48 research outputs found
Testing Yukawa-unified SUSY during year 1 of LHC: the role of multiple b-jets, dileptons and missing E_T
We examine the prospects for testing SO(10) Yukawa-unified supersymmetric
models during the first year of LHC running at \sqrt{s}= 7 TeV, assuming
integrated luminosity values of 0.1 to 1 fb^-1. We consider two cases: the
Higgs splitting (HS) and the D-term splitting (DR3) models. Each generically
predicts light gluinos and heavy squarks, with an inverted scalar mass
hierarchy. We hence expect large rates for gluino pair production followed by
decays to final states with large b-jet multiplicity. For 0.2 fb^-1 of
integrated luminosity, we find a 5 sigma discovery reach of m(gluino) ~ 400 GeV
even if missing transverse energy, E_T^miss, is not a viable cut variable, by
examining the multi-b-jet final state. A corroborating signal should stand out
in the opposite-sign (OS) dimuon channel in the case of the HS model; the DR3
model will require higher integrated luminosity to yield a signal in the OS
dimuon channel. This region may also be probed by the Tevatron with 5-10 fb^-1
of data, if a corresponding search in the multi-b+ E_T^miss channel is
performed. With higher integrated luminosities of ~1 fb^-1, using E_T^miss plus
a large multiplicity of b-jets, LHC should be able to discover Yukawa-unified
SUSY with m(gluino) up to about 630 GeV. Thus, the year 1 LHC reach for
Yukawa-unified SUSY should be enough to either claim a discovery of the gluino,
or to very nearly rule out this class of models, since higher values of
m(gluino) lead to rather poor Yukawa unification.Comment: 32 pages including 31 EPS figure
Neutralino versus axion/axino cold dark matter in the 19 parameter SUGRA model
We calculate the relic abundance of thermally produced neutralino cold dark
matter in the general 19 parameter supergravity (SUGRA-19) model. A scan over
GUT scale parameters reveals that models with a bino-like neutralino typically
give rise to a dark matter density \Omega_{\tz_1}h^2\sim 1-1000, i.e. between 1
and 4 orders of magnitude higher than the measured value. Models with higgsino
or wino cold dark matter can yield the correct relic density, but mainly for
neutralino masses around 700-1300 GeV. Models with mixed bino-wino or
bino-higgsino CDM, or models with dominant co-annihilation or A-resonance
annihilation can yield the correct abundance, but such cases are extremely hard
to generate using a general scan over GUT scale parameters; this is indicative
of high fine-tuning of the relic abundance in these cases. Requiring that
m_{\tz_1}\alt 500 GeV (as a rough naturalness requirement) gives rise to a
minimal probably dip in parameter space at the measured CDM abundance. For
comparison, we also scan over mSUGRA space with four free parameters. Finally,
we investigate the Peccei-Quinn augmented MSSM with mixed axion/axino cold dark
matter. In this case, the relic abundance agrees more naturally with the
measured value. In light of our cumulative results, we conclude that future
axion searches should probe much more broadly in axion mass, and deeper into
the axion coupling.Comment: 23 pages including 17 .eps figure
Non-standard interactions versus non-unitary lepton flavor mixing at a neutrino factory
The impact of heavy mediators on neutrino oscillations is typically described
by non-standard four-fermion interactions (NSIs) or non-unitarity (NU). We
focus on leptonic dimension-six effective operators which do not produce
charged lepton flavor violation. These operators lead to particular
correlations among neutrino production, propagation, and detection non-standard
effects. We point out that these NSIs and NU phenomenologically lead, in fact,
to very similar effects for a neutrino factory, for completely different
fundamental reasons. We discuss how the parameters and probabilities are
related in this case, and compare the sensitivities. We demonstrate that the
NSIs and NU can, in principle, be distinguished for large enough effects at the
example of non-standard effects in the --sector, which basically
corresponds to differentiating between scalars and fermions as heavy mediators
as leading order effect. However, we find that a near detector at superbeams
could provide very synergistic information, since the correlation between
source and matter NSIs is broken for hadronic neutrino production, while NU is
a fundamental effect present at any experiment.Comment: 32 pages, 5 figures. Final version published in JHEP. v3: Typo in Eq.
(27) correcte
Beyond the standard seesaw: neutrino masses from Kahler operators and broken supersymmetry
We investigate supersymmetric scenarios in which neutrino masses are
generated by effective d=6 operators in the Kahler potential, rather than by
the standard d=5 superpotential operator. First, we discuss some general
features of such effective operators, also including SUSY-breaking insertions,
and compute the relevant renormalization group equations. Contributions to
neutrino masses arise at low energy both at the tree level and through finite
threshold corrections. In the second part we present simple explicit
realizations in which those Kahler operators arise by integrating out heavy
SU(2)_W triplets, as in the type II seesaw. Distinct scenarios emerge,
depending on the mechanism and the scale of SUSY-breaking mediation. In
particular, we propose an appealing and economical picture in which the heavy
seesaw mediators are also messengers of SUSY breaking. In this case, strong
correlations exist among neutrino parameters, sparticle and Higgs masses, as
well as lepton flavour violating processes. Hence, this scenario can be tested
at high-energy colliders, such as the LHC, and at lower energy experiments that
measure neutrino parameters or search for rare lepton decays.Comment: LaTeX, 34 pages; some corrections in Section
Decoupling property of the supersymmetric Higgs sector with four doublets
In supersymmetric standard models with multi Higgs doublet fields,
selfcoupling constants in the Higgs potential come only from the D-terms at the
tree level. We investigate the decoupling property of additional two heavier
Higgs doublet fields in the supersymmetric standard model with four Higgs
doublets. In particular, we study how they can modify the predictions on the
quantities well predicted in the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM),
when the extra doublet fields are rather heavy to be measured at collider
experiments. The B-term mixing between these extra heavy Higgs bosons and the
relatively light MSSM-like Higgs bosons can significantly change the
predictions in the MSSM such as on the masses of MSSM-like Higgs bosons as well
as the mixing angle for the two light CP-even scalar states. We first give
formulae for deviations in the observables of the MSSM in the decoupling region
for the extra two doublet fields. We then examine possible deviations in the
Higgs sector numerically, and discuss their phenomenological implications.Comment: 26 pages, 24 figures, text sligtly modified,version to appear in
Journal of High Energy Physic
Validity of self-assessment of hallux valgus using the Manchester scale
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hallux valgus (HV) is a common condition involving the progressive subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint due to lateral deviation of the hallux and medial deviation of the first metatarsal. The objective of this study was to evaluate the re-test reliability and validity of self-assessment of HV using a simple clinical screening tool involving four standardised photographs (the Manchester scale), in order to determine whether this tool could be used for postal surveys of the condition.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>HV was assessed with the Manchester scale in 138 people aged 65 to 93 years of age (102 women and 36 men) as part of a larger randomised controlled trial. At the six month follow-up assessment, HV was reassessed to determine re-test reliability, and participants were asked to self-assess their degree of HV independent of the examiners. Associations between (i) baseline and follow-up assessments of the examiners and (ii) participant and examiner assessments were performed using weighted kappa statistics. Analyses were then repeated after HV was dichotomised as present or absent using unweighted kappa, and sensitivity and specificity of self-assessment of HV was determined.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Re-test reliability of the examiners was substantial to almost perfect (weighted kappa = 0.78 to 0.90), and there was a substantial level of agreement between observations of the participants and the examiners (weighted kappa = 0.71 to 0.80). Overall, there was a slight tendency for participants to rate their HV as less severe than the examiners. When the Manchester scale scores were dichotomised, agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both re-test comparisons (kappa = 0.80 to 0.89) and substantial for comparisons between participants and examiners (kappa = 0.64 to 0.76). The sensitivity and specificity of self-assessment of HV using the dichotomous scale were 85 and 88%, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The Manchester scale demonstrates high re-test reliability, and self-assessment scores obtained by participants are strongly associated with scores obtained by examiners. These findings indicate that the tool can be used with confidence in postal surveys to document the presence and severity of HV.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ACTRN12608000065392</p
Peccei-Quinn extended gauge-mediation model with vector-like matter
We construct a gauge-mediated SUSY breaking model with vector-like matters
combined with the Peccei-Quinn mechanism to solve the strong CP problem. The
Peccei-Quinn symmetry plays an essential role for generating sizable masses for
the vector-like matters and the -term without introducing dangerous CP
angle. The model naturally explains both the 125GeV Higgs mass and the muon
anomalous magnetic moment. The stabilization of the Peccei-Quinn scalar and the
cosmology of the saxion and axino are also discussed.Comment: 33 pages, 5 figures; version to be published (JHEP
Constrained SUSY seesaws with a 125 GeV Higgs
Motivated by the ATLAS and CMS discovery of a Higgs-like boson with a mass
around 125 GeV, and by the need of explaining neutrino masses, we analyse the
three canonical SUSY versions of the seesaw mechanism (type I, II and III) with
CMSSM boundary conditions. In type II and III cases, SUSY particles are lighter
than in the CMSSM (or the constrained type I seesaw), for the same set of input
parameters at the universality scale. Thus, to explain
at low energies, one is forced into regions of parameter space with very large
values of , or . We compare the squark and gluino masses
allowed by the ATLAS and CMS ranges for (extracted from the 2011-2012
data), and discuss the possibility of distinguishing seesaw models in view of
future results on SUSY searches. In particular, we briefly comment on the
discovery potential of LHC upgrades, for squark/gluino mass ranges required by
present Higgs mass constraints. A discrimination between different seesaw
models cannot rely on the Higgs mass data alone, therefore we also take into
account the MEG upper limit on BR and show that, in some
cases, this may help to restrict the SUSY parameter space, as well as to set
complementary limits on the seesaw scale.Comment: 28 pages, 7 figures. v2: comments and references added. Final version
to appear in JHE
Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with five years of the ANTARES detector data
[EN] A search for magnetic monopoles using five years of data recorded with the ANTARES neutrino telescope from January 2008 to December 2012 with a total live time of 1121 days is presented. The analysis is carried out in the range b>0.6 of magnetic monopole velocities using a strategy based on run-by-run Monte Carlo simulations. No signal above the background expectation from atmospheric muons and atmospheric neutrinos is observed, and upper limits are set on the magnetic monopole flux ranging from 5.7x10-16 to 1.5x10-18 cm-2 . s-1.sr-1.The authors acknowledge the financial support of the funding agencies: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives (CEA), Commission Europeenne (FEDER fund and Marie Curie Program), Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), IdEx program and UnivEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cite (ANR-10-LABX-0023 and ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02), Labex OCEVU (ANR-11-LABX-0060) and the A*MIDEX project (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02), Region Ile-de-France (DIM-ACAV), Region Alsace (contrat CPER), Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur, Departement du Var and Ville de La Seyne-sur-Mer, France; Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany; Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy; Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), Nederlandse organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Netherlands; Council of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and leading scientific schools supporting grants, Russia; National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS), Romania; Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO): Plan Estatal de Investigacion (refs. FPA2015-65150-C3-1-P, -2-P and -3-P, (MINECO/FEDER)), Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence and MultiDark Consolider (MINECO), and Prometeo and Grisolia programs (Generalitat Valenciana), Spain; Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Professional Training, Morocco. We also acknowledge the technical support of Ifremer, AIM and Foselev Marine for the sea operation and the CC-IN2P3 for the computing facilitiesAlbert, A.; Andre, M.; Anghinolfi, M.; Anton, G.; Ardid Ramírez, M.; Aubert, J.; Avgitas, T.... (2017). Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with five years of the ANTARES detector data. Journal of High Energy Physics (Online). (7):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)054S1167P.A.M. Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 133 (1931) 60 [ INSPIRE ].G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276 [ INSPIRE ].A.M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett. 20 (1974) 194 [ INSPIRE ].G. Lazarides, C. Panagiotakopoulos and Q. Shafi, Magnetic Monopoles From Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1707 [ INSPIRE ].Y.M. Cho and D. Maison, Monopoles in Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Lett. B 391 (1997) 360 [ hep-th/9601028 ] [INSPIRE].Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Patrignani et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001 [ INSPIRE ].L. Patrizii and M. Spurio, Status of Searches for Magnetic Monopoles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65 (2015) 279 [ arXiv:1510.07125 ] [INSPIRE].ATLAS collaboration, Search for magnetic monopoles and stable particles with high electric charges in 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 052009 [ arXiv:1509.08059 ] [ INSPIRE ].MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya et al., Search for magnetic monopoles with the MoEDAL prototype trapping detector in 8 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2016) 067 [ arXiv:1604.06645 ] [INSPIRE].MoEDAL collaboration, B. Acharya et al., Search for Magnetic Monopoles with the MoEDAL Forward Trapping Detector in 13 TeV Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 061801 [ arXiv:1611.06817 ] [INSPIRE].T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387 [ INSPIRE ].J. Preskill, Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1365 [ INSPIRE ].A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [ INSPIRE ].D. Ryu, H. Kang and P.L. Biermann, Cosmic magnetic fields in large scale filaments and sheets, Astron. Astrophys. 335 (1998) 19 [ astro-ph/9803275 ] [ INSPIRE ].E.N. Parker, The Origin of Magnetic Fields, Astrophys. J 160 (1970) 383.ANTARES collaboration, M. Ageron et al., ANTARES: the first undersea neutrino telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 656 (2011) 11 [ arXiv:1104.1607 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Search for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 634 [ arXiv:1110.2656 ] [ INSPIRE ].IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Searches for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles in IceCube, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 133 [ arXiv:1511.01350 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., The data acquisition system for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 570 (2007) 107 [ astro-ph/0610029 ] [INSPIRE].D.R. Tompkins, Total energy loss and Čerenkov emission from monopoles, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B248.Y. Kazama, C.N. Yang and A.S. Goldhaber, Scattering of a Dirac Particle with Charge Ze by a Fixed Magnetic Monopole, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2287 [ INSPIRE ].S.P. Ahlen, Monopole Track Characteristics in Plastic Detectors, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2935 [ INSPIRE ].S.P. Ahlen, Stopping Power Formula for Magnetic Monopoles, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 229 [ INSPIRE ].J. Derkaoui et al., Energy losses of magnetic monopoles and of dyons in the earth, Astropart. Phys. 9 (1998) 173 [ INSPIRE ].CERN Application Software Group, GEANT 3.21 Detector Description and Simulation Tool, CERN Program Library Long Writeup W5013 (1993).G. Carminati, A. Margiotta and M. Spurio, Atmospheric MUons from PArametric formulas: A fast GEnerator for neutrino telescopes (MUPAGE), Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) 915 [ arXiv:0802.0562 ] [INSPIRE].Y. Becherini, A. Margiotta, M. Sioli and M. Spurio, A parameterisation of single and multiple muons in the deep water or ice, Astropart. Phys. 25 (2006) 1 [ hep-ph/0507228 ] [INSPIRE].J. Brunner, ANTARES simulation tools, in proceedings of The VLVnT workshop, Amsterdam (2003), http://www.vlvnt.nl/proceedings.pdf .ANTARES collaboration, A. Margiotta, Common simulation tools for large volume neutrino detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 725 (2013) 98 [ INSPIRE ].V. Agrawal, T.K. Gaisser, P. Lipari and T. Stanev, Atmospheric neutrino flux above 1-GeV, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1314 [ hep-ph/9509423 ] [INSPIRE].G.D. Barr, T.K. Gaisser, S. Robbins and T. Stanev, Uncertainties in Atmospheric Neutrino Fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 094009 [ astro-ph/0611266 ] [INSPIRE].L. Fusco and A. Margiotta, The Run-by-Run Monte Carlo simulation for the ANTARES experiment, EPJ Web Conf. 116 (2016) 02002.ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., A fast algorithm for muon track reconstruction and its application to the ANTARES neutrino telescope, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2011) 652 [ arXiv:1105.4116 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Searches for Point-like and extended neutrino sources close to the Galactic Centre using the ANTARES neutrino Telescope, Astrophys. J. 786 (2014) L5 [ arXiv:1402.6182 ] [INSPIRE].G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873 [ physics/9711021 ] [INSPIRE].G.C. Hill and K. Rawlins, Unbiased cut selection for optimal upper limits in neutrino detectors: The model rejection potential technique, Astropart. Phys. 19 (2003) 393 [ astro-ph/0209350 ] [ INSPIRE ].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., Zenith distribution and flux of atmospheric muons measured with the 5-line ANTARES detector, Astropart. Phys. 34 (2010) 179 [ arXiv:1007.1777 ] [ INSPIRE ].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Measurement of the atmospheric ν μ energy spectrum from 100 GeV to 200 TeV with the ANTARES telescope, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2606 [ arXiv:1308.1599 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., First Search for Point Sources of High Energy Cosmic Neutrinos with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astrophys. J. 743 (2011) L14 [ arXiv:1108.0292 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, P. Amram et al., The ANTARES optical module, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 484 (2002) 369 [ astro-ph/0112172 ] [INSPIRE].ANTARES collaboration, J.A. Aguilar et al., Transmission of light in deep sea water at the site of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 23 (2005) 131 [ astro-ph/0412126 ] [ INSPIRE ].MACRO collaboration, M. Ambrosio et al., Final results of magnetic monopole searches with the MACRO experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 25 (2002) 511 [ hep-ex/0207020 ] [INSPIRE].BAIKAL collaboration, K. Antipin et al., Search for relativistic magnetic monopoles with the Baikal Neutrino Telescope, Astropart. Phys. 29 (2008) 366 [ INSPIRE ].KM3Net collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 084001 [ arXiv:1601.07459 ] [INSPIRE]