HPV-negative tumors of the uterine cervix

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the causative agents of virtually all cervical carcinomas. Nevertheless, a small proportion of cervical cancer are negative for HPV, although the significance of this finding remains unclear. We aimed to provide insight into the differential clinico-pathological characteristics of this unusual subset of HPV-negative cervical cancer. We performed HPV-DNA detection using a highly sensitive PCR test (SPF10) and p16 immunostaining in 214 cervical carcinomas specimens from women treated at the Gynecological Oncology Unit of the Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) from 2012 to 2015. The clinical and pathological characteristics, including disease-free survival and overall survival, of HPV-negative and -positive cervical carcinomas were compared. Twenty-one out of 214 tumors (10%) were negative for HPV DNA. HPV-negative tumors were more frequently of the non-squamous type (9/21, 43% vs. 37/193, 19%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and showed negative p16 staining (9/21; 43% vs. 7/193; 4%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01). HPV-negative tumors were more frequently diagnosed at advanced FIGO stage (19/21, 91% vs. 110/193, 57%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and more frequently had lymph node metastases (14/21, 67% vs. 69/193, 36%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01). Patients with HPV-negative cervical cancer had a significantly worse disease-free survival (59.8 months, 95% confidence interval 32.0-87.6 vs. 132.2 months, 95% confidence interval 118.6-145.8; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and overall survival (77.0 months, 95% confidence interval 47.2-106.8 vs. 153.8 months, 95% confidence interval 142.0-165.6; p\xE2\x80\x89=\xE2\x80\x890.01) than women with HPV-positive tumors. However, only advanced FIGO stage and lymph node metastases remained associated with a poor disease-free survival and overall survival on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, our results suggest that a low percentage of cervical cancer arise via an HPV-independent pathway. These HPV-negative tumors are diagnosed at advanced stages, show higher prevalence of lymph nodes metastases and have an impaired prognosis

Real-time ratiometric imaging of micelles assembly state in a microfluidic cancer-on-a-chip

The performance of supramolecular nanocarriers as drug delivery systems depends on their stability in the complex and dynamic biological media. After administration, nanocarriers are challenged by physiological barriers such as shear stress and proteins present in blood, endothelial wall, extracellular matrix, and eventually cancer cell membrane. While early disassembly will result in a premature drug release, extreme stability of the nanocarriers can lead to poor drug release and low efficiency. Therefore, comprehensive understanding of the stability and assembly state of supramolecular carriers in each stage of delivery is the key factor for the rational design of these systems. One of the main challenges is that current 2D in vitro models do not provide exhaustive information, as they fail to recapitulate the 3D tumor microenvironment. This deficiency in the 2D model complexity is the main reason for the differences observed in vivo when testing the performance of supramolecular nanocarriers. Herein, we present a real-time monitoring study of self-assembled micelles stability and extravasation, combining spectral confocal microscopy and a microfluidic cancer-on-a-chip. The combination of advanced imaging and a reliable 3D model allows tracking of micelle disassembly by following the spectral properties of the amphiphiles in space and time during the crucial steps of drug delivery. The spectrally active micelles were introduced under flow and their position and conformation continuously followed by spectral imaging during the crossing of barriers, revealing the interplay between carrier structure, micellar stability, and extravasation. Integrating the ability of the micelles to change their fluorescent properties when disassembled, spectral confocal imaging and 3D microfluidic tumor blood vessel-on-a-chip resulted in the establishment of a robust testing platform suitable for real-time imaging and evaluation of supramolecular drug delivery carrier's stability

CADM1, MAL, and miR124 Promoter Methylation as Biomarkers of Transforming Cervical Intrapithelial Lesions

Background: Squamous intraepithelial lesions/cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (SIL/CIN) are high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV)-related lesions which are considered as high grade (HSIL/CIN2-3) or low grade (LSIL/CIN1) lesions according to their risk of progression to cervical cancer (CC). Most HSIL/CIN2-3 are considered as transforming hrHPV infections, so truly CC precursors, although some clear spontaneously. hrHPV testing has a high sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2-3 but a relatively low specificity for identifying transforming lesions. We aimed to determine whether the combination of CADM1, MAL and miR124 promoter methylation status assessed in histological samples can be used as a biomarker in the identification of transforming HSIL/CIN lesions. Design: 131 cervical biopsies, including 8 cases with no lesion and a negative hrHPV test result (control group), 19 low-grade (L)SIL/CIN1, 30 HSIL/CIN2, 60 HSIL/CIN3, and 14 CC were prospectively collected. hrHPV was detected and genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique SPF10 HPV LIPA. A multiplex quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) was used to identify the methylation status of the CADM1, MAL, and miR124 promoter genes. Results: Significantly higher methylation levels of CADM1, MAL and miR-124 were found in HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC compared with normal and LSIL lesions. DNA methylation of at least one gene was detected in 12.5% (1/8) of normal samples, 31.5% (6/19) of LSIL/CIN1, 83.3% (25/30) of HSIL/CIN2, 81.6% (49/60) of HSIL/CIN3 and 100% (14/14) of CC (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC of having at least one methylated gene were 84.6% and 74.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of at least one methylated gene and a positive hrHPV test were 80.7% and 85.1% for HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC, respectively. Conclusions: The methylation rate of CADM1, MAL and miR124 increases with the severity of the lesion. Further research is warranted to evaluate the usefulness of these biomarkers for the identification of transforming HSIL/CIN

mRNA Detection in Anal Cytology: A Feasible Approach for Anal Cancer Screening in Men Who Have Sex with Men Living With HIV

There is growing interest in anal cancer screening strategies. However, cytological/molecular evaluation of anal samples is challenging. We aimed to determine the feasibility of detecting, in anal liquid-based cytologies, the expression of biomarkers involved in the cell cycle disturbance elicited by human papillomavirus (HPV). The accuracy of this approach in the identification of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade2-3 (HSIL/AIN2-3) was also evaluated. 215 anal cytologies from men having sex with men living with human immunodeficiency virus were evaluated. Patients showing concordant cytological and anoscopy-directed biopsy diagnosis were selected: 70 with negative cytology and HPV test, 70 with low-grade SIL (LSIL/AIN1) cytology and biopsy, and 75 with cytology and biopsy of HSIL/AIN2-3. CDKN2A/p16, MKI67 and TOP2A mRNA expression was analyzed. HPV detection was performed with Xpert HPV Assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). HSIL/AIN2-3 showed higher expression for the biomarkers than LSIL/AIN1 or negative samples. The specificity for HSIL/AIN2-3 detection for a sensitivity established at 70% was 44.7% (95%confidence interval [CI] 36.5-53.2) for TOP2A and MKI67 and 54.5% (95%CI 46.0-62.8%) for CDKN2A/p16. mRNA detection of cell biomarkers in anal liquid-based cytology is feasible. Further studies are warranted to confirm if strategies based on mRNA detection have any role in anal cancer screening

Taking the pulse of Earth's tropical forests using networks of highly distributed plots

Tropical forests are the most diverse and productive ecosystems on Earth. While better understanding of these forests is critical for our collective future, until quite recently efforts to measure and monitor them have been largely disconnected. Networking is essential to discover the answers to questions that transcend borders and the horizons of funding agencies. Here we show how a global community is responding to the challenges of tropical ecosystem research with diverse teams measuring forests tree-by-tree in thousands of long-term plots. We review the major scientific discoveries of this work and show how this process is changing tropical forest science. Our core approach involves linking long-term grassroots initiatives with standardized protocols and data management to generate robust scaled-up results. By connecting tropical researchers and elevating their status, our Social Research Network model recognises the key role of the data originator in scientific discovery. Conceived in 1999 with RAINFOR (South America), our permanent plot networks have been adapted to Africa (AfriTRON) and Southeast Asia (T-FORCES) and widely emulated worldwide. Now these multiple initiatives are integrated via ForestPlots.net cyber-infrastructure, linking colleagues from 54 countries across 24 plot networks. Collectively these are transforming understanding of tropical forests and their biospheric role. Together we have discovered how, where and why forest carbon and biodiversity are responding to climate change, and how they feedback on it. This long-term pan-tropical collaboration has revealed a large long-term carbon sink and its trends, as well as making clear which drivers are most important, which forest processes are affected, where they are changing, what the lags are, and the likely future responses of tropical forests as the climate continues to change. By leveraging a remarkably old technology, plot networks are sparking a very modern revolution in tropical forest science. In the future, humanity can benefit greatly by nurturing the grassroots communities now collectively capable of generating unique, long-term understanding of Earth's most precious forests.Additional co-authors: Susan Laurance, William Laurance, Francoise Yoko Ishida, Andrew Marshall, Catherine Waite, Hannsjoerg Woell, Jean-Francois Bastin, Marijn Bauters, Hans Beeckman, Pfascal Boeckx, Jan Bogaert, Charles De Canniere, Thales de Haulleville, Jean-Louis Doucet, Olivier Hardy, Wannes Hubau, Elizabeth Kearsley, Hans Verbeeck, Jason Vleminckx, Steven W. Brewer, Alfredo Alarcón, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Eric Arets, Luzmila Arroyo, Ezequiel Chavez, Todd Fredericksen, René Guillén Villaroel, Gloria Gutierrez Sibauty, Timothy Killeen, Juan Carlos Licona, John Lleigue, Casimiro Mendoza, Samaria Murakami, Alexander Parada Gutierrez, Guido Pardo, Marielos Peña-Claros, Lourens Poorter, Marisol Toledo, Jeanneth Villalobos Cayo, Laura Jessica Viscarra, Vincent Vos, Jorge Ahumada, Everton Almeida, Jarcilene Almeida, Edmar Almeida de Oliveira, Wesley Alves da Cruz, Atila Alves de Oliveira, Fabrício Alvim Carvalho, Flávio Amorim Obermuller, Ana Andrade, Fernanda Antunes Carvalho, Simone Aparecida Vieira, Ana Carla Aquino, Luiz Aragão, Ana Claudia Araújo, Marco Antonio Assis, Jose Ataliba Mantelli Aboin Gomes, Fabrício Baccaro, Plínio Barbosa de Camargo, Paulo Barni, Jorcely Barroso, Luis Carlos Bernacci, Kauane Bordin, Marcelo Brilhante de Medeiros, Igor Broggio, José Luís Camargo, Domingos Cardoso, Maria Antonia Carniello, Andre Luis Casarin Rochelle, Carolina Castilho, Antonio Alberto Jorge Farias Castro, Wendeson Castro, Sabina Cerruto Ribeiro, Flávia Costa, Rodrigo Costa de Oliveira, Italo Coutinho, John Cunha, Lola da Costa, Lucia da Costa Ferreira, Richarlly da Costa Silva, Marta da Graça Zacarias Simbine, Vitor de Andrade Kamimura, Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima, Lia de Oliveira Melo, Luciano de Queiroz, José Romualdo de Sousa Lima, Mário do Espírito Santo, Tomas Domingues, Nayane Cristina dos Santos Prestes, Steffan Eduardo Silva Carneiro, Fernando Elias, Gabriel Eliseu, Thaise Emilio, Camila Laís Farrapo, Letícia Fernandes, Gustavo Ferreira, Joice Ferreira, Leandro Ferreira, Socorro Ferreira, Marcelo Fragomeni Simon, Maria Aparecida Freitas, Queila S. García, Angelo Gilberto Manzatto, Paulo Graça, Frederico Guilherme, Eduardo Hase, Niro Higuchi, Mariana Iguatemy, Reinaldo Imbrozio Barbosa, Margarita Jaramillo, Carlos Joly, Joice Klipel, Iêda Leão do Amaral, Carolina Levis, Antonio S. Lima, Maurício Lima Dan, Aline Lopes, Herison Madeiros, William E. Magnusson, Rubens Manoel dos Santos, Beatriz Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon Junior, Roberta Marotti Martelletti Grillo, Luiz Martinelli, Simone Matias Reis, Salomão Medeiros, Milton Meira-Junior, Thiago Metzker, Paulo Morandi, Natanael Moreira do Nascimento, Magna Moura, Sandra Cristina Müller, Laszlo Nagy, Henrique Nascimento, Marcelo Nascimento, Adriano Nogueira Lima, Raimunda Oliveira de Araújo, Jhonathan Oliveira Silva, Marcelo Pansonato, Gabriel Pavan Sabino, Karla Maria Pedra de Abreu, Pablo José Francisco Pena Rodrigues, Maria Piedade, Domingos Rodrigues, José Roberto Rodrigues Pinto, Carlos Quesada, Eliana Ramos, Rafael Ramos, Priscyla Rodrigues, Thaiane Rodrigues de Sousa, Rafael Salomão, Flávia Santana, Marcos Scaranello, Rodrigo Scarton Bergamin, Juliana Schietti, Jochen Schöngart, Gustavo Schwartz, Natalino Silva, Marcos Silveira, Cristiana Simão Seixas, Marta Simbine, Ana Claudia Souza, Priscila Souza, Rodolfo Souza, Tereza Sposito, Edson Stefani Junior, Julio Daniel do Vale, Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira, Dora Villela, Marcos Vital, Haron Xaud, Katia Zanini, Charles Eugene Zartman, Nur Khalish Hafizhah Ideris, Faizah binti Hj Metali, Kamariah Abu Salim, Muhd Shahruney Saparudin, Rafizah Mat Serudin, Rahayu Sukmaria Sukri, Serge Begne, George Chuyong, Marie Noel Djuikouo, Christelle Gonmadje, Murielle Simo-Droissart, Bonaventure Sonké, Hermann Taedoumg, Lise Zemagho, Sean Thomas, Fidèle Baya, Gustavo Saiz, Javier Silva Espejo, Dexiang Chen, Alan Hamilton, Yide Li, Tushou Luo, Shukui Niu, Han Xu, Zhang Zhou, Esteban Álvarez-Dávila, Juan Carlos Andrés Escobar, Henry Arellano-Peña, Jaime Cabezas Duarte, Jhon Calderón, Lina Maria Corrales Bravo, Borish Cuadrado, Hermes Cuadros, Alvaro Duque, Luisa Fernanda Duque, Sandra Milena Espinosa, Rebeca Franke-Ante, Hernando García, Alejandro Gómez, Roy González-M., Álvaro Idárraga-Piedrahíta, Eliana Jimenez, Rubén Jurado, Wilmar López Oviedo, René López-Camacho, Omar Aurelio Melo Cruz, Irina Mendoza Polo, Edwin Paky, Karen Pérez, Angel Pijachi, Camila Pizano, Adriana Prieto, Laura Ramos, Zorayda Restrepo Correa, James Richardson, Elkin Rodríguez, Gina M. Rodriguez M., Agustín Rudas, Pablo Stevenson, Markéta Chudomelová, Martin Dancak, Radim Hédl, Stanislav Lhota, Martin Svatek, Jacques Mukinzi, Corneille Ewango, Terese Hart, Emmanuel Kasongo Yakusu, Janvier Lisingo, Jean-Remy Makana, Faustin Mbayu, Benjamin Toirambe, John Tshibamba Mukendi, Lars Kvist, Gustav Nebel, Selene Báez, Carlos Céron, Daniel M. Griffith, Juan Ernesto Guevara Andino, David Neill, Walter Palacios, Maria Cristina Peñuela-Mora, Gonzalo Rivas-Torres, Gorky Villa, Sheleme Demissie, Tadesse Gole, Techane Gonfa, Kalle Ruokolainen, Michel Baisie, Fabrice Bénédet, Wemo Betian, Vincent Bezard, Damien Bonal, Jerôme Chave, Vincent Droissart, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury, Annette Hladik, Nicolas Labrière, Pétrus Naisso, Maxime Réjou-Méchain, Plinio Sist, Lilian Blanc, Benoit Burban, Géraldine Derroire, Aurélie Dourdain, Clement Stahl, Natacha Nssi Bengone, Eric Chezeaux, Fidèle Evouna Ondo, Vincent Medjibe, Vianet Mihindou, Lee White, Heike Culmsee, Cristabel Durán Rangel, Viviana Horna, Florian Wittmann, Stephen Adu-Bredu, Kofi Affum-Baffoe, Ernest Foli, Michael Balinga, Anand Roopsind, James Singh, Raquel Thomas, Roderick Zagt, Indu K. Murthy, Kuswata Kartawinata, Edi Mirmanto, Hari Priyadi, Ismayadi Samsoedin, Terry Sunderland, Ishak Yassir, Francesco Rovero, Barbara Vinceti, Bruno Hérault, Shin-Ichiro Aiba, Kanehiro Kitayama, Armandu Daniels, Darlington Tuagben, John T. Woods, Muhammad Fitriadi, Alexander Karolus, Kho Lip Khoon, Noreen Majalap, Colin Maycock, Reuben Nilus, Sylvester Tan, Almeida Sitoe, Indiana Coronado G., Lucas Ojo, Rafael de Assis, Axel Dalberg Poulsen, Douglas Sheil, Karen Arévalo Pezo, Hans Buttgenbach Verde, Victor Chama Moscoso, Jimmy Cesar Cordova Oroche, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Massiel Corrales Medina, Nallaret Davila Cardozo, Jano de Rutte Corzo, Jhon del Aguila Pasquel, Gerardo Flores Llampazo, Luis Freitas, Darcy Galiano Cabrera, Roosevelt García Villacorta, Karina Garcia Cabrera, Diego García Soria, Leticia Gatica Saboya, Julio Miguel Grandez Rios, Gabriel Hidalgo Pizango, Eurídice Honorio Coronado, Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Walter Huaraca Huasco, Yuri Tomas Huillca Aedo, Jose Luis Marcelo Peña, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Vanesa Moreano Rodriguez, Percy Núñez Vargas, Sonia Cesarina Palacios Ramos, Nadir Pallqui Camacho, Antonio Peña Cruz, Freddy Ramirez Arevalo, José Reyna Huaymacari, Carlos Reynel Rodriguez, Marcos Antonio Ríos Paredes, Lily Rodriguez Bayona, Rocio del Pilar Rojas Gonzales, Maria Elena Rojas Peña, Norma Salinas Revilla, Yahn Carlos Soto Shareva, Raul Tupayachi Trujillo, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Rodolfo Vasquez Martinez, Jim Vega Arenas, Christian Amani, Suspense Averti Ifo, Yannick Bocko, Patrick Boundja, Romeo Ekoungoulou, Mireille Hockemba, Donatien Nzala, Alusine Fofanah, David Taylor, Guillermo Bañares-de Dios, Luis Cayuela, Íñigo Granzow-de la Cerda, Manuel Macía, Juliana Stropp, Maureen Playfair, Verginia Wortel, Toby Gardner, Robert Muscarella, Hari Priyadi, Ervan Rutishauser, Kuo-Jung Chao, Pantaleo Munishi, Olaf Bánki, Frans Bongers, Rene Boot, Gabriella Fredriksson, Jan Reitsma, Hans ter Steege, Tinde van Andel, Peter van de Meer, Peter van der Hout, Mark van Nieuwstadt, Bert van Ulft, Elmar Veenendaal, Ronald Vernimmen, Pieter Zuidema, Joeri Zwerts, Perpetra Akite, Robert Bitariho, Colin Chapman, Eilu Gerald, Miguel Leal, Patrick Mucunguzi, Miguel Alexiades, Timothy R. Baker, Karina Banda, Lindsay Banin, Jos Barlow, Amy Bennett, Erika Berenguer, Nicholas Berry, Neil M. Bird, George A. Blackburn, Francis Brearley, Roel Brienen, David Burslem, Lidiany Carvalho, Percival Cho, Fernanda Coelho, Murray Collins, David Coomes, Aida Cuni-Sanchez, Greta Dargie, Kyle Dexter, Mat Disney, Freddie Draper, Muying Duan, Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert, Robert Ewers, Belen Fadrique, Sophie Fauset, Ted R. Feldpausch, Filipe França, David Galbraith, Martin Gilpin, Emanuel Gloor, John Grace, Keith Hamer, David Harris, Tommaso Jucker, Michelle Kalamandeen, Bente Klitgaard, Aurora Levesley, Simon L. Lewis, Jeremy Lindsell, Gabriela Lopez-Gonzalez, Jon Lovett, Yadvinder Malhi, Toby Marthews, Emma McIntosh, Karina Melgaço, William Milliken, Edward Mitchard, Peter Moonlight, Sam Moore, Alexandra Morel, Julie Peacock, Kelvin Peh, Colin Pendry, R. Toby Pennington, Luciana de Oliveira Pereira, Carlos Peres, Oliver L. Phillips, Georgia Pickavance, Thomas Pugh, Lan Qie, Terhi Riutta, Katherine Roucoux, Casey Ryan, Tiina Sarkinen, Camila Silva Valeria, Dominick Spracklen, Suzanne Stas, Martin Sullivan, Michael Swaine, Joey Talbot, James Taplin, Geertje van der Heijden, Laura Vedovato, Simon Willcock, Mathew Williams, Luciana Alves, Patricia Alvarez Loayza, Gabriel Arellano, Cheryl Asa, Peter Ashton, Gregory Asner, Terry Brncic, Foster Brown, Robyn Burnham, Connie Clark, James Comiskey, Gabriel Damasco, Stuart Davies, Tony Di Fiore, Terry Erwin, William Farfan-Rios, Jefferson Hall, David Kenfack, Thomas Lovejoy, Roberta Martin, Olga Martha Montiel, John Pipoly, Nigel Pitman, John Poulsen, Richard Primack, Miles Silman, Marc Steininger, Varun Swamy, John Terborgh, Duncan Thomas, Peter Umunay, Maria Uriarte, Emilio Vilanova Torre, Ophelia Wang, Kenneth Young, Gerardo A. Aymard C., Lionel Hernández, Rafael Herrera Fernández, Hirma Ramírez-Angulo, Pedro Salcedo, Elio Sanoja, Julio Serrano, Armando Torres-Lezama, Tinh Cong Le, Trai Trong Le, Hieu Dang Tra

Utilidad de la determinación VPH, genotipado y tinción dual p16/Ki67 en la prevención secundaria del cáncer de cuello de útero

[spa] Los programas de cribado basados en la determinación del virus del papiloma humano (VPH) han demostrado una mejor detección de lesiones premalignas de cáncer de cuello de útero (CCU) que los basados en citologías. Sin embargo, las pruebas VPH presentan menor especificidad condicionando el seguimiento y evaluación de muchas mujeres que no son portadoras de infecciones/lesiones con riesgo de progresión a cáncer, suponiendo un problema de sobrecarga asistencial y coste económico. Por tanto, es necesario: 1) elegir una prueba VPH que demuestre tener el mejor perfil de sensibilidad y especificidad y 2) identificar biomarcadores moleculares útiles en la selección de mujeres VPH-positivas y riesgo de desarrollar lesiones con capacidad de progresión. El genotipado VPH 16/18 y la citología con tinción dual p16/Ki67 se han propuesto en la selección de mujeres con prueba VPH positiva y citología negativa para identificar al subgrupo de mujeres con mayor riesgo de lesión intraepitelial de alto grado o CCU (HSIL/CIN2+) subyacente. Sin embargo, queda menos claro el valor pronóstico de estos biomarcadores en la evaluación mujeres VPH-positivas y sin lesión cervical. En el primer estudio analizamos 5 pruebas de determinación y genotipado VPH (Hybrid Capture 2 [HC2], AnyplexTMII HPV28, Linear Array, GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA-RH y CLART2) en 295 mujeres remitidas a la Unidad de Colposcopia del Hospital Clínic por alteración de alguna de las pruebas de cribado. La extracción de ADN para realizar las pruebas de genotipado se realizó en muestras cervicales después de la citología y la determinación VPH mediante HC2. Se incluyeron mujeres con una adecuada muestra cervical para realizar todas las pruebas a estudiar y que tuvieran al menos una biopsia dirigida por colposcopia y/o legrado endocervical. HC2 mostró la mayor sensibilidad (96,1%) para la detección de HSIL/CIN2+, pero todas las pruebas de genotipado mostraron mayor especificidad (Anyplex 86,8%; Linear Array 86,0%; GP5+/6+ 78,8%; CLART2 76,5%). La concordancia entre HC2 y las otras pruebas fue similar. La identificación de VPH 16/18 con todas las pruebas fue un factor de riesgo para presentar HSIL/CIN2+ subyacente, siendo Anyplex la que mostró el mayor riesgo (OR 31,1; 95% IC 12,1-80,0). En el segundo estudio evaluamos el valor pronóstico del genotipado VPH y la tinción dual citológica en 200 mujeres VPH-positivas sin lesión o lesiones de bajo grado. Para ello valoramos la progresión a HSIL/CIN2+, persistencia/regresión de la infección VPH en mujeres remitidas a nuestra unidad que presentaron una prueba VPH positiva, histología diferente a HSIL/CIN2+ y citología negativa. El genotipado y la tinción dual se realizaron en muestras de citología líquida obtenidas en la primera visita. Un 8% de las mujeres presentaron progresión. Aquellas con infección VPH 16/18 tuvieron un mayor riesgo de progresión comparado con las mujeres infectadas por otros genotipos y también mostraron mayor persistencia. Sin embargo, no observamos asociación entre progresión o persistencia y el resultado de la tinción dual. Por tanto, las pruebas de determinación y genotipado VPH estudiadas son altamente concordantes, con una similar sensibilidad clínica y especificidad para la detección de HSIL/CIN2+. Además de la precisión, se deben tener en cuenta otras características de cada prueba, como el rango de genotipos que se quieran determinar para elegir una u otra prueba en función del propósito clínico. Además, parece razonable utilizar el genotipado VPH 16/18, más que la tinción dual y la citología de referencia, en las unidades especializadas para la estratificación del riesgo de pacientes sin lesión de alto grado y prueba VPH positiva. Las mujeres con infección por los genotipos 16/18 se podrían beneficiar de un seguimiento más estricto con identificación precoz de HSIL/CIN2+ y tratarlas en función de las recomendaciones de las guías clínicas.[eng] Human papilloma virus (HPV)-based screening provides greater protection against cervical cancer (CC) than cytology-based strategies. However, HPV tests present lower specificity to detection high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or CC (HSIL/CIN2+), which means following many women without infections/lesions with risk of progression to cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to: 1) choose an HPV test that demonstrates the best sensitivity and specificity profile and 2) identify useful molecular biomarkers in the selection of HPV-positive women with risk of developing HSIL/CIN2+. In the first study, we analyzed 5 HPV testing and genotyping techniques (Hybrid Capture 2 [HC2], AnyplexTMII HPV28, Linear Array, GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA-RH and CLART2 in 295 women referred to colposcopy due to an altered screening test. DNA extraction for HPV genotyping was performed in cervical sample specimens after Pap test and HPV detection by HC2. We included women with an adequate cervical sampling with sufficient material for the Pap test and HPV detection and genotyping and those with at least one colposcopically-directed biopsy and/or endocervical curettage. HC2 showed the highest sensitivity for HSIL/CIN2+ detection (96.1%), but all the HPV genotyping tests showed a higher specificity (76.5%-86.8%). The agreement between HC2 results and the other techniques was similar. HPV16/18 infection was a risk factor for underlying HSIL/CIN2+. Anyplex showed the highest risk of underlying HSIL/CIN2+ after positive HPV16/18 tests (OR 31.1; 95% IC 12.1-80.0). In the second study we assessed the prognostic value HPV16/18 genotyping and p16/Ki67 dual staining cytology in HPV-positive women with no lesion or minor abnormalities. We evaluated progression HSIL/CIN2+, persistence/regression of HPV infection in 200 women referred to our unit showing HPV infection, histology diagnosis different from HSIL/CIN2+ and negative cytology. HPV genotyping and dual staining were performed in liquid-based cytological specimens obtained on the first visit. Progression was observed in 8% of the women. Those with HPV16/18 infection had an increased risk of progression compared with women infected by other HPV types and they also showed more persistence. However, no association was observed between progression or persistence and the result of the dual staining. In conclusion, the HPV tests evaluated yield very high concordance and showed a similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for HSIL/CIN2+ detection. Moreover, HPV 16/18-positive women with no lesion or minor abnormalities are at high risk of progression to HSIL/CIN2+ and HPV persistence

HPV-negative tumors of the uterine cervix

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the causative agents of virtually all cervical carcinomas. Nevertheless, a small proportion of cervical cancer are negative for HPV, although the significance of this finding remains unclear. We aimed to provide insight into the differential clinico-pathological characteristics of this unusual subset of HPV-negative cervical cancer. We performed HPV-DNA detection using a highly sensitive PCR test (SPF10) and p16 immunostaining in 214 cervical carcinomas specimens from women treated at the Gynecological Oncology Unit of the Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain) from 2012 to 2015. The clinical and pathological characteristics, including disease-free survival and overall survival, of HPV-negative and -positive cervical carcinomas were compared. Twenty-one out of 214 tumors (10%) were negative for HPV DNA. HPV-negative tumors were more frequently of the non-squamous type (9/21, 43% vs. 37/193, 19%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and showed negative p16 staining (9/21; 43% vs. 7/193; 4%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01). HPV-negative tumors were more frequently diagnosed at advanced FIGO stage (19/21, 91% vs. 110/193, 57%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and more frequently had lymph node metastases (14/21, 67% vs. 69/193, 36%; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01). Patients with HPV-negative cervical cancer had a significantly worse disease-free survival (59.8 months, 95% confidence interval 32.0-87.6 vs. 132.2 months, 95% confidence interval 118.6-145.8; p\xE2\x80\x89<\xE2\x80\x890.01) and overall survival (77.0 months, 95% confidence interval 47.2-106.8 vs. 153.8 months, 95% confidence interval 142.0-165.6; p\xE2\x80\x89=\xE2\x80\x890.01) than women with HPV-positive tumors. However, only advanced FIGO stage and lymph node metastases remained associated with a poor disease-free survival and overall survival on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, our results suggest that a low percentage of cervical cancer arise via an HPV-independent pathway. These HPV-negative tumors are diagnosed at advanced stages, show higher prevalence of lymph nodes metastases and have an impaired prognosis

CADM1, MAL, and miR124 Promoter Methylation as Biomarkers of Transforming Cervical Intrapithelial Lesions

Background: Squamous intraepithelial lesions/cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (SIL/CIN) are high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV)-related lesions which are considered as high grade (HSIL/CIN2-3) or low grade (LSIL/CIN1) lesions according to their risk of progression to cervical cancer (CC). Most HSIL/CIN2-3 are considered as transforming hrHPV infections, so truly CC precursors, although some clear spontaneously. hrHPV testing has a high sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2-3 but a relatively low specificity for identifying transforming lesions. We aimed to determine whether the combination of CADM1, MAL and miR124 promoter methylation status assessed in histological samples can be used as a biomarker in the identification of transforming HSIL/CIN lesions. Design: 131 cervical biopsies, including 8 cases with no lesion and a negative hrHPV test result (control group), 19 low-grade (L)SIL/CIN1, 30 HSIL/CIN2, 60 HSIL/CIN3, and 14 CC were prospectively collected. hrHPV was detected and genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique SPF10 HPV LIPA. A multiplex quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) was used to identify the methylation status of the CADM1, MAL, and miR124 promoter genes. Results: Significantly higher methylation levels of CADM1, MAL and miR-124 were found in HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC compared with normal and LSIL lesions. DNA methylation of at least one gene was detected in 12.5% (1/8) of normal samples, 31.5% (6/19) of LSIL/CIN1, 83.3% (25/30) of HSIL/CIN2, 81.6% (49/60) of HSIL/CIN3 and 100% (14/14) of CC (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC of having at least one methylated gene were 84.6% and 74.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of at least one methylated gene and a positive hrHPV test were 80.7% and 85.1% for HSIL/CIN2-3 and CC, respectively. Conclusions: The methylation rate of CADM1, MAL and miR124 increases with the severity of the lesion. Further research is warranted to evaluate the usefulness of these biomarkers for the identification of transforming HSIL/CIN