The Effect of Body Size on Countermovement Jump Kinetics in Children aged 7 to 11 years

The purpose this study was to examine the effect of body size oncountermovement jump (CMJ)kinetics in children.Participants(n = 160) aged 7-11 years, divided equally by sex and into primary school year groups(years 3, 4, 5 and 6), each performedone CMJ on aforce platform. The variables bodyweight(BW), peak force (Fmax), in-jump minimum force (IMF), in-jump vertical force range (IFR) and basic rate of force development (BRFD)wereattained from the force-time history and then subsequently scaled to account for body size. A significant age, sex and interaction effect werefound for theabsolutevariables BW, IMF, Fmaxand IFR (P 0.05). No significant age or sex differences were observed for normalised or allometrically scaled values(P > 0.05). The results indicate thatgirls and boys can be grouped together but that body size must be accounted for to enable accurate conclusions to be drawn independent of growth.Bodysizesignificantlyeffects the representation of CMJ kinetic results and therefore, future studies should report both absolute and scaled values.Future research should developan age-appropriate criterion method for children in order to determine processed CMJ variables to further investigate neuromuscular performance of children

City of Hitchcock Comprehensive Plan 2020-2040

Hitchcock is a small town located in Galveston County (Figure 1.1), nestled up on the Texas Gulf Coast. It lies about 40 miles south-east of Houston. The boundaries of the city encloses an area of land of 60.46 sq. miles, an area of water of 31.64 sq. miles at an elevation just 16 feet above sea level. Hitchcock has more undeveloped land (~90% of total area) than the county combined. Its strategic location gives it a driving force of opportunities in the Houston-Galveston Region.The guiding principles for this planning process were Hitchcock’s vision statement and its corresponding goals, which were crafted by the task force. The goals focus on factors of growth and development including public participation, development considerations, transportation, community facilities, economic development, parks, and housing and social vulnerabilityTexas Target Communitie

Allometric scaling of strength measurements to body size

For comparative purposes, normalisation of strength measures to body size using allometric scaling is recommended. A wide range of scaling exponents have been suggested, typically utilising body mass, although a comprehensive evaluation of different body size variables has not been documented. Differences between force (F) and torque (T) measurements of strength, and the velocity of measurement might also explain some of the variability in the scaling exponents proposed. Knee extensor strength of 86 young men was assessed with measurement of torque at four velocities (0-4.19 rad s(-1)) and force measured isometrically. Body size variables included body mass, height and fat-free mass. Scaling exponents for torque were consistently higher than for force, but the velocity of torque measurement had no influence. As the confounding effects of fat mass were restricted, scaling exponents and the strength of the power-function relationships progressively increased. Fat-free mass determined a surprisingly high proportion of the variance in measured strength (F, 31%; T, 52-58%). Absolute force and torque measurements, and even torque normalised for body mass, were significantly influenced by height, although strength measures normalised to fat-free mass were not. To normalise strength measurements to body mass, for relatively homogenous lean populations (body fat 20%) lower body mass exponents appear more suitable (F, 0.45; T, 0.68). Nevertheless, fat-free mass is the recommended index for scaling strength to body size, and higher exponents (F, 0.76; T, 1.12) are advocated in this case

Muscle strength and its relationship with skeletal muscle mass indices as determined by segmental bio-impedance analysis

Purpose: Despite increasing interest in bio-impedance analysis (BIA) for estimation of segmental skeletal muscle mass (SMM), published results have not been entirely convincing. Furthermore, a better understanding of the relationship between muscle strength and SMM will be useful in interpreting outcomes of physical/training interventions particularly in groups with diverse body sizes (e.g. men vs women). This study aimed to measure SMM in the upper body (upper extremity and torso), to determine its correlation with muscle strength and to examine the effects of gender on muscle strength–muscle mass relationship. Methods: Segmental (upper extremity and torso) SMM and muscle strength in five distinct shoulder planes (forward flexion, abduction in scapular plane, abduction in coronal plane, internal and external rotation) were measured in 45 healthy participants (22 males, 23 females) with mean age 30.3 years. Statistical analysis included independent t tests, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis. Results: Men and women differed significantly in body mass (BMI: 25.9 ± 4.3 vs 23 ± 3.6) and SMM (p < 0.01). A strong relationship correlation was found between the five shoulder strength measurements and upper extremity SMM (r = 0.66–0.80, p < 0.01), which was not affected by gender. There was a significant gender difference (p < 0.01) in absolute shoulder strength, but not after normalisation to the SMM. Conclusion: BIA-estimated SMM of upper extremity and torso was highly correlated with upper extremity (shoulder) strength independent of gender. SMM may, therefore, be useful for the normalisation of muscle strength allowing size-independent comparisons of muscle strength in individuals with diverse physical characteristics