Experimental evidence that immune trypanolysis using the LiTat 1.3 and LiTat 1.5 variant antigen types is not specific to Trypanosoma brucei gambiense in pigs

In the context of the human African trypanosomiasis elimination process, reliable and accurate diagnostic tools are crucial for exploring the role of a potential animal reservoir of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense. The immune trypanolysis test (TL) using the variant antigen types (VAT) LiTat 1.3 and LiTat 1.5, described as a specific serological method to detect people infected by T. b. gambiense, seems to be a promising tool. However, its specificity was recently questioned during field animal surveys. The present study evaluates the performance of TL during experimental T. b. brucei infection in pigs. Eight infected pigs and four uninfected pigs were followed up with blood and plasma collection. Blood was used for parasitological investigation. TL was performed on the plasma with the LiTat 1.3, LiTat 1.5 and LiTat 1.6 VATs. All control pigs remained negative to parasitological investigation and TL. Trypanosomes were detected in all the infected pigs and the first detection was between 10 and 14 days post infection (dpi). TL results showed that infected pigs developed antibodies against the three VATs. The first antibody detections by TL occurred between 14 and 21 dpi for antibodies directed against LiTat 1.6, 21 and 168 dpi for antibodies directed against LiTat 1.5 and 70, and 182 dpi for antibodies directed against LiTat 1.3. This study highlights for the first time that TL using LiTat 1.3 and LiTat 1.5 VATs is not specific to T. b. gambiense. Development of specific diagnostic tools for the detection of T. b. gambiense infections in animals, especially in pigs, is still needed

Personalized therapy for mycophenolate:Consensus report by the international association of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology

When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.</p

Étude de l’hyperconjugaison dans la molécule de propène

Deux méthodes ont été utilisées pour introduire l’effet du méthyle sur le système d’électrons π du propène : dans la première, les combinaisons linéaires des orbitales du carbone et des hydrogènes de même symétrie que les orbitales π sont considérées comme appartenant à la base d’orbitales atomiques; dans la seconde, le carbone tétraédrique est traité comme un hétéroatome portant une paire d’électrons π. Les deux méthodes fournissent un bon résultat pour la première transition π — π* singulet-singulet; les résultats sont moins satisfaisants pour le potentiel d’ionisation et le moment dipolaire