Brain-specific Foxp1 deletion impairs neuronal development and causes autistic-like behaviour

Neurodevelopmental disorders are multi-faceted and can lead to intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder and language impairment. Mutations in the Forkhead box FOXP1 gene have been linked to all these disorders, suggesting that it may play a central role in various cognitive and social processes. To understand the role of Foxp1 in the context of neurodevelopment leading to alterations in cognition and behaviour, we generated mice with a brain-specific Foxp1 deletion (Nestin-Cre(Foxp1−/−)mice). The mutant mice were viable and allowed for the first time the analysis of pre- and postnatal neurodevelopmental phenotypes, which included a pronounced disruption of the developing striatum and more subtle alterations in the hippocampus. More detailed analysis in the CA1 region revealed abnormal neuronal morphogenesis that was associated with reduced excitability and an imbalance of excitatory to inhibitory input in CA1 hippocampal neurons in Nestin-Cre(Foxp1−/−) mice. Foxp1 ablation was also associated with various cognitive and social deficits, providing new insights into its behavioural importance

Dopamine–Glutamate Interplay in the Ventral Striatum Modulates Spatial Learning in a Receptor Subtype-Dependent Manner

The ventral striatum (VS) is characterized by a distinctive neural architecture in which multiple corticolimbic glutamatergic (GLUergic) and mesolimbic dopaminergic (DAergic) afferents converge on the same output cell type (the medium-sized spiny neuron, MSN). However, despite the gateway function attributed to VS and its involvement in action selection and spatial navigation, as well as the evidence of physical and functional receptor–receptor interaction between different members of ionotropic GLUergic and DAergic receptors, there is no available knowledge that such reciprocal interaction may be critical in shaping the ability to learn novel spatial and non-spatial arrangement of stimuli. In this study, it was evaluated whether intra-VS bilateral infusion of either N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor-selective antagonists may suppress the ability to detect spatial or non-spatial novelty in a non-associative behavioral task. In a second set of experiments, we further examined the hypothesis that VS-mediated spatial information processing may be subserved by some preferential receptor–receptor interactions among specific GLUergic and DAergic receptor subtypes. This was assessed by concomitant intra-VS infusion of the combination between subthreshold doses of either NMDA or AMPA receptor antagonists with individual D1 or D2 receptor blockade. The results of this study highlighted the fact that NMDA or AMPA receptors are differentially involved in processing of spatial and non-spatial novelty, and showed for the first time that preferential NMDA/D1 and AMPA/D2 receptor–receptor functional communication, but not NMDA/ D2 and AMPA/D1, is required for enabling learning of novel spatial information in the VS

D1 and D2 receptors antagonist injections in the prefrontal cortex selectively impair spatial learning in mice

on line publication 9.8.200