The Great Lakes Charter: Principles for the Management of Great Lakes Water Resources

The water resources of the Great Lakes Basin are precious public natural resources, shared and held in trust by the Great Lakes States and Provinces. The Great Lakes are valuable regional, national and international resources for which the federal governments of the United States and Canada and the International Joint Commission have, in partnership with the States and Provinces, and important, continuing an abiding role and responsibility. The waters of the Great Lakes Basin are interconnected and part of a single hydrologic system. The multiple uses of these resources for municipal, industrial and agricultural water supply; mining; navigation; hydroelectric power and energy production; recreation; and the maintenance of fish and wildlife habitat and a balanced ecosystem are interdependent. Studies conducted by the International Joint Commission, the Great Lakes States and Provinces, and other agencies have found that without careful and prudent management, the future development of diversions and consumptive uses of the water resources of the Great Lakes Basin may have significant adverse impacts on the environment, economy, and welfare of the Great Lakes region. As trustees of the Basin\u27s natural resources, the Great Lakes States and Provinces have a shared duty to protect, conserve, and manage the renewable but finite waters of the Great Lakes Basin for the use, benefit, and enjoyment of all their citizens, including generations yet to come. The most effective means of protecting, conserving, and managing the water resources of the Great Lakes is through the joint pursuit of unified and cooperative principles, policies and programs mutually agreed upon, enacted and adhered to by each and every Great Lakes State and Province. Management of the water resources of the Basin is subject to the jurisdiction, rights and responsibilities of the signatory States and Provinces. Effective management of the water resources of the Great Lakes requires the exercise of such jurisdiction, rights, and responsibilities in the interest of all the people of the Great Lakes Region, acting in a continuing spirit of comity and mutual cooperation. The Great Lakes States and Provinces reaffirm the mutual rights and obligations of all Basin jurisdictions to use, conserve, and protect Basin water resources, as expressed in the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909, the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, and the principles of other applicable international agreements. Les ressources en eau du bassin des Grands Lacs constituent des ressources naturelles publiques de grande valeur partagées et tenues en fiducie par les États et provinces du bassin des Grands Lacs. Les Grands Lacs constituent de précieuses ressources régionales, nationales et internationales à l\u27égard desquelles les gouvernements fédéraux respectifs des États-Unis et du Canada et la Commission mixte internationale assument, de façon constante et en association avec les États et les provinces, un rôle et une responsabilité essentiels et constants. Les eaux du bassin des Grands Lacs sont reliées entre elles et font partie d\u27un même système hydrologique. Les multiples utilisations auxquelles se prêtent ces ressources sont interdépendantes et comprennent: l\u27alimentation en eau à des fins municipales, industrielles et agricoles; l\u27exploitation minière; la navigation; la production hydro-électrique et énergétique; les loisirs et le maintien de l\u27habitat du poisson et de la faune et de l\u27équilibre de l\u27écosystème. Des études menées par la Commission mixte internationale, par les États et les provinces du bassin des Grands Lacs et par d\u27autres organismes ont montré qu\u27à défaut d\u27une gestion sage et prévoyante, une éventuelle augmentation des dérivations et consommations des eaux du bassin des Grands Lacs pourrait avoir des effets défavorables appréciables sur l\u27environnement, l\u27économie et la prospérité de la région des Grands Lacs. À titre de fiduciaires des ressources naturelles du Bassin, les États et les provinces du bassin des Grands Lacs partagent collectivement le devoir de protéger, conserver et gérer les ressources renouvelables mais limitées que sont les eaux du bassin des Grands Lacs, pour l\u27usage, le bénéfice et la jouissance de tous leurs citoyens, y compris les générations à venir. Pour s\u27acquitter de ce devoir, le moyen le plus efficace consiste à élaborer collectivement des principes, des politiques et des programmes unifiés et coopératifs qui auront tous été convenus et adoptés et auront reçu l\u27adhésion de tous et chacun des États et provinces du bassin des Grands Lacs. La gestion des ressources en eau du Bassin est soumise à la juridiction, aux droits et aux responsabilités des États et provinces signataires. Une gestion efficace des ressources en eau des Grands Lacs requiert, dans l\u27intérêt des populations de la région des Grands Lacs, que cette juridiction, ces droits et ces responsabilités s\u27exercent dans un esprit constant de bonne entente et de coopération mutuelle. Les États et provinces du bassin des Grands Lacs réaffirment les droits et obligations réciproques de tous les gouvernements du Bassin d\u27utiliser, de conserver et de protéger les ressources en eau du Bassin, tel qu\u27il est énoncé dans le Traité des eaux limitrophes internationales de 1909, dans l\u27Accord relatif à la qualité de l\u27eau dans les Grands Lacs de 1978 et dans les principes de tous les autres accords internationaux pertinents

Stakeholders' perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies

The ecosystem service (ES) concept is becoming mainstream in policy and planning, but operational influence on practice is seldom reported. Here, we report the practitioners' perspectives on the practical implementation of the ES concept in 27 case studies. A standardised anonymous survey (n = 246), was used, focusing on the science-practice interaction process, perceived impact and expected use of the case study assessments. Operationalisation of the concept was shown to achieve a gradual change in practices: 13% of the case studies reported a change in action (e.g. management or policy change), and a further 40% anticipated that a change would result from the work. To a large extent the impact was attributed to a well conducted science-practice interaction process (>70%). The main reported advantages of the concept included: increased concept awareness and communication; enhanced participation and collaboration; production of comprehensive science-based knowledge; and production of spatially referenced knowledge for input to planning (91% indicated they had acquired new knowledge). The limitations were mostly case-specific and centred on methodology, data, and challenges with result implementation. The survey highlighted the crucial role of communication, participation and collaboration across different stakeholders, to implement the ES concept and enhance the democratisation of nature and landscape planning. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.Peer reviewe

The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people

The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework. This conceptual and analytical tool, presented here in detail, will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that IPBES will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions. Salient innovative aspects of the IPBES Conceptual Framework are its transparent and participatory construction process and its explicit consideration of diverse scientific disciplines, stakeholders, and knowledge systems, including indigenous and local knowledge. Because the focus on co-construction of integrative knowledge is shared by an increasing number of initiatives worldwide, this framework should be useful beyond IPBES, for the wider research and knowledge-policy communities working on the links between nature and people, such as natural, social and engineering scientists, policy-makers at different levels, and decision-makers in different sectors of society

An introduction to proteoglycans and their localization

Proteoglycans comprise a core protein to which one or more glycosaminoglycan chains are covalently attached. Although a small number of proteins have the capacity to be glycanated and become proteoglycans, it is now realized that these macromolecules have a range of functions, dependent on type and in vivo location, and have important roles in invertebrate and vertebrate development, maintenance, and tissue repair. Many biologically potent small proteins can bind glycosaminoglycan chains as a key part of their function in the extracellular matrix, at the cell surface, and also in some intracellular locations. Therefore, the participation of proteoglycans in disease is receiving increased attention. In this short review, proteoglycan structure, function, and localizations are summarized, with reference to accompanying reviews in this issue as well as other recent literature. Included are some remarks on proteoglycan and glycosaminoglycan localization techniques, with reference to the special physicochemical properties of these complex molecules