7 research outputs found
Psychological therapies for auditory hallucinations (voices): current status and key directions for future research
This report from the International Consortium on Hallucinations Research considers the current status and future directions in research on psychological therapies targeting auditory hallucinations (hearing voices). Therapy approaches have evolved from behavioral and coping-focused interventions, through formulation-driven interventions using methods from cognitive therapy, to a number of contemporary developments. Recent developments include the application of acceptance- and mindfulness-based approaches, and consolidation of methods for working with connections between voices and views of self, others, relationships and personal history. In this article, we discuss the development of therapies for voices and review the empirical findings. This review shows that psychological therapies are broadly effective for people with positive symptoms, but that more research is required to understand the specific application of therapies to voices. Six key research directions are identified: (1) moving beyond the focus on overall efficacy to understand specific therapeutic processes targeting voices, (2) better targeting psychological processes associated with voices such as trauma, cognitive mechanisms, and personal recovery, (3) more focused measurement of the intended outcomes of therapy, (4) understanding individual differences among voice hearers, (5) extending beyond a focus on voices and schizophrenia into other populations and sensory modalities, and (6) shaping interventions for service implementation
Tratamientos Psicológicos Empíricamente Apoyados Para Adultos: Una Revisión Selectiva [Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments for Adults: A Selective Review]
Antecedentes: los tratamientos psicológicos han mostrado su efi cacia,
efectividad y efi ciencia para el abordaje de los trastornos mentales; no
obstante, considerando el conocimiento científi co generado en los últimos
años, no se dispone de trabajos de actualización en español sobre cuáles
son los tratamientos psicológicos con respaldo empírico. El objetivo fue
realizar una revisión selectiva de los principales tratamientos psicológicos
empíricamente apoyados para el abordaje de trastornos mentales en personas
adultas. Método: se recogen niveles de evidencia y grados de recomendación
en función de los criterios propuestos por el Sistema Nacional de Salud
de España (en las Guías de Práctica Clínica) para diferentes trastornos
psicológicos. Resultados: los resultados sugieren que los tratamientos
psicológicos disponen de apoyo empírico para el abordaje de un amplio
elenco de trastornos psicológicos. El grado de apoyo empírico oscila de bajo
a alto en función del trastorno psicológico analizado. La revisión sugiere
que ciertos campos de intervención necesitan una mayor investigación.
Conclusiones: a partir de esta revisión selectiva, los profesionales de la
psicología podrán disponer de información rigurosa y actualizada que les
permita tomar decisiones informadas a la hora de implementar aquellos
procedimientos psicoterapéuticos empíricamente fundamentados en
función de las características de las personas que demandan ayuda.
// Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments for Adults: A Selective Review. Background: Psychological treatments have shown their effi cacy,
effectiveness, and effi ciency in dealing with mental disorders. However,
considering the scientifi c knowledge generated in recent years, in the
Spanish context, there are no updating studies about empirically supported psychological treatments. The main goal was to carry out a selective
review of the main empirically supported psychological treatments for
mental disorders in adults. Method: Levels of evidence and degrees of recommendation were collected based on the criteria proposed by the Spanish National Health System (Clinical Practice Guidelines) for different
psychological disorders. Results: The results indicate that psychological
treatments have empirical support for the approach to a wide range of
psychological disorders. These levels of empirical evidence gathered range from low to high depending on the psychological disorder analysed.
The review indicates the existence of certain fi elds of intervention that
need further investigation. Conclusions: Based on this selective review,
psychology professionals will be able to have rigorous, up-to-date information that allows them to make informed decisions when implementing
empirically based psychotherapeutic procedures based on the characteristics of the people who require help