A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation

PURPOSE: The number of older adults with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiotherapy is considered standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older HNSCC patients. METHODS: The XXX study is an international multicenter cohort study including older (≥65 years) HNSCC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Here, patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analyses, while Fine-Gray competing risks regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures (LRFs) and distant metastases (DMs). RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n=310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n=137; 20%), carboplatin (n=73; 10%), and mitomycin c plus 5-fluorouracil (n=64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (HR=1.39 [1.03-1.89], p.05). Median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR=0.71 [0.53-0.95], p=.02), PFS (HR=0.66 [0.51-0.87], p=.003), and lower incidence of LRFs (SHR=0.50 [0.31-0.80], p=.004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR=0.996 [0.993-0.999], p=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent cisplatin can be considered as the standard chemotherapy regimen for older HNSCC patients who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant also in older HNSCC patients

Evaluation of Concomitant Systemic Treatment in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy

IMPORTANCE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unclear whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in older adults with HNSCC. OBJECTIVE To examine whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to definitive radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Special Care Patterns for Elderly HNSCC Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (SENIOR) study is an international, multicenter cohort study including older adults (≥65 years) with LA-HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx/hypopharynx, or larynx treated with definitive radiotherapy, either alone or with concomitant systemic treatment, between January 2005 and December 2019 at 12 academic centers in the US and Europe. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to August 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent definitive radiotherapy alone or with concomitant systemic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and locoregional failure rate. RESULTS Among the 1044 patients (734 men [70.3%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years) included in this study, 234 patients (22.4%) were treated with radiotherapy alone and 810 patients (77.6%) received concomitant systemic treatment with chemotherapy (677 [64.8%]) or cetuximab (133 [12.7%]). Using inverse probability weighting to attribute for selection bias, chemoradiation was associated with longer overall survival than radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77; P < .001), whereas cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy was not (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.27; P = .70). Progression-free survival was also longer after the addition of chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81; P < .001), while the locoregional failure rate was not significantly different (subhazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.26; P = .19). The survival benefit of the chemoradiation group was present in patients up to age 80 years (65-69 years: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; 70-79 years: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.41). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of older adults with LA- HNSCC, chemoradiation, but not cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy, was associated with longer survival compared with radiotherapy alone

31st Annual Meeting and Associated Programs of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC 2016) : part two

Background The immunological escape of tumors represents one of the main ob- stacles to the treatment of malignancies. The blockade of PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors represented a milestone in the history of immunotherapy. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be effective in specific cohorts of patients. It has been proposed that their efficacy relies on the presence of an immunological response. Thus, we hypothesized that disruption of the PD-L1/PD-1 axis would synergize with our oncolytic vaccine platform PeptiCRAd. Methods We used murine B16OVA in vivo tumor models and flow cytometry analysis to investigate the immunological background. Results First, we found that high-burden B16OVA tumors were refractory to combination immunotherapy. However, with a more aggressive schedule, tumors with a lower burden were more susceptible to the combination of PeptiCRAd and PD-L1 blockade. The therapy signifi- cantly increased the median survival of mice (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the reduced growth of contralaterally injected B16F10 cells sug- gested the presence of a long lasting immunological memory also against non-targeted antigens. Concerning the functional state of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), we found that all the immune therapies would enhance the percentage of activated (PD-1pos TIM- 3neg) T lymphocytes and reduce the amount of exhausted (PD-1pos TIM-3pos) cells compared to placebo. As expected, we found that PeptiCRAd monotherapy could increase the number of antigen spe- cific CD8+ T cells compared to other treatments. However, only the combination with PD-L1 blockade could significantly increase the ra- tio between activated and exhausted pentamer positive cells (p= 0.0058), suggesting that by disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis we could decrease the amount of dysfunctional antigen specific T cells. We ob- served that the anatomical location deeply influenced the state of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. In fact, TIM-3 expression was in- creased by 2 fold on TILs compared to splenic and lymphoid T cells. In the CD8+ compartment, the expression of PD-1 on the surface seemed to be restricted to the tumor micro-environment, while CD4 + T cells had a high expression of PD-1 also in lymphoid organs. Interestingly, we found that the levels of PD-1 were significantly higher on CD8+ T cells than on CD4+ T cells into the tumor micro- environment (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In conclusion, we demonstrated that the efficacy of immune check- point inhibitors might be strongly enhanced by their combination with cancer vaccines. PeptiCRAd was able to increase the number of antigen-specific T cells and PD-L1 blockade prevented their exhaus- tion, resulting in long-lasting immunological memory and increased median survival