14 research outputs found
Assessment of the Accuracy of a Multi-Beam LED Scanner Sensor for Measuring Olive Canopies
MDPI. CC BYCanopy characterization has become important when trying to optimize any kind of agricultural operation in high-growing crops, such as olive. Many sensors and techniques have reported satisfactory results in these approaches and in this work a 2D laser scanner was explored for measuring canopy trees in real-time conditions. The sensor was tested in both laboratory and field conditions to check its accuracy, its cone width, and its ability to characterize olive canopies in situ. The sensor was mounted on a mast and tested in laboratory conditions to check: (i) its accuracy at different measurement distances; (ii) its measurement cone width with different reflectivity targets; and (iii) the influence of the target’s density on its accuracy. The field tests involved both isolated and hedgerow orchards, in which the measurements were taken manually and with the sensor. The canopy volume was estimated with a methodology consisting of revolving or extruding the canopy contour. The sensor showed high accuracy in the laboratory test, except for the measurements performed at 1.0 m distance, with 60 mm error (6%). Otherwise, error remained below 20 mm (1% relative error). The cone width depended on the target reflectivity. The accuracy decreased with the target density
Mechanical canopy and trunk shaking for the harvesting mechanization of table olive orchards
Table olive harvesting is highly dependent on manual labour and may jeopardize the crop benefit. The introduction of a mechanical harvest system requires a global evaluation of the whole process. A trunk shaker along with shaker combs and a continuous canopy shaker harvester have been tested in two orchards with different tree training and layout to determine their feasibility to mechanical harvesting in table olives. For that purpose, several parameters have been evaluated. Canopy shaker required adapted orchard layout and hedge of canopies for reaching an acceptable harvesting efficiency about 80% and trunk shaker performed a higher efficiency of more than 95% but depended highly on labour. Both systems had a high field capacity about 0.15 ha h-1 but low for the trunk shaker considering the people (0.01 ha h-1 person-1). The vibration pattern that applied on branches was totally different although the quantitative tree damages were no significative different. There were no significant differences in fruit bruising between both systems, but there were between the different sampling points, mainly in the detachment. The fruit bruising index of the remaining fruit on canopy suggests that it is possible to perform a second harvest. Both mechanical systems are suitable for table olive harvesting whilst improving the efficiency of manual systems with bearable damages, but each one has pros and cons that must be considered bearing in mind that require an adaptation of the orchard where there are applied.
Highlights
Table olives mechanization is possible by integrating with the fruit liquid store.
Trunk shaker performed high efficiency in adapted orchards but depended on labour.
Canopy shakers require the adaption of orchard and machine for commercial purposes.
There were no differences in detached fruit bruising between both mechanical systems.
The bruising index of the remaining fruit on trees suggest second harvesting pass.Table olive harvesting is highly dependent on manual labour and may jeopardize the crop benefit. The introduction of a mechanical harvest system requires a global evaluation of the whole process. A trunk shaker along with shaker combs and a continuous canopy shaker harvester have been tested in two orchards with different tree training and layout to determine their feasibility to mechanical harvesting in table olives. For that purpose, several parameters have been evaluated. Canopy shaker required adapted orchard layout and hedge of canopies for reaching an acceptable harvesting efficiency about 80% and trunk shaker performed a higher efficiency of more than 95% but depended highly on labour. Both systems had a high field capacity about 0.15 ha h-1 but low for the trunk shaker considering the people (0.01 ha h-1 person-1). The vibration pattern that applied on branches was totally different although the quantitative tree damages were no significative different. There were no significant differences in fruit bruising between both systems, but there were between the different sampling points, mainly in the detachment. The fruit bruising index of the remaining fruit on canopy suggests that it is possible to perform a second harvest. Both mechanical systems are suitable for table olive harvesting whilst improving the efficiency of manual systems with bearable damages, but each one has pros and cons that must be considered bearing in mind that require an adaptation of the orchard where there are applied.
Highlights
Table olives mechanization is possible by integrating with the fruit liquid store.
Trunk shaker performed high efficiency in adapted orchards but depended on labour.
Canopy shakers require the adaption of orchard and machine for commercial purposes.
There were no differences in detached fruit bruising between both mechanical systems.
The bruising index of the remaining fruit on trees suggest second harvesting pass
Patrones de desprendimiento de cítricos y respuesta del árbol bajo recolección mecanizada con sistemas sacudidores de copa
La recolección mecanizada es una importante alternativa para afrontar los problemas de disponibilidad de mano de obra, los costes de producción y mejorar la rentabilidad de la explotación. La viabilidad de la recolección mecanizada está marcada por la calidad de la fruta y la eficiencia su derribo y para ello es necesaria una adaptación entre máquina y árbol. El objetivo del trabajo es la determinación del patrón de abscisión de naranja dulce con sistema sacudidor de copa en comparación con otros sistemas de desprendimiento y, al mismo tiempo, establecer recomendaciones para alcanzar un elevado porcentaje de derribo. Se ensayaron 4 parcelas de naranja variedad ‘Valencia’ durante las campañas 2017/2018, empleando un sacudidor de copa Oxbo-3210. El patrón de desprendimiento según el tipo de recolección fue determinado junto el análisis de la vibración en la copa del árbol. La frecuencia de rotura tipo AZ-C predominó en caída natural (89,0%) y la recolección manual (79,5%) y se fue igualando con AZ-A en el sacudidor de copa (58,8%). La zona de contacto con las varas mostró un valor medio de ARMS de 2,3 veces mayor que la zona sin contacto, además de un 85% de desprendimiento frente a un 27%. Se definió que la forma de seto ancho debe ser adaptado para facilitar el acceso de las varas y que la máquina debe ajustarse entre el valor ARMS y el tiempo mayor de 300 ms-2 para lograr un desprendimiento del 100%
Olive Actual “on Year” Yield Forecast Tool Based on the Tree Canopy Geometry Using UAS Imagery
Olive has a notable importance in countries of Mediterranean basin and its profitability
depends on several factors such as actual yield, production cost or product price. Actual “on
year” Yield (AY) is production (kg tree-1) in “on years”, and this research attempts to relate it with
geometrical parameters of the tree canopy. Regression equation to forecast AY based on manual
canopy volume was determined based on data acquired from different orchard categories and
cultivars during different harvesting seasons in southern Spain. Orthoimages were acquired with
unmanned aerial systems (UAS) imagery calculating individual crown for relating to canopy volume
and AY. Yield levels did not vary between orchard categories; however, it did between irrigated
orchards (7000–17,000 kg ha-1) and rainfed ones (4000–7000 kg ha-1). After that, manual canopy
volume was related with the individual crown area of trees that were calculated by orthoimages
acquired with UAS imagery. Finally, AY was forecasted using both manual canopy volume and
individual tree crown area as main factors for olive productivity. AY forecast only by using individual
crown area made it possible to get a simple and cheap forecast tool for a wide range of olive orchards.
Finally, the acquired information was introduced in a thematic map describing spatial AY variability
obtained from orthoimage analysis that may be a powerful tool for farmers, insurance systems,
market forecasts or to detect agronomical problems
Postharvest Geometric Characterization of Table Olive Bruising from 3D Digitalization
The physical properties of table olive fruit are an important factor in the design of harvesting, transport, classification, and commercialization. The visual quality of the fruits harvested is the most important factor limiting the commercialization of table olives. The mechanical damage during harvesting consists of local tissue degradation, resulting in bruising of the fruits. In recent years, several studies have been carried out to identify physical properties and to calculate indices that characterize the damage to olives. However, all of them are based on 2D techniques. The aim of this work is the determination of new geometric parameters based on a 3D analysis of the scanned olives. The 3D shape parameters have been collated with those obtained by standard 2D shape analysis methods. From the results, it is observed that the use of high-resolution, medium-cost 3D technologies allows a more precise characterization of the shape of damages observed in table olives. To carry out three-dimensional analysis, Boolean operations of the solid and parametric surfaces of the meshes obtained by a 3D scanner have been used
Analysis of fruit and oil quantity and quality distribution in high-density olive trees in order to improve the mechanical harvesting process
Olive fruit production and oil quality distribution with respect to canopy distribution are important criteria for selection and improvement of mechanical harvesting methods. Tests were performed in a high-density olive orchard (Olea europea L., cv. Arbequina) in southern Spain. Fruit distribution, fruit properties and oil parameters were measured by taken separate samples for each canopy location and tree. Results showed a high percentage of fruits and oil located in the middle-outer and upper canopy, representing more than 60% of total production. The position of these fruits along with their higher weight per fruit, maturity index and polyphenol content make them the target for all mechanical harvesting systems. The fruits from the lower canopy represented close to 30% of fruit and oil production, however, the mechanical harvesting of these fruits is inefficient for mechanical harvesting systems. Whether these fruits cannot be properly harvested, enhance tree training to raise their position is recommended. Fruits located inside the canopy are not a target location for mechanical harvesting systems as they were a small percentage of the total fruit (<10%). Significant differences were found for polyphenol content with respect to canopy height, although this was not the case with acidity. In addition, the ripening index did not influence polyphenol content and acidity values within the canopy. Fruit production, properties and oil quality varied depending on fruit canopy position. Thus harvesting systems may be targeted at maximize harvesting efficiency including an adequate tree training system adapted to the harvesting system
The vibration behaviour of hedgerow olive trees in response to mechanical harvesting with straddle harvester
Vibration analysis of the fruit detachment process in late-season ‘Valencia’ orange with canopy shaker technology
Adjustment of olive fruit temperature before grinding for olive oil extraction. Experimental study and pilot plant trials
Harvesting at high temperatures and bulk transport can negatively influence the quality of olives and lead to undesirable alterations in the extracted oil. Cooling the fruit in the field would be the most logical solution, but it means that the olives arrive too cold at the mill for immediate processing. In this work, the use of warm water in the washing tub to warm up the fruit before grinding instead of flash heat treatment on the paste was assessed in two experiments. In the first one, at the laboratory level, the temperature after milling was determined in three olive cultivars, previously stored at 5 or 10 °C, and then submerged at different water temperatures (25, 30, and 35 °C) for 15, 30, 45, and 60 s. In the second one, two batches of olives were cooled in the field at 5 °C and then conditioned with washing water to obtain a paste at the entrance of the pilot plant malaxer at 27 °C. The temperature of the olives was measured at five points from the discharging up to their entering, as paste, into the malaxer. The results demonstrated the feasibility of the method as the temperature of the ground olives was kept at the desired temperature (28 ± 1 °C). The trials highlight the potential for automating an even more precise adjustment of the temperature of the olives before milling once the washing tub is equipped with a safe heating system