Pollen grain development is compromised in Arabidopsis agp6 agp11 null mutants

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) are structurally complex plasma membrane and cell wall proteoglycans that are implicated in diverse developmental processes, including plant sexual reproduction. Male gametogenesis (pollen grain development) is fundamental to plant sexual reproduction. The role of two abundant, pollen-specific AGPs, AGP6, and AGP11, have been investigated here. The pollen specificity of these proteoglycans suggested that they are integral to pollen biogenesis and their strong sequence homology indicated a potential for overlapping function. Indeed, single gene transposon insertion knockouts for both AGPs showed no discernible phenotype. However, in plants homozygous for one of the insertions and heterozygous for the other, in homozygous double mutants, and in RNAi and amiRNA transgenic plants that were down-regulated for both genes, many pollen grains failed to develop normally, leading to their collapse. The microscopic observations of these aborted pollen grains showed a condensed cytoplasm, membrane blebbing and the presence of small lytic vacuoles. Later in development, the generative cells that arise from mitotic divisions were not seen to go into the second mitosis. Anther wall development, the establishment of the endothecium thickenings, the opening of the stomium, and the deposition of the pollen coat were all normal in the knockout and knockdown lines. Our data provide strong evidence that these two proteoglycans have overlapping and important functions in gametophytic pollen grain development

Characterization of constricted fruit (ctf) Mutant Uncovers a Role for AtMYB117/LOF1 in Ovule and Fruit Development in Arabidopsis thaliana

Pistil and fruit morphogenesis is the result of a complex gene network that is not yet fully understood. A search for novel genes is needed to make a more comprehensive model of pistil and fruit development. Screening for mutants with alterations in fruit morphology generated by an activation tagging strategy resulted in the isolation of the ctf (constricted fruit) mutant. It is characterized by a) small and wrinkled fruits, with an enlarged replum, an amorphous structure of the septum and an irregular distribution of ovules and seeds; b) ectopic carpelloid structures in sepals bearing ovule-like structures and c) dwarf plants with curled rosette leaves. The overexpressed gene in ctf was AtMYB117, also named LOF1 (LATERAL ORGAN FUSION1). AtMYB117/LOF1 transcripts were localized in boundary regions of the vegetative shoot apical meristem and leaf primordia and in a group of cells in the adaxial base of petioles and bracts. Transcripts were also detected in the boundaries between each of the four floral whorls and during pistil development in the inner of the medial ridges, the placenta, the base of the ovule primordia, the epidermis of the developing septum and the outer cell layers of the ovule funiculi. Analysis of changes of expression of pistil-related genes in the ctf mutant showed an enhancement of SHATTERPROOF1 (SHP1) and SHP2 expression. All these results suggest that AtMYB117/LOF1 is recruited by a variety of developmental programs for the establishment of boundary regions, including the development of floral organs and the initiation of ovule outgrowth

A FRUITFULL-like gene is associated with genetic variation for fruit flesh firmness in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)

The FRUITFULL (FUL) and SHATTERPROOF (SHP) genes are involved in regulating fruit development and dehiscence in Arabidopsis. We tested the hypothesis that this class of genes are also involved in regulating the development of fleshy fruits, by exploring genetic and phenotypic variation within the apple (Malus domestica) gene pool. We isolated and characterised the genomic sequences of two candidate orthologous FUL-like genes, MdMADS2.1 and MdMADS2.2. These were mapped using the reference population ‘Prima x Fiesta’ to loci on Malus linkage groups LG14 and LG06, respectively. An additional MADS-box gene, MdMADS14, shares high amino acid identity with the Arabidopsis SHATTERPROOF1/2 genes and was mapped to Malus linkage group LG09. Association analysis between quantitative fruit flesh firmness estimates of ‘Prima x Fiesta’ progeny and the MdMADS2.1, MdMADS2.2 and MdMADS14 loci was carried out using a mixed model analysis of variance. This revealed a significant association (P < 0.01) between MdMADS2.1 and fruit flesh firmness. Further evidence for the association between MdMADS2.1 and fruit flesh firmness was obtained using a case–control population-based genetic association approach. For this, a polymorphic repeat, (AT)n, in the 3′ UTR of MdMADS2.1 was used as a locus-specific marker to screen 168 apple accessions for which historical assessments of fruit texture attributes were available. This analysis revealed a significant association between the MdMADS2.1 and fruit flesh firmness at both allelic (χ 2 = 34, df = 9, P < 0.001) and genotypic (χ 2 = 57, df = 32, P < 0.01) levels

The role of the pod in seed development: strategies for manipulating yield

Pods play a key role in encapsulating the developing seeds and protecting them from pests and pathogens. In addition to this protective function, it has been shown that the photosynthetically active pod wall contributes assimilates and nutrients to fuel seed growth. Recent work has revealed that signals originating from the pod may also act to coordinate grain filling and regulate the reallocation of reserves from damaged seeds to those that have retained viability. In this review we consider the evidence that pods can regulate seed growth and maturation, particularly in members of the Brassicaceae family, and explore how the timing and duration of pod development might be manipulated to enhance either the quantity of crop yield or its nutritional properties

Functional Analysis of the Arlequin Mutant Corroborates the Essential Role of the ARLEQUIN/TAGL1 Gene during Reproductive Development of Tomato

Reproductive development of higher plants comprises successive events of organ differentiation and growth which finally lead to the formation of a mature fruit. However, most of the genetic and molecular mechanisms which coordinate such developmental events are yet to be identified and characterized. Arlequin (Alq), a semi-dominant T-DNA tomato mutant showed developmental changes affecting flower and fruit ripening. Sepals were converted into fleshy organs which ripened as normal fruit organs and fruits displayed altered ripening features. Molecular characterization of the tagged gene demonstrated that it corresponded to the previously reported TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 (TAGL1) gene, the tomato ortholog of SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes of Arabidopsis thaliana, and that the Alq mutation promoted a gain-of-function phenotype caused by the ectopic expression of TAGL1. Ectopic overexpression of TAGL1 resulted in homeotic alterations affecting floral organ identity that were similar to but stronger than those observed in Alq mutant plants. Interestingly, TAGL1 RNAi plants yielded tomato fruits which were unable to ripen. They displayed a yellow-orange color and stiffness appearance which are in accordance with reduced lycopene and ethylene levels, respectively. Moreover, pericarp cells of TAGL1 RNAi fruits showed altered cellular and structural properties which correlated to both decreased expression of genes regulating cell division and lignin biosynthesis. Over-expression of TAGL1 is able to rescue the non-ripening phenotype of rin and nor mutants, which is mediated by the transcriptional activation of several ripening genes. Our results demonstrated that TAGL1 participates in the genetic control of flower and fruit development of tomato plants. Furthermore, gene silencing and over-expression experiments demonstrated that the fruit ripening process requires the regulatory activity of TAGL1. Therefore, TAGL1 could act as a linking factor connecting successive stages of reproductive development, from flower development to fruit maturation, allowing this complex process to be carried out successfully

Two euAGAMOUS genes control C-function in Medicago truncatula

[EN] C-function MADS-box transcription factors belong to the AGAMOUS (AG) lineage and specify both stamen and carpel identity and floral meristem determinacy. In core eudicots, the AG lineage is further divided into two branches, the euAG and PLE lineages. Functional analyses across flowering plants strongly support the idea that duplicated AG lineage genes have different degrees of subfunctionalization of the C-function. The legume Medicago truncatula contains three C-lineage genes in its genome: two euAG genes (MtAGa and MtAGb) and one PLENA-like gene (MtSHP). This species is therefore a good experimental system to study the effects of gene duplication within the AG subfamily. We have studied the respective functions of each euAG genes in M. truncatula employing expression analyses and reverse genetic approaches. Our results show that the M. truncatula euAG- and PLENA-like genes are an example of subfunctionalization as a result of a change in expression pattern. MtAGa and MtAGb are the only genes showing a full C-function activity, concomitant with their ancestral expression profile, early in the floral meristem, and in the third and fourth floral whorls during floral development. In contrast, MtSHP expression appears late during floral development suggesting it does not contribute significantly to the C-function. Furthermore, the redundant MtAGa and MtAGb paralogs have been retained which provides the overall dosage required to specify the C-function in M. truncatula.This work was funded by grants BIO2009-08134 and BIO2012-39849-C02-01 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the Ramon y Cajal Program (RYC-2007-00627 to CGM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Serwatowska, J.; Roque Mesa, EM.; Gómez Mena, MC.; Constantin, GD.; Wen, J.; Mysore, KS.; Lund, OS.... (2014). Two euAGAMOUS genes control C-function in Medicago truncatula. PLoS ONE. 9(8):103770-1-103770-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103770S103770-1103770-1298Prunet, N., & Jack, T. P. (2013). Flower Development in Arabidopsis: There Is More to It Than Learning Your ABCs. Flower Development, 3-33. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9408-9_1Causier, B., Schwarz-Sommer, Z., & Davies, B. (2010). Floral organ identity: 20 years of ABCs. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 21(1), 73-79. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.10.005Irish, V. F. (2010). The flowering of Arabidopsis flower development. The Plant Journal, 61(6), 1014-1028. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04065.xHeijmans, K., Morel, P., & Vandenbussche, M. (2012). MADS-box Genes and Floral Development: the Dark Side. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(15), 5397-5404. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers233Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1989). Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 1(1), 37-52. doi:10.1105/tpc.1.1.37Yanofsky, M. F., Ma, H., Bowman, J. L., Drews, G. N., Feldmann, K. A., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1990). The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature, 346(6279), 35-39. doi:10.1038/346035a0Bradley, D., Carpenter, R., Sommer, H., Hartley, N., & Coen, E. (1993). Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of antirrhinum. Cell, 72(1), 85-95. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90052-rPinyopich, A., Ditta, G. S., Savidge, B., Liljegren, S. J., Baumann, E., Wisman, E., & Yanofsky, M. F. (2003). Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature, 424(6944), 85-88. doi:10.1038/nature01741Liljegren, S. J., Ditta, G. S., Eshed, Y., Savidge, B., Bowman, J. L., & Yanofsky, M. F. (2000). SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature, 404(6779), 766-770. doi:10.1038/35008089Davies, B., Motte, P., Keck, E., Saedler, H., Sommer, H., & Schwarz-Sommer, Z. (1999). PLENA and FARINELLI: redundancy and regulatory interactions between two Antirrhinum MADS-box factors controlling flower development. The EMBO Journal, 18(14), 4023-4034. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.14.4023Kramer, E. M., Jaramillo, M. A., & Di Stilio, V. S. (2004). Patterns of Gene Duplication and Functional Evolution During the Diversification of the AGAMOUS Subfamily of MADS Box Genes in Angiosperms. Genetics, 166(2), 1011-1023. doi:10.1534/genetics.166.2.1011Becker, A. (2003). The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 29(3), 464-489. doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00207-0Irish, V. F. (2003). The evolution of floral homeotic gene function. BioEssays, 25(7), 637-646. doi:10.1002/bies.10292Zahn, L. M., Leebens-Mack, J. H., Arrington, J. M., Hu, Y., Landherr, L. L., dePamphilis, C. W., … Ma, H. (2006). Conservation and divergence in the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS-box genes: evidence of independent sub- and neofunctionalization events. Evolution Development, 8(1), 30-45. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142x.2006.05073.xFerrandiz, C. (2000). Negative Regulation of the SHATTERPROOF Genes by FRUITFULL During Arabidopsis Fruit Development. Science, 289(5478), 436-438. doi:10.1126/science.289.5478.436Ma, H., Yanofsky, M. F., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1991). AGL1-AGL6, an Arabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. Genes & Development, 5(3), 484-495. doi:10.1101/gad.5.3.484Savidge, B., Rounsley, S. D., & Yanofsky, M. F. (1995). Temporal relationship between the transcription of two Arabidopsis MADS box genes and the floral organ identity genes. The Plant Cell, 7(6), 721-733. doi:10.1105/tpc.7.6.721Colombo, M., Brambilla, V., Marcheselli, R., Caporali, E., Kater, M. M., & Colombo, L. (2010). A new role for the SHATTERPROOF genes during Arabidopsis gynoecium development. Developmental Biology, 337(2), 294-302. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.043Fourquin, C., & Ferrándiz, C. (2012). Functional analyses of AGAMOUS family members in Nicotiana benthamiana clarify the evolution of early and late roles of C-function genes in eudicots. The Plant Journal, 71(6), 990-1001. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.05046.xKapoor, M., Tsuda, S., Tanaka, Y., Mayama, T., Okuyama, Y., Tsuchimoto, S., & Takatsuji, H. (2002). Role of petuniapMADS3in determination of floral organ and meristem identity, as revealed by its loss of function. The Plant Journal, 32(1), 115-127. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01402.xPan, I. L., McQuinn, R., Giovannoni, J. J., & Irish, V. F. (2010). Functional diversification of AGAMOUS lineage genes in regulating tomato flower and fruit development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61(6), 1795-1806. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq046Pnueli, L., Hareven, D., Rounsley, S. D., Yanofsky, M. F., & Lifschitz, E. (1994). Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. The Plant Cell, 6(2), 163-173. doi:10.1105/tpc.6.2.163Dreni, L., & Kater, M. M. (2013). MADSreloaded: evolution of theAGAMOUSsubfamily genes. New Phytologist, 201(3), 717-732. doi:10.1111/nph.12555Brunner, A. M. (2000). Plant Molecular Biology, 44(5), 619-634. doi:10.1023/a:1026550205851Perl-Treves, R., Kahana, A., Rosenman, N., Xiang, Y., & Silberstein, L. (1998). Expression of Multiple AGAMOUS-Like Genes in Male and Female Flowers of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant and Cell Physiology, 39(7), 701-710. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029424Yu, D., Kotilainen, M., Pöllänen, E., Mehto, M., Elomaa, P., Helariutta, Y., … Teeri, T. H. (1999). Organ identity genes and modified patterns of flower development in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae). The Plant Journal, 17(1), 51-62. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00351.xDong, Z., Zhao, Z., Liu, C., Luo, J., Yang, J., Huang, W., … Luo, D. (2005). Floral Patterning in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiology, 137(4), 1272-1282. doi:10.1104/pp.104.054288Hofer, J. M., & Noel Ellis, T. (2014). Developmental specialisations in the legume family. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 17, 153-158. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.11.014Fourquin, C., del Cerro, C., Victoria, F. C., Vialette-Guiraud, A., de Oliveira, A. C., & Ferrándiz, C. (2013). A Change in SHATTERPROOF Protein Lies at the Origin of a Fruit Morphological Novelty and a New Strategy for Seed Dispersal in Medicago Genus. Plant Physiology, 162(2), 907-917. doi:10.1104/pp.113.217570Hewitt EJ (1966) Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. Farnham Royal, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau.Cheng, X., Wang, M., Lee, H.-K., Tadege, M., Ratet, P., Udvardi, M., … Wen, J. (2013). An efficient reverse genetics platform in the model legumeMedicago truncatula. New Phytologist, 201(3), 1065-1076. doi:10.1111/nph.12575D’ Erfurth, I., Cosson, V., Eschstruth, A., Lucas, H., Kondorosi, A., & Ratet, P. (2003). Efficient transposition of theTnt1tobacco retrotransposon in the model legumeMedicago truncatula. The Plant Journal, 34(1), 95-106. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01701.xTadege, M., Ratet, P., & Mysore, K. S. (2005). Insertional mutagenesis: a Swiss Army knife for functional genomics of Medicago truncatula. Trends in Plant Science, 10(5), 229-235. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.009Tadege, M., Wen, J., He, J., Tu, H., Kwak, Y., Eschstruth, A., … Mysore, K. S. (2008). Large-scale insertional mutagenesis using the Tnt1 retrotransposon in the model legume Medicago truncatula. The Plant Journal, 54(2), 335-347. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03418.xCheng, X., Wen, J., Tadege, M., Ratet, P., & Mysore, K. S. (2010). Reverse Genetics in Medicago truncatula Using Tnt1 Insertion Mutants. Plant Reverse Genetics, 179-190. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-682-5_13Benlloch, R., d’ Erfurth, I., Ferrandiz, C., Cosson, V., Beltrán, J. P., Cañas, L. A., … Ratet, P. (2006). Isolation of mtpim Proves Tnt1 a Useful Reverse Genetics Tool in Medicago truncatula and Uncovers New Aspects of AP1-Like Functions in Legumes. Plant Physiology, 142(3), 972-983. doi:10.1104/pp.106.083543Larkin, M. A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P. A., McWilliam, H., … Higgins, D. G. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23(21), 2947-2948. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404Altschul, S. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(17), 3389-3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007). MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24(8), 1596-1599. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092Dellaporta, S. L., Wood, J., & Hicks, J. B. (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1(4), 19-21. doi:10.1007/bf02712670Schmittgen, T. D., & Livak, K. J. (2008). Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nature Protocols, 3(6), 1101-1108. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.73Constantin, G. D., Krath, B. N., MacFarlane, S. A., Nicolaisen, M., Elisabeth Johansen, I., & Lund, O. S. (2004). Virus-induced gene silencing as a tool for functional genomics in a legume species. The Plant Journal, 40(4), 622-631. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02233.xWesley, S. V., Helliwell, C. A., Smith, N. A., Wang, M., Rouse, D. T., Liu, Q., … Waterhouse, P. M. (2001). Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. The Plant Journal, 27(6), 581-590. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.xGuerineau F, Mullineaux P (1993) Plant transformation and expression vectors. In: Croy R, editor. Plant Molecular Biology. Oxford, UK: Bios Scientific Publishers, Academic Press. pp. 121–147.Clough, S. J., & Bent, A. F. (1998). Floral dip: a simplified method forAgrobacterium-mediated transformation ofArabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16(6), 735-743. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.xBenlloch, R., Roque, E., Ferrándiz, C., Cosson, V., Caballero, T., Penmetsa, R. V., … Madueño, F. (2009). Analysis of B function in legumes: PISTILLATA proteins do not require the PI motif for floral organ development inMedicago truncatula. The Plant Journal, 60(1), 102-111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03939.xRoque, E., Serwatowska, J., Cruz Rochina, M., Wen, J., Mysore, K. S., Yenush, L., … Cañas, L. A. (2012). Functional specialization of duplicated AP3-like genes inMedicago truncatula. The Plant Journal, 73(4), 663-675. doi:10.1111/tpj.12068Flanagan, C. A., Hu, Y., & Ma, H. (1996). Specific expression of the AGL1 MADS-box gene suggests regulatory functions in Arabidopsis gynoecium and ovule development. The Plant Journal, 10(2), 343-353. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.10020343.xSieburth, L. E., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1997). Molecular dissection of the AGAMOUS control region shows that cis elements for spatial regulation are located intragenically. The Plant Cell, 9(3), 355-365. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.3.355Busch, M. A. (1999). Activation of a Floral Homeotic Gene in Arabidopsis. Science, 285(5427), 585-587. doi:10.1126/science.285.5427.585Moyroud, E., Minguet, E. G., Ott, F., Yant, L., Posé, D., Monniaux, M., … Parcy, F. (2011). Prediction of Regulatory Interactions from Genome Sequences Using a Biophysical Model for the Arabidopsis LEAFY Transcription Factor. The Plant Cell, 23(4), 1293-1306. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083329Grønlund, M., Constantin, G., Piednoir, E., Kovacev, J., Johansen, I. E., & Lund, O. S. (2008). Virus-induced gene silencing in Medicago truncatula and Lathyrus odorata. Virus Research, 135(2), 345-349. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2008.04.005Mandel, M. A., Bowman, J. L., Kempin, S. A., Ma, H., Meyerowitz, E. M., & Yanofsky, M. F. (1992). Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco. Cell, 71(1), 133-143. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90272-eMizukami, Y., & Ma, H. (1992). Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell, 71(1), 119-131. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90271-dCannon, S. B., Sterck, L., Rombauts, S., Sato, S., Cheung, F., Gouzy, J., … Young, N. D. (2006). Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(40), 14959-14964. doi:10.1073/pnas.0603228103Young, N. D., & Bharti, A. K. (2012). Genome-Enabled Insights into Legume Biology. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63(1), 283-305. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103754Jager, M. (2003). MADS-Box Genes in Ginkgo biloba and the Evolution of the AGAMOUS Family. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20(5), 842-854. doi:10.1093/molbev/msg089Johansen, B., Pedersen, L. B., Skipper, M., & Frederiksen, S. (2002). MADS-box gene evolution—structure and transcription patterns. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23(3), 458-480. doi:10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00032-5Rutledge, R., Regan, S., Nicolas, O., Fobert, P., Côté, C., Bosnich, W., … Stewart, D. (1998). Characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue from the conifer black spruce ( Picea mariana ) that produces floral homeotic conversions when expressed in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 15(5), 625-634. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00250.xParcy, F., Nilsson, O., Busch, M. A., Lee, I., & Weigel, D. (1998). A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature, 395(6702), 561-566. doi:10.1038/26903Causier, B., Bradley, D., Cook, H., & Davies, B. (2009). Conserved intragenic elements were critical for the evolution of the floral C-function. The Plant Journal, 58(1), 41-52. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03759.xAiroldi, C. A., & Davies, B. (2012). Gene Duplication and the Evolution of Plant MADS-box Transcription Factors. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 39(4), 157-165. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2012.02.008Giménez, E., Pineda, B., Capel, J., Antón, M. T., Atarés, A., Pérez-Martín, F., … Lozano, R. (2010). Functional Analysis of the Arlequin Mutant Corroborates the Essential Role of the ARLEQUIN/TAGL1 Gene during Reproductive Development of Tomato. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e14427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014427Kater, M. M., Colombo, L., Franken, J., Busscher, M., Masiero, S., Van Lookeren Campagne, M. M., & Angenent, G. C. (1998). Multiple AGAMOUS Homologs from Cucumber and Petunia Differ in Their Ability to Induce Reproductive Organ Fate. The Plant Cell, 10(2), 171-182. doi:10.1105/tpc.10.2.171Tsuchimoto, S., van der Krol, A. R., & Chua, N. H. (1993). Ectopic expression of pMADS3 in transgenic petunia phenocopies the petunia blind mutant. The Plant Cell, 5(8), 843-853. doi:10.1105/tpc.5.8.843Airoldi, C. A., Bergonzi, S., & Davies, B. (2010). Single amino acid change alters the ability to specify male or female organ identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(44), 18898-18902. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009050107Causier, B., Castillo, R., Zhou, J., Ingram, R., Xue, Y., Schwarz-Sommer, Z., & Davies, B. (2005). Evolution in Action: Following Function in Duplicated Floral Homeotic Genes. Current Biology, 15(16), 1508-1512. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.063Birchler, J. A., & Veitia, R. A. (2007). The Gene Balance Hypothesis: From Classical Genetics to Modern Genomics. The Plant Cell, 19(2), 395-402. doi:10.1105/tpc.106.049338Birchler, J. A., & Veitia, R. A. (2009). The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution. New Phytologist, 186(1), 54-62. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03087.xEdger, P. P., & Pires, J. C. (2009). Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Research, 17(5), 699-717. doi:10.1007/s10577-009-9055-9Freeling, M. (2006). Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Research, 16(7), 805-814. doi:10.1101/gr.368140