Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

Background: The aim was to identify and evaluate existing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform the selection for use in surgical practice. Methods: Two systematic reviews were conducted: a systematic review to identify valid, reliable and acceptable PROMs for patients with AAA and a qualitative evidence synthesis to assess the relevance to patients of the identified PROMs items. PROMs studies were evaluated for their psychometric properties using established assessment criteria and their methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist. Qualitative studies were synthesised using framework analysis and identified concepts were then triangulated using a triangulation protocol with the item concepts of the identified PROMs. Results: Four PROMs from three studies were identified in the first review; the SF-36, the Australian Vascular Quality of Life Index, the AneurysmDQoL and AneurysmSRQ. None of the identified PROMs had undergone a rigorous psychometric evaluation within the AAA population. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, from which 28 concepts important to patients with an AAA were identified. The AneurysmDQoL and the AneurysmSRQ together provided the most comprehensive assessment of these concepts. Fear of rupture, control, ability to forget about the condition and size of aneurysm were all concepts identified in the qualitative studies but not covered by items on the identified PROMs. Conclusion: Further research is needed to develop PROMs that are reliable, valid and acceptable to patients for use in surgical practice for AAA

Aneurysmal disease is associated with lower carotid intima-media thickness than occlusive arterial disease

Objective: Patients with aneurysmal and occlusive arterial disease have overlapping cardiovascular risk profiles. The question remains how atherosclerosis is related to the formation of aortic aneurysms. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) is an easily accessible and objective marker of early atherosclerosis. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether there is a difference in atherosclerotic burden as measured by CIMT between patients with aneurysmal and those with occlusive arterial disease. Methods: From 2004 to 2011, the CIMT was measured using B-mode ultrasound scanning in patients undergoing vascular surgery for aortic aneurysmal or occlusive arterial disease at the Erasmus University Medical Center. Cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and medication were recorded. Patients treated for combined aneurysmal and occlusive arterial disease and patients diagnosed with a genetic aneurysm syndrome were excluded. Univariable and multivariable analyses wer

The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) randomised controlled trials: long-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Short-term survival benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair (OR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms have been shown in randomised trials, but this early survival benefit is soon lost. Survival benefit of EVAR was unclear at follow-up to 10 years. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy of EVAR against OR in patients deemed fit and suitable for both procedures (EVAR trial 1; EVAR-1); and against no intervention in patients unfit for OR (EVAR trial 2; EVAR-2). To appraise the long-term significance of type II endoleak and define criteria for intervention. DESIGN: Two national, multicentre randomised controlled trials: EVAR-1 and EVAR-2. SETTING: Patients were recruited from 37 hospitals in the UK between 1 September 1999 and 31 August 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged ≥ 60 years with an aneurysm of ≥ 5.5 cm (as identified by computed tomography scanning), anatomically suitable and fit for OR were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to either EVAR (n = 626) or OR (n = 626) in EVAR-1 using computer-generated sequences at the trial hub. Patients considered unfit were randomly assigned to EVAR (n = 197) or no intervention (n = 207) in EVAR-2. There was no blinding. INTERVENTIONS: EVAR, OR or no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points were total and aneurysm-related mortality until mid-2015 for both trials. Secondary outcomes for EVAR-1 were reinterventions, costs and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In EVAR-1, over a mean of 12.7 years (standard deviation 1.5 years; maximum 15.8 years), we recorded 9.3 deaths per 100 person-years in the EVAR group and 8.9 deaths per 100 person-years in the OR group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.27;p = 0.14]. At 0-6 months after randomisation, patients in the EVAR group had a lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.02 for total mortality; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.93 for aneurysm-related mortality;p = 0.031), but beyond 8 years of follow-up patients in the OR group had a significantly lower mortality (adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.56,p = 0.048 for total mortality; HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.64 to 20.65,p = 0.0064 for aneurysm-related mortality). The increased aneurysm-related mortality in the EVAR group after 8 years was mainly attributable to secondary aneurysm sac rupture, with increased cancer mortality also observed in the EVAR group. Overall, aneurysm reintervention rates were higher in the EVAR group than in the OR group, 4.1 and 1.7 per 100 person-years, respectively (p < 0.001), with reinterventions occurring throughout follow-up. The mean difference in costs over 14 years was £3798 (95% CI £2338 to £5258). Economic modelling based on the outcomes of the EVAR-1 trial showed that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained over the patient's lifetime exceeds conventional thresholds used in the UK. In EVAR-2, patients died at the same rate in both groups, but there was suggestion of lower aneurysm mortality in those who actually underwent EVAR. Type II endoleak itself is not associated with a higher rate of mortality. LIMITATIONS: Devices used were implanted between 1999 and 2004. Newer devices might have better results. Later follow-up imaging declined, particularly for OR patients. Methodology to capture reinterventions changed mainly to record linkage through the Hospital Episode Statistics administrative data set from 2009. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR has an early survival benefit but an inferior late survival benefit compared with OR, which needs to be addressed by lifelong surveillance of EVAR and reintervention if necessary. EVAR does not prolong life in patients unfit for OR. Type II endoleak alone is relatively benign. FUTURE WORK: To find easier ways to monitor sac expansion to trigger timely reintervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55703451. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and the results will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.Funding for this study was provided by the Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health Research

LEV S. VIGOTSKI AND THE MODERN SPECIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Authors of this theme gave analytical review of the Lev S. Vigotski’s consideration about the essence and characteristics of handicapped children and their treatment. They underline that Vigotski examined the question of psychological essence of disabled children and he gave a great contribution in development of psychology of mentally retarded children. They like to point Vigotski’s approach that: “Humans sooner or later will win the deafness, blindness and mental retardation”. But, previously it will be win won better with pedagogy and social work than with medicine and biology. The authors of this paper accentuated significant knowledge of Vigotski in the treatment of disabled children by social and psychological aspect