Critical Competences for the Management of Post-Operative Course in Patients with Digestive Tract Cancer: The Contribution of MADIT Methodology for a Nine-Month Longitudinal Study

There is a high postoperative morbidity rate after cancer surgery, that impairs patients' self-management, job condition and economic strength. This paper describes the results of a peculiar psychological intervention on patients undergoing surgery for esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer. The intervention aimed to enhance patients' competences in the management of postoperative daily life. A narrative approach (M.A.D.I.T.-Methodology for the Analysis of Computerised Text Data) was used to create a questionnaire, Health and Employment after Gastro-Intestinal Surgery-Dialogical Questionnaire, HEAGIS-DQ, that assesses four competences. It was administered to 48 participants. Results were used as guidance for specific intervention, structured on patients' competence profiles. The intervention lasted nine months after surgery and was structured in weekly to monthly therapeutic sessions. Quality of Life questionnaires were administered too. At the end of the intervention, 94% of patients maintained their job and only 10% of patients asked for financial support. The mean self-perception of health-related quality of life was 71.2. The distribution of three of four competences increased after nine months (p < 0.05). Despite economic difficulties due to lasting symptoms after surgery, and to the current pandemic scenario, a structured intervention with patients let them to resume their jobs and continue activities after surgery

Managing the Consequences of Oncological Major Surgery: A Short- and Medium-Term Skills Assessment Proposal for Patient and Caregiver through M.A.D.I.T. Methodology

The effects of cancer surgery and treatment harm patients' life and working ability: major causes of this can be intensified by the postoperative symptoms. This study, the first part of the HEAGIS project (Health and Employment after Gastrointestinal Surgery), proposes a method to assess patients and caregivers' competences in dealing with postoperative course and the related needs to improve the adequate competences. In this observational study, an ad hoc structured interview was conducted with 47 patients and 15 caregivers between the third and fifteenth postoperative day. Oesophageal (38%), esophagogastric junction (13%), gastric (30%), colon (8%) and rectum (11%) cancer patients were considered. Computerized textual data analysis methodology was used to identify levels of competences. Text analysis highlighted three different levels (low, medium and high) of four specific types of patients and caregivers' competences. In particular, the overall trend of the preview of future scenarios and use of resource competences was low. Less critical were situation evaluation and preview repercussion of own actions' competences. Caregivers' trends were similar. The Kruskal-Wallis test did not distinguish any differences in the level of competences related to the characteristics of the participants. Patients and caregivers are not accurate in planning the future after surgery, using personal beliefs rather than referring to physicians, and not recognizing adequate resources. The medium-low competences' trend leads to unexpected critical situations, and patients could not deal with them in a maximally effective way. Both patients and caregivers should be taken over by healthcare professionals to improve patients' competences and make the curative surgery effective in daily life

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy

Objective: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the gold standard for treating carotid disease in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, though carotid angioplasty and stenting has emerged as a safe alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the durability of CEA in a large series of patients followed up according to a strict clinical and ultrasonographic protocol. Methods: Over a 23-year period (1990-2012) a total of 1773 patients (1251 men and 522 women) with a mean age of 75.2 years (range, 31 to 96 years) who underwent 2007 consecutive primary eversion CEAs performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia with electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting were prospectively followed up with ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. A long-term follow-up (median, 11.2 years; mean, 12.9 years) was obtained for 1680 patients (94.8%). End points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death and late carotid restenosis/occlusion rates. Results: More than two in three of the lesions (1446 of 2007, 72.1%) were symptomatic at the time of surgery, with a 25% rate of preoperative stroke. Preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy was used by 1675 patients (94.4%), whereas 918 (51.8%) were receiving statin treatment. Overall, there were eight (0.4%) perioperative strokes and no deaths. During the follow-up, there were nine (0.47%) asymptomatic late carotid restenoses (six moderate [50%-69%] and three severe [$70%]) and one (0.05%) carotid occlusion. Nine patients (0.47%) had late ipsilateral strokes, none of them related to restenosis/occlusion. Overall, there were 159 late deaths (9.4%). Conclusions: The results of this study show that eversion CEA can be performed in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with an extremely low perioperative stroke/death risk and a negligible incidence of late restenosis/occlusion, thus assuring a persistently good protection against the risk of cerebral ischemia

Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly

none6BACKGROUND: The indication for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is uncertain in patients with asymptomatic severe (≥60% luminal narrowing according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria) carotid stenosis (ASCS), especially in the very elderly, because current evidence suggests that the risk of future stroke has been dropping in the past two decades owing to the recent advances in medical therapy. The aim of this observational study was to compare early and late outcomes in patients ≥80 years old with ASCS treated with CEA plus best medical treatment (BMT) or with BMT alone. METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 69 octogenarians with ASCS underwent CEA plus BMT (group 1), and another 54 received BMT alone (group 2). All operations were eversion CEAs. BMT included lipid-lowering drugs, new antiplatelet and antihypertensive agents, avoidance of smoking, careful blood pressure and glycemic control, and lifestyle changes. Follow-up with serial ultrasonographic examination was obtained in 118 patients for a median 4.4-year period. RESULTS:There were no perioperative (30-day) strokes or deaths and one transient ischemic attack (1.4%). One late minor stroke developed in a CEA patient (1.5%). No late restenoses or occlusions were detected. Five patients in group 2 (9.6%) became symptomatic (one transient ischemic attack and four minor strokes) and subsequently underwent successful CEA; all their carotid plaques were complicated by ulceration and intraplaque hemorrhage (with plaque progression in four cases), confirmed by computed tomography images. The rate of freedom from cerebral ischemic events at 5 years showed a significant benefit for elderly patients who had CEA vis-à-vis those who did not (98% vs 84%; P = .04), and so did the 5-year rate of freedom from ipsilateral carotid disease progression (100% vs 91%; P = .01). At 5 years, the mortality rate was comparable for elderly patients whether they had CEA or not (66% vs 68%; P = .65). CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for ASCS in patients aged 80 years or more, carrying an insignificant perioperative stroke/death risk. CEA associated with BMT seems preferable to BMT alone in preventing the risk of ipsilateral ischemic events, without translating into a longer survival.mixedBallotta E; Toniato A; Da Roit A; Lorenzetti R; Piatto G; Baracchini CBallotta, Enzo; Toniato, Antonio; DA ROIT, Anna; Lorenzetti, Renata; Piatto, Giacomo; Baracchini, Claudi

Intestinal Surgery for Crohn's Disease: Role of Preoperative Therapy in Postoperative Outcome

Purposes: Patients affected by Crohn's disease (CD) require lifelong medical therapy, but they can also often require abdominal surgery. The effect of CD therapy on postoperative course is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative medical therapy on the outcome of intestinal surgery in these patients. Methods: Data from a consecutive series of 167 patients with CD operated on at the University of Padova Hospital from 2000 to 2013 were retrieved. Data of preoperative therapy during the 6 months before surgery were available for 146 patients who were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data and surgical details were retrieved and postoperative complications and reoperation were considered outcome measures. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: No significant difference was observed between patients without data about their preoperative therapy and those with them. Eight patients underwent reoperation in the first 30 postoperative days: two of them for anastomotic leak, three for bleeding, one for obstruction and two for abdominal wound dehiscence. At multivariate analysis, preoperative adalimumab and budesonide resulted to be an independent predictor of reoperation (OR = 7.67 (95% CI = 1.49-39.20), p = 0.01 and OR = 6.7749 (95% CI = 0.98-46.48), p = 0.05, respectively). At multivariate analysis neither pharmacological nor clinical variables resulted to predict anastomotic leak. Conclusions: In our series, adalimumab seemed to be associated to early reoperation after intestinal surgery. This may be due to a worst disease severity in patients who needed surgery in spite of biological therapy. Preoperative tapering of budesonide dose seems a safe option before elective abdominal surgery for CD

Management of Liver Oligometastatic Esophageal Cancer: Overview and Critical Analysis of the Different Loco-Regional Treatments

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive disease that is associated with a poor prognosis. Since metastastic EC is usually considered suitable only for palliative therapy with an estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) less than 5%, the optimal management of patients with liver oligometastatic EC (LOEC) is still undefined. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the different treatment options for LOEC. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify articles evaluating different treatment strategies for LOEC. Among 828 records that were identified, 20 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies included patients who have undergone any type of surgical procedure and/or loco-regional therapy. Liver resection resulted in the best survival for patients with low tumor burden (3 lesions): 5-year OS 30&ndash;50% versus 8&ndash;12% after only chemotherapy (CHT). The 5-year OS of loco-regional therapies was 23% with a local recurrence risk ranging 0&ndash;8% for small lesions (2 to 3 cm). An aggressive multidisciplinary approach for LOEC patients may improve survival. Surgery seems to be the treatment of choice for resectable LOEC. If unfeasible, loco-regional therapies may be considered. In order to better select these patients and offer a chance of cure, prospective trials and a definition of treatment protocols are needed

Intestinal Surgery for Crohn's Disease: Role of Preoperative Therapy in Postoperative Outcome

Purposes: Patients affected by Crohn's disease (CD) require lifelong medical therapy, but they can also often require abdominal surgery. The effect of CD therapy on postoperative course is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative medical therapy on the outcome of intestinal surgery in these patients. Methods: Data from a consecutive series of 167 patients with CD operated on at the University of Padova Hospital from 2000 to 2013 were retrieved. Data of preoperative therapy during the 6 months before surgery were available for 146 patients who were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data and surgical details were retrieved and postoperative complications and reoperation were considered outcome measures. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: No significant difference was observed between patients without data about their preoperative therapy and those with them. Eight patients underwent reoperation in the first 30 postoperative days: two of them for anastomotic leak, three for bleeding, one for obstruction and two for abdominal wound dehiscence. At multivariate analysis, preoperative adalimumab and budesonide resulted to be an independent predictor of reoperation (OR = 7.67 (95% CI = 1.49-39.20), p = 0.01 and OR = 6.7749 (95% CI = 0.98-46.48), p = 0.05, respectively). At multivariate analysis neither pharmacological nor clinical variables resulted to predict anastomotic leak. Conclusions: In our series, adalimumab seemed to be associated to early reoperation after intestinal surgery. This may be due to a worst disease severity in patients who needed surgery in spite of biological therapy. Preoperative tapering of budesonide dose seems a safe option before elective abdominal surgery for CD