23 research outputs found
Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11\ua0x\ua0MIR162\ua0x\ua01507\ua0x\ua0GA21 and three subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses under Regulation (EC) No\ua01829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-DE-2010-86)
In this opinion, the GMO Panel\ua0assessed the four-event stack maize Bt11\ua0
7\ua0MIR162\ua0
7\ua01507\ua0
7\ua0GA21 and three of its subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel\ua0previously assessed the four single events and seven of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events or the seven subcombinations leading to modification of the original conclusions were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single events in the four-event stack maize did not give rise to food/feed safety issues.\ua0Based on the nutritional assessment of the compositional characteristics of maize Bt11\ua0
7\ua0MIR162\ua0
7\ua01507\ua0
7\ua0GA21, foods and feeds derived from the genetically modified (GM) maize are expected to have the same nutritional impact as those derived from non-GM maize varieties. In the case of\ua0accidental release of viable grains of maize Bt11\ua0
7\ua0MIR162\ua0
7\ua01507\ua0
7\ua0GA21 into the environment, this\ua0would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel\ua0concludes that maize Bt11\ua0
7\ua0MIR162\ua0
7\ua01507\ua0
7\ua0GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to and as safe as its non-GM comparator in the context of the scope of this application. For the three subcombinations included in the scope, for which no experimental data were provided, the GMO Panel\ua0assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events and concluded that their combinations would not raise safety concerns. These maize subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the four-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize Bt11\ua0
7\ua0MIR162\ua0
7\ua01507\ua0
7\ua0GA21 and its subcombinations. A minority opinion expressed by a GMO Panel\ua0member is appended to this opinion
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON89034x1507xNK603xDAS-40278-9 and subcombinations independently of their origin for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No1829-2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2013-112)
Maize MON 89034 Ă 1507 Ă NK603 Ă DASâ40278â9 (fourâevent stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine four single events: MON 89034, 1507, NK603 and DASâ40278â9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the four single events and four of their subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their four subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicates that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the fourâevent stack maize does not give rise to food/feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the fourâevent stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its nonâGM comparator and the nonâGM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the fourâevent stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the six maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided, and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the fourâevent stack maize. The postâmarket environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the fourâevent stack maize. No postâmarket monitoring for food/feed is necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the fourâevent stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its nonâGM comparator and the tested nonâGM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment
Assessment of genetically modified soybean MON 87708 Ă MON 89788 Ă A5547â127, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSAâGMOâNLâ2016â135)
Soybean MON 87708 Ă MON 89788 Ă A5547â127 (threeâevent stack soybean) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: MON 87708, MON 89788 and A5547â127. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single events and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single soybean events and of the newly expressed proteins in the threeâevent stack soybean does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the threeâevent stack soybean, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its conventional counterpart and the nonâGM reference varieties tested. The nutritional impact of food/feed derived from the threeâevent stack soybean is expected to be the same as that of food/feed derived from the conventional counterpart and nonâGM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable seeds of the threeâevent stack soybean into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The postâmarket environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the threeâevent stack soybean. Postâmarket monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the threeâevent stack soybean is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested nonâGM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment
Assessment of genetically modified maize Bt11 Ă MIR162 Ă MIR604 Ă 1507 Ă 5307 Ă GA21 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSAâGMOâDEâ2011â103)
Maize Bt11 Ă MIR162 Ă MIR604 Ă 1507 Ă 5307 Ă GA21 (sixâevent stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine six single events: Bt11, MIR162, MIR604, 1507, 5307 and GA21. The GMO Panel previously assessed the six single events and 22 of their combinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the maize single events or their 22 combinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety have been identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the sixâevent stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the sixâevent stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its nonâGM comparator and the nonâGM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the sixâevent stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 34 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the sixâevent stack maize. The postâmarket environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the sixâevent stack maize. Postâmarket monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the sixâevent stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its nonâGM comparator and the tested nonâGM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment
The Metabolites of the Herbicide L-Phosphinothricin (Glufosinate) (Identification, Stability, and Mobility in Transgenic, Herbicide-Resistant, and Untransformed Plants).
The metabolism of the herbicide L-phosphinothricin (L-Pt) was analyzed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and carrot (Daucus carota). In transgenic, Pt-resistant plants expressing the Pt-N-acetyltransferase gene (pat), L-Pt was acetylated, resulting in two forms of N-acetyl-Pt (ac-Pt). In transgenic plants expressing only low pat-encoded acetylating activity as well as in genetically unmodified plants, three metabolic compounds 4-methylphosphinico-2-oxo-butanoic acid, 3-methylphosphinico-propanoic acid (MPP), and 4-methylphosphinico-2-hydroxy-butanoic acid (MHB) were identified. Hence, the transgene-encoded acetylation of L-Pt competes with a plant-specific degradation. The compounds MPP, MHB, and ac-Pt were found to be the final, stable products of the plant's metabolic pathways. The mobility of these stable compounds in the plant was investigated: L-Pt as well as the derived metabolites were found to be preferentially transported to the upper regions of the plant