Global maps of soil temperature

Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1-km2 resolution for 0\u20135 and 5\u201315 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e. offset) between in situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1-km2 pixels (summarized from 8519 unique temperature sensors) across all the world's major terrestrial biomes, and coarse-grained air temperature estimates from ERA5-Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10\ub0C (mean = 3.0 \ub1 2.1\ub0C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 \ub1 2.3\ub0C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler ( 120.7 \ub1 2.3\ub0C). The observed substantial and biome-specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near-surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil-related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications

Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission

NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is collecting spaceborne full waveform lidar data with a primary science goal of producing accurate estimates of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD). This paper presents the development of the models used to create GEDI's footprint-level (similar to 25 m) AGBD (GEDI04_A) product, including a description of the datasets used and the procedure for final model selection. The data used to fit our models are from a compilation of globally distributed spatially and temporally coincident field and airborne lidar datasets, whereby we simulated GEDI-like waveforms from airborne lidar to build a calibration database. We used this database to expand the geographic extent of past waveform lidar studies, and divided the globe into four broad strata by Plant Functional Type (PFT) and six geographic regions. GEDI's waveform-to-biomass models take the form of parametric Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models with simulated Relative Height (RH) metrics as predictor variables. From an exhaustive set of candidate models, we selected the best input predictor variables, and data transformations for each geographic stratum in the GEDI domain to produce a set of comprehensive predictive footprint-level models. We found that model selection frequently favored combinations of RH metrics at the 98th, 90th, 50th, and 10th height above ground-level percentiles (RH98, RH90, RH50, and RH10, respectively), but that inclusion of lower RH metrics (e.g. RH10) did not markedly improve model performance. Second, forced inclusion of RH98 in all models was important and did not degrade model performance, and the best performing models were parsimonious, typically having only 1-3 predictors. Third, stratification by geographic domain (PFT, geographic region) improved model performance in comparison to global models without stratification. Fourth, for the vast majority of strata, the best performing models were fit using square root transformation of field AGBD and/or height metrics. There was considerable variability in model performance across geographic strata, and areas with sparse training data and/or high AGBD values had the poorest performance. These models are used to produce global predictions of AGBD, but will be improved in the future as more and better training data become available

Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission

NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is collecting spaceborne full waveform lidar data with a primary science goal of producing accurate estimates of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD). This paper presents the development of the models used to create GEDI's footprint-level (~25 m) AGBD (GEDI04_A) product, including a description of the datasets used and the procedure for final model selection. The data used to fit our models are from a compilation of globally distributed spatially and temporally coincident field and airborne lidar datasets, whereby we simulated GEDI-like waveforms from airborne lidar to build a calibration database. We used this database to expand the geographic extent of past waveform lidar studies, and divided the globe into four broad strata by Plant Functional Type (PFT) and six geographic regions. GEDI's waveform-to-biomass models take the form of parametric Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models with simulated Relative Height (RH) metrics as predictor variables. From an exhaustive set of candidate models, we selected the best input predictor variables, and data transformations for each geographic stratum in the GEDI domain to produce a set of comprehensive predictive footprint-level models. We found that model selection frequently favored combinations of RH metrics at the 98th, 90th, 50th, and 10th height above ground-level percentiles (RH98, RH90, RH50, and RH10, respectively), but that inclusion of lower RH metrics (e.g. RH10) did not markedly improve model performance. Second, forced inclusion of RH98 in all models was important and did not degrade model performance, and the best performing models were parsimonious, typically having only 1-3 predictors. Third, stratification by geographic domain (PFT, geographic region) improved model performance in comparison to global models without stratification. Fourth, for the vast majority of strata, the best performing models were fit using square root transformation of field AGBD and/or height metrics. There was considerable variability in model performance across geographic strata, and areas with sparse training data and/or high AGBD values had the poorest performance. These models are used to produce global predictions of AGBD, but will be improved in the future as more and better training data become available

THE POTENTIAL OF DISCRETE RETURN, SMALL FOOTPRINT AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA FOR VEGETATION DENSITY ESTIMATION

ABSTRACT We evaluate the potential of deriving a vegetation leaf area index (LAI) from small footprint airborne laser scanning data. Based on findings from large area histograms of discrete laser returns for two contrasting plots, LAI is estimated from the fraction of first to last and single returns inside the canopy. The canopy returns are classified using thresholding of LIDAR raw data heights subtracted by interpolated digital terrain model heights. This should yield LAI estimates being independent of fractional vegetation cover, an ambiguity many passive optical approaches suffer from. Validation is carried out using 78 georeferenced hemispherical photographs, with LAI and gap fractions for a range of zenith angles being computed using the Gap Light Analyzer (GLA, Frazer et al. [1997]). Since the range sensitivity of the hemispherical photographs is not a priori known, we use variable LIDAR data trap sizes to find a suitable diameter. This is achieved searching the maximum R 2 value of the regression for the trap size range from 5 to 50 m diameter. Larger diameters ( 30 m ) provide best results for our canopy types. Regressions of LIDAR estimates shows a moderate agreement with field data based on hemispherical photographs, with R 2 0.6 for LAI. Due to either heterogenity of the canopy or geolocation errors, a quite large amount of noise seems to be attributed to the regression, explaining the somewhat low values of R 2

Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction

We evaluate the potential of deriving fractional cover (fCover) and leaf area index (LAI) from discrete return, small footprint airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. fCover was computed as the fraction of laser vegetation hits over the number of total laser echoes per unit area. Analogous to the concept of contact frequency, an effective LAI proxy was estimated by a fraction of first and last echo types inside the canopy. Validation was carried out using 83 hemispherical photographs georeferenced to centimeter accuracy by differential GPS, for which the respective gap fractions were computed over a range of zenith angles using the Gap Light Analyzer (GLA). LAI was computed by GLA from gap fraction estimations at zenith angles of 0–60°. For ALS data, different data trap sizes were used to compute fCover and LAI proxy, the range of radii was 2–25 m. For fCover, a data trap size of 2 m radius was used, whereas for LAI a radius of 15 m provided best results. fCover was estimated both from first and last echo data, with first echo data overestimating field fCover and last echo data underestimating field fCover. A multiple regression of fCover derived from both echo types with field fCover showed no increase of R2 compared to the regression of first echo data, and thus, we only used first echo data for fCover estimation. R2 for the fCover regression was 0.73, with an RMSE of 0.18. For the ALS LAI proxy, R2 was lower, at 0.69, while the RMSE was 0.01. For LAI larger radii (∼15 m ) provided best results for our canopy types, which is due to the importance of a larger range of zenith angles (0–60°) in LAI estimation from hemispherical photographs. Based on the regression results, maps of fCover and LAI were computed for our study area and compared qualitatively to equivalent maps based on imaging spectrometry, revealing similar spatial patterns and ranges of values