Parenting stress and resilience in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Southeast Asia: a systematic review

Background: This paper aimed to review the literature on the factors associated with parenting stress and resilience among parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the South East Asia (SEA) region. Methods: An extensive search of articles in multiple online databases (PsycNET, ProQuest, PudMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) resulted in 28 papers that met the inclusion criteria (i.e., conducted in the SEA region, specific to ASD only, published in a peer-reviewed journal, full text in English). Studies found were conducted in the following countries: Brunei, n = 1; Indonesia, n = 2; Malaysia, n = 12; Philippines, n = 5; Singapore, n = 5, Thailand, n = 2; and Vietnam, n = 1, but none from Cambodia, East Timor, Laos, and Myanmar were identified. Results: Across the studies, six main factors were found to be associated with parenting stress: social support, severity of autism symptoms, financial difficulty, parents' perception and understanding toward ASD, parents' anxiety and worries about their child's future, and religious beliefs. These six factors could also be categorized as either a source of parenting stress or a coping strategy/resilience mechanism that may attenuate parenting stress. Conclusion: The findings suggest that greater support services in Western countries may underlie the cultural differences observed in the SEA region. Limitations in the current review were identified. The limited number of studies yielded from the search suggests a need for expanded research on ASD and parenting stress, coping, and resilience in the SEA region especially in Cambodia, East Timor, Laos, and Myanmar. The identified stress and resilience factors may serve as sociocultural markers for clinicians, psychologists, and other professionals to consider when supporting parents of children with ASD

Combined central retinal artery and vein occlusion following trabeculectomy

Retinal vascular events may occur as rare complications of glaucoma procedures due to various factors, including exacerbation of ischemia in patients with pre-existing vascular comorbidities, toxic effect of mitomycin-C, and decompression retinopathy. We present the case of a 47-year-old hypertensive male who underwent trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma in his right eye. At 3 weeks postoperatively, he presented with a drop in visual acuity to light perception with a spike in intraocular pressure. On examination, there was increased bleb vascularity as well as rubeosis. Fundoscopy revealed findings consistent with both central retinal artery occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion. Combined central retinal artery and vein occlusion is a rare retinal vascular condition. Neovascular glaucoma can occur as a sequelae of the ischemic process in the retina. Despite treatment, there is a poor visual prognosis, with the affected eye usually becoming blind from optic atrophy and neovascularization

Effect of Six-Month Postoperative Endothelial Cell Density on Graft Survival after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To analyze if 6-month endothelial cell density (ECD) affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival 5 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).Design: Retrospective cohort study.Participants: A total of 585 DMEK eyes were included. The study group was divided into 4 groups based on 6-month ECD quartiles: group 1 (n = 146) with 313 to 1245 cells/mm(2), group 2 (n = 148) with 1246 to 1610 cells/mm(2), group 3 (n = 145) with 1611 to 1938 cells/mm(2), and group 4 (n = 146) with 1939 to 2760 cells/mm(2). Group 1 was further split into subgroups 1a (n = 36) with 6-month ECD of <828 cells/mm(2), 1b (n = 37) with 829 to 1023 cells/mm(2), 1c (n = 37) with 1024 to 1140 cells/mm(2), and 1d (n = 36) 1141 to 1245 cells/mm(2).Methods: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Main Outcome Measures: Long-term ECD, graft survival, and postoperative complication rates.Results: For group 1, 6-month ECD decreased from 951 (+/- 233) cells/mm(2) (n = 146) to 735 (+/- 216) cells/mm(2) (n = 99) at 5 years postoperatively. Group 1 graft survival probability was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99] at 5 years postoperatively, which was lower than for groups 2 to 4 (P = 0.001). Five-year graft survival in subgroup 1a was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67-0.94), which was lower than in subgroups 1b to 1d (P = 0.001). Preoperative ECD did not influence graft survival (P = 0.400), and higher 6-month ECD values were associated with lower graft failure rates (hazard ratio, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = 0.001).Conclusions: Six-month ECD is associated with DMEK graft survival. High early cell loss after DMEK negatively affects long-term ECD outcome and graft survival. Grafts in the lowest 6-month ECD subgroup (<828 cells/mm(2)) are at higher risk of failure within 5 years after DMEK. To ensure sufficiently high 6-month ECD, preoperative graft quality assessment should be optimized, and cellular stress induced to the graft should be minimized. Additionally, developing therapeutic options for the treatment of low postoperative ECD could further improve DMEK graft longevity. (C) 2021 by the American Academy of OphthalmologyOphthalmic researc

Use of Corneas From Septic Donors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To evaluate the suitability of corneas from septic donors for transplantation by analyzing the discard rate in the eye bank and the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) using organ-cultured corneal grafts from septic versus nonseptic donors. Methods: This retrospective study included 1554 corneas of which 456 corneas (29%) were from septic and 1072 corneas (69%) from nonseptic donors [for 26 corneas (2%) sepsis status was unknown]. The clinical outcome at 6 months after DMEK was evaluated for 82 grafts (26 from septic and 56 from nonseptic donors). Outcome measures were endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and postoperative complications. Results: Primary discard rates were higher for corneas from septic than from nonseptic donors (32.9% vs. 24.5%, P = 0.001). The main discard reason was poor endothelial cell quality for both septic (13.8%) and nonseptic (11.8%) donor corneas. Eye bank contamination rates for septic and nonseptic donor corneas were 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively (P = 0.102). After DMEK, donor endothelial cell density at 6m postoperatively was comparable between grafts from septic and nonseptic donors (1410 +/- 422 cells/mm(2) vs. 1590 +/- 519 cells/mm(2), P = 0.140). No differences in 6m central corneal thickness and in the rebubbling rate were observed between the 2 groups (P = 0.780 and P = 0.396, respectively). None of the cases had graft rejection nor endophthalmitis in both groups. Conclusions: Provided strict adherence to donor screening and evaluation protocols, the use of organ-cultured corneas from septic donors for DMEK does not seem to increase the risk for recipients and allows for expansion of the donor pool for corneal tissue.Ophthalmic researc

Prevention and Management of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Complications

Ophthalmic researc