38 research outputs found

    Probing Control : Analysis and Design with Application to Fed-Batch Bioreactors

    Get PDF
    In most control problems the objective is to control the output at a desired value in spite of disturbances. In some cases, the best setpoint is not known a priori and it should be found online to optimize the process performance. This thesis examines a probing strategy that can be applied for this class of problems. The focus is on the application of the technique to the control of feed supply in fed-batch fermentations of the bacterium Escherichia coli. The thesis is divided into three parts. In the first part, the convergence properties of the probing algorithm are examined. The analysis is limited to processes modeled by a linear time-invariant dynamic in series with a static nonlinearity. Stability and performance analysis taking into account the process dynamic is performed. Tuning guidelines that help the user for the design are also derived. The second part presents a novel cultivation technique based on the probing approach. The fermentation technique combines the advantages of probing control and temperature-limited fed-batch technique. The feeding strategy is well adapted for prolonged operation at the maximum oxygen transfer capacity of the reactor. The efficiency of the method is demonstrated by simulations and experimental results. The strategy leads to a high biomass and it limits the degradation of the recombinant protein activity in the late production phase. In the third part, the probing feeding strategy is evaluated in industrial-scale bioreactors. Based on experimental results the influence of scale and complex medium is discussed. It is shown that the flexibility and robustness of the technique makes it a useful tool for process development

    Oxygen Control for an Industrial Pilot-Scale Fed-Batch Filamentous Fungal Fermentation

    Get PDF
    Industrial filamentous fungal fermentations are typically operated in fed- batch mode. Oxygen control represents an important operational challenge due to the varying biomass concentration. In this study, oxygen control is implemented by manipulating the substrate feed rate, i.e. the rate of oxygen consumption. It turns out that the setpoint for dissolved oxygen represents a trade-off since a low dissolved oxygen value favors productivity but can also induce oxygen limitation. This paper addresses the regulation of dissolved oxygen using a cascade control scheme that incorporates auxiliary measurements to improve the control performance. The computation of an appropriate setpoint profile for dissolved oxygen is solved via process optimization. For that purpose, an existing morphologically structured model is extended to include the effects of both low levels of oxygen on growth and medium rheological properties on oxygen transfer. Experimental results obtained at the industrial pilot-scale level confirm the efficiency of the proposed control strategy but also illustrate the shortcomings of the process model at hand for optimizing the dissolved oxygen setpoints

    Instrumentation and control of anaerobic digestion processes: a review and some research challenges

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9382-6[EN] To enhance energy production from methane or resource recovery from digestate, anaerobic digestion processes require advanced instrumentation and control tools. Over the years, research on these topics has evolved and followed the main fields of application of anaerobic digestion processes: from municipal sewage sludge to liquid mainly industrial then municipal organic fraction of solid waste and agricultural residues. Time constants of the processes have also changed with respect to the treated waste from minutes or hours to weeks or months. Since fast closed loop control is needed for short time constant processes, human operator is now included in the loop when taking decisions to optimize anaerobic digestion plants dealing with complex solid waste over a long retention time. Control objectives have also moved from the regulation of key variables measured online to the prediction of overall process perfor- mance based on global off-line measurements to optimize the feeding of the processes. Additionally, the need for more accurate prediction of methane production and organic matter biodegradation has impacted the complexity of instrumentation and should include a more detailed characterization of the waste (e.g., biochemical fractions like proteins, lipids and carbohydrates)andtheirbioaccessibility andbiodegradability characteristics. However, even if in the literature several methodologies have been developed to determine biodegradability based on organic matter characterization, only a few papers deal with bioaccessibility assessment. In this review, we emphasize the high potential of some promising techniques, such as spectral analysis, and we discuss issues that could appear in the near future concerning control of AD processes.The authors acknowledge the financial support of INRA (the French National Institute for Agricultural Research), the French National Research Agency (ANR) for the "Phycover" project (project ANR-14-CE04-0011) and ADEME for Inter-laboratory assay financial support.Jimenez, J.; Latrille, E.; Harmand, J.; Robles MartĂ­nez, Á.; Ferrer Polo, J.; Gaida, D.; Wolf, C.... (2015). Instrumentation and control of anaerobic digestion processes: a review and some research challenges. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 14(4):615-648. doi:10.1007/s11157-015-9382-6S615648144Aceves-Lara CA, Latrille E, Steyer JP (2010) Optimal control of hydrogen production in a continuous anaerobic fermentation bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35:10710–10718Aguado D, Montoya T, Ferrer J, Seco A (2006) Relating ions concentration variations to conductivity variations in a sequencing batch reactor operated for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Environ Modell Softw 21:845–851Aguilar-Garnica E, Dochain D, Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V (2009) A multivariable control scheme in a two-stage anaerobic digestion system described by partial differential equations. J Process Contr 19:1324–1332Ahring BK, Angelidaki I, Johansen K (1992) Anaerobic treatment of manure together with industrial waste. Water Sci Technol 25:311–318Ajeej A, Thanikal JV, Narayanan CM, Senthil Kumar R (2015) An overview of bio augmentation of methane by anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge along with microalgae and waste paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:270–276Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V (2007) Selected topics in dynamics and control of chemical and biological processes. Springer, BerlinAlcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, Harmand J, Rapaport A, Steyer JP, GonzĂĄlez-Álvarez V, Pelayo-Ortiz C (2005a) Robust interval-based regulation for anaerobic digestion processes. Water Sci Technol 52:449–456Alcaraz-GonzĂĄlez V, Salazar-Peña R, GonzĂĄlez-Alvarez V, GouzĂ© JL, Steyer JP (2005b) A tunable multivariable nonlinear robust observer for biological systems. C R Biol 328:317–325Alferes J, Irizar I (2010) Combination of extremum-seeking algorithms with effective hydraulic handling of equalization tanks to control anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol 61:2825–2834Alferes J, GarcĂ­a-Heras JL, Roca E, GarcĂ­a C, Irizar I (2008) Integration of equalisation tanks within control strategies for anaerobic reactors. Validation based on ADM1 simulations. Water Sci Technol 57:747–752Alimahmoodi M, Mulligan CN (2008) Anaerobic bioconversion of carbon dioxide to biogas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 58:95–103Alvarez JA, Otero L, Lema JM (2010) A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour Technol 101:1153–1158Alvarez-Ramirez J, Meraz M, Monroy O, Velasco A (2002) Feedback control design for an anaerobic digestion process. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 77:725–734Anderson GK, Yang G (1992) Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration. Water Environ Res 64:53–59Andrews JF, Graef SP (1971) Dynamic modelling and simulation of the AD process. Advances in chemistry series no. 105, Anaerobic Biological Treatment Processes. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p 126Andrews JF, Pearson EA (1965) Kinetics and characteristics of volatile acid production in anaerobic fermentation processes. Air Water Pollut 9:439–461Angelidaki I, Sanders W (2004) Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropllutants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:117–129Antila J, Tuohiniemi M, Rissanen A, KantojĂ€rvi U, Lahti M, Viherkanto K, Kaarre M, Malinen J (2014) MEMS- and MOEMS-based near-infrared spectrometers. Encycl Anal Chem 1–36. doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a9376Antoniades CD, Christofides P (2001) Integrating nonlinear output feedback control and optimal actuator/sensor placement for transport-reaction processes. Chem Eng Sci 56:4517–4535APHA (2005) American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environmental Federation, Standard methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. Washington, DC, USAAppels L, Baeyens J, DegrĂšve J, Dewil R (2008) Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energ Combust 34:755–781Appels L, Lauwers J, Gins G, Degreve J, Van Impe J, Dewil R (2011) Parameter identification and modeling of the biochemical methane potential of waste activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 45:4173–4178Aquino SF, Chernicharo CAL, Soares H, Takemoto SY, Vazoller RF (2008) Methodologies for determining the bioavailability and biodegradability of sludges. Environ Technol 29:855–862Astals S, Esteban-GutiĂ©rrez M, FernĂĄndez-ArĂ©valo T, Aymerich E, GarcĂ­a-Heras JL, Mata-Alvarez J (2013a) Anaerobic digestion of seven different sewage sludges: a biodegradability and modelling study. Water Res 47:6033–6043Astals S, Nolla-ArdĂšvol V, Mata-Alvarez J (2013b) Thermophilic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol: process performance and digestate stability. J Biotechnol 166:97–104Babary JP, Julien S, NihtilĂ€ MT et al (1999) New boundary conditions and adaptive control of fixed-bed bioreactors. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 38:35–44Barat R, Serralta J, Ruano MV, JimĂ©nez E, Ribes J, Seco A, Ferrer J (2012) Biological nutrient removal model No 2 (BNRM2): a general model for wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 67:1481–1489Bastin G, Dochain D (1990) On-line estimation and adaptive control of bioreactors. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamBatstone DJ (2013) Modelling and control in anaerobic digestion: achievements and challenges. 13th IWA World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion (AD 13), pp 1–6Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I et al (2002) Anaerobic digestion model No. 1. (ADM1). IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 13. IWABatstone DJ, Tait S, Starrenburg D (2009) Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1513–1520Batstone DJ, Amerlinck Y, Ekama G et al (2012) Towards a generalized physicochemical framework. Water Sci Technol 66:1147–1161Baumann WT, Rugh WJ (1986) Feedback control of nonlinear systems by extended linearization. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-31:40–46Benyahia B, Campillo F, Cherki B, Harmand J (2012) Particle filtring for the chemostat. In: MED’12, Barcelone, SpainBernard O (2011) Hurdles and challenges for modelling and control of microalgae for CO2 mitigation and biofuel production. J Process Control 21:1378–1389Bernard O, GouzĂ© JL (2004) Closed loop observers bundle for uncertain biotechnological models. J Process Control 14:765–774Bernard O, Hadj-Sadok Z, Dochain D et al (2001a) Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol Bioeng 75:424–438Bernard O, Polit M, Hadj-Sadok Z, Pengov M, Dochain D, Estaben M, Labat P (2001b) Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: software sensors and controllers for an anaerobic digester. Water Sci Technol 43:175–182Bernard O, Chachuat B, HĂ©lias A, Rodriguez J (2005a) Can we assess the model complexity for a bioprocess? Theory and example of the anaerobic digestion process. Water Sci Technol 53:85–92Bernard O, Chachuat B, HĂ©lias A, Le Dantec B, Sialve B, Steyer JP, Lavigne JF (2005b) An integrated system to remote monitor and control anaerobic wastewater treatment plants through the internet. Water Sci Technol 52:457–464Björnsson L, Hörnsten EG, Mattiasson B (2001a) Utilization of a palladium–metal oxide semiconductor (Pd-MOS) sensor for on-line monitoring of dissolved hydrogen in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng 73:35–43Björnsson L, Murto M, Jantsch TG, Mattiasson B (2001b) Evaluation of new methods for the monitoring of alkalinity, dissolved hydrogen and the microbial community in anaerobic digestion. Water Res 35:2833–2840Boe K (2006) Online monitoring and control of the biogas process. Technical University of DenmarkBoe K, Batstone D, Angelidaki I (2007) An innovative online VFA monitoring system for the anerobic process, based on headspace gas chromatography. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:712–721Boe K, Steyer JP, Angelidaki I (2008) Monitoring and control of the biogas process based on propionate concentration using online VFA measurement. Water Sci Technol 57:661–766Boe K, Batstone DJ, Steyer JP, Angelidaki I (2010) State indicators for monitoring the anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 44:5973–5980Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254Brinkmann K, Blaschke L, Polle A (2002) Comparison of different methods for lignin determination as a basis for calibration of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and implications of lignoproteins. J Chem Ecol 28:2483–2501BuendĂ­a IM, FernĂĄndez FJ, Villaseñor J, RodrĂ­guez L (2008) Biodegradability of meat industry wastes under anaerobic and aerobic conditions. Water Res 42:3767–3774Buffiere P, Loisel D, Bernet N, Delgenes JP (2006) Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Sci Technol 53:233–241Cao Y, Pawlowski A (2012) Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: brief overview and energy efficiency assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1657–1665Carballa M, Regueiro L, Lema JM (2015) Microbial management of anaerobic digestion: exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:103–111Carlos-Hernandez S, Beteau JF, Sanchez EN (2007) Intelligent control strategy for an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. In: Michel P (ed) Computer applications in biotechnology, vol 1. Cancun, Mexico, pp 73–78Carlos-Hernandez S, Sanchez EN, Bueno JA (2010) Neurofuzzy control strategy for an abattoir wastewater treatment process. In: Banga JR, Bogaerts P, Van Impe J, Dochain D, Smets I (eds) 11th International symposium on computer applications in biotechnology. Leuven, Belgium, pp 84–89Chandler JA, Jewell WJ, Gossett JM (1980) Predicting methane fermentation biodegradability. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 10:93–107Chen YH (1990) Adaptive robust observers for non-linear uncertain systems. Int J Syst Sci 21:803–814Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064Chynoweth DP, Turick CE, Owens JM, Jerger DE, Peck MW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg 5:95–111Cirne DG, van der Zee FP, Fernandez-Polanco M, Fernandez-Polanco F (2008) Control of sulphide during anaerobic treatment of S-containing wastewaters by adding limited amounts of oxygen or nitrate. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:93–105ColombiĂ© S, Latrille E, Sablayrolles JM (2007) Online estimation of assimilable nitrogen by electrical conductivity measurement during alcoholic fermentation in enological conditions. J Biosci Bioeng 103:229–235Cord-Ruwisch R, Mercz TI, Hoh CY, Strong GE (1997) Dissolved hydrogen concentration as an on-line control parameter for the automated operation and optimization of anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:626–634Cossu R, Raga R (2008) Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste. Waste Manage 28:381–388Cresson R, Pommier S, BĂ©line F et al (2014) Etude interlaboratoires pour l’harmonisation des protocoles de mesure du potentiel bio-mĂ©thanogĂšne des matrices solides hĂ©tĂ©rogĂšnes—Final report (in French) ADEMEDalmau J, Comas J, RodrĂ­guez-Roda I, Pagilla K, Steyer JP (2010) Model development and simulation for predicting risk of foaming in anaerobic digestion systems. Bioresour Technol 101:4306–4314Davidsson A, Gruvberger C, Christensen TH, Hansen TL, Jansen J (2007) Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 27:406–414De Baere L (2000) Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art. Water Sci Technol 41:283–290De Baere L (2008) Partial stream digestion of residual municipal solid waste. Water Sci Technol 57:1073–1077De Gracia M, Grau P, Huete E et al (2009) New generic mathematical model for WWTP sludge digesters operating under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: model building and experimental verification. Water Res 43:4626–4642De Vrieze J, Verstraete W, Boon N (2013) Repeated pulse feeding induces functional stability in anaerobic digestion. Microb Biotechnol 6:414–424Delattre C, Dochain D, Winkin J (2004) Observability analysis of nonlinear tubular (bio)reactor models: a case study. J Process Control 14:661–669Di Pinto AC, Limoni N, Passino R, Rozzi A, Tomei MC (1990) Instrumentation, control and automation of water and wastewater treatment and transport systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th IAWPRC workshop, pp 51–58DĂ­az I, PĂ©rez C, Alfaro N, Fdz-Polanco F (2015) A feasibility study on the bioconversion of CO2 and H2 to biomethane by gas sparging through polymeric membranes. Bioresour Technol 185:246–253Dochain D (2003) State and parameter estimation in chemical and biochemical processes: a tutorial. J Process Control 13:801–818Dochain D, Tali-Maamar N, Babary JP (1997) On modelling, monitoring and control of fixed bed bioreactors. Comput Chem Eng 21:1255–1266Dochain D, Perrier M, Guay M (2011) Extremum seeking control and its application to process and reaction systems: a survey. Math Comput Simulat 82:369–380Donoso-Bravo A, Garcia G, PĂ©rez-Elvira S, Fernandez-Polanco F (2011) Initial rates technique as a procedure to predict the anaerobic digester operation. Biochem Eng J 53(3):275–280Doublet J, Boulanger A, Ponthieux A, Laroche C, Poitrenaud M, Cacho Rivero JA (2013) Predicting the biochemical methane potential of wide range of organic substrates by near infrared spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol 128:252–258Dreywood R (1946) Qualitative test for carbohydrate material. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition. Am Chem Soc 18:499Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356Ekama GA, Sotemann SW, Wentzel MC (2007) Biodegradability of activated sludge organics under anaerobic conditions. Water Res 41:244–252Ellison WJ, Pedarros-Caubet F, Caubet R (2007) Automatic and rapid measurement of microbial suspension growth parameters: application to the evaluation of effector agents. J Rapid Meth Aut Mic 15:369–410Fang HHP (2012) Bioenergy production from waste and wastewater in China. In: Technical proceedings of the 2012 NSTI nanotechnology conference and expo, NSTI-nanotech 2012, pp 381–383Fannin KF, Chynoweth DP, Isaacson R (1987) Start-up, operation, stability, and control. Anaerob Dig Biomass 171–196Fdz-Polanco M, DĂ­az I, PĂ©rez SI, Lopes AC, Fdz-Polanco F (2009a) Hydrogen sulphide removal in the anaerobic digestion of sludge by micro-aerobic processes: pilot plant experience. Water Sci Technol 60:3045–3050Fdz-Polanco M, PĂ©rez-Elvira SI, DĂ­az I, GarcĂ­a L, TorĂ­o R, Acevedo AF (2009b) EliminaciĂłn de H2S en digestiĂłn anaerobia de lodos por procesos microaerofĂ­licos: experiencia en planta piloto. Tecnol del Agua 29:58–64Feitkenhauer H, von Sachs J, Meyer U (2002) On-line titration of volatile fatty acids for the process control of anaerobic digestion plants. Water Res 36:212–218FernĂĄndez YB, Soares A, Villa R, Vale P, Cartmell E (2014) Carbon capture and biogas enhancement by carbon dioxide enrichment of anaerobic digesters treating sewage sludge or food waste. Bioresour Technol 159:1–7Fountoulakis MS, Stamatelatou K, Lyberatos G (2008) The effect of pharmaceuticals on the kinetics of methanogenesis and acetogenesis. Bioresour Technol 99:7083–7090Francioso O, Rodriguez-Estrada MT, Montecchio D, Salomoni C, Caputo A, Palenzona D (2010) Chemical characterization of municipal wastewater sludges produced by two-phase anaerobic digestion for biogas production. J Hazard Mater 175:740–746Frigon JC, Roy C, Guiot SR (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with mulched switchgrass for improvement of the methane yield. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35:341–349Frings CS, Dunn RT (1970) A colorimetric method for determination of total serum lipids based on the sulfo-phospho-vanillin reaction. Am J Clin Pathol 53:89–91FrĂžlund B, Palmgren R, Keiding K, Nielsen PH (1996) Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res 30:1749–1758Gaida D, Wolf C, Meyer C, Stuhlsatz A, Lippel J, BĂ€ck T, Bongards M, McLoone S (2012) State estimation for anaerobic digesters using the ADM1. Water Sci Technol 66:1088–1095Ganesh R, Torrijos M, Sousbie P et al (2013) Anaerobic co-digestion of solid waste: effect of increasing organic loading rates and characterization of the solubilised organic matter. Bioresource Technol 130:559–569GarcĂ­a-DiĂ©guez C, Molina F, Roca E (2011) Multi-objective cascade controller for an anaerobic digester. Process Biochem 46:900–909GarcĂ­a-Gen (2015) Modelling, optimisation and control of anaerobic co-digestion processes (2015), Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­micaGarcĂ­a-Gen S, Sousbie P, Rangaraj G et al (2015) Kinetic modelling of anaerobic hydrolysis of solid wastes, including disintegration processes. Waste Manag 35:96–104Gauthier JP, Kupka IAK (1994) Observability and observers for nonlinear systems. SIAM J Control Optim 32:975–994Gauthier JP, Hammouri H, Othman S (1992) A simple observer for nonlinear systems applications to bioreactors. Autom Control IEEE Trans 37:875–880Ge H, Jensen PD, Batstone DJ (2011) Increased temperature in the thermophilic stage in temperature phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) improves degradability of waste activated sludge. J Hazard Mater 187:355–361Gendron S, Perrier M, Barrett J, Legault N (1993) Adaptive control of brightness: the model weighting approach. Annual meeting—technical section, Canadian Pulp and Paper Association, Preprints. Publ by Canadian Pulp & Paper AssocGhosh S, Conrad JR, Klass DL (1975) Anaerobic acidogenesis of waste activated sludge, WPCF 47Goffaux G, Van de Wouwer A (2005) Bioprocess state estimation: some classical and less classical approaches. Springer, BerlinGornall AG, Bardawill CJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J Biochem Chem 177:751–766GouzĂ© JL, Rapaport A, Hadj-Sadok MZ (2000) Interval observers for uncertain biological systems. Ecol Model 133:45–56Grau P, de Gracia M, Vanrolleghem PA, Ayesa E (2007) A new plant-wide modelling methodology for WWTPs. Water Res 41:4357–4372Gregersen KH (2003) Økonomien i biogasfĂŠllesanlĂŠg, Udvikling og status medio (2002) Report no. 150. Institute of Food and Resource Economic, Rolighedsvej 25, DK 1958, Frederiksberg C, DenmarkGrepmeier M (2002) Experimentelle Untersuchungen an einer zweistufigen fuzzy-geregelten anaeroben Abwasserreinigungsanlage mit neuartigem Festbettmaterial. TU MunichGuay M, Dochain D, Perrier M (2004) Adaptive extremum seeking control of continuous stirred tank bioreactors with unknown growth kinetics. Automatica 40:881–888Gunaseelan VN (2007) Regression models of ultimate methane yields of fruits and vegetable solid wastes, sorghum and napiergrass on chemical composition. Bioresour Technol 98:1270–1277Gunaseelan VN (2009) Predicting ultimate methane yields of Jatropha curcus and Morus indica from their chemical composition. Bioresour Technol 100:3426–3429Guwy AJ, Hawkes FR, Wilcox SJ, Hawkes DL (1997) Neural network and on-off control of bicarbonate alkalinity in a fluidised-bed anaerobic digester. Water Res 31:2019–2025Guwy AJ, Dinsdale RM, Kim JR et al (2011) Fermentative biohydrogen production systems integration. Bioresour Technol 102:8534–8542Hao OJ (2003) Sulphate-reducing bacteria. In: Mara D, Horan N (eds) Handbook of water and wastewater microbiology. Academic Press Inc, London, pp 459–468HarremoĂ«s P, Capodaglio AG, H

    Process analytical technology in food biotechnology

    Get PDF
    Biotechnology is an area where precision and reproducibility are vital. This is due to the fact that products are often in form of food, pharmaceutical or cosmetic products and therefore very close to the human being. To avoid human error during the production or the evaluation of the quality of a product and to increase the optimal utilization of raw materials, a very high amount of automation is desired. Tools in the food and chemical industry that aim to reach this degree of higher automation are summarized in an initiative called Process Analytical Technology (PAT). Within the scope of the PAT, is to provide new measurement technologies for the purpose of closed loop control in biotechnological processes. These processes are the most demanding processes in regards of control issues due to their very often biological rate-determining component. Most important for an automation attempt is deep process knowledge, which can only be achieved via appropriate measurements. These measurements can either be carried out directly, measuring a crucial physical value, or if not accessible either due to the lack of technology or a complicated sample state, via a soft-sensor.Even after several years the ideal aim of the PAT initiative is not fully implemented in the industry and in many production processes. On the one hand a lot effort still needs to be put into the development of more general algorithms which are more easy to implement and especially more reliable. On the other hand, not all the available advances in this field are employed yet. The potential users seem to stick to approved methods and show certain reservations towards new technologies.Die Biotechnologie ist ein Wissenschaftsbereich, in dem hohe Genauigkeit und Wiederholbarkeit eine wichtige Rolle spielen. Dies ist der Tatsache geschuldet, dass die hergestellten Produkte sehr oft den Bereichen Nahrungsmitteln, Pharmazeutika oder Kosmetik angehöhren und daher besonders den Menschen beeinflussen. Um den menschlichen Fehler bei der Produktion zu vermeiden, die QualitĂ€t eines Produktes zu sichern und die optimale Verwertung der Rohmaterialen zu gewĂ€hrleisten, wird ein besonders hohes Maß an Automation angestrebt. Die Werkzeuge, die in der Nahrungsmittel- und chemischen Industrie hierfĂŒr zum Einsatz kommen, werden in der Process Analytical Technology (PAT) Initiative zusammengefasst. Ziel der PAT ist die Entwicklung zuverlĂ€ssiger neuer Methoden, um Prozesse zu beschreiben und eine automatische Regelungsstrategie zu realisieren. Biotechnologische Prozesse gehören hierbei zu den aufwĂ€ndigsten Regelungsaufgaben, da in den meisten FĂ€llen eine biologische Komponente der entscheidende Faktor ist. Entscheidend fĂŒr eine erfolgreiche Regelungsstrategie ist ein hohes Maß an ProzessverstĂ€ndnis. Dieses kann entweder durch eine direkte Messung der entscheidenden physikalischen, chemischen oder biologischen GrĂ¶ĂŸen gewonnen werden oder durch einen SoftSensor. Zusammengefasst zeigt sich, dass das finale Ziel der PAT Initiative auch nach einigen Jahren des Propagierens weder komplett in der Industrie noch bei vielen Produktionsprozessen angekommen ist. Auf der einen Seite liegt dies mit Sicherheit an der Tatsache, dass noch viel Arbeit in die Generalisierung von Algorithmen gesteckt werden muss. Diese mĂŒsse einfacher zu implementieren und vor allem noch zuverlĂ€ssiger in der Funktionsweise sein. Auf der anderen Seite wurden jedoch auch Algorithmen, Regelungsstrategien und eigne AnsĂ€tze fĂŒr einen neuartigen Sensor sowie einen Soft-Sensors vorgestellt, die großes Potential zeigen. Nicht zuletzt mĂŒssen die möglichen Anwender neue Strategien einsetzen und Vorbehalte gegenĂŒber unbekannten Technologien ablegen

    Minimal time control of fed-batch bioreactor with product inhibition

    Get PDF
    International audienceThis paper is devoted to the minimal time control problem for fed-batch bioreactors, in presence of an inhibitory product, which is released by the biomass proportionally to its growth. We first consider a growth rate with substrate saturation and product inhibition, and we prove that the optimal strategy is fill and wait (bang-bang). We then investigate the case of the Jin growth rate which takes into account substrate and product inhibition. For this type of growth function, we can prove the existence of singular arc paths defining singular strategies. Several configurations are addressed depending on the parameter set. For each case, we provide an optimal feedback control of the problem (of type bang-bang or bang-singular-bang). These results are obtained gathering the initial system into a planar one by using conservation laws. Thanks to Pontryagin maximum principle, Green's theorem, and properties of the switching function, we obtain the optimal synthesis. A methodology is also proposed in order to implement the optimal feeding strategies

    State estimation and trajectory tracking control for a nonlinear and multivariable bioethanol production system

    Get PDF
    In this paper a controller is proposed based on linear algebra for a fed-batch bioethanol production process. It involves fnding feed rate profles (control actions obtained as a solution of a linear equations system) in order to make the system follow predefned concentration profles. A neural network states estimation is designed in order to know those variables that cannot be measured. The controller is tuned using a Monte Carlo experiment for which a cost function that penalizes tracking errors is defned. Moreover, several tests (adding parametric uncertainty and perturbations in the control action) are carried out so as to evaluate the controller performance. A comparison with another controller is made. The demonstration of the error convergence, as well as the stability analysis of the neural network, are included.Fil: FernĂĄndez, Maria Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a. Instituto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; ArgentinaFil: Pantano, Maria Nadia. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a. Instituto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Rossomando, Francisco Guido. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - San Juan. Instituto de AutomĂĄtica. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a. Instituto de AutomĂĄtica; ArgentinaFil: Ortiz, Oscar Alberto. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a. Instituto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; ArgentinaFil: Scaglia, Gustavo Juan Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a. Instituto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; Argentin

    Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control using Polynomial Chaos Expansions

    Get PDF
    The performance of model predictive controllers (MPCs) is largely dependent on the accuracy of the model predictions as compared to the actual plant outputs. Irrespective of the model used, first-principles (FP) or empirical, plant-model mismatch is unavoidable. Consequently, model based controllers must be robust to mismatch between the model predictions and the actual process behavior. Controllers that are not robust may result in poor closed loop response and even instability. Model uncertainty can generally be formulated into two broader forms, parametric uncertainty and unstructured uncertainty. Most of the current robust nonlinear MPC have been based on FP-model where only robustness to bounded disturbances rather than parametric uncertainty has been addressed. Systematically accounting for parametric uncertainty in the robust design has been difficult in FP-models due to varying forms in which uncertain parameters occur in the models. To address parametric uncertainty robustness tests based on Structured Singular Value (SSV) and Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI) have been proposed previously, however these algorithms tend to be conservative because they consider worst-case scenarios and they are also computationally expensive. For instance the SSV calculation is NP-hard and as a result it is not suitable for fast computations. This provides motivation to work on robust control algorithms addressing both parametric and unstructured uncertainty with fast computation times. To facilitate the design of robust controllers which can be computed fast, empirical models are used in which parametric uncertainty is propagated using Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE) of parameters. PCE assists in speeding up the computations by providing an analytical expression for the L^2-norm of model predictions while also eliminating the need to design for the worst-case scenario which results in conservatism. Another way of speeding up computations in MPC algorithms is by grouping subsets of available the inputs and outputs into subsystems and by controlling each of the subsystems by MPC controllers of lower dimensions. This latter approach, referred in the literature as Distributed MPC, has been tackled by different strategies involving different degrees of coordination between subsystems but it has not been studied in terms of robustness to model error. Based on the above considerations the current work investigates different robustness aspects of predictive control algorithms for nonlinear processes with special emphasis on the following three situations, i) a nonlinear predictive control based on a Volterra series model where the uncertain parameters are formulated as PCE’s, ii) The application of a PCE-based approach to control and optimization of bioreactors where the model is based on dynamic flux metabolic models, and iii) A Robust Distributed MPC with a robust estimator that is needed to account for the interactions between sub-systems in distributed control

    ModĂ©lisation et commande robuste des systĂšmes biologiques : exemple de la production d’acide lactique en fermenteur industriel

    Get PDF
    This PhD thesis focuses on the optimization of the bioprocess of lactic acid production from wheat flour. Indeed, lactic acid has received much attention for the production of PLA (Poly Lactic Acid), a biopolymer, since different inexpensive raw material such as wheat flour are now used as carbon source for its production. This work was performed in three main steps. In the first step, an innovative wheat transformation process is proposed, whose main steps are the following: a liquefaction followed by a simultaneous saccharification, proteins hydrolysis (SSPH) and and a final simultaneous saccharification, proteins hydrolysis and fermentation (SSPHF). Secondly, the modeling of the SSPHF (limiting step) in a continuous bioreactor is considered. The determination and validation of model parameters is performed by means of experimental campaigns in a 5 L bioreactor.In the last step, the development of control strategies to maintain the process at its optimal operating point is considered. To do so, due to the absence of sensors for real-time measurement of the concentrations of key variables of the bioreactor, estimators of these concentrations and of the lactic acid production rate are first developed. Then, control strategies for regulating the lactic acid concentration at its optimal value are designed and compared in simulation. An adaptive control combining a state feedback linearizing control and an estimator of the lactic acid production rate is finally chosen to be experimentally validated on an instrumented reactor. This strategy showed good robustness features with respect to modeling mismatches and was able during experiments to increase twice the lactic acid productivity.Cette thĂšse de doctorat porte sur l’optimisation du bioprocĂ©dĂ© de production d’acide lactique Ă  partir de la farine de blĂ©. L'acide lactique s’avĂšre en effet de plus en plus attractif pour la production de PLA (acide poly lactique), un bio polymĂšre, d’autant plus que diffĂ©rentes matiĂšres premiĂšres peu coĂ»teuses comme la farine de blĂ© sont dĂ©sormais utilisĂ©es comme sources de carbone pour sa production. Cette thĂšse comprend trois parties principales. Une premiĂšre partie propose pour l’optimisation du procĂ©dĂ© de transformation du blĂ© un schĂ©ma innovant composĂ© de trois Ă©tapes successives : une liquĂ©faction, suivi d’une Ă©tape de saccharification et hydrolyse des protĂ©ines simultanĂ©es (SSPH) et une Ă©tape finale de saccharification, hydrolyse des protĂ©ines et fermentation simultanĂ©es (SSPHF). La deuxiĂšme partie s’intĂ©resse Ă  la modĂ©lisation de l’étape SSPHF (Ă©tape limitante) dans un biorĂ©acteur continu. La dĂ©termination des paramĂštres du modĂšle ainsi que leur validation sont rĂ©alisĂ©es Ă  l’aide de campagnes d’essais sur un biorĂ©acteur de 5 L.Enfin, la derniĂšre partie dĂ©veloppe la mise en oeuvre de stratĂ©gies de commande permettant de maintenir le bioprocĂ©dĂ© Ă  son point optimal de fonctionnement. Pour ce faire, du fait de l’absence de capteurs pour la mesure en temps rĂ©el des concentrations des variables clĂ© dans le biorĂ©acteur, des estimateurs de ces concentrations ainsi que du taux de production en acide lactique sont tout d’abord Ă©laborĂ©s. Des stratĂ©gies de commande rĂ©gulant la concentration d’acide lactique Ă  sa valeur optimale sont ensuite synthĂ©tisĂ©es et comparĂ©es en simulation. Une commande adaptative combinant une commande linĂ©arisante par retour d’état et un estimateur du taux de production en acide lactique est finalement retenue et validĂ©e expĂ©rimentalement sur un rĂ©acteur instrumentĂ©. Cette derniĂšre s’est avĂ©rĂ©e robuste vis-Ă -vis des erreurs de modĂ©lisation et a permis lors des expĂ©riences de doubler la productivitĂ© de l’acide lactique

    Real-Time Substrate Feed Optimization of Anaerobic Co-Digestion Plants

    Get PDF
    In anaerobic co-digestion plants a mix of organic materials is converted to biogas using the anaerobic digestion process. These organic materials, called substrates, can be crops, sludge, manure, organic wastes and many more. They are fed on a daily basis and significantly affect the biogas production process. In this thesis dynamic real-time optimization of the substrate feed for anaerobic co-digestion plants is developed. In dynamic real-time optimization a dynamic simulation model is used to predict the future performance of the controlled plant. Therefore, a complex simulation model for biogas plants is developed, which uses the famous Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). With this model the future economics as well as stability can be calculated resulting in a multi-objective performance criterion. Using multi-objective nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) the model predictions are used to find the optimal substrate feed for the biogas plant. Therefore, NMPC solves an optimization problem over a moving horizon and applies the optimal substrate feed to the plant for a short while before recalculating the new optimal solution. The multi-objective optimization problem is solved using state-of-the-art methods such as SMS-EMOA and SMS-EGO. The performance of the proposed approach is validated in a detailed simulation studyAlgorithms and the Foundations of Software technolog
    corecore