Improving the Biomethane Yield and Biogas Quality of Food Waste During Anaerobic Digestion by Sequential Process Optimisation and Biomethanation

In spite of global efforts to reduce the generation of food waste, overwhelming quantities are still generated annually. In the United Kingdom for example, a third of the food crops produced annually for consumption end up in the bins. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is currently the most suitable technology for treating food waste, providing energy in the form of methane. However, the highly organic nature of food waste enriches the release of nutrients up to levels, which can be toxic or inhibitory to the acting microorganisms. As a result, the biomethane yields are much lower than the theoretical potential. This study investigates the possibility of improving the stability of AD and enhancing biomethane yield from mono-digestion of food waste, by a sequential optimisation of the biomethane production process. The first level of optimisation was to identify suitable combinations of food waste particle size and microbial availability (inoculum-to-substrate ratio – ISR), to improve the process stability and biomethane yield. This investigation revealed that PS reduction (≤ 3 mm) resulted in a rapid digestion of food waste, and while this is expected to result in higher rates of acidification within the system, the variation in ISR helped to reduce such effects. Hence, an optimum condition of 1 mm PS and 3:1 ISR was determined; resulting in 38% increase in methane, and was used henceforth. The second level of optimisation explored the potential for incorporating biomethanation into food waste AD. To optimise the conversion of the injected hydrogen to biomethane, three hydrogen injection points were investigated. As a result, 12.1%, 4% and 9.6% increases in biomethane yield were achieved, when hydrogen was added before hydrolysis, at the peak of acidification and during active methanogenesis respectively. The third level of optimisation adopted the principle of acclimation to further improve the biomethane yield and explore the possibility of using formic acid (FA) as an alternative source of H2. The H2-acclimated systems performed better than the FA-acclimated systems, and yielded up to 81% biomethane against 65% without acclimation. Based on the results obtained in this study, it is possible to obtain up to 98% biomethane content, with continuous hydrogen acclimation. This reveals that the energy and revenue potential of food waste AD can be improved, by opening up multiple end uses beyond combined heat and power, such as gas-to-grid injection and vehicle fuel

Improving the biomethane yield from food waste by boosting hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis

Anaerobic digestion of food waste is usually impacted by high levels of VFAs, resulting in low pH and inhibited methane production from acetate (acetoclastic methanogenesis); however, this could be harnessed for improving methane production via hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (biomethanation). In this study, batch anaerobic digestion of food waste was conducted to enhance biomethanation by supplying hydrogen gas (H2), using a gas mixture of 5%-H2 and 95%-N2. The addition of H2 influenced a temporal microbial shift in substrate utilisation from dissolved organic nutrients to H2 and CO2 and was perceived to have enhanced the hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity. As a result, with the release of hydrogen as degradation progressed (secondary fermentation) hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis was further enriched. This resulted in an enhancement of the upgrading of the biogas, with a 12.1% increase in biomethane (from 417.6 to 468.3 NmL-CH4/gVSadded) and 38.9% reduction in CO2 (from 227.1 to 138.7 NmL-CO2/gVSadded). Furthermore, the availability of hydrogen gas at the start of the process promoted faster propionate degradation, by the enhanced activity of the H2-utilisers, thereby, reducing likely propionate-induced inhibitions. The high level of acidification from VFAs production helped to prevent excessive pH increases from the enhanced hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity. Therefore, it was found that the addition of hydrogen gas to AD reactors treating food waste showed great potential for enhanced methane yield and biogas upgrade, supported by VFAs-induced pH buffer. This creates the possibility to optimise hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis towards obtaining biogas of the right quality for injection into the gas grid

Enhancing bioenergy production from food waste by in situ biomethanation: Effect of the hydrogen injection point

The increasing rate of food waste (FW) generation around the world is a growing environmental concern, notwithstanding, its valorisation through anaerobic digestion (AD) makes it a potential resource. Moreover, there is a growing demand to optimise the biomethane from AD for gas‐to‐grid (GtG) and vehicular applications. This has spurred researches on hydrogen gas (H2) injection into AD systems to enhance the biological conversion of H2 and carbon dioxide (CO2) to methane (CH4), a process known as biomethanation. A simplistic approach for biomethanation is to add H2 directly into working AD reactors (in situ biomethanation). However, a competition for the injected H2 towards other biological reactions besides H2/CO2 conversion to CH4 could follow, thus, reducing the efficiency of the system. Hence, this study was conducted to understand how different H2 injection points would affect H2/CO2 conversion to CH4 during FW in situ biomethanation, to identify an optimal injection point. Experiments were designed using H2 equivalent to 5% of the head‐space of the AD reactor at three injection points representing different stages of AD: before volatile fatty acids (VFA) accumulation, during VFA accumulation and at depleted VFA intermediates. Lower potential for competitive H2 consumption before the accumulation of VFA enabled a high H2/CO2 conversion to CH4. However, enhanced competition for soluble substrates during VFA accumulation reduced the efficiency of H2/CO2 conversion to CH4 when H2 was added at this stage. In general, 12%, 4% and 10% CH4 increases as well as 39%, 25% and 34% CO2 removal were obtained for H2 added before VFA accumulation, during VFA accumulation and at depleted VFA intermediates, respectively. For immediate integration of biomethanation with existing AD facilities, it is suggested that the required H2 be obtained biologically by dark fermentation

Particle size, inoculum-to-substrate ratio and nutrient media effects on biomethane yield from food waste

This study investigates the effects of particle size reduction at different inoculum-to-substrate ratios and nutrient media supplementation on the assessment of biomethane production from food waste, under batch mesophilic conditions. Two different food waste samples were used and the best method for testing biomethane potential was chosen based on their characterisation and methane yields. Results obtained indicate that Inoculum-to-substrate ratios of 3:1 and 4:1 helped to stabilise test reactors with smaller particle sizes of 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. Consequently, an overall biomethane yield increase of 38% was reported (i.e., from 393 NmLCH4 gVS−1added to 543 NmLCH4 gVS−1added). This could potentially imply a better assessment of energy outputs from anaerobic digestion of food waste (i.e., 43.5% higher energy output as electricity from biogas, using commercial scale Combined Heat and Power (CHP) units). Although nutrient media supplementation did not enhance methane yield from optimum inoculum-to-substrate ratio (3:1) and particle size (1 mm), it was found that its application helped to stabilise food waste digestion by avoiding volatile fatty acids accumulation and high propionic-to-acetic acid ratio, consequently, improving the overall test kinetics with 91% lag time reduction from 5.6 to 0.5 days. This work supports the importance of key variables to consider during biomethane potential tests used for assessing methane yields from food waste samples, which in return can potentially increase the throughput of anaerobic digestion system processing food waste, to further increase the overall energy output

The Impact of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Sewage Sludge as a Pre-treatment for Dark Fermentation

For many years, sewage sludge has been processed for methane production in anaerobic digestion reactors at wastewater treatment plants around the world. Sewage sludge is produced in large quantities and is rich in biodegradable organic materials, from which sugars (e.g., glucose) can be produced, recovered and used as a substrate to support hydrogen production through the Dark Fermentation (DF) process. DF is one of several methods used for bio-hydrogen production, whereby fermentative bacteria are used to hydrolyse organic substrates to produce hydrogen gas. Carbohydrates (sugars) is one of the main fermentable substrates for hydrogen production, and they are considered the most favourable substrate for fermentative bacteria (e.g., Clostridium bacteria). Although sewage sludge is rich in organic materials, still the complexity of its structure and low carbon/nitrogen ratio limits the bio-hydrogen production via DF processes. Therefore, this paper addresses the impact of Enzymatic Hydrolysis (EH) as a pre-treatment of sewage sludge on enhancing the biodegradability and glucose content in sewage sludge. The result shows that using the EH process as pre-treatment for sewage sludge, enhanced the glucose content in sewage sludge and converted some of the macro sewage flocs to easy digestible micro flocs (glucose). Therefore, the substrate being more favourable and easier to digest by bacteria in the DF reactor, enhanced the production of hydrogen and VFAs. More research needs to be done to find the optimum enzyme dosage, initial substrate concentration and operation temperature (especially when the enzyme is used inside the DF reactor)

Assessing Different Inoculum Treatments for Improved Production of Hydrogen through Dark Fermentation

Hydrogen gas (H2) is an energy carrier that does not generate carbon dioxide emissions during combustion, but several processes in use for its production demand high energy inputs associated with fossil fuels and greenhouse emissions. Biological processes, such as dark fermentation (DF), have the potential to remove the dependency on fossil fuels in H2 production. DF is a process that encourages fermentative bacteria to ferment organic substrates to produce H2 as a truly clean energy carrier, but its success depends on removing the presence of competing H2−consuming microorganisms in the inoculum consortia. This paper addresses a strategy to enhance H2 production from different types of substrates by testing inoculum pre-treatment processes to inactivate H2−consuming bacteria, including acid-shock (pH 3), basic-shock (pH 10) and heat-shock (115 °C) methods. Digestate from anaerobic digesters processing sewage sludge was used to produce pre-treated inocula, which were subsequently tested in a batch bio-H2 potential (BHP) test using glucose as a substrate. The results show that heat-shock pre-treatment was the best method, reporting a H2 yield of 191.8 mL-H2/gVS added (the untreated inoculum reported 170.91 mL-H2/gVS added). Glucose conversion data show a high concentration of butyric acid in both treated and untreated inocula during BHP tests, which indicate that the butyrate pathway for H2 production was dominant; shifting this to the formate route could further enhance net H2 production. A standardised inoculum-conditioning method can help to consistently assess the biohydrogen potential of suitable feedstock for DF and maximise H2 yields

Enhanced in-situ biomethanation of food waste by sequential inoculum acclimation: Energy efficiency and carbon savings analysis

The increasing rate of food waste (FW) generation globally, makes it an attractive resource for renewable energy through anaerobic digestion (AD). The biogas recovered from AD can be upgraded by the methanation of internally produced carbon dioxide, CO2 with externally sourced hydrogen gas, H2 (biomethanation). In this work, H2 was added to AD reactors processing FW in three successive phases, with digestate from preceding phases recycled in succession with the addition of fresh inoculum to enhance acclimation. The concentration of H2 was increased for succeeding phases: 5%, 10% and 15% of the reactor headspace in Phase 1 (EH1), Phase 2 (EH2) and Phase 3 (EH3), respectively. The H2 utilisation rate and biomethane yields increased as acclimation progressed from EH1 through EH3. Biomethane yield from the controls: EH1_Control, EH2_Control and EH3_Control were 417.6, 435.4 and 453.3 NmL-CH4/gVSadded accounting for 64.8, 73.9 and 77.8% of the biogas respectively. And the biomethane yield from the test reactors EH1_Test, EH2_Test and EH3_Test were 468.3, 483.6, and 499.0 NmL-CH4/gVSadded, accounting for 77.2, 78.1 and 81.0% of the biogas respectively. A progressive in-situ biomethanation could lead to biomethane production that meets higher fuel standards for gas-to-grid (GtG) injections and vehicle fuel – i.e. >95% CH4. This would increase the energy yield and carbon savings compared to conventional biogas upgrade methods. For example, biogas upgrade for GtG by in-situ biomethanation could yield 7.3 MWh/tFW energy and 1343 kg-CO2e carbon savings, which is better than physicochemical upgrade options (i.e., 4.6–4.8 MWh/tFW energy yield and 846–883 kg-CO2e carbon savings)