Comparing Journalistic Role Performance Across Thematic Beats: A 37-Country Study

Studies suggest that, at the routine level, news beats function as unique “micro-cultures.” Exploring this “particularist” approach in news content, we compare how the interventionist, watchdog, loyal, service, infotainment, and civic roles materialize across 11 thematic news beats and analyze the moderating effect of platforms, ownership, and levels of political freedom on journalistic role performance in hard and soft news. Based on the second wave of the Journalistic Role Performance (JRP) project, this article reports the findings of a content analysis of 148,474 news items from 37 countries. Our results reveal the transversality of interventionism, the strong associations of some topics and roles, and the limited reach of news beat particularism in the face of moderating variables

Simultaneous vitality and DNA-fragmentation measurement in spermatozoa of smokers and non-smokers

International audienceBACKGROUND:Because cigarette smoke is a powerful ROS producer, we hypothesized that the spermatozoa of smokers would be more at risk of having increased DNA fragmentation than spermatozoa of non-smoking men.METHODS:A cross-sectional study was performed on consenting smokers and non-smokers, consulting in an infertility clinic for routine sperm analysis. The application of a novel TUNEL assay coupled to a vitality marker, LIVE/DEAD®, allowed both DNA fragmentation and viability measurement within spermatozoa of participants to be analyzed by flow cytometry.RESULTS:The coupled vitality-DNA fragmentation analysis revealed that non-smokers and smokers, respectively presented medians of 3.6% [0.6-36.8] and 3.3% [0.9-9.6] DNA fragmented spermatozoa among the living spermatozoa population (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION:No deleterious effect of smoking on spermatozoa was found in our study. More studies concerning potential mutagenic capacities of cigarette smoke on spermatozoa are necessary. In addition, the coupled vitality-DNA fragmentation analysis may orient Assisted Reproductive Technology teams when confronted with patients having a high percentage of DNA-fragmented living spermatozoa

Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: The crucial role of symbolic embryo representation

International audienceStudy question: In couples who have chosen and confirmed the fate of surplus frozenembryos, which factors influence their decision, with a special emphasis on their symbolic representation of the embryo(s)? summary answer: Embryo representation and gamete donation use significantly influence the fate of surplus cryopreserved embryos. what is known already: Previous studies report difficulties for couples to decide whether or not to continue storing their frozen embryo(s) and different factors have been already highlighted which influence their decision, including embryo conceptualization, information and support provided by the medical institution, quality of embryo(s) and life events. Little is known, however, about couples who definitely decided to stop their parental project and finalized the process of decision-making about the fate of their cryopreserved embryo(s). study design, size, duration: This prospective study was conducted over a period of 3 years (2007-2010) and included IVF/ICSI patients with surplus frozen embryos, who made a final embryo disposition decision. Among the 280 eligible IVF/ICSI patients, 247 agreed to participate in the study. According to the available options, 91 persons chose to 'stop cryopreservation', 77 chose donation to 'research' and 48 'embryo donation' to infertile couples. Furthermore, 31 participants who chose embryo donation for a parental project were refused by the center as not compatible with their mandatory medical conditions. Among them, 27 participants then selected donation to research as a new option and were included in a fourth group: 'donation to research after Refusal of Embryo Donation for parental project' or 'research- RED' (n = 27). Four participants chose 'stop cryopreservation', however, given the small number of subjects this latter group was not included in the analysis. In all, 243 participants who made a final choice concerning the fate of their cryopreserved embryos were included in this study. participants/materials, setting, methods: Participants were sent a letter of invitation to a semi-structured interview of 30 min with a psychologist. Interviews were conducted separately for each partner, including a questionnaire with a common part and a specific part, according to the chosen option, and allowing a quantitative evaluation. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the link between their embryo representation and their decision about their embryos' fate. main results and the role of chance: After adjustment for age, gender, gamete donation, number of children and the different embryo representations, a choice to 'stop cryopreservation' is more frequent if the embryo is represented as a child [odds ratio (OR) adjusted = 3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62'6.66], P = 0.0009. Representing the embryo as a project prompts patients to choose 'donation to research' [OR adjusted = 3.76, 95% CI = 1.56'9.06], P = 0.0032. Respondents are more likely to choose 'embryo donation' if they represent the embryo as a potential person [OR adjusted = 3.77, 95% CI = 1.45'9.80], P = 0.0064. Furthermore, patients who benefited from gamete donation are 10 times more likely to donate their embryos to another couple [OR adjusted = 10.62, 95% CI = 3.99'28.30], P , 0.0001. For more than half the participants (57%) the decision-making was easy, however, deciding to stop cryopreservation was significantly more difficult than choosing research or embryo donation (P , 0.0001). limitations, reasons for caution: Socio-economic status, moral and religious affiliations are known to influence the choice of couples but analyzing these factors was not an aim of the present study. wider implications of the findings: When couples definitely decide to stop their parental project, the embryo symbolic representation remains the main factor that influences the fate of their frozen embryo(s). Moreover, this representation can evolvewhen influenced by external events and information provided. In order to support patients who are making this difficult decision, it could be helpful to explore this symbolic representation early in the IVF/ICSI procedure, before surplus embryo freezing, as a new tool enhancing the accuracy of counseling. study funding/competing interest(s): this study was supported by a grant from the 'Agence de la biomedicine (ABM)', the national regulatory ART agency, under the authority of the French Ministry of Health. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. © The Author 2016

Motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors according to parenthood status: a national study from the French CECOS network

International audienceAbstract STUDY QUESTION In a non-commercial national gamete donation programme, do the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate sperm and oocyte donors differ according to their parenthood status? SUMMARY ANSWER Moderate differences exist between non-parent and parent candidate donors in motivations for gamete donation and representations as well as in personality characteristics. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Several studies have analysed the motivations and experiences of oocyte or sperm donors, but mainly in countries where gamete donation is a commercial transaction, and very few studies have reported results of personality traits using personality inventory tests. No study has specifically investigated the motivations and personality characteristics of candidate gamete donors according to parenthood status. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective study was carried out including 1021 candidate donors from 21 centres (in university hospitals) of the national sperm and egg banking network in France between November 2016 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In total, 1021 candidate gamete donors were included in the study. During their first visit, male (n = 488) and female candidate donors (n = 533) completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, their motivations for donation and their representations of donation, infertility and family. Secondly, a NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) exploring the Big Five personality traits was completed online. Results were compared between parent and non-parent candidate donors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Altruistic values were the principal motive for donation irrespective of parenthood status. Reassurance about their fertility or preservation of sperm for future use was more often reported in non-parent than in parent candidate donors. With regard to representation of gamete donation or of the family, independently of their parenthood status, candidate donors more frequently selected social rather than biological representations. Mean personality characteristics were in the normal range. Non-parent candidate donors had higher scores on openness and depression than parents, while parent candidate donors appeared more social than non-parents. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The personality characteristics inventory was not completed by all candidate donors included in the study. However, family status did not differ between the two groups (NEO-PI-R completed (n = 525) or not), while the group who completed the NEO-PI-R had a higher educational level. This national study was performed in a country where gamete donation is subject to strict legislation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In a global context where reproductive medicine is commercialized and gamete donor resources are limited, this study found that altruism and social representations of gamete donation and family are the main motivations for gamete donation in a country which prohibits financial incentive. These findings are relevant for health policy and for gamete donation information campaigns. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Grant from the Agence de la Biomédecine, France. The authors have nothing to disclose related to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A