32 research outputs found

    How much synthetic oxytocin is infused during labour? A review and analysis of regimens used in 12 countries.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To compare synthetic oxytocin infusion regimens used during labour, calculate the International Units (IU) escalation rate and total amount of IU infused over eight hours. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Twelve countries, eleven European and South Africa. SAMPLE: National, regional or institutional-level regimens on oxytocin for induction and augmentation labour. METHODS: Data on oxytocin IU dose, infusion fluid amount, start dose, escalation rate and maximum dose were collected. Values for each regimen were converted to IU in 1000ml diluent. One IU corresponded to 1.67μg for doses provided in grams/micrograms. IU hourly dose increase rates were based on escalation frequency. Cumulative doses and total IU amount infused were calculated by adding the dose administered for each previous hour. Main Outcome Measures Oxytocin IU dose infused. RESULTS: Data were obtained on 21 regimens used in 12 countries. Details on the start dose, escalation interval, escalation rate and maximum dose infused were available from 16 regimens. Starting rates varied from 0.06 IU/hour to 0.90 IU/hour, and the maximum dose rate varied from 0.90 IU/hour to 3.60 IU/hour. The total amount of IU oxytocin infused, estimated over eight hours, ranged from 2.38 IU to 27.00 IU, a variation of 24.62 IU and an 11-fold difference. CONCLUSION: Current variations in oxytocin regimens for induction and augmentation of labour are inexplicable. It is crucial that the appropriate minimum infusion regimen is administered because synthetic oxytocin is a potentially harmful medication with serious consequences for women and babies when inappropriately used. Estimating the total amount of oxytocin IU received by labouring women, alongside the institution's mode of birth and neonatal outcomes, may deepen our understanding and be the way forward to identifying the optimal infusion regimen

    Antilymphangiogenic therapy to promote transplant survival and to reduce cancer metastasis: What can we learn from the eye?

    No full text
    The lymphatic vasculature is -amongst other tasks - essentially involved in inflammation, (auto) immunity, graft rejection and cancer metastasis. The eye is mainly devoid of lymphatic vessels except for its adnexa, the conjunctiva and the limbus. However, several pathologic conditions can result in the secondary ingrowth of lymphatic vessels into physiologically alymphatic parts of the eye such as the cornea or the inner eye. Therefore, the cornea has served as an excellent in vivo model system to study lymphangiogenesis, and findings from such studies have substantially contributed to the understanding of central principles of lymphangiogenesis also with relevance outside the eye. Grafting experiments at the cornea have been extensively used to analyze the role of lymphangiogenesis in transplant immunology. In this regard, we recently demonstrated the crucial role of lymphatic vessels in mediating corneal allograft rejection and could show that antilymphangiogenic therapy increases graft survival. In the field of cancer research, we recently detected tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in the most common malignant tumors of the eye, such as conjunctival carcinoma and melanoma, and ciliochoroidal melanoma with extraocular extension. These neolymphatics correlate with an increased risk of local recurrence, metastasis and tumor related death, and may offer potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of these tumors. This review will focus on corneal and tumor-associated ocular lymphangiogenesis. First, we will describe common experimentally used corneal lymphangiogenesis models and will recapitulate recent findings regarding the involvement of lymphatic vessels in corneal diseases and transplant immunology. The second part of this article will summarize findings about the participation of tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis in ocular malignancies and their implications for the development of future therapeutic strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
    corecore