Pioglitazone in early Parkinson's disease: a phase 2, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial

Background A systematic assessment of potential disease-modifying compounds for Parkinson's disease concluded that pioglitazone could hold promise for the treatment of patients with this disease. We assessed the effect of pioglitazone on the progression of Parkinson's disease in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, futility clinical trial. Methods Participants with the diagnosis of early Parkinson's disease on a stable regimen of 1 mg/day rasagiline or 10 mg/day selegiline were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 15 mg/day pioglitazone, 45 mg/day pioglitazone, or placebo. Investigators were masked to the treatment assignment. Only the statistical centre and the central pharmacy knew the treatment name associated with the randomisation number. The primary outcome was the change in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score between the baseline and 44 weeks, analysed by intention to treat. The primary null hypothesis for each dose group was that the mean change in UPDRS was 3 points less than the mean change in the placebo group. The alternative hypothesis (of futility) was that pioglitazone is not meaningfully different from placebo. We rejected the null if there was significant evidence of futility at the one-sided alpha level of 0.10. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01280123. Findings 210 patients from 35 sites in the USA were enrolled between May 10, 2011, and July 31, 2013. The primary analysis included 72 patients in the 15 mg group, 67 in the 45 mg group, and 71 in the placebo group. The mean total UPDRS change at 44 weeks was 4.42 (95% CI 2.55-6.28) for 15 mg pioglitazone, 5.13 (95% CI 3.17-7.08) for 45 mg pioglitazone, and 6.25 (95% CI 4.35-8.15) for placebo (higher change scores are worse). The mean difference between the 15 mg and placebo groups was -1.83 (80% CI -3.56 to -0.10) and the null hypothesis could not be rejected (p=0.19). The mean difference between the 45 mg and placebo groups was -1.12 (80% CI -2.93 to 0.69) and the null hypothesis was rejected in favour of futility (p=0.09). Planned sensitivity analyses of the primary outcome, using last value carried forward (LVCF) to handle missing data and using the completers' only sample, suggested that the 15 mg dose is also futile (p=0.09 for LVCF, p=0.09 for completers) but failed to reject the null hypothesis for the 45 mg dose (p=0.12 for LVCF, p=0.19 for completers). Six serious adverse events occurred in the 15 mg group, nine in the 45 mg group, and three in the placebo group; none were thought to be definitely or probably related to the study interventions. Interpretation These findings suggest that pioglitazone at the doses studied here is unlikely to modify progression in early Parkinson's disease. Further study of pioglitazone in a larger trial in patients with Parkinson's disease is not recommended. Funding National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Translational approaches to restoring mitochondrial function in Parkinson's disease

There is strong evidence of a key role for mitochondrial dysfunction in both sporadic and all forms of familial Parkinson's disease (PD). However, none of the clinical trials carried out with putative mitochondrial rescue agents has been successful. Firm establishment of a wet biomarker or a reliable readout from imaging studies detecting mitochondrial dysfunction and reflecting disease progression is also awaited. We will provide an overview of our current knowledge about mitochondrial dysfunction in PD and related drug screens. We will also summarize previously undertaken mitochondrial wet biomarker studies and relevant imaging studies with particular focus on 31P-MRI Spectroscopy. We will conclude with an overview of clinical trials which tested putative mitochondrial rescue agents in PD patients. Parkinson's disease is a common, relentlessly progressive neurodegenerative disorder. The pathological hallmark is loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. The resulting motor presentation includes rest tremor, bradykinesia and rigidity but the importance of non-motor symptoms such as cognitive impairment and depression is increasingly recognized, too. Currently available dopaminergic treatment often only addresses the motor impairment partially. This review will summarize our current knowledge about mitochondrial dysfunction as a key target for disease-modifying treatment for PD. We will also provide an update on mitochondrial readouts in PD patients, namely imaging and putative mitochondrial biomarkers, which may become highly relevant in the context of future drug trials. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved