94 research outputs found
Medidas de morbidade produzidas por duas fontes diversas: Ribeirão Preto, SP (Brasil), 1975
Induction of male sterility through manipulation of genetic mechanisms present in vector species of Triatominae. II. Partial restoration of male fertility
Agricultural policies exacerbate honeybee pollination service supply-demand mismatches across Europe
Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about the supply of pollination services to agriculture. Simultaneously, EU agricultural and biofuel policies have encouraged substantial growth in the cultivated area of insect pollinated crops across the continent. Using data from 41 European countries, this study demonstrates that the recommended number of honeybees required to provide crop pollination across Europe has risen 4.9 times as fast as honeybee stocks between 2005 and 2010. Consequently, honeybee stocks were insufficient to supply >90% of demands in 22 countries studied. These findings raise concerns about the capacity of many countries to cope with major losses of wild pollinators and highlight numerous critical gaps in current understanding of pollination service supplies and demands, pointing to a pressing need for further research into this issue
Spatial and Temporal Trends of Global Pollination Benefit
Pollination is a well-studied and at the same time a threatened ecosystem service. A significant part of global crop production depends on or profits from pollination by animals. Using detailed information on global crop yields of 60 pollination dependent or profiting crops, we provide a map of global pollination benefits on a 5′ by 5′ latitude-longitude grid. The current spatial pattern of pollination benefits is only partly correlated with climate variables and the distribution of cropland. The resulting map of pollination benefits identifies hot spots of pollination benefits at sufficient detail to guide political decisions on where to protect pollination services by investing in structural diversity of land use. Additionally, we investigated the vulnerability of the national economies with respect to potential decline of pollination services as the portion of the (agricultural) economy depending on pollination benefits. While the general dependency of the agricultural economy on pollination seems to be stable from 1993 until 2009, we see increases in producer prices for pollination dependent crops, which we interpret as an early warning signal for a conflict between pollination service and other land uses at the global scale. Our spatially explicit analysis of global pollination benefit points to hot spots for the generation of pollination benefits and can serve as a base for further planning of land use, protection sites and agricultural policies for maintaining pollination services
A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society
Recommended from our members
Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being
Wild and managed pollinators provide a wide range of benefits to society in terms of contributions to food security, farmer
and beekeeper livelihoods, social and cultural values, as well as the maintenance of wider biodiversity and ecosystem
stability. Pollinators face numerous threats, including changes in land-use and management intensity, climate change,
pesticides and genetically modified crops, pollinator management and pathogens, and invasive alien species. There are
well-documented declines in some wild and managed pollinators in several regions of the world. However, many effective
policy and management responses can be implemented to safeguard pollinators and sustain pollination services
A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
Data standardization of plant–pollinator interactions
Background: Animal pollination is an important ecosystem function and service, ensuring both the integrity of natural systems
and human well-being. Although many knowledge shortfalls remain, some high-quality data sets on biological interactions are now
available. The development and adoption of standards for biodiversity data and metadata has promoted great advances in biological
data sharing and aggregation, supporting large-scale studies and science-based public policies. However, these standards are currently
not suitable to fully support interaction data sharing.
Results: Here we present a vocabulary of terms and a data model for sharing plant–pollinator interactions data based on the Darwin
Core standard. The vocabulary introduces 48 new terms targeting several aspects of plant–pollinator interactions and can be used to
capture information from different approaches and scales. Additionally, we provide solutions for data serialization using RDF, XML,
and DwC-Archives and recommendations of existing controlled vocabularies for some of the terms. Our contribution supports open
access to standardized data on plant–pollinator interactions.
Conclusions: The adoption of the vocabulary would facilitate data sharing to support studies ranging from the spatial and temporal
distribution of interactions to the taxonomic, phenological, functional, and phylogenetic aspects of plant–pollinator interactions. We
expect to fill data and knowledge gaps, thus further enabling scientific research on the ecology and evolution of plant–pollinator
communities, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, and the development of public policies. The proposed data model is
flexible and can be adapted for sharing other types of interactions data by developing discipline-specific vocabularies of termsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
- …