23 research outputs found
ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างความกระปรี้กระเปร่าในงานกับผลการปฏิบัติงานโดยมีความยืดหยุ่นทางการรู้คิด การสนับสนุนจากเพื่อนร่วมงาน ความยืนหยัดในงาน และการกำหนดเป้าหมาย ที่ท้าทายเป็นตัวแปรส่งผ่าน
(Relationship Between Vigor and Job Performance: The Mediating Effects of Cognitive Flexibility, Coworker Support, Task Persistence, and Difficulty of Self-Set Goals) Abstract The aims of the current study are to examine the relationship between vigor and job performance, and to test the mediating effects of cognitive flexibility, co-worker support, task persistence, and difficulty of self-set goals on the relationship. Three hundred and nine Thai employees from private organizations in Bangkok Metropolitan region gave selt report tor vigor , cognitive flexibility, coworker support, difficulty of self-set goal, and perception of their own job performance. Participants’ immediate supervisor provided assessments of participants’ task persistence and overall job performance. A mediating analysis using bootstrapping indicates that, as expected, vigor significantly predicts job performance (participants’ and supervisors’ combined; [β = .98, R2= .35, F (3,305) = 53.53, p < .001). Cognitive flexibility (indirect effect = .12, BCs 95% CI [.07, .19]), task persistence (indirect effect = .16, BCs 95% CI [.08, .25]), and difficulty of self-set goal (indirect effect = .07, BCs 95% CI [.01, .14]) significantly mediats the predictive effect of vigor on job performance, while co-worker support does not (indirect effect = .01, BCs 95% CI [-.06, .07]). Keywords: Job performance, Vigor, Cognitive flexibility, Co-worker support, Task persistence, Difficulty of self-set goals
Recommended from our members
Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves
How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April through November 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic (29 countries, N = 6,917; 2,249 male, 4,218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). These data can be used to assess differences and similarities in people's fundamental social motives both across and within cultures, at different time points, and in relation to other commonly studied cultural indicators and outcomes
Social mindfulness predicts concern for nature and immigrants across 36 nations
People cooperate every day in ways that range from largescale contributions that mitigate climate change to simple actions such as leaving another individual with choice – known as social mindfulness. It is not yet clear whether and how these complex and more simple forms of cooperation relate. Prior work has found that countries with individuals who made more socially mindful choices were linked to a higher country environmental performance – a proxy for complex cooperation. Here we replicated this initial finding in 41 samples around the world, demonstrating the robustness of the association between social mindfulness and environmental performance, and substantially built on it to show this relationship extended to a wide range of complex cooperative indices, tied closely to many current societal issues. We found that greater social mindfulness expressed by an individual was related to living in countries with more social capital, more community participation and reduced prejudice towards immigrants. Our findings speak to the symbiotic relationship between simple and more complex forms of cooperation in societies
Moral expansiveness around the world:The role of societal factors across 36 countries
International audienceWhat are the things that we think matter morally, and how do societal factors influence this? To date, research has explored several individual-level and historical factors that influence the size of our ‘moral circles.' There has, however, been less attention focused on which societal factors play a role. We present the first multi-national exploration of moral expansiveness—that is, the size of people’s moral circles across countries. We found low generalized trust, greater perceptions of a breakdown in the social fabric of society, and greater perceived economic inequality were associated with smaller moral circles. Generalized trust also helped explain the effects of perceived inequality on lower levels of moral inclusiveness. Other inequality indicators (i.e., Gini coefficients) were, however, unrelated to moral expansiveness. These findings suggest that societal factors, especially those associated with generalized trust, may influence the size of our moral circles
Family Matters:Rethinking the Psychology of Human Social Motivation
What motives do people prioritize in their social lives? Historically, social psychologists, especially those adopting an evolutionary perspective, have devoted a great deal of research attention to sexual attraction and romantic-partner choice (mate seeking). Research on long-term familial bonds (mate retention and kin care) has been less thoroughly connected to relevant comparative and evolutionary work on other species, and in the case of kin care, these bonds have been less well researched. Examining varied sources of data from 27 societies around the world, we found that people generally view familial motives as primary in importance and mate-seeking motives as relatively low in importance. Compared with other groups, college students, single people, and men place relatively higher emphasis on mate seeking, but even those samples rated kin-care motives as more important. Furthermore, motives linked to long-term familial bonds are positively associated with psychological well-being, but mate-seeking motives are associated with anxiety and depression. We address theoretical and empirical reasons why there has been extensive research on mate seeking and why people prioritize goals related to long-term familial bonds over mating goals. Reallocating relatively greater research effort toward long-term familial relationships would likely yield many interesting new findings relevant to everyday people’s highest social priorities
Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves
How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives—self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care—are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which datawere gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April through
November 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic (29 countries, N = 6,917; 2,249 male, 4,218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). These data can be used to assess differences and similarities in people’s fundamental social motives both across and within cultures, at different time points, and in relation to other commonly studied cultural indicators and outcomes
Happiness around the world: A combined etic-emic approach across 63 countries.
What does it mean to be happy? The vast majority of cross-cultural studies on happiness have employed a Western-origin, or "WEIRD" measure of happiness that conceptualizes it as a self-centered (or "independent"), high-arousal emotion. However, research from Eastern cultures, particularly Japan, conceptualizes happiness as including an interpersonal aspect emphasizing harmony and connectedness to others. Following a combined emic-etic approach (Cheung, van de Vijver & Leong, 2011), we assessed the cross-cultural applicability of a measure of independent happiness developed in the US (Subjective Happiness Scale; Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999) and a measure of interdependent happiness developed in Japan (Interdependent Happiness Scale; Hitokoto & Uchida, 2015), with data from 63 countries representing 7 sociocultural regions. Results indicate that the schema of independent happiness was more coherent in more WEIRD countries. In contrast, the coherence of interdependent happiness was unrelated to a country's "WEIRD-ness." Reliabilities of both happiness measures were lowest in African and Middle Eastern countries, suggesting these two conceptualizations of happiness may not be globally comprehensive. Overall, while the two measures had many similar correlates and properties, the self-focused concept of independent happiness is "WEIRD-er" than interdependent happiness, suggesting cross-cultural researchers should attend to both conceptualizations
Implementation of Best Practices Regarding Treatment Fidelity in the Family Colorectal Cancer Awareness and Risk Education Randomized Controlled Trial
Treatment fidelity is associated with improvement in research
outcomes and increased confidence in significant findings. However, few studies report
on recommended areas of treatment fidelity (i.e., study design, training, treatment
delivery, treatment receipt, and treatment enactment), leaving a dearth of information
about implementation components that contributed to a study’s success. Without such
information, it is difficult for researchers to correctly assess previous findings and
for practitioners to correctly implement findings into practice. Thus, it is crucial
that studies assess both treatment fidelity and applicability of treatment fidelity
findings. We report measures of treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of
an intervention promoting colonoscopy in at-risk relatives of colorectal cancer (CRC)
patients. We describe assessments related to both treatment delivery and treatment
receipt. We conducted separate ANCOVAs to model the change in each of the treatment
receipt variables, comparing the two intervention arms. Compared with the control group,
the intervention group had significantly greater improvements in CRC knowledge (f =
17.46, p < .0001), perceptions about susceptibility (f = 15.08, p = .0002), response
efficacy (f = 7.46, p = .0076), self-efficacy (f = 8.16, p = .0053), and reduced
decisional uncertainty (f = 19.59, p < .0001) from baseline to 1-month follow-up.
Overall, our study adhered to most of the best-practice guidelines for behavioral
intervention fidelity. This demonstrates that our intervention was delivered as intended
and positively affected the cognitive processes that are purported to be predictive of
adherent behavioral outcomes
Recommended from our members
Family still matters: human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic social changes for many people, including separation from friends and coworkers, enforced close contact with family, and reductions in mobility. Here we assess the extent to which people's evolutionarily-relevant basic motivations and goals—fundamental social motives such as Affiliation and Kin Care—might have been affected. To address this question, we gathered data on fundamental social motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) across two waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered both before and during the pandemic (pre-pandemic wave: 32 countries, N = 8998; 3302 male, 5585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91; mid-pandemic wave: 29 countries, N = 6917; 2249 male, 4218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). Samples include data collected online (e.g., Prolific, MTurk), at universities, and via community sampling. We found that Disease Avoidance motivation was substantially higher during the pandemic, and that most of the other fundamental social motives showed small, yet significant, differences across waves. Most sensibly, concern with caring for one's children was higher during the pandemic, and concerns with Mate Seeking and Status were lower. Earlier findings showing the prioritization of family motives over mating motives (and even over Disease Avoidance motives) were replicated during the pandemic. Finally, well-being remained positively associated with family-related motives and negatively associated with mating motives during the pandemic, as in the pre-pandemic samples. Our results provide further evidence for the robust primacy of family-related motivations even during this unique disruption of social life