An overview of the functioning of Sitobion avenea populations at three spatial scales in France

In this paper we give 3 snapshots of our recent work on S. avenae at field, landscape and country scales. From April to June wheat fields are continuously colonized by winged S. avenae and previously established colonies experience high extinction rates. This leads to changes in spatial distribution of aggregates of aphids and to a progressive spatial homogenisation of the populations in fields, and highlights the role of spring immigrants in the field dynamics of S. avenae. In the surrounding landscape, the S. avenae populations on cultivated cereals (wheat, maize, barley) do not differ genetically. Conversely, aphids from weed margins and pastures (mostly on Poeae) clearly differ from those on cereals, indicating a low level of gene flow between the ‘uncultivated’ (mostly perennial) and cultivated system (annual). Consequently weeds and pasture grasses are probably poor sources of S. avenae for further infestation of cereal fields. The role of surrounding crops and weeds as a source of aphids infesting wheat was assessed by stable isotopic ratios and population genetic tools. In autumn, up to the beginning of October, most S. avenae landing on wheat originated from maize and after this from cereal volunteers. In spring the influx from surrounding cereal volunteers varied between years, but uncultivated Poeae played a minor role. At country scale on cereals, clonal reproduction and parthenogenetic overwintering prevails everywhere in France, but there is a trend toward increasing sexuality northward. The weak genetic differentiation of the regional populations on cereals and the presence of many identical genotypes in most of the regions sampled confirm the high dispersal ability of S. avenae. The high occurrence of widespread genotypes in multiple copies, belonging to the same genetic pool, which persist over several years in France and other countries in Europe, indicates a homogenising effect of selection by millions of hectares of cereal

Spatiotemporal variations in aphid-parasitoid relative abundance patterns and food webs in agricultural ecosystems

Understanding the stability of communities is fundamental in theoretical and applied ecology. Organisms atop trophic chains are particularly sensitive to disturbance, especially when they are dependent on a specific trophic resource subject to strong fluctuations in density and quality, which is the case of parasitoids. We investigated the (1) variability in spatiotemporal relative abundance patterns of a cereal aphid parasitoid community, determining at what scales such patterns vary in agrosystems. We also investigated whether (2) parasitoid relative abundances are strongly influenced by host relative abundances and if (3) different host species are exploited at distinct rates. Aphid parasitoid populations were monitored in three remote agricultural regions in France between 2010 and 2012. Five parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) and three aphid species (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were identified in each of those three regions. Fields sampled in one region in a single year exhibited similar relative abundance patterns, with aphid parasitoid communities varying across regions and years. All parasitoid species were able to exploit each monitored host species. Metopolophium dirhodum Wlk was consistently a more frequent species among parasitized aphids than among living aphids, indicating that this aphid species was exploited at a higher rate than the other two aphid species found (Sitobion avenae F and Rhopalosiphum padi L). Those findings suggest the cereal aphid-parasitoid network is not strictly determined by the intrinsic permanent environmental characteristics but partially varies from one year to another. The similarity in abundance patterns in different fields of a region in a given year suggests the existence of a mechanism allowing a rapid synchronisation of the relative abundance patterns at an intra-regional scale. This phenomenon could be useful in predicting host-parasitoid communities and bear important consequences for the ecosystem service provided by parasitoids

Aider à la gestion des services de régulation naturelle des bioagresseurs : enjeux de connaissances et de prise en compte des agriculteurs : une approche bibliographique

Comment construire des connaissances pour aider les agriculteurs à mieux mobiliser les services de régulation naturelle des bioagresseurs? Nous avons réalisé une revue de la littérature scientifique pour examiner si et comment les connaissances produites pouvaient aider à la réalisation d'un diagnostic de ces services. Nous avons considéré pour cela que ces connaissances devaient porter sur les relations entre i) la problématique de la régulation naturelle des bioagresseurs, ii) les facteurs affectant cette problématique (e.g., pratiques agricoles, environnement paysager), et iii) les ressources des agriculteurs impactées par la régulation biologique (e.g., productions) et/ou permettant de maîtriser les facteurs affectant cette régulation (e.g., ressources en connaissance, travail, équipements). Nous avons aussi examiné si les dynamiques temporelles de ces relations étaient étudiées (Duru, Therond et al, 2015). 1. Nous avons réalisé une requête large dans le Web Of Science des études portant sur le contrôle, y compris chimique et/ou mécanique, des bioagresseurs (15334 articles). 2. Ayant peu de mots clés précis pour identifier les dimensions d'un diagnostic dans ces études, nous avons construit et mobilisé des dictionnaires de mots clés dans une analyse lexicale de notices avec l'outil CorText. Un sous-corpus de 6024 articles a été obtenu après extraction d'études hors-sujet. Nous avons identifié 9 thématiques diversement combinées dans les études, les plus fréquentes étant: "gestion des bioagresseurs", "gestion des adventices", "systèmes de cultures", "modélisation et prise de décision", "acteurs et système d'exploitation" et "agroécosystème et paysage". 3. Afin d'identifier les connaissances utiles pour un diagnostic à partir de ces thématiques, nous avons échantillonné des études selon leurs profils et les avons analysées à partir d'une grille de lecture ad hoc. Nous présentons les résultats pour une sélection de 31 études les plus pertinentes a priori. Leurs notices mentionnent la régulation naturelle des bioagresseurs et combinent 3-5 thématiques dont au moins "acteurs et systèmes d'exploitation": notre hypothèse est qu'elles prennent en compte explicitement les acteurs et leurs ressources. Ces études sont effectivement les plus riches. Cependant la plupart n'étudient aucune dynamique temporelle. Nous avons distingué 3 groupes. Le premier groupe (15 articles) met l'accent sur l'élucidation de l'influence relative des facteurs "pratiques" et "paysage" sur le phénomène de régulation; les ressources des agriculteurs sont contextuelles (ex: comparaison agriculture biologique vs. agriculture conventionnelle). Le deuxième groupe (6 articles) met l'accent sur l'impact de la régulation biologique et/ou des nouvelles pratiques et aménagements paysagers sur les ressources des agriculteurs (e.g., coûts/bénéfices économiques) à l'échelle de la parcelle. Le dernier groupe (10 articles) est le plus intégrateur des composantes du diagnostic; on y trouve le plus d'études engagée dans l'accompagnement des agriculteurs, notamment l'apprentissage collectif (Bell et al, 2016; Robertson et al, 2014)

Diversity Of Wheat Crop Management From Conventional To Organic Farming: Socio-Economic And Ecological Assessment.

" Biological control is considered a promising way to reduce pesticide use in cropping systems. In this study we aimed to assess biological control and natural enemy communities in a diversity of organic and conventional wheat fields. We also aimed to evaluate economic and labor aspects of cropping systems studied. Twenty pairs of organic and conventional fields were studied in Brittany, France in 2016. Data on carabid abundance and species richness, as well as pest predation rates were collected in fields; crop management and machinery used were also surveyed. We identified 2 organic crop management types and 3 conventional types. Results were not equal for all types of each category. One type of organic crop management, associated with less work for farmers and more economic profit, was beneficial to carabid beetles. Predation rate was lower only in one type of conventional crop management compared with other management types. This study underlines the need to account for the diversity of crop management strategies to assess socio-economic and ecological aspects in organic and conventional farming systems.

Le projet SEBIOPAG-PHYTO : déterminants agricoles parcellaires et paysagers des variations de niveaux de régulation biologique

Ce séminaire est une restitution des principales avancées obtenues dans le cadre des projets ANR PEERLESS «viabilité d’une gestion écologique renforcée de la santé des plantes dans les paysages agricoles » (2013-2017) et FRB SEBIOPAG-PHYTO «déterminants agricoles parcellaires et paysagers des variations de niveaux de régulation biologique » (2014-2017). Le séminaire a rassemblé 60 scientifiques, pour moitié extérieure aux unités INRA partenaires de ces projets. Il s'est déroulé à Paris Paris les 27-28 novembre 2017

Les effets conjugués de la gestion parcellaire et du contexte paysager et de sa dynamique sur les bioagresseurs et les niveaux de régulation biologique

Ce séminaire est une restitution des principales avancées obtenues dans le cadre des projets ANR PEERLESS «viabilité d’une gestion écologique renforcée de la santé des plantes dans les paysages agricoles » (2013-2017) et FRB SEBIOPAG-PHYTO «déterminants agricoles parcellaires et paysagers des variations de niveaux de régulation biologique » (2014-2017). Le séminaire a rassemblé 60 scientifiques, pour moitié extérieure aux unités INRA partenaires de ces projets. Il s'est déroulé à Paris Paris les 27-28 novembre 2017

Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies

Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies