47 research outputs found

    Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants

    Get PDF

    Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050

    Get PDF
    To meet the 1.5 °C target, methane (CH) from ruminants must be reduced by 11 to 30% by 2030 and 24 to 47% by 2050 compared to 2010 levels. A meta-analysis identified strategies to decrease product-based (PB; CH per unit meat or milk) and absolute (ABS) enteric CH emissions while maintaining or increasing animal productivity (AP; weight gain or milk yield). Next, the potential of different adoption rates of one PB or one ABS strategy to contribute to the 1.5 °C target was estimated. The database included findings from 430 peer-reviewed studies, which reported 98 mitigation strategies that can be classified into three categories: animal and feed management, diet formulation, and rumen manipulation. A random-effects meta-analysis weighted by inverse variance was carried out. Three PB strategies—namely, increasing feeding level, decreasing grass maturity, and decreasing dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio—decreased CH per unit meat or milk by on average 12% and increased AP by a median of 17%. Five ABS strategies—namely CH inhibitors, tanniferous forages, electron sinks, oils and fats, and oilseeds—decreased daily methane by on average 21%. Globally, only 100% adoption of the most effective PB and ABS strategies can meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050, because mitigation effects are offset by projected increases in CH due to increasing milk and meat demand. Notably, by 2030 and 2050, low- and middle-income countries may not meet their contribution to the 1.5 °C target for this same reason, whereas high-income countries could meet their contributions due to only a minor projected increase in enteric CH emissions.We thank the GLOBAL NETWORK project for generating part of the database. The GLOBAL NETWORK project (https://globalresearchalliance.org/research/livestock/collaborative-activities/global-research-project/; accessed 20 June 2020) was a multinational initiative funded by the Joint Programming Initiative on Food Security, Agriculture, and Climate Change and was coordinated by the Feed and Nutrition Network (https://globalresearchalliance.org/research/livestock/networks/feed-nutrition-network/; accessed 20 June 2020) within the Livestock Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural GHG (https://globalresearchalliance.org; accessed 20 June 2020). We thank MitiGate, which was part of the Animal Change project funded by the EU under Grant Agreement FP7-266018 for sharing their database with us (http://mitigate.ibers.aber.ac.uk/, accessed 1 July 2017). Part of C.A., A.N.H., and S.C.M.’s time in the early stages of this project was funded by the Kravis Scientific Research Fund (New York) and a gift from Sue and Steve Mandel to the Environmental Defense Fund. Another part of C.A.’s work on this project was supported by the National Program for Scientific Research and Advanced Studies - PROCIENCIA within the framework of the "Project for the Improvement and Expansion of the Services of the National System of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation" (Contract No. 016-2019) and by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (issued through Deutsche Gesellschaft fĂŒr Internationale Zusammenarbei) through the research “Programme of Climate Smart Livestock” (Programme 2017.0119.2). Part of A.N.H.’s work was funded by the US Department of Agriculture (Washington, DC) National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN 04539 and Accession no. 1000803. E.K. was supported by the Sesnon Endowed Chair Fund of the University of California, Davis

    Association between protein feeding and reproductive efficiency in the dairy cow: specific emphasis on protein feeding in Finland

    Get PDF
    Associations between protein feeding and reproductive efficiency in the dairy cow are reviewed. Examination of published data indicated that reproductive responses assessed as days open, services per conception or conception rate following changes in protein feeding tend to be inconsistent. Discrepancies can arise due to between-study variations in experimental design, statistical analysis, sample population size, uterine health, cow age, parity, reproductive management or nutrient intake. Detri-mental effects on reproductive efficiency following periods of excessive protein feeding are often attributed to increases in tissue urea and ammonia oncentrations leading to impaired reproductive hysiology, modified endocrine function or exacerbated postpartum negative energy balance. Examination of data collected from Finnish dairy herds (n = 16 051) participating in the national milk recording scheme during 1993 indicated that milk production was maximised in herds fed diets containing 180 g crude protein/kg dry matter. In contrast, no consistent relationships were identified between increases in on-farm protein feeding necessary to secure higher milk production and herd reproductive efficiency assessed as calving interval, first service interval and number of inseminations per calving. Further examination of data derived from 5 437 herds within the National recording scheme indicated that on-farm reproductive efficiency was independent of large variations in the mean annual urea concentration of bulk tank milk. It is concluded that increases in the crude protein content of Finnish dairy cow rations from 150 to between 170 and 180 g/kg dry matter would allow improvements in milk production to be realised without leading to significant reductions in reproductive efficiency.;TÀssÀ kirjallisuustutkimuksessa on tarkasteltu valkuaisruokinnan ja hedelmÀllisyyden vÀlistÀ yhteyttÀ lypsylehmillÀ. Julkaistun aineiston perusteella valkuaisruokinnan vaikutus hedelmÀllisyyteen vaihtelee. HedelmÀllisyyden parametreinÀ kÀytettiin tyhjÀpÀivien mÀÀrÀÀ, siemennysten mÀÀrÀÀ tiineyttÀ kohti ja tiinehtymisprosenttia.Vaihtelevat tulokset voivat johtua erilaisista koejÀrjestelyistÀ, tilastollisista analyysimenetelmistÀ, havaintojen mÀÀrÀstÀ (usein liian pieni hedelmÀllisyyden mittaamiseksi luotettavasti), kohdun terveydentilasta, lehmÀn iÀstÀ, poikimiskertojen mÀÀrÀstÀ, lehmien hoidosta ja ravintoaineiden saannista. Liian runsaan valkuaisruokinnan aiheuttamaan heikentyneeseen hedelmÀllisyyteen liittyy usein kudosten urea- ja ammoniakkipitoisuuden nousu,mikÀ huonontaa lisÀÀntymiselinten fysiologista toimintaa, muuttaa hormonien eritystÀ tai lisÀÀ negatiivista energiatasetta poikimisen jÀlkeen. Vuoden 1993 tarkkailuaineistojen (16 051 karjaa) analysointi osoitti, ettÀ maidontuotannon optimi saavutettiin rehuannoksen raakavalkuaispitoisuuden ollessa 180 g/kg kuiva-ainetta (ka) hedelmÀllisyysparametrien pysyessÀ lÀhes ennallaan. Tutkittaessa tankkimaidon ureapitoisuuden vaikutusta hedelmÀllisyyteen 5 437 tilan aineistossa havaittiin, ettÀ tilojen vÀliset erot maidon ureapitoisuudessa eivÀt vaikuttaneet hedelmÀllisyyteen. JohtopÀÀtöksenÀ voidaan todeta, ettÀ rehuannoksen raakavalkuaispitoisuuden nostaminen 150:stÀ 170 g:aan/kg ka lisÀÀ maidontuotantoa huonontamatta merkittÀvÀsti hedelmÀllisyyttÀ

    Association between protein feeding and reproductive efficiency in the dairy cow: specific emphasis on protein feeding in Finland

    No full text
    Associations between protein feeding and reproductive efficiency in the dairy cow are reviewed. Examination of published data indicated that reproductive responses assessed as days open, services per conception or conception rate following changes in protein feeding tend to be inconsistent. Discrepancies can arise due to between-study variations in experimental design, statistical analysis, sample population size, uterine health, cow age, parity, reproductive management or nutrient intake. Detri-mental effects on reproductive efficiency following periods of excessive protein feeding are often attributed to increases in tissue urea and ammonia oncentrations leading to impaired reproductive hysiology, modified endocrine function or exacerbated postpartum negative energy balance. Examination of data collected from Finnish dairy herds (n = 16 051) participating in the national milk recording scheme during 1993 indicated that milk production was maximised in herds fed diets containing 180 g crude protein/kg dry matter. In contrast, no consistent relationships were identified between increases in on-farm protein feeding necessary to secure higher milk production and herd reproductive efficiency assessed as calving interval, first service interval and number of inseminations per calving. Further examination of data derived from 5 437 herds within the National recording scheme indicated that on-farm reproductive efficiency was independent of large variations in the mean annual urea concentration of bulk tank milk. It is concluded that increases in the crude protein content of Finnish dairy cow rations from 150 to between 170 and 180 g/kg dry matter would allow improvements in milk production to be realised without leading to significant reductions in reproductive efficiency.
    corecore