8 research outputs found
Breastfeeding during COVID-19: A Narrative Review of the Psychological Impact on Mothers
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the normal course of life, with measures to reduce the
virus spread impacting motherhood expectations and, in particular, breastfeeding practices. This study
aimed to review evidence regarding the impact of COVID-19 on breastfeeding plans and how these
relate to women’s psychological outcomes. Searches were conducted on PubMed and Web of Science for
studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese between January 2020 and January 2021. All study designs
and pre-prints were considered. Twelve studies were included. Reports suggest that COVID-19 impacts
differently on breastfeeding plans, which in turn leads to distinctive mental health outcomes. Positive
breastfeeding experiences have been observed when mothers perceive that they have more time for
motherhood, which may be associated with better mental health outcomes. Negative breastfeeding
experiences have been observed when mothers are separated from their newborns, when mothers
struggle with breastfeeding, or when mothers perceive decreased family and professional support,
which seems to be associated with worse mental health outcomes. These preliminary results highlight
the need for further research into the association between COVID-19, breastfeeding expectations, and
maternal mental health. Filling this gap will foster the development of guidelines and interventions to
better support mothers experiencing the obstacles of COVID-19 pandemic
Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health (Riseup-PPD-COVID-19): protocol for an international prospective cohort study
Corona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19) is a new pandemic, declared a public health emergency by the World Health Organization, which could have negative consequences for pregnant and postpartum women. The scarce evidence published to date suggests that perinatal mental health has deteriorated since the COVID-19 outbreak. However, the few studies published so far have some limitations, such as a cross-sectional design and the omission of important factors for the understanding of perinatal mental health, including governmental restriction measures and healthcare practices implemented at the maternity hospitals. Within the Riseup-PPD COST Action, a study is underway to assess the impact of COVID-19 in perinatal mental health. The primary objectives are to (1) evaluate changes in perinatal mental health outcomes; and (2) determine the risk and protective factors for perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we will compare the results between the countries participating in the study
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic review
Ana Osorio received financial support from CAPES/Proex (grant no. 0653/2018). Ana Osorio and Ana Ganho-Avila received support from CAPES/PrInt (grant no. 88887.310343/2018-00).Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been suggested as alternative treatments to
decrease depression symptoms during the perinatal period. These include brain stimulation techniques that do
not require surgery and that are nonpharmacological and non-psychotherapeutic. NIBS with evidence of antidepressant
effects include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial electric stimulation
(TES) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
Objectives: This systematic review aims to summarize evidence on NIBS efficacy, safety and acceptability in
treating peripartum depression (PPD).
Methods: We included randomized, non-randomized and case reports, that used NIBS during pregnancy and the
postpartum. The reduction of depressive symptoms and neonatal safety were the primary and co-primary outcomes,
respectively.
Results: rTMS shows promising results for the treatment of PPD, with clinically significant decreases in depressive
symptoms between baseline and end of treatment and overall good acceptability. Although the safety profile for
rTMS is adequate in the postpartum, caution is warranted during pregnancy. In TES, evidence on efficacy derives
mostly from single-arm studies, compromising the encouraging findings. Further investigation is necessary
concerning ECT, as clinical practice relies on clinical experience and is only described in low-quality case-reports.
Limitations: The reduced number of controlled studies, the lack of complete datasets and the serious/high risk of
bias of the reports warrant cautious interpretations.
Conclusions and implications: Existing evidence is limited across NIBS techniques; comparative studies are lacking,
and standard stimulation parameters are yet to be established. Although rTMS benefits from the most robust
research, future multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the position of each NIBS strategy
within the pathways of care.Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) 0653/2018CAPES/PrInt 88887.310343/2018-0
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in decreasing depression symptoms during the peripartum period: A systematic review
Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have been suggested as alternative treatments to decrease depression symptoms during the perinatal period. These include brain stimulation techniques that do not require surgery and that are nonpharmacological and non-psychotherapeutic. NIBS with evidence of antidepressant effects include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial electric stimulation (TES) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Objectives: This systematic review aims to summarize evidence on NIBS efficacy, safety and acceptability in treating peripartum depression (PPD). Methods: We included randomized, non-randomized and case reports, that used NIBS during pregnancy and the postpartum. The reduction of depressive symptoms and neonatal safety were the primary and co-primary outcomes, respectively. Results: rTMS shows promising results for the treatment of PPD, with clinically significant decreases in depressive symptoms between baseline and end of treatment and overall good acceptability. Although the safety profile for rTMS is adequate in the postpartum, caution is warranted during pregnancy. In TES, evidence on efficacy derives mostly from single-arm studies, compromising the encouraging findings. Further investigation is necessary concerning ECT, as clinical practice relies on clinical experience and is only described in low-quality case-reports. Limitations: The reduced number of controlled studies, the lack of complete datasets and the serious/high risk of bias of the reports warrant cautious interpretations. Conclusions and implications: Existing evidence is limited across NIBS techniques; comparative studies are lacking, and standard stimulation parameters are yet to be established. Although rTMS benefits from the most robust research, future multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the position of each NIBS strategy within the pathways of care
Measuring vulnerability to anxiety: factorial structure, reliability, validity, and discriminatory accuracy of the anxiety sensitivity index-3-PT
We evaluated the Portuguese version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 (ASI-3-PT). Results of a confirmatory factor analysis (N = 603; 65.3% women, M age = 28.55, SD = 10.42) confirmed multidimensionality of the construct and the receiver operating characteristic confirmed the discriminant capacity of the measure between clinical and nonclinical samples.This work was supported by a Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal and Programa COMPETE Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/80945/2011 to Ana Ganho-Avila, and a Post-Doctoral Grant SFRH/BPD/87514/2012 to Mariana Moura-Ramos. This study was partially conducted at Psychology Research Centre (UID/PSI/01662/2013), University of Minho, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds and co-financed by FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653)
The impact of COVID-19 on breastfeeding rates: An international cross-sectional study
Background: Breastfeeding promotes children’s health and is associated with positive effects to maternal physical and mental health. Uncertainties regarding SARS-CoV-2 transmission led to worries experienced by women and health professionals which impacted breastfeeding plans. We aimed to investigate the impact of self-reported and country-specific factors on breastfeeding rates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study is part of a broader international prospective cohort study about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health (Riseup-PPD-COVID-19). We analysed data from 5612 women, across 12 countries. Potential covariates of breastfeeding (sociodemographic, perinatal, physical/mental health, professional perinatal care, changes in healthcare due to the pandemic, COVID-19 related, breastfeeding support, governmental containment measures and countries’ inequality levels) were studied by Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models. Results: A model encompassing all covariates of interest explained 24% of the variance of breastfeeding rates across countries (first six months postpartum). Overall, first child (β = -0.27), age of the child (β = -0.29), preterm birth (β = -0.52), admission to the neonatal/pediatric care (β = -0.44), lack of breastfeeding support (β = -0.18), current psychiatric treatment (β = -0.69) and inequality (β = -0.71) were negatively associated with breastfeeding (p < .001). Access to postnatal support groups was positively associated with breastfeeding (β = 0.59; p < .001). In countries with low-inequality, governmental measures to contain virus transmission had a deleterious effect on breastfeeding (β = -0.16; p < .05) while access to maternity leave protected breastfeeding (β = 0.50; p < .001). Discussion: This study shows that mother’s COVID-19 diagnosis and changes in healthcare and birth/postnatal plans did not influence breastfeeding rates. Virtual support groups help women manage breastfeeding, particularly when their experiencing a first child and for those under psychiatric treatment. The complex associations between covariates and breastfeeding vary across countries, suggesting the need to define context-specific measures to support breastfeeding
Characterisation of microbial attack on archaeological bone
As part of an EU funded project to investigate the factors influencing bone preservation in the archaeological record, more than 250 bones from 41 archaeological sites in five countries spanning four climatic regions were studied for diagenetic alteration. Sites were selected to cover a range of environmental conditions and archaeological contexts. Microscopic and physical (mercury intrusion porosimetry) analyses of these bones revealed that the majority (68%) had suffered microbial attack. Furthermore, significant differences were found between animal and human bone in both the state of preservation and the type of microbial attack present. These differences in preservation might result from differences in early taphonomy of the bones. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved