21 research outputs found

    Holistan Revisited: Demonstrating Agent- and Knowledge-Based Capabilities for Future Coalition Military Operations

    No full text
    As a fundamental research program, the International Technology Alliance (ITA) aims to explore innovative solutions to some of the challenges confronting US/UK coalition military forces in an era of network-enabled operations. In order to demonstrate some of the scientific and technical achievements of the ITA research program, we have developed a detailed military scenario that features the involvement of US and UK coalition forces in a large-scale humanitarian-assistance/disaster relief (HA/DR) effort. The scenario is based in a fictitious country called Holistan, and it draws on a number of previous scenario specification efforts that have been undertaken as part of the ITA. In this paper we provide a detailed description of the scenario and review the opportunities for technology demonstration in respect of a number of ITA research focus areas

    TAK1 Is Required for Survival of Mouse Fibroblasts Treated with TRAIL, and Does So by NF-ÎșB Dependent Induction of cFLIPL

    Get PDF
    Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is known as a “death ligand”—a member of the TNF superfamily that binds to receptors bearing death domains. As well as causing apoptosis of certain types of tumor cells, TRAIL can activate both NF-ÎșB and JNK signalling pathways. To determine the role of TGF-ÎČ-Activated Kinase-1 (TAK1) in TRAIL signalling, we analyzed the effects of adding TRAIL to mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from TAK1 conditional knockout mice. TAK1−/− MEFs were significantly more sensitive to killing by TRAIL than wild-type MEFs, and failed to activate NF-ÎșB or JNK. Overexpression of IKK2-EE, a constitutive activator of NF-ÎșB, protected TAK1−/− MEFs against TRAIL killing, suggesting that TAK1 activation of NF-ÎșB is critical for the viability of cells treated with TRAIL. Consistent with this model, TRAIL failed to induce the survival genes cIAP2 and cFlipL in the absence of TAK1, whereas activation of NF-ÎșB by IKK2-EE restored the levels of both proteins. Moreover, ectopic expression of cFlipL, but not cIAP2, in TAK1−/− MEFs strongly inhibited TRAIL-induced cell death. These results indicate that cells that survive TRAIL treatment may do so by activation of a TAK1–NF-ÎșB pathway that drives expression of cFlipL, and suggest that TAK1 may be a good target for overcoming TRAIL resistance

    Financial Systems and Industrial Policy in Germany and Great Britain: The Limits of Convergence

    Full text link

    Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

    Get PDF
    Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely

    Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018.

    Get PDF
    Over the past decade, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death (NCCD) has formulated guidelines for the definition and interpretation of cell death from morphological, biochemical, and functional perspectives. Since the field continues to expand and novel mechanisms that orchestrate multiple cell death pathways are unveiled, we propose an updated classification of cell death subroutines focusing on mechanistic and essential (as opposed to correlative and dispensable) aspects of the process. As we provide molecularly oriented definitions of terms including intrinsic apoptosis, extrinsic apoptosis, mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT)-driven necrosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, NETotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, immunogenic cell death, cellular senescence, and mitotic catastrophe, we discuss the utility of neologisms that refer to highly specialized instances of these processes. The mission of the NCCD is to provide a widely accepted nomenclature on cell death in support of the continued development of the field

    Reviews

    No full text
    The following publications have been reviewed by the mentioned authors;Crafts and Craftsmen by Christopher Chappell, reviewed by Marjorie CruickshankLearning and Teaching through Art and Crafts by Alan Cotton and Frank Haddon, reviewed by Keith GentleThe New Handicraft/Processes and Projects by Lester and Kathleen Griswold, reviewed by Francis CeloriaDesign Projects in Technical Drawing: A Course for Examination Candidates by B. G. Cuthbert and M. R. Pattenden, reviewed by G. RobertsDesign and Technology - Metal by G. A. Hicks, G. M. Heddle and P. A. Bridge, reviewed by F. O. ZankerWoodwork by J. Maynard and D. Jones, reviewed by B. J. AylwardDesign Concept Series by Gerald F. Brammer, reviewed by Ian ToonIntroducing Finger Painting by Guy Scott, reviewed by Edward PhelpsCraft Education: Woodwork Design by T. Pettitt, reviewed by B. J. AylwardLettering by John Cataldo, reviewed by Keith RiseamThe Complete Book of Woodwork by Charles Hayward, reviewed by I. D. Jone
    corecore