Three Geographically Distant Secondary Centers of Diversity. PLoS ONE, 7(7), e41748. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041748Liu, J., Yang, Y., Zhou, X., Bao, S., & Zhuang, Y. (2018). Genetic diversity and population structure of worldwide eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) germplasm using SSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 65(6), 1663-1670. doi:10.1007/s10722-018-0643-4Rodriguez-Jimenez, J., Amaya-Guerra, C., Baez-Gonzalez, J., Aguilera-Gonzalez, C., Urias-Orona, V., & Nino-Medina, G. (2018). Physicochemical, Functional, and Nutraceutical Properties of Eggplant Flours Obtained by Different Drying Methods. Molecules, 23(12), 3210. doi:10.3390/molecules23123210RaigĂłn, M. D., Prohens, J., Muñoz-FalcĂłn, J. E., & Nuez, F. (2008). Comparison of eggplant landraces and commercial varieties for fruit content of phenolics, minerals, dry matter and protein. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 21(5), 370-376. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2008.03.006Arivalagan, M., Gangopadhyay, K. K., Kumar, G., Bhardwaj, R., Prasad, T. V., Sarkar, S. K., & Roy, A. (2012). Variability in mineral composition of Indian eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 26(1-2), 173-176. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2012.03.001Ranil, R. H. G., Niran, H. M. L., Plazas, M., Fonseka, R. M., Fonseka, H. H., Vilanova, S., 
 Prohens, J. (2015). Improving seed germination of the eggplant rootstock Solanum torvum by testing multiple factors using an orthogonal array design. Scientia Horticulturae, 193, 174-181. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.030Van der Weerden, G. M., & Barendse, G. W. M. (2007). A WEB-BASED SEARCHABLE DATABASE DEVELOPED FOR THE EGGNET PROJECT AND APPLIED TO THE RADBOUD UNIVERSITY SOLANACEAE DATABASE. Acta Horticulturae, (745), 503-506. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2007.745.37Kaushik, P., Prohens, J., Vilanova, S., Gramazio, P., & Plazas, M. (2016). Phenotyping of Eggplant Wild Relatives and Interspecific Hybrids with Conventional and Phenomics Descriptors Provides Insight for Their Potential Utilization in Breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00677Kumar, G., Meena, B. L., Kar, R., Tiwari, S. K., Gangopadhyay, K. K., Bisht, I. S., & Mahajan, R. K. (2008). Morphological diversity in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) germplasm accessions. Plant Genetic Resources, 6(3), 232-236. doi:10.1017/s1479262108994211Vilanova, S., Manzur, J. P., & Prohens, J. (2011). Development and characterization of genomic simple sequence repeat markers in eggplant and their application to the study of diversity and relationships in a collection of different cultivar types and origins. Molecular Breeding, 30(2), 647-660. doi:10.1007/s11032-011-9650-2Nunome, T., Negoro, S., Kono, I., Kanamori, H., Miyatake, K., Yamaguchi, H., 
 Fukuoka, H. (2009). Development of SSR markers derived from SSR-enriched genomic library of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 119(6), 1143-1153. doi:10.1007/s00122-009-1116-0Liu, K., & Muse, S. V. (2005). PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics, 21(9), 2128-2129. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update. Bioinformatics, 28(19), 2537-2539. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460Nei, M. (1972). Genetic Distance between Populations. The American Naturalist, 106(949), 283-292. doi:10.1086/282771Wright, S. (1965). THE INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION STRUCTURE BY F-STATISTICS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO SYSTEMS OF MATING. Evolution, 19(3), 395-420. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1965.tb01731.xEVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611-2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.xEarl, D. A., & vonHoldt, B. M. (2011). STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 4(2), 359-361. doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7Remington, D. L., Thornsberry, J. M., Matsuoka, Y., Wilson, L. M., Whitt, S. R., Doebley, J., 
 Buckler, E. S. (2001). Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11479-11484. doi:10.1073/pnas.201394398Beerling, D. J., Leake, J. R., Long, S. P., Scholes, J. D., Ton, J., Nelson, P. N., 
 Hansen, J. (2018). Farming with crops and rocks to address global climate, food and soil security. Nature Plants, 4(3), 138-147. doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0108-yMarconi, G., Ferradini, N., Russi, L., Concezzi, L., Veronesi, F., & Albertini, E. (2018). Genetic Characterization of the Apple Germplasm Collection in Central Italy: The Value of Local Varieties. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01460Wang, L., Li, J., Zhao, J., & He, C. (2015). Evolutionary developmental genetics of fruit morphological variation within the Solanaceae. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00248Prohens, J., Blanca, J. M., & Nuez, F. (2005). Morphological and Molecular Variation in a Collection of Eggplants from a Secondary Center of Diversity: Implications for Conservation and Breeding. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 130(1), 54-63. doi:10.21273/jashs.130.1.54BOYACI, H. F., TOPCU, V., TEPE, A., YILDIRIM, I. K., OTEN, M., & AKTAS, A. (2015). Morphological and Molecular Characterization and Relationships of Turkish Local Eggplant Heirlooms. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 43(1), 100-107. doi:10.15835/nbha4319773Muñoz-FalcĂłn, J. E., Prohens, J., Vilanova, S., & Nuez, F. (2008). Characterization, diversity, and relationships of the Spanish striped (Listada) eggplants: a model for the enhancement and protection of local heirlooms. Euphytica, 164(2), 405-419. doi:10.1007/s10681-008-9688-3Polignano, G., Uggenti, P., Bisignano, V., & Gatta, C. D. (2009). Genetic divergence analysis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and allied species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57(2), 171-181. doi:10.1007/s10722-009-9459-6Russo, V. M. (1996). Cultural Methods and Mineral Content of Eggplant (Solanum melongena) Fruit. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 71(1), 119-123. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199605)71:13.0.co;2-rRaigón, M. D., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., & Prohens, J. (2010). Effects of Organic and Conventional Cultivation Methods on Composition of Eggplant Fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(11), 6833-6840. doi:10.1021/jf904438nGe, H., Liu, Y., Jiang, M., Zhang, J., Han, H., & Chen, H. (2013). Analysis of genetic diversity and structure of eggplant populations (Solanum melongena L.) in China using simple sequence repeat markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 162, 71-75. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.004Muñoz-FalcĂłn, J. E., Vilanova, S., Plazas, M., & Prohens, J. (2011). Diversity, relationships, and genetic fingerprinting of the Listada de GandĂ­a eggplant landrace using genomic SSRs and EST-SSRs. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(2), 238-246. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.034Demir, K., Bakır, M., SarıkamÄ±ĆŸ, G., & Acunalp, S. (2010). Genetic diversity of eggplant (Solanum melongena) germplasm from Turkey assessed by SSR and RAPD markers. Genetics and Molecular Research, 9(3), 1568-1576. doi:10.4238/vol9-3gmr878VILANOVA, S., HURTADO, M., CARDONA, A., PLAZAS, M., HERRAIZ, F. J., GRAMAZIO, P., 
 PROHENS, J. (2014). Genetic Diversity and Relationships in Local Varieties of Eggplant from Different Cultivar Groups as Assessed by Genomic SSR Markers. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42(1). doi:10.15835/nbha4219414Muñoz-FalcĂłn, J. E., Prohens, J., Vilanova, S., & Nuez, F. (2009). Diversity in commercial varieties and landraces of black eggplants and implications for broadening the breeders’ gene pool. Annals of Applied Biology, 154(3), 453-465. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00314.xFrankham, R. (1997). Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity, 78(3), 311-327. doi:10.1038/hdy.1997.46Hargreaves, S., Maxted, N., Hirano, R., Abberton, M., SkĂžt, L., & Ford-Lloyd, B. V. (2009). Islands as refugia of Trifolium repens genetic diversity. Conservation Genetics, 11(4), 1317-1326. doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9960-7Lawson, D. A., & Rands, S. A. (2019). The effects of rainfall on plant–pollinator interactions. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 13(4), 561-569. doi:10.1007/s11829-019-09686-zKyriakopoulou, O. G., Arens, P., Pelgrom, K. T. B., Karapanos, I., Bebeli, P., & Passam, H. C. (2014). Genetic and morphological diversity of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus [L.] Moench.) genotypes and their possible relationships, with particular reference to Greek landraces. Scientia Horticulturae, 171, 58-70. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2014.03.02

    Improving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) antioxidative defense mechanisms against salinity stress by exogenous application of potassium silicate

    Get PDF
    The primary objective of this study was to investigate the beneficial effects of seed priming and foliar spray of potassium silicate on antioxidant activities under different salinity levels, thereby potentially improving wheat growth. Seeds were soaked into solutions containing potassium silicate (K2SiO3, 1.5 mM) for 6 h, while foliar spray with K2SiO3 (4 mM) was applied at the early and the late stages of tillering. Lake Urmia water was used to prepare salinity levels of 0, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 14 dS m −1. For such traits as anthocyanin, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase activity, an initial increase was observed at lower salinity levels; higher salinities subsequently decreased these traits or they remained mostly constant. Salinity also increased phenol, malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and polyphenol oxidase, but decreased flavonoid, nitrate content, and nitrate reductase activity. Seed priming and foliar spray provided effective approaches to reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) manifestation in wheat grown under saline conditions. The improved antioxidant defense abilities by seed priming and foliar spray alleviated the oxidative damage of proteins and lipids and improved nitrate content and nitrate reductase activity

    Physiological responses and productivity of the seaweed Ulva ohnoi (Chlorophyta) under changing cultivation conditions in pilot large land-based ponds

    Get PDF
    Land based intensive cultivation systems have been proposed as an ideal option for the commercial production of high value products from seaweeds. However, many cultures on Ulva and other seaweeds are based on relatively small-scale facilities. The high variability of culture conditions can strongly affect the physiological performance of seaweeds, but few studies examine their phenotypic plasticity by integrating critical biological descriptors, e.g. photobiology, oxidative stress, nutrient acquisition. The purpose of this study was to determine the physiological plasticity and growth of Ulva ohnoi during its cultivation in land-based 40 m3 ponds. Through an entire culti-vation cycle (four-weeks), photosynthesis, respiration, pigments, antioxidant capacity and nutrient content were measured. Light, temperature, pH, and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) were simultaneously monitored in seawater. Additionally, the N-uptake kinetics of U. ohnoi were examined in the laboratory in order to explain the efïŹciency of the seaweed biomass for DIN-incorporation in the ponds after fertilization. Generally, the gradual increase in seaweed density throughout the cultivation period was directly associated to a drop in light avail-ability and dissolved inorganic carbon (i.e. higher pH) within the ponds. These changes in cultivation conditions were related to a reduction of photosynthetic capacities, nutrient content and growth of U. ohnoi. N-uptake kinetics of U. ohnoi and the behavior of DIN within the ponds after fertilization, indicated that U. ohnoi was able to incorporate ammonium more efïŹciently than nitrate, and the presence of the former likely inhibits nitrate acquisition. The understanding of the capacity of U. ohnoi to acclimate to the extreme changing culture condi-tions, could be applied to improve its productivity and chemical composition.En prens

    Glyphosate-dependent effects on photosynthesis of Solanum lycopersicum L. an ecophysiological, ultrastructural and molecular approach

    Get PDF
    This study aimed to assess the toxicity of glyphosate (GLY; 0, 10, 20 and 30?mg?kg-1) in Solanum lycopersicum L., particularly focusing on the photosynthetic metabolism. By combining ecophysiological, ultrastructural, biochemical and molecular tools, the results revealed that the exposure of tomato plants to GLY led to alterations in leaf water balance regulation [increasing stomatal conductance (gs) and decreasing water use efficiency (WUEi) at higher concentrations] and induced slight alterations in the structural integrity of cells, mainly in chloroplasts, accompanied by a loss of cell viability. Moreover, the transcriptional and biochemical control of several photosynthetic-related parameters was reduced upon GLY exposure. However, in vivo chlorophyll fluorometry and IRGA gas-exchange studies revealed that the photosynthetic yield of S. lycopersicum was not repressed by GLY. Overall, GLY impacts cellular and subcellular homeostasis (by affecting chloroplast structure, reducing photosynthetic pigments and inhibiting photosynthetic-related genes transcription), and leaf structure, but is not reducing the carbon flow on a leaf area basis. Altogether, these results suggest a trade-off effect in which GLY-induced toxicity is compensated by a higher photosynthetic activity related to GLY-induced dysfunction in gs and an increase in mesophyll thickness/density, allowing the viable leaf cells to maintain their photosynthetic capacity.FCT -Fundação para a CiÃÂȘncia e a Tecnologia(SFRH/BD/115643/2016)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Why Are Some Plant Genera More Invasive Than Others?

    Get PDF
    Determining how biological traits are related to the ability of groups of organisms to become economically damaging when established outside of their native ranges is a major goal of population biology, and important in the management of invasive species. Little is known about why some taxonomic groups are more likely to become pests than others among plants. We investigated traits that discriminate vascular plant genera, a level of taxonomic generality at which risk assessment and screening could be more effectively performed, according to the proportion of naturalized species which are pests. We focused on the United States and Canada, and, because our purpose is ultimately regulatory, considered species classified as weeds or noxious. Using contingency tables, we identified 11 genera of vascular plants that are disproportionately represented by invasive species. Results from boosted regression tree analyses show that these categories reflect biological differences. In summary, approximately 25% of variation in genus proportions of weeds or noxious species was explained by biological covariates. Key explanatory traits included genus means for wetland habitat affinity, chromosome number, and seed mass

    Plant selection for rain gardens : response to simulated cyclical flooding of 15 perennial species

    Get PDF
    Plant selection for rain gardens can be complicated, as cyclic flooding and a gradient of moisture level are expected in the depression structure of a rain garden. However, few studies to date have quantified how plant establishment is affected by rain garden moisture dynamics. This study investigated tolerance of 15 candidate perennial species, which experienced flooding cycles consisting of 1-day and 4-day inundation and draining phases. In this study, detection of species suitability using survival and growth measurements coupled with the stress indicator (i.e. chlorophyll fluorescence) provided a valid framework for wider use in plant selection for rain gardens. The methodology is also confident in predicting the possible placing in different plant moisture zones. All species survived the cyclic flooding treatments and grew to their maximum. Photosynthesis and physical growth in only a few candidate species (e.g. Amsonia tabernaemontana var. salicifolia, Gaura lindheimeri, Sanguisorba tenuifolia ‘Purpurea’ and Thalictrum aquilegifolium) tended to be inhibited by treatments adopting 4-day cyclic flooding, whilst tolerance to 1-day cyclic flooding was clearly demonstrated in most species. Analysis suggests that most species assumed to withstand infrequent to periodic inundation, such as Iris sibirica, Filipendula purpurea and Miscanthus sinensis, are resilient species and are sensible for use in a wider range of rain garden moisture conditions from damp depression bottom to dry margin. Species assumed to be intolerant of inundation such as Gaura lindheimeri may be successful in the rain garden environment, but they are recommended for the dryer zones

    Comparison of transcriptome-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for genetic fingerprinting, diversity evaluation, and establishment of relationships in eggplants

    Full text link
    [EN] Simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers are amongst the most common markers of choice for studies of diversity and relationships in horticultural species. We have used 11 SSR and 35 SNP markers derived from transcriptome sequencing projects to fingerprint 48 accessions of a collection of brinjal (Solanum melongena), gboma (S. macrocarpon) and scarlet (S. aethiopicum) eggplant complexes, which also include their respective wild relatives S. incanum, S. dasyphyllum and S. anguivi. All SSR and SNP markers were polymorphic and 34 and 36 different genetic fingerprints were obtained with SSRs and SNPs, respectively. When combining both markers all accessions but two had different genetic profiles. Although on average SSRs were more informative than SNPs, with a higher number of alleles, genotypes and polymorphic information content (PIC), and expected heterozygosity (He) values, SNPs have proved highly informative in our materials. Low observed heterozygosity (Ho) and high fixation index (f) values confirm the high degree of homozygosity of eggplants. Genetic identities within groups of each complex were higher than with groups of other complexes, although differences in the ranks of genetic identity values among groups were observed between SSR and SNP markers. For low and intermediate values of pair-wise SNP genetic distances, a moderate correlation between SSR and SNP genetic distances was observed (r(2) = 0.592), but for high SNP genetic distances the correlation was low (r(2) = 0.080). The differences among markers resulted in different phenogram topologies, with a different eggplant complex being basal (gboma eggplant for SSRs and brinjal eggplant for SNPs) to the two others. Overall the results reveal that both types of markers are complementary for eggplant fingerprinting and that interpretation of relationships among groups may be greatly affected by the type of marker used.This work has been funded by European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 677379 (G2P-SOL project: Linking genetic resources, genomes and phenotypes of Solanaceous crops) and by Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (Grant AGL2015-64755-R from MINECO/FEDER). Pietro Gramazio is grateful to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia for a pre-doctoral contract (Programa FPI de la UPV-Subprograma 1/2013 call). Mariola Plazas is grateful to Spanish Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad for a post-doctoral grant within the Juan de la Cierva-Formacion programme (FJCI-2015-24835).Gramazio, P.; Prohens TomĂĄs, J.; Borras, D.; Plazas Ávila, MDLO.; Herraiz GarcĂ­a, FJ.; Vilanova Navarro, S. (2017). Comparison of transcriptome-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for genetic fingerprinting, diversity evaluation, and establishment of relationships in eggplants. Euphytica. 213(264):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-2057-3S118213264Acquadro A, Barchi L, Gramazio P et al (2017) Coding SNPs analysis highlights genetic relationships and evolution pattern in eggplant complexes. PLoS ONE 12:e0180774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180774Adeniji O, Kusolwa P, Reuben S (2013) Morphological descriptors and micro satellite diversity among scarlet eggplant groups. Afr Crop Sci J 21(1):37–49Aguoru C, Omoigui L, Olasan J (2015) Molecular characterization of Solanum species (Solanum aethiopicum complex; Solanum macrocarpon and Solanum anguivi) using multiplex RAPD primers. J Plant Stud 4:27–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v4n1p27Arumuganathan K, Earle E (1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9(3):208–218Ashrafi H, Hill T, Stoffel K et al (2012) De novo assembly of the pepper transcriptome (Capsicum annuum): a benchmark for in silico discovery of SNPs, SSRs and candidate genes. BMC Genom 13:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-571Augustinos AA, Petropoulos C, Karasoulou V et al (2016) Assessing diversity among traditional Greek and foreign eggplant cultivars using molecular markers and morphometrical descriptors. Span J Agric Res 14:e0710. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016144-9020Avise JC (2012) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9Blanca J, Cañizares J, Roig C et al (2011) Transcriptome characterization and high throughput SSRs and SNPs discovery in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). BMC Genom 12:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-104Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32(3):314–331Bukenya Z, Carasco J (1994) Biosystematic study of Solanum macrocarpon—S. dasyphyllum complex in Uganda and relations with Solanum linnaeanum. East Afr Agric For J 59(3):187–204Castillo A, Budak H, Varshney RK et al (2008) Transferability and polymorphism of barley EST-SSR markers used for phylogenetic analysis in Hordeum chilense. BMC Plant Biol 8:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-97Choudhary S, Sethy NK, Shokeen B, Bhatia S (2009) Development of chickpea EST-SSR markers and analysis of allelic variation across related species. Theor Appl Genet 118:591–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0923-zCoates BS, Sumerford DV, Miller NJ et al (2009) Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis. J Hered 100:556–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esp028D’Agostino N, Golas T, van de Geest H et al (2013) Genomic analysis of the native European Solanum species, S. dulcamara. BMC Genom 14:356. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-356Daunay MC, Hazra P (2012) Eggplant. In: Peter KV, Hazra P (eds) Handbook of Vegetables. Studium Press, Houston, pp 257–322Davey J, Hohenlohe P, Etter P et al (2011) Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 12:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3012De Barba M, Miquel C, LobrĂ©aux S et al (2016) High-throughput microsatellite genotyping in ecology: improved accuracy, efficiency, standardization and success with low-quantity and degraded DNA. Mol Ecol Resour 17(3):492–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12594Doyle J, Doyle J (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Ellegren H (2004) Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet 5:435–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1348Felsenstein, J (2007). PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.67. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAFernandez-Silva I, Whitney J, Wainwright B (2013) Microsatellites for next-generation ecologists: a post-sequencing bioinformatics pipeline. PLoS ONE 8(2):e55990Filippi CV, Aguirre N, Rivas JG et al (2015) Population structure and genetic diversity characterization of a sunflower association mapping population using SSR and SNP markers. BMC Plant Biol 15:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0360-xFischer MC, Rellstab C, Leuzinger M et al (2017) Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation—an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri. BMC Genom 18:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3459-7Furini A, Wunder J (2004) Analysis of eggplant (Solanum melongena)-related germplasm: morphological and AFLP data contribute to phylogenetic interpretations and germplasm utilization. Theor Appl Genet 108:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1439-1Gadaleta A, Giancaspro A, Zacheo S et al (2011) Comparison of genomic and EST-derived SSR markers in phylogenetic analysis of wheat. Plant Genet Resour 9:243–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147926211100030XGe H, Liu Y, Jiang M et al (2013) Analysis of genetic diversity and structure of eggplant populations (Solanum melongena L.) in China using simple sequence repeat markers. Sci Hortic 162:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.004Gonzaga ZJ (2015) Evaluation of SSR and SNP Markers for Molecular Breeding in Rice. Plant Breed Biotechnol 3:139–152. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2015.3.2.139Goodwin S, McPherson J, McCombie W (2016) Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet 17(6):333–351Gramazio P, Blanca J, Ziarsolo P et al (2016) Transcriptome analysis and molecular marker discovery in Solanum incanum and S. aethiopicum, two close relatives of the common eggplant (Solanum melongena) with interest for breeding. BMC Genom 17:300. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2631-4Grover A, Sharma PC (2014) Development and use of molecular markers: past and present. Crit Rev Biotechnol 8551:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.959891Hamblin MT, Warburton ML, Buckler ES (2007) Empirical comparison of simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms in assessment of maize diversity and relatedness. PLoS ONE 2:e1367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001367Hess JE, Matala AP (2011) Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for fine-scale application of genetic stock identification of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for fine-scale application of genetic stock identification of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Mol Ecol Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02958.xHighton R (1993) The relationship between the number of loci and the statistical support for the topology of UPGMA trees obtained from genetic distance data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2:337–343Hirakawa H, Shirasawa K, Miyatake K, Nunome, T et al (2014) Draft genome sequence of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): the representative solanum species indigenous to the old world. DNA Res 21:649–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsu027Hong CP, Piao ZY, Kang TW et al (2007) Genomic distribution of simple sequence repeats in Brassica rapa. Mol Cells 23:349–356.Hu J, Wang L, Li J (2011) Comparison of genomic SSR and EST-SSR markers for estimating genetic diversity in cucumber. Biol Plant 55:577–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-011-0129-0Isshiki S, Iwata N, Khan MMR (2008) ISSR variations in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and related Solanum species. Sci Hortic 117:186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.04.003Jones ES, Sullivan H, Bhattramakki D, Smith JSC (2007) A comparison of simple sequence repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism marker technologies for the genotypic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 115:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0570-9Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S et al (2011) Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177:309–334Kashi Y, King DG (2006) Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. Trends Genet 22:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2006.03.005Kaushik P, Prohens J, Vilanova S et al (2016) Phenotyping of eggplant wild relatives and interspecific hybrids with conventional and phenomics descriptors provides insight for their potential utilization in breeding. Front Plant Sci 7:677Kim C, Guo H, Kong W et al (2016) Application of genotyping by sequencing technology to a variety of crop breeding programs. Plant Sci 242:14–22Knapp S, Vorontsova MS, Prohens J (2013) Wild relatives of the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.: Solanaceae): new understanding of species names in a complex group. PLoS ONE 8:e57039Kruglyak S, Durrett RT, Schug MD, Aquadro CF (1998) Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10774–10778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.18.10774Lester RN, Daunay MC (2003) Diversity of African vegetable Solanum species and its implications for a better understanding of plant domestication. Schriften zu Genetischen Ressourcen 22:137–152Lester RN, Niakan L (1986) Origin and domestication of the scarlet eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum, from S. anguivi in Africa. In: D’Arcy WG (ed) Solanaceae: biology and systematics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 433–456Lester RN, Jaeger PML, Bleijendaal-Spierings BHM et al (1990) African eggplants-a review of collecting in West Africa. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 81:17–26Levin R, Myers N, Bohs L (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among the ‘spiny solanums’ (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). Am J Bot 93(1):157–169Li WH, Gojobori T, Nei M (1981) Pseudogenes as a paradigm of neutral evolution. Nature 292:237–239Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T et al (2002) Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol 11:2453–2465Liu K, Muse S (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21:2128–2129Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/214637b0MartĂ­nez-Arias R, Calafell F, Mateu E et al (2001) Sequence variability of a human pseudogene. Genome Res 11:1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.167701Meyer RS, Karol KG, Little DP et al (2012) Phylogeographic relationships among Asian eggplants and new perspectives on eggplant domestication. Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:685–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.006Muñoz-FalcĂłn J, Prohens J, Vilanova S, Nuez F (2009) Diversity in commercial varieties and landraces of black eggplants and implications for broadening the breeders’ gene pool. Ann Appl Biol 154(3):453–465Nandha PS, Singh J (2014) Comparative assessment of genetic diversity between wild and cultivated barley using gSSR and EST-SSR markers. Plant Breed 133:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12118Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771Nunome T, Negoro S, Kono I et al (2009) Development of SSR markers derived from SSR-enriched genomic library of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Theor Appl Genet 119:1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1116-0Page R (2001) TreeView. Glasgow University, GlasgowPeakall P, Smouse R (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539Pessarakli M, Dris R (2004) Pollination and breeding of eggplants. J Food Agric Environ 2:218–219Plazas M, AndĂșjar I, Vilanova S et al (2014) Conventional and phenomics characterization provides insight into the diversity and relationships of hypervariable scarlet (Solanum aethiopicum L.) and gboma (S. macrocarpon L.) eggplant complexes. Front. Plant Sci 5:318Ranil R, Niran H, Plazas M et al (2015) Improving seed germination of the eggplant rootstock Solanum torvum by testing multiple factors using an orthogonal array design. Sci Hortic 193:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.030Sakata Y, Lester RN (1997) Chloroplast DNA diversity in brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) and related species. Euphytica 97:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003000612441Sakata Y, Nishio T, Matthews PJ (1991) Chloroplast DNA analysis of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and related species for their taxonomic affinity. Euphytica 55:21–26SĂ€rkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S (2013) A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evol Biol 13:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-214Scheben A, Batley J, Edwards D (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application. Plant Biotechnol J 15:149–161Sneath P, Sokal R (1973) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. W H Freeman Limited, San FranciscoStĂ gel A, Portis E, Toppino L et al (2008) Gene-based microsatellite development for mapping and phylogeny studies in eggplant. BMC Genom 9:357. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-357Sunseri F, Polignano GB, Alba V et al (2010) Genetic diversity and characterization of African eggplant germplasm collection. Afr J Plant Sci 4:231–241Syfert MM, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Khoury CK et al (2016) Crop wild relatives of the brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena): poorly represented in genebanks and many species at risk of extinction. Am J Bot 103:635–651. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500539Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney R, Graner A (2003) Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 106:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0Thomson MJ, Alfred J, Dangl J et al (2014) High-throughput SNP genotyping to accelerate crop improvement. Plant Breed Biotechnol 2:195–212. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2014.2.3.195ThorvaldsdĂłttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP (2013) Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14:178–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs017Tumbilen Y, Frary A, Daunay MC, Doganlar S (2011) Application of EST-SSRs to examine genetic diversity in eggplant and its close relatives. Turk J Biol 35:125–136. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-0906-57van Inghelandt D, Melchinger AE, Lebreton C, Stich B (2010) Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor Appl Genet 120:1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1256-2Van Tassell CP, Smith TPL, Matukumalli LK et al (2008) SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nat Methods 5:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1185Varshney R, Graner A, Sorrells M (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol 23(1):48–55Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS et al (2007) Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys. Plant Sci 173:638–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.08.010Vilanova S, Manzur JP, Prohens J (2012) Development and characterization of genomic simple sequence repeat markers in eggplant and their application to the study of diversity and relationships in a collection of different cultivar types and origins. Mol Breed 30:647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9650-2Vilanova S, Hurtado M, Cardona A (2014) Genetic diversity and relationships in local varieties of eggplant from different cultivar groups as assessed by genomic SSR markers. Not Bot Horti Agrobo Cluj-Napoca 42:59–65Vogel JP, Gu YQ, Twigg P et al (2006) EST sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Theor Appl Genet 113:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0285-3Vorontsova MS, Stern S, Bohs L, Knapp S (2013) African spiny solanum (subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle. Bot J Linn Soc 173:176–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12053Weese TL, Bohs L (2010) Eggplant origins: out of Africa, into the Orient. Taxon 59:49–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/27757050Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19:395–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406450Xiao M, Zhang Y, Chen X et al (2013) Transcriptome analysis based on next-generation sequencing of non-model plants producing specialized metabolites of biotechnological interest. J Biotechnol 166:122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.04.004Yan J, Yang X, Shah T et al (2010) High-throughput SNP genotyping with the Goldengate assay in maize. Mol Breed 25:441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-009-9343-2Yang X, Xu Y, Shah T et al (2011) Comparison of SSRs and SNPs in assessment of genetic relatedness in maize. Genetica 139:1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-011-9606-9Yu J, Zhang Z, Zhu C et al (2009) Simulation appraisal of the adequacy of number of background markers for relationship estimation in association mapping. Plant Genome 2:63. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2008.09.0009Zhan L, Paterson I, Fraser B (2016) MEGASAT: automated inference of microsatellite genotypes from sequence data. Ecol Resour, Mol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.1256
    • 

    corecore