18 research outputs found
3-Hydroxyflavones vs. 3-Hydroxyquinolinones: Structure-Activity Relationships and Stability Studies on RuII(arene) Anticancer Complexes with Biologically Active Ligands
3-Hydroxyflavones vs. 3-hydroxyquinolinones: structure–activity relationships and stability studies on Ru II
Synthesis and anticancer activity evaluation of η5-C5(CH3)4R ruthenium complexes bearing chelating diphosphine ligands
The complexes [RuCp*(PP)Cl] (Cp* = C5Me5; [1], PP = dppm; [4], PP = Xantphos), [RuCp#(PP)Cl] (Cp# = C5Me4(CH2)5OH; [2], PP = dppm; [5], PP = Xantphos) and [RuCp*(dppm)(CH3CN)][SbF6] [3] were syn- thesized and evaluated in vitro as anticancer agents. Compounds 1–3 gave nanomolar IC50 values against normoxic A2780 and HT-29 cell lines, and were also tested against hypoxic HT-29 cells, maintaining their high activity. Complex 3 yielded an IC50 value of 0.55 ± 0.03 μM under a 0.1% O2 concentration
Protein ruthenation and DNA alkylation: chlorambucil-functionalized RAPTA complexes and their anticancer activity
Cytotoxicity and preliminary mode of action studies of novel 2-aryl-4-thiopyrone-based organometallics
RAPTA complexes containing N‐substituted Tetrazole scaffolds: Synthesis, characterization and Antiproliferative activity
Photophysical and Biological Studies with Organometallic Ruthenium Complexes of Selenodiazole Ligands
Structure–Activity Relationships of Targeted Ru<sup>II</sup>(η<sup>6</sup>‑<i>p</i>‑Cymene) Anticancer Complexes with Flavonol-Derived Ligands
Ru<sup>II</sup>(arene) complexes have been shown to be
promising
anticancer agents, capable of overcoming major drawbacks of currently
used chemotherapeutics. We have synthesized Ru<sup>II</sup>(η<sup>6</sup>-arene) compounds carrying bioactive flavonol ligands with
the aim to obtain multitargeted anticancer agents. To validate this
concept, studies on the mode of action of the complexes were conducted
which indicated that they form covalent bonds to DNA, have only minor
impact on the cell cycle, but inhibit CDK2 and topoisomerase IIα
in vitro. The cytotoxic activity was determined in human cancer cell
lines, resulting in very low IC<sub>50</sub> values as compared to
other Ru<sup>II</sup>(arene) complexes and showing a structure–activity
relationship dependent on the substitution pattern of the flavonol
ligand. Furthermore, the inhibition of cell growth correlates well
with the topoisomerase inhibitory activity. Compared to the flavonol
ligands, the Ru<sup>II</sup>(η<sup>6</sup>-<i>p</i>-cymene) complexes are more potent antiproliferative agents, which
can be explained by potential multitargeted properties
Rhodium, Iridium, and Ruthenium Half-Sandwich Picolinamide Complexes as Anticancer Agents
Novel rhodium, iridium, and ruthenium half-sandwich complexes containing (N,N)-bound picolinamide ligands have been prepared for use as anticancer agents. The complexes show promising cytotoxicities, with the presence, position, and number of halides having a significant effect on the corresponding IC50 values. One ruthenium complex was found to be more cytotoxic than cisplatin on HT-29 and MCF-7 cells after 5 days and 1 h, respectively, and it remains active with MCF-7 cells even under hypoxic conditions, making it a promising candidate for in vivo studies